User Talk: Alexandraaaacs1989

{{User:MiszaBot/config
| algo = old(7d)
| archive = User talk:Alexandraaaacs1989/Archive %(counter)d
| counter = 1
| maxarchivesize = 200K
| minthreadsleft = 0
}}

{{Archive box|auto=1}}

<!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## -->

Concern regarding Draft:Deportation publicity campaign during Trump's second presidency ↗

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, Alexandraaaacs1989. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Deportation publicity campaign during Trump's second presidency ↗, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted ↗, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it ↗ again&#32;or request ↗ that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted ↗ so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:06, 4 July 2026 (UTC)

A note

You have great ideas and have done incredible work for Wikipedia. You are unquestionably here to build an encyclopedia, and I genuinely appreciate your tireless contributions. But the reason I made this comment ↗ is because your behavior related to sidebar templates is disruptive, despite being in good faith; even if you don't intend them to, your actions relating to those sidebar templates line up with ownership behavior. I'm not intentionally trying to drag up old grudges between you and Sirfurboy; I'm just pointing out that when you say things like {{tq|The problem is that right now, the opposite is true: that currently if you decide to remove dozens of articles from a sidebar, it is nearly impossible to challenge said removal without devoting weeks of time to each individual discussion.}}, which pretty clearly refer to the disputes involving the sidebar templates you made, it makes it look as if you are unwilling to accept the results of the discussions until you get your preferred result.

I offer this advice, which may seem strange: try to disengage with sidebar templates entirely and focus your incredible content work elsewhere. I really ''don't'' want to go to ANI, but I sincerely hope that you reconsider your behavior and your approach to handling disputes. If an RfC expired with consensus against your proposal, then why open another proposal explicitly referencing the same dispute at a different forum? SuperPianoMan9167 (talk) 02:23, 4 July 2026 (UTC)

:You say you {{tq|really ''don't'' want to go to ANI}}, but the final sentence in your comment said {{tq|I think this matter should be referred to ANI because of the disruption}} despite how you did not make any efforts at prior communication on my talk page. I like you, I like our discussions, and yes I have handled things poorly in the past with Sirfurboy. We can talk about that, and if you believe I'm being disruptive then I'm completely open to having that conversation. But can we please move this discussion ↗ to my talk page instead of keeping it on the VPP thread? If you really don't want to take this to an ANI, that seems like a good first step and I would very much appreciate the de-escalation. Alexandraaaacs1989 (talk) 02:33, 4 July 2026 (UTC)
::Feel free to collapse that part of the discussion at VPP. I realize I am not willing to take this further. SuperPianoMan9167 (talk) 14:07, 4 July 2026 (UTC)