User Talk: 7rucify

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

{{Talk header}}

</div>
</div>

Good article

I see you've been working on these music-related articles lately. I wondered if you plan to get them to good article status in the future. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 13:38, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

:I have not yet considered it, but perhaps in the future. RXLFZ (talk) 20:39, 26 April 2025 (UTC)
::Oh, I thought that was your intention since you've been working on the articles, as if you were trying to get them to good article status. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 02:35, 27 April 2025 (UTC)
:::I'll make sure I get myself familiar with the GA stuff, getting these articles to GA status is something I could do in the future, now that you mentioned it lol RXLFZ (talk) 08:22, 27 April 2025 (UTC)
::::Please ensure that any sources you add are not already included in the articles. TheAmazingPeanuts (talk) 10:09, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Destroy Lonely - If Looks Could Kill (Alternate Covers).png listed for discussion

30px|left ↗ A file that you uploaded or altered, :File:Destroy Lonely - If Looks Could Kill (Alternate Covers).png ↗, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion ↗. Please see the '''discussion''' ↗ to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. 

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history ↗ for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:32, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Legends Never Die Anniversary cover.jpg

35px|text-top|left|⚠|link= ↗ Thanks for uploading ''':File:Legends Never Die Anniversary cover.jpg ↗'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use ↗. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media ↗).

Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:25, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

Your nomination of Die Lit ↗ is under review

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Die Lit ↗ is <span class="nowrap">20px|alt=|link= ↗ </span>'''under review'''. See Talk:Die Lit/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗ for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.  <small>Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chchcheckit</small> -- Chchcheckit (talk) 10:27, 13 October 2025 (UTC)

Your nomination of Die Lit ↗ has passed

Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Die Lit ↗ has <span class="nowrap">20px|alt=|link= ↗ </span>'''passed'''; congratulations! See Talk:Die Lit/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗ for more information. If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days.  <small>Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Chchcheckit</small> -- Chchcheckit (talk) 14:05, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 18 November 2025 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>

Recommending you to nominate Music (Playboi Carti album) ↗ for GA

I just cleaned up Music (Playboi Carti album) ↗ a bit, and I have seen that the article looks really good that I recommend you, the highest contributor, to nominate the article for {{icon|GA}} status, considering that you did for Die Lit ↗. However, something I feel confused about is the sample information, since the sampled writers are credited, but there's no reliable source of what sample was used on the album; that's the only issue I got so far. RTSthestardust (talk) 17:39, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

:Apologies for not replying to this earlier; I had marked it as read and forgot about going back to it. About the article, it in fact is close to GA, but I'm sure it could be cleaned up; for example, the first things I noticed while looking back at it were the unreliable sources ''Medium ↗'' (per WP:MEDIUM ↗) and ''The Culture Crypt'' (not a lot of coverage about it, most likely a self-published source). And it could be expanded; knowing that the one-year anniversary is coming close, I'm sure more sources will come by that time. But I definitely will get to it after ''Whole Lotta Red ↗'', probably for the album's one-year anniversary.
:About the sample information, I have no idea; I only hope that the sources for them will come. 7rucify (talk) 10:21, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" | 100px ↗
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Original Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | ...in recognition of your work on ''Whole Lotta Red ↗'': you have massively outdone yourself as an editor from ''Die Lit ↗'' (and prior), and I hope that you continue to write more quality articles in the future. Chchcheckit (talk) 18:26, 27 January 2026 (UTC)
|}

Ca$ino link

Hello just curious but why did you change the Ca$ino link on the baby keen page? Kree2008 (talk) 20:27, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

June 2026 GAN Backlog Drive

{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ; background-color: #FFF; padding:10px 15px 0; color: black"
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em; font-size:130%" |'''Good article nominations ↗ |''' <span style="font-size:85%">June 2026 Backlog Drive</span>
|rowspan=3|right|75px ↗
|-
|'''June 2026 Backlog Drive:'''
Do you want to become more experienced in the GA process?

On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin.

Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles reviewed.

Mentors are available, and new reviewers (<6 reviews) get bonus points!

Interested in taking part? You can '''sign up here ↗'''.
|-
|colspan=2|'''Other ways to participate:'''

Join the conversations on our talk page ↗.

|-
|colspan=2 style="font-size:85%; padding-top:15px;"|You're receiving this message because you have participated in a good article review this year or participated in the previous backlog drive.
|}

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:58, 25 May 2026 (UTC)