W
Active Editors
Back to Profile

User Talk: AimanAbir18plus

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

{{archives|search=yes}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config |archive = User talk:AimanAbir18plus/Archive %(counter)d |algo = old(30d) |counter = 1 |maxarchivesize = 250K |minthreadsleft = 5 |minthreadstoarchive = 1 |archiveheader = {{aan}} }}

Page moves



Hi AimanAbir18plus, I hope you're well. In future, per WP:RMUM ↗, please start a discussion before moving pages like ''Undead Nightmare ↗'', as you did both today ↗ and two months ago ↗. Thanks, and happy editing. <span class="nowrap">– <span style="color:#008;">'''''Rhain'''''</span> ☔ <small>{{su|p=he|b=him}} ↗</small></span> 13:15, 29 May 2026 (UTC)

:Repeatedly making the same edits after someone contested them, without engaging in any discussion, is what just got your account blocked, AimanAbir18plus. Is there something you're not understanding? If you're refusing to change this behavior, your account is going to be blocked again. <span style="color:green">Sergecross73</span> <span style="color:teal">msg me</span> 17:47, 30 May 2026 (UTC)
::I've been a little worried by the high amount of edits that have been reverted since he's been unblocked - for example, out of thirty-odd edits on 26 May, the vast majority have been undone. That said, the rollbacks are all by one editor, often on the basis that images were changed without a specific reason being given. Of the edits that aren't rolled back, there are some strange instances of swapping words around for no apparent reason, such as here ↗. Blue<span style="opacity:0">-</span>Sonnet ''In solidarity'' ↗ 19:09, 30 May 2026 (UTC)
:::Agreed. There's further context here too. <span style="color:green">Sergecross73</span> <span style="color:teal">msg me</span> 19:48, 30 May 2026 (UTC)
::::It's good to know I'm not the only person who is concerned, but on the other hand it's really not good at all.
::::@AimanAbir18plus, are you aware of this discussion and do you have anything to add? Blue<span style="opacity:0">-</span>Sonnet ''In solidarity'' ↗ 20:30, 30 May 2026 (UTC)

Further unexplained edits



Hello again. Reviewing your edits, I can't help but notice that the bulk of your edits continue to be removing/changing/tinkering with valid information/images without any explanation of why you're making the edit, what was wrong with the prior content, or why your version is better. And it's taxing the community - a lot of your edits are being undone because your intentions are not clear and they can't understand what you're doing or why your actions are necessary.

This can't go on. If you can't communicate or engage with the community, then editing Wikipedia isn't going to work out. It doesn't help that you refuse to engage with myself or anyone else for that matter. If you refuse to change or engage (in your own words, not rambling AI babble that doesn't address things) then your account will be blocked again.

Any input on any of this? <span style="color:green">Sergecross73</span> <span style="color:teal">msg me</span> 16:33, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

:I pledge not guilty of any of this. AimanAbir18plus (talk) 14:40, 16 June 2026 (UTC)
::Hi. I actually also came here to discuss this. I noticed you removed two images from Fetishization of LGBTQ people ↗ that were relevant to their specific subsections without providing a reason. If there is a problem with them like a copyright issue or something then please elaborate on that. Urchincrawler (talk) 16:30, 17 June 2026 (UTC)
::@AimanAbir18plus Please just use edit summaries when you make a change - we're not mind readers and if you change something that looks fine to everyone else, we will have no idea why you chose to change it.
::Edit summaries are a show of basic respect and courtesy to other volunteers, so that they don't have to waste unnecessary extra time going through all of your edits one by one to try to understand what you were thinking. ''In solidarity'' ↗, Blue<span style="opacity:0">-</span>Sonnet <small>(I'm listening)</small> 18:13, 17 June 2026 (UTC)

Block (2)


<div class="user-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #ffefd5; min-height: 40px"> 40px|left|alt=|link= ↗
You may remember that when you were blocked from editing a while ago the message from the blocking administrator contained three main points: you must desist from edit warring; you must start responding to messages and taking part in discussions; if you continued in the same way you would be blocked again for a longer time. As you know you have continued to ignore what you have been told, on this page and on other pages such as Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents ↗, and have failed to either respond to or take notice of messages. As you also know you have returned to edit warring. In view of those facts you must have expected to be blocked for a longer time, and that expectation has indeed been fulfilled.

However, things are, unfortunately, even worse than that, in two ways. Firstly, looking at the history of the account I see that there have been other concerns that you have been warned about, apart from those mentioned in the last block message, which were just part of the problems. Secondly, you have edit warred using a temporary account, and, according to an administrator who has made relevant checks, using a proxy. I don't have any doubt that you did that in the (rather naive) hope that you would thereby avoid scrutiny.

Because of those concerns, I don't think it would be sufficient to just block you for a somewhat longer time than the last block, and let you sit out the block, as you did last time. I have therefore blocked you indefinitely. The block may be removed if and when you can convince an administrator that you have taken notice of '''all''' the concerns about your editing, and will not repeat any of the problematic editing patterns. If you think you can do that, first read guide to appealing blocks ↗ and then<nowiki> add the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of this page, replacing "Your reason here" with appropriate text.</nowiki> JBW (talk) 16:32, 26 June 2026 (UTC) </div>
{{unblock reviewed |1=<small>The following request was written through the unblock wizard ↗.</small><div class="paragraphbreak" style="margin-top:0.5em"></div> '''''Can you explain, in your own words, what you were blocked for?'''''<div class="paragraphbreak" style="margin-top:0.5em"></div> I was blocked for edit warring.<div class="paragraphbreak" style="margin-top:0.5em"></div> '''''If unblocked, what edits would you make and what (if applicable) would you do differently?'''''<div class="paragraphbreak" style="margin-top:0.5em"></div> When unblocked, I would engage in discussions and make constructive edits.<div class="paragraphbreak" style="margin-top:0.5em"></div> '''''Is there anything else that may be helpful to your unblock request?'''''<div class="paragraphbreak" style="margin-top:0.5em"></div> I will positively contribute to Wikipedia. <div class="paragraphbreak" style="margin-top:0.5em"></div> AimanAbir18plus (talk) 17:30, 26 June 2026 (UTC) |decline = You were given a chance. You blew it. You've given us no reason here to believe it's worth giving you a third chance or that doing so would turn out any differently. I'm not sure you are taking this seriously. Yamla (talk) 18:44, 26 June 2026 (UTC)}}

{{Non-administrator comment}} In the interests of fairness I'm going to give you some very important tips - if you can follow them, that'll go a
long way.
''In solidarity'' ↗, Blue<span style="opacity:0">-</span>Sonnet <small>(I'm listening)</small> 20:05, 26 June 2026 (UTC)

June 2026


{{checkuserblock-account|sig=<span style="font-family:Impact;color:#006400;">Girth</span>&nbsp;<span style="font-family:Impact;color:#4B0082;">Summit</span><sub style="font-family:Segoe print;color:blue;"> (blether)</sub> 18:07, 27 June 2026 (UTC)}}

Unblock request



{{unblock reviewed|decline=I think you should take the standard offer ↗ and re-apply in six months time with no more abuse of multiple accounts. PhilKnight (talk) 00:29, 29 June 2026 (UTC)|reason=I was blocked for edit warring. I realize now that repeatedly reverting without discussion violated the edit warring policy. I should have used the talk page to seek consensus instead. I understand this behavior harms the project, and I commit to discussing changes first and following dispute resolution processes in the future. Thank you for considering my unblock. AimanAbir18plus (talk) 17:39, 28 June 2026 (UTC)}} AimanAbir18plus (talk) 17:39, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

{{non-administrator comment}} Please don't use AI to write your appeal for you, the administrators need to see that ''you'' as a person understand why you were blocked and know how to avoid the same thing happening in future. The AI wasn't blocked - you were - so you need to write your own appeal. ''In solidarity,'' ↗ Blue<span style="opacity:0">-</span>Sonnet <small>(I'm listening)</small> 18:46, 28 June 2026 (UTC)