W
Active Editors
Back to Profile

User Talk: רמרום

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

'''
'''* For conversations prior to January 1, 2026 see: Archive 1'''''


CS1 error on Qaryut ↗


25px|alt=|link= ↗ Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have '''automatically detected''' that this edit ↗ performed by you, on the page :Qaryut ↗, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive ↗, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/Boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20%D7%A8%D7%9E%D7%A8%D7%95%D7%9D&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d={{FULLPAGENAMEE:Qaryut}}&preloadparams%5b%5d=1341358966 report it to my operator].
Thanks, <!-- User:Qwerfjkl (bot)/inform -->Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:18, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Al-Lubban ash-Sharqiya ↗


25px|alt=|link= ↗ Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have '''automatically detected''' that this edit ↗ performed by you, on the page :Al-Lubban ash-Sharqiya ↗, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive ↗, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/Boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20%D7%A8%D7%9E%D7%A8%D7%95%D7%9D&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d={{FULLPAGENAMEE:Al-Lubban ash-Sharqiya}}&preloadparams%5b%5d=1341359180 report it to my operator].
Thanks, <!-- User:Qwerfjkl (bot)/inform -->Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:20, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

:Resolved רמרום (talk) 20:40, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on As-Sawiya ↗


25px|alt=|link= ↗ Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have '''automatically detected''' that this edit ↗ performed by you, on the page :As-Sawiya ↗, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive ↗, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/Boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20%D7%A8%D7%9E%D7%A8%D7%95%D7%9D&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d={{FULLPAGENAMEE:As-Sawiya}}&preloadparams%5b%5d=1341359345 report it to my operator].
Thanks, <!-- User:Qwerfjkl (bot)/inform -->Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:21, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

:Resolved רמרום (talk) 20:39, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Al-Tabban ↗


25px|alt=|link= ↗ Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have '''automatically detected''' that this edit ↗ performed by you, on the page :Al-Tabban ↗, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive ↗, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/Boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20%D7%A8%D7%9E%D7%A8%D7%95%D7%9D&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d={{FULLPAGENAMEE:Al-Tabban}}&preloadparams%5b%5d=1341362347 report it to my operator].
Thanks, <!-- User:Qwerfjkl (bot)/inform -->Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:44, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

:Resolvedרמרום (talk) 22:16, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 6



An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yanun ↗, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aqraba ↗ was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright



30px|alt=Control copyright icon ↗ Hello רמרום! Your additions to :Israeli settler violence ↗ have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted ↗ content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain ↗ or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible ↗ copyright license—''to request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission ↗''. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright ↗ and plagiarism ↗ issues. Here are the key points:
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked ↗ from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-copyright-new --> — Diannaa&nbsp;<span style="color:red">🍁</span>&nbsp;(talk) 15:21, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

:Hi User:Diannaa, I appreciate your feedback!
:I thought that I have paraphrased the text enough (the data/itself - numbers, figures, names, incidents, is of course not copyrighted). How can I know when paraphrasing that the revised text is different enough from the original to be considered clear for use? Please let me know your thoughts before I preceed to revise and restore the content in a non-infringing way.
:רמרום (talk) 17:42, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

I have also cleaned copyright violations from numerous other articles. Please be sure not to copy from any copyright web page. This includes the United Nations website, which is copyright. Don't use an LLM ↗ or chatbot to paraphrase their articles or generate text. Everything you add to Wikipedia must be written in your own words. — Diannaa&nbsp;<span style="color:red">🍁</span>&nbsp;(talk) 15:59, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

:See above replyרמרום (talk) 17:43, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
::Content has to be written in your own words and not include any wording from the source material (short properly attributed quotations are allowed, but cannot be used as a substitute for writing your own content). One thing I find that works for me is to read over the source material and then pretend I am verbally describing the topic to a friend in my own words. Stuff should also be presented in a different order where possible. Summarize rather than paraphrase, and don't try to include every single detail. This will typically result in your version being much shorter than the source document. It also helps to have more than one source to draw from. There's some reading material on this topic at :Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing ↗ and/or have a look at the material at Paraphrase: Write It in Your Own Words ↗; check out the links in the menu on the left for some exercises to try. Or study this module aimed at WikiEd students ↗. — Diannaa&nbsp;<span style="color:red">🍁</span>&nbsp;(talk) 17:48, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Journal name



According to the "About" page on their web site, the name of BASOR was changed in 2022 to "Bulletin of the American Society of Overseas Research". You seem to be using the old name. Zero<sup><small>talk ↗</small></sup> 04:18, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

:Hi Zero, thank you for noticing! I know it mostly as BASOR ! I will mind that in the future, including in more writing on archaeology-related issues and figures. A bit less current events seems about right these days. cheers. רמרום (talk) 22:16, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Yosef Garfinkel ↗


25px|alt=|link= ↗ Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have '''automatically detected''' that this edit ↗ performed by you, on the page :Yosef Garfinkel ↗, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive ↗, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/Boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20%D7%A8%D7%9E%D7%A8%D7%95%D7%9D&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d={{FULLPAGENAMEE:Yosef Garfinkel}}&preloadparams%5b%5d=1342713569 report it to my operator].
Thanks, <!-- User:Qwerfjkl (bot)/inform -->Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 10:10, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

:Addressedרמרום (talk) 12:09, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

March 2026



25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm Gurkubondinn. An edit that you recently made to :Khirbet Bal'ama ↗ seemed to be generated using a large language model ↗ (an "AI chatbot ↗" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is usually unsuitable for an encyclopedia ↗, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources ↗ and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted ↗. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.{{PAGENAME}} ↗<!-- Template:uw-ai1 --> <span class="nowrap">--G<small>urkubondinn</small> (talk)</span> 10:35, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

:I've used it to draft the text but the text itself has been verified manually with the citations individually checked out. WIkipedia does not forbid this use. Please undo your reversions. רמרום (talk) 11:01, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
::No. That is not some magic loophole that allows you to submit AI-generated text without scrutiny. You are always required to read your sources, that is a basic minimum requirement. <span class="nowrap">--G<small>urkubondinn</small> (talk)</span> 11:52, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
:::I've read all of those articles carefully and I'm well acquainted with the matter. I'll rewrite it in my words and submit it for review. רמרום (talk) 16:31, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Please refrain from making edits generated using a large language model ↗ (an "AI chatbot ↗" or other application using such technology) to Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to :Kafr Yarub ↗. Your edits have been reverted ↗. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you.{{PAGENAME}} ↗<!-- Template:uw-ai2 --> <span class="nowrap">--G<small>urkubondinn</small> (talk)</span> 10:44, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

25px|alt=Warning icon ↗ Please stop. If you continue to make edits with misleading or inaccurate edit summaries ↗, even if unintentional, as you did at :Draft:Kafr Yarub ↗, you may be blocked from editing ↗. <!-- Template:uw-mislead3 --> <span class="nowrap">--G<small>urkubondinn</small> (talk)</span> 10:39, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

:These are not {{!tqq|typos}}: Special:Diff/1343943023 ↗. <span class="nowrap">--G<small>urkubondinn</small> (talk)</span> 10:39, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

30px|alt=Stop icon ↗ You may be '''blocked from editing ↗ without further warning''' the next time you unconstructively edit Wikipedia using a large language model ↗, as you did at :Draft:Kashda ↗. <span class="nowrap">--G<small>urkubondinn</small> (talk)</span> 10:40, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

:{{u|רמרום}}: please read WP:NEWLLM ↗, it is not permissible to use an AI to generate new articles. <span class="nowrap">--G<small>urkubondinn</small> (talk)</span> 10:46, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Khirbet Bal'ama ↗ moved to draftspace



Thanks for your contributions to Khirbet Bal'ama ↗. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because '''it consists of machine-generated text'''.
I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page ↗.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. <span class="nowrap">--G<small>urkubondinn</small> (talk)</span> 10:36, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

:~read the draft versus the sources. I've edited the output myself. The policy you're qouting has exceptions and it is undergoing substantial revisions, so don't threaten a longstanding contributing author with a block.רמרום (talk) 11:03, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Kafr Yarub ↗ moved to draftspace



Thanks for your contributions to Kafr Yarub ↗. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because '''it consists of machine-generated text'''.
I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page ↗.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. <span class="nowrap">--G<small>urkubondinn</small> (talk)</span> 10:38, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Kashda ↗ moved to draftspace



Thanks for your contributions to Kashda ↗. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because '''it consists of machine-generated text'''.
I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page ↗.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. <span class="nowrap">--G<small>urkubondinn</small> (talk)</span> 10:40, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

:I've rewritten the pages according to the wikipolicies you were kind to highlight. Would you care having a look by reviewing them and perhaps suggesting editorial improvements? רמרום (talk) 17:05, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
::No, not after this comment: Diff/1344631562 ↗. You should read WP:NEWLLM ↗ again btw, it was amended yesterday after a succesful RfC, it not permissible to add any new content to articles using an LLM. <span class="nowrap">--G<small>urkubondinn</small> (talk)</span> 17:10, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
:::I've rewritten the articles in full in my own language, and have read the sources beforehand. Nowhere did i even hint not reading them. רמרום (talk) 17:33, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 18



An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tayibe ↗, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Milestones ↗ was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

:Resolvedרמרום (talk) 17:05, 21 March 2026 (UTC)

Appropriation of the term "pogrom" on multiple articles



I noticed you incorrectly and insensitively appropriated the term "pogrom", generally used to describe a very specific kind of violence committed against Jews, to describe Israeli settler violence ↗ committed towards Palestinians in Khallit al-Dabe' ↗. I would argue the term should not apply in such a case, as aside from it being offensive to Jewish people, the term shouldn't be used to describe inter-ethnic violence, as a pogrom is defined as inter-religious violence. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding unsigned ↗ comment added by LeveledSquared (talk • contribs ↗) 18:16, 20 March 2026 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

:Thank you for raising the point. I certainly did not intend to cause offense. My use of the term ''pogrom'' was not meant as a polemical invention, but followed existing reliable-source usage for organized mob attacks against a vulnerable minority carried out with official acquiescence or passivity.<ref>{{cite encyclopedia |title=Pogrom |encyclopedia=Encyclopaedia Britannica |url=https://www.britannica.com/topic/pogrom |date=27 February 2026}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |date=5 March 2026 |title=Pogrom |url=https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/pogrom |website=Merriam-Webster}}</ref>
:In other words, while the term is historically most associated with anti-Jewish violence, reliable sources do not treat it as exclusively anti-Jewish or exclusively inter-religious. For example, Reuters reported that Maj. Gen. Yehuda Fuchs, the Israeli military commander in the West Bank, described the 2023 settler attack on Huwara as “a pogrom,” and Reuters also reported that Ehud Olmert used the same term for anti-Palestinian settler attacks in 2008.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Ayyub |first1=Rami |last2=Sawafta |first2=Ali |date=1 March 2023 |title=Israel arrests suspects in settler rampage described by general as 'pogrom' |url=https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/israel-arrests-suspects-settler-rampage-described-by-general-pogrom-2023-03-01/ |work=Reuters}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |date=7 December 2008 |title=Olmert slams 'pogrom', Palestinians still fearful |url=https://www.reuters.com/article/economy/olmert-slams-pogrom-palestinians-still-fearful-idUSL7574518/ |work=Reuters}}</ref>
:So my usage was based on attested reliable source language. Additional reliable and reputable description of Jewish settler violence as pogrom, including in Hebrew/Israeli sources, can be found below:
:-https://www.972mag.com/settler-soldier-pogrom-masafer-yatta/
:-https://www.haaretz.com/opinion/2023-07-03/ty-article-opinion/.premium/all-israelis-bear-responsibility-for-the-west-bank-pogroms/00000189-1800-d7b0-af9f-1ef111cc0000
:-https://peacenews.info/node/11039/pogroms-against-palestinians-west-bank
:-https://www.btselem.org/publications/202309_the_pogroms_are_working_the_transfer_is_already_happening
:-https://www.fondapol.org/en/study/pogroms-in-palestine-before-the-creation-of-the-state-of-israel-1830-1948/
:-https://www.haaretz.com/opinion/editorial/2025-11-09/ty-article/idf-chief-needs-to-do-more-to-protect-west-bank-palestinians/0000019a-6a38-d218-a5be-7aff9be00000
:-https://www.972mag.com/pogroms-west-bank-soldiers-settlers/
:-https://www.lemonde.fr/en/international/article/2023/06/23/in-the-west-bank-palestinian-villages-are-at-the-mercy-of-jewish-settlers_6035874_4.html
:So, given that extensive, representative selection of sources, including Jewish/Hebrew and Israeli/International ones, this use seems compatible and verifiable.
:רמרום (talk) 17:04, 21 March 2026 (UTC) רמרום (talk) 17:04, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
:@LeveledSquared, please be aware that to edit in the Arab-Israeli topic area on Wikipedia ↗ accounts must be at least thirty days old and have at least 500 edits ↗. This includes editing talk pages ↗, with the sole exception being for simple and specific edit requests ↗, which should be in the form of "change x to y for reason z", complying with EDITXY ↗. IOHANNVSVERVS (talk) 19:27, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Kafr Yarub ↗ (March 31)


<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: var(--background-color-warning-subtle, #fdf2d5); color: inherit; padding: 0.5em 1em; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">'''Draft declined'''{{pb}}50px|left ↗Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation ↗ has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.{{pb}}
<nowiki> </nowiki>'''Feedback'''{{pb}}The reviewer, Wisenerd, left the following feedback:
{{divbox|gray|3=This draft appears to be generated by a large language model ↗ (such as ChatGPT). You should not use LLMs ↗ to generate article content.
LLM-generated pages with the below issues may be deleted without notice ↗.

These tools are prone to specific issues that violate our policies:

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources ↗ that discuss the subject.

See the advice page on large language models ↗ for more information.|}}<!--
--
-->

'''Next steps'''

'''Need help?'''

'''Scam warning'''
Wisenerd (talk) 00:56, 31 March 2026 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC decline-->

:Dear @Wisenerd, the draft which I have submitted for review was not composed by LLM, as claimed by @G<small>urkubondinn</small>, but a thoroughly revised text, written in my own language and based on direct reading of the sources referenced in the text. It was a very different version that the original one which did include some formatting and summary using an LLM. The version I submitted for review contains no hellucinations or AI-derived text at all. Accordingly, and in line with wiki policies, please review the paper on its own merit. רמרום (talk) 19:51, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
::You are doing an awful lot of dancing around the point.
::{{tqb|written in my own language}}
::This is English Wikipedia, so you need to submit drafts in English. Your draft is in English, so what are you not telling us?
::Now two independent, and unconnected editors, have determined that you have submitted AI-generated text. You will quickly find out that this community is not happy when people lie about AI use. <span class="nowrap">--G<small>urkubondinn</small> (talk)</span> 20:00, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
:::There was also the tell of irrelevant "See also" pages including one which is redlinked. Read over your pages before submitting and please do not use LLM to generate any sections of the page. Wisenerd (talk) 07:18, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

{| style="margin: 0.4em 2em;"
|- style="vertical-align: top;"
| alt=Teahouse logo ↗
| <div style="background-color:#e1e6db; color: #393D38; padding: 1em; font-size: 1.1em; border-radius:10px;box-shadow:-2px -2px 1px #8e8a78;">Hello, '''רמרום'''!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the '''Articles for creation help desk ↗'''. If you have any ''other'' questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the '''Teahouse ↗''', a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Wisenerd (talk) 00:56, 31 March 2026 (UTC)</div>
|}<!-- Wikipedia:Teahouse/AfC Invitation -->
Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC ↗

Source discussion


The place called "Kirbet en Nebi Yarub" in Zertal p216-217 is located close to the north of Jaba ↗, very far from "4km south of Jenin". Zero<sup><small>talk ↗</small></sup> 12:19, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

:There are two sites, look at the SWP. רמרום (talk) 19:51, 31 March 2026 (UTC)
:: Sorry, but that doesn't answer the objection. The map coordinates 1706/1904 given by Zertal point to the site near Jaba. The SWP map coordinates "Mm" given on the page you link to also indicate the site near Jeba. So those citations are wrong. I presume you want the site shown as "Kefr Yarub or el Ghannam" at coords Nl on sheet VIII, about 4km south of Jenin (also SWP II, p53), but that isn't where those two sources point to. Your citation to H&A is also dubious: the entry for Bayt Yarub on page 129 identifies it at coords 170/194, which is also the site near Jaba (which is P11 on page 125). There is no entry in H&A that they place just south of Jenin. Zero<sup><small>talk ↗</small></sup> 01:53, 1 April 2026 (UTC)
:::Hi @Zero0000, perhaps I am a bit under the weather for not following 100% through. I was working according to the article on the Bulla. I have looked at the SWP and I do find "Kefr Yarub or el-Gannam ↗" just south of Bal'ama 4 kms south of Jenin. On the British 1:20,000 there is a Beit Yarub ↗ north of Jaba, so I am confused. Is it that Zertal might have mixed Keft Yarub and Beit Yarub? Both have Yarub in them Might I have mixed the sites? What are the roles of use editors concerning validating scholarly sources and forbidden original research ? How is best to proceed. I would appreciate your insights. רמרום (talk) 13:21, 1 April 2026 (UTC)
:::: I'm waiting for my copy of that article; should be soon. Let's discuss it then. Zero<sup><small>talk ↗</small></sup> 00:19, 2 April 2026 (UTC)
:: I also wonder about "Today it is called also Khirbat Abū Ghannām." The site called "Kefr Yarub or el Ghannam" on SWP is at 1764/2046 and is called "Kh. Um el Naml" on mandate-era maps and "ח׳רבת אום א-נמל" on recent Israeli maps. Meanwhile, there is a different site at 1801/2057, 3.5km to the east which is called "Khurbet en Nejjar" on the SWP map, "Kh. Abu Ghannam" on mandate-era maps, and either "ח׳רבת אבו ע׳נם" or "ח׳רבת אבו ר׳נם" on recent Israeli maps. I don't have the source you gave for this. Zero<sup><small>talk ↗</small></sup> 06:14, 1 April 2026 (UTC)
::: Just to add to the confusion, regarding "nearby Bal'ama", I notice that Khirbet Bal'ama is less than 1km from this third site at 1801/2057. Zero<sup><small>talk ↗</small></sup> 00:19, 2 April 2026 (UTC)
::::Yes, I think that this is the "proof" used by the authors re: Kafr Yarub and Bal'ama, both are two independent sites mentioned on this one lead bulla (tax stamp). It looks like the authors of the paper mixed Bayt Yarub and Kafr Yarub, at least as it comes to the archaeological description (pp. 316-317), but otherwise cite historical sources directly relevant to Kafr Yaroub (Guerin, SWP, PRHP ↗). רמרום (talk) 20:30, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

April 2026



25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Please do not use misleading edit summaries ↗ when making changes to Wikipedia pages, as you did to :Yosef Garfinkel ↗. This behavior is viewed as disruptive ↗, and continuation may result in loss of editing privileges ↗. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-mislead2 --> <span class="nowrap">--G<small>urkubondinn</small> (talk)</span> 05:50, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

:@Gurkubondinn I disagree with both the revert and the warning.
:The edit in question was a routine copyedit correcting clear grammatical errors in the article (e.g., “Garfinkel concentrated on the specialized in” and “He has excavated dating to the full sequence…”). Per WP:COPYEDIT, such fixes are encouraged and improve readability.
:Regarding the edit summary: describing a straightforward grammatical fix as a “typo” is consistent with normal practice under WP:EDITSUMMARY, where concise summaries are acceptable for routine edits. There was no intent to mislead nor is it extraordinary or peculiar.
:Reverting to a version that contains obvious malformed English does not improve the article. Restoring incorrect text can itself be disruptive to the editing process, per WP:DISRUPTIVE ↗.
:If there is a specific concern about any individual change, please identify the exact diff on Yosef Garfinkel talk page so it can be addressed constructively. רמרום (talk) 13:09, 1 April 2026 (UTC)
::Describing this change as {{tqq|typos}} is both misleading and factually incorrect, as no typos were corrected: Diff/1346253421 ↗. This is disruptive behaviour, as described above, and can be contrued as WP:NOTHERE ↗. Please keep your WP:EDITSUMMARIES ↗ accurate and descriptive in the future. <span class="nowrap">--G<small>urkubondinn</small> (talk)</span> 14:17, 1 April 2026 (UTC)
:::@Gurkubondinn I think we are talking past each other.
:::My intent with the edit was to improve malformed or unclear English in the article text (e.g., “Garfinkel concentrated on the specialized in” and similar constructions), which falls under routine copyediting per WP:COPYEDIT ↗. If the term “typo” in the edit summary was too narrow or imprecise for the scope of the changes, I explained these in my revision of the article, and will make sure to use more specific summaries in future edits, per WP:EDITSUMMARY ↗.
:::However, I do not agree that this constitutes disruptive editing or that WP:NOTHERE ↗ applies. The edits were made in good faith with the aim of improving readability and clarity.
:::If there are specific changes that you believe are inaccurate or inappropriate, please indicate the exact sentences so they can be reviewed or reverted individually. A blanket revert to grammatically incorrect text does not, in my view, improve the article.
:::I am open to adjusting or refining the edits where needed, but I would prefer to proceed through discussion of specific diffs.רמרום (talk) 14:51, 1 April 2026 (UTC)
::::I told you what the problem is, there were no {{tqq|typos}} fixed. This was a misleading edit summary, and persistently using them {{emph|can be seen as}} NOTHERE behaviour, see WP:NOTDUMB ↗ for example. Use accurate and factually correct summaries in the future. <span class="nowrap">--G<small>urkubondinn</small> (talk)</span> 14:56, 1 April 2026 (UTC)
::::@Gurkubondinn Understood.
::::If the term “typo” was not an accurate description of the scope of the changes, I will use more precise edit summaries going forward, in line with WP:EDITSUMMARY ↗.
::::My edits were intended as routine copyediting to improve clarity and correct malformed English, per WP:COPYEDIT ↗, and were made in good faith. I do not agree that this rises to the level of disruptive editing or WP:NOTHERE ↗, but I will ensure that future summaries more accurately reflect the nature of the changes.
::::If there are specific content issues in the edit itself, I am happy to review them on a sentence-by-sentence basis.רמרום (talk) 15:01, 1 April 2026 (UTC)
:::::Please also read WP:LLMCOMM ↗. <span class="nowrap">--G<small>urkubondinn</small> (talk)</span> 15:11, 1 April 2026 (UTC)
::::::@Gurkubondinn The comments are not LLM derived but reflect my own views regarding the edits and the discussion. If there are specific concerns about the content of my edits, I am happy to address them on a diff-by-diff basis. I believe the definition of "typo" use in edits summaries and the prohibition on LLM usage have both been addressed. Please advise on any remaining issues on your part, if needs be. Best wishes, רמרום (talk) 15:24, 1 April 2026 (UTC)
:::::::Stop pasting output from an AI chatbot to me. Unless you start writing your own replies, I will not address any of your questions. Read LLMCOMM. <span class="nowrap">--G<small>urkubondinn</small> (talk)</span> 16:08, 1 April 2026 (UTC)
::::::::I am writing this myself, and your baseless accusation is a deflection from the content of the article. If you are unwilling to discuss the grammatical errors I corrected (the specific diffs I provided), please say so. Otherwise, have a good day. רמרום (talk) 16:40, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

Popular use of the word "typo" varies in its scope. You might find use for the more general term "mistype" for something typed without the intention to type it (such as accidentally repeating a word or phrase). And of course "grammatical error" for things that violate the rules of grammar. Meanwhile, don't take the above too seriously. Zero<sup><small>talk ↗</small></sup> 00:07, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

:Thank you, I would follow these instructions closely. רמרום (talk) 20:22, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Kashda ↗ has been accepted


<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:var(--background-color-success-subtle, #dff2eb); padding: 0.5em 1em; color: inherit; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">50px|left ↗ '''Kashda ↗, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!'''<br />

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. <br />

The article has been assessed as '''Start-Class''', which is recorded on its talk page ↗. Most new articles start out as Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time ↗. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme ↗ to see how you can improve the article.

'''Future articles'''
<div class="autoconfirmed-show">
<div class="unconfirmed-show">

'''Next steps'''
Thanks again, and happy editing!
CopyleftEverything (talk) 23:57, 9 June 2026 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC accept-->

:Thank you. I will take this and push it further in the coming days רמרום (talk) 13:36, 23 June 2026 (UTC)