User Talk: Arjayay

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

{{archives
|small=
|search=yes
|index=
}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
| algo = old(21d)
| archive = User talk:Arjayay/Archive %(counter)d
| counter = 37
| maxarchivesize = 75K
| archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}}
| minthreadstoarchive = 1
| minthreadsleft = 4
}}

Hi

Hi I would take look at the edits Logical Editor Kakji made on Bhatt ↗ article from May 18 2026 until now since that was a comprised account. Cena332 (talk) 04:35, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

:Hi @Arjayay, I think the edits made by that account on the Bhatt article were correct. They were related to a different category of edits than the topics for which the account was blocked. You can check this article, and if possible, please revert it to the previous version, on the basis of your checking. ~2026-37463-46 ↗ (talk) 06:25, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

Bhatt revert

Hi @Arjayay. Since May 18, 2026, @Logical Editor Kakji had made edits to the Bhatt article. Those edits were on a distinct topic, unrelated to the topic of other articles, for which the account was blocked. The edits were correct and had been widely accepted, and the page was also moved in the meantime, with consensus. The sudden blanket revert by @Cena332 disrupts the article's development and removes a significant amount of content that was added later. Also it doesn't align to the rename of the page. XYZWORLDS (talk) 06:39, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

I find it very curious that your account @XYZWORLDS has just pop out of the blue and been made right now. All the edits I reverted on Bhatt article had to do with Logical Editor Kakji revisions. Any edits made inbetween by other editors was just fixing his edits he made. You say 'those edits were on a distance topic' for which he was banned, that is not true the reason he was banned was that he was abusing multiple accounts.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Logical_Editor_Kakji ↗ Cena332 (talk) 06:42, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

@Arjayay The edits I'm referring to concern the content itself rather than the editor who made them. My understanding is that they were unrelated to the conduct that led to the block, remained in the article for some time without objection, and the page was subsequently moved by consensus. My concern is that reverting the entire revision chain also removed constructive changes that appear unrelated to the reason for the block. I'll leave it to the administrator to determine whether those specific edits should be restored based on their merits and the relevant policies. XYZWORLDS (talk) 06:50, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

I'll leave it to @Arjayay determination too. Something is very suspicious here. Why is ~2026-37463-46 ↗ & @XYZWORLDS both have made their accounts today commenting on me reverting edits of Sock account that has been blocked? Cena332 (talk) 06:59, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

:Hi Cena332 - sorry for the delay in replying, but I have been away, and, other than one edit on 29 June (before this thread started) I was unable to get a usable phone signal, but am now back on my desktop. It appears that, in the interim, XYZWORLDS has been indeffed as a sock puppet. As for the page move, it went through a withdrawn page move discussion in 2021, but was then moved from Bhat ↗ to Bhatt (last name) ↗ without any discussion, on 28 May. There was then a brief discussion on moving it again here ↗, supported by an admin, as there was no need for a disambiguating term. Please note that I am NOT an admin, so can do no more than you can. To regularize the situation, rather than making another undiscussed move, I suggest you start another requested move at Talk:Bhatt ↗, explaining the history and proposing the move back to Bhat. Best wishes. - Arjayay (talk) 14:30, 2 July 2026 (UTC)

Should i continue to revert his edits on other articles? I probably got 20% through until that sock messaged you here when I reverted his edits on the Bhat article. --Cena332 (talk) 12:07, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

:Hi Cena332. Looking at the block of User:Logical Editor Kakji, it was for a compromised account, not actually for block evasion. I'm not sure where this stands under WP:BANREVERT ↗ which states "Anyone is free to revert any edits made in violation of a ban or block, without giving any further reason .... This does not mean that edits must be reverted just because they were made in violation of a block or ban (changes that are obviously helpful, such as fixing typos or undoing vandalism, can be allowed to stand), but the presumption in ambiguous cases should be to revert." It depends, therefore, whether the edits are beneficial to the project, and (if relevant) whether they are supported by reliable sources, or not. There is no point in trying to "punish" the editor, by removing all their edits, if doing so makes Wikipedia worse. - Arjayay (talk) 12:41, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
::Hi @Arjayay I think that, instead of undoing all the changes made by @Logical Editor Kakji, just to punish him, we should review his edits and determine whether they were constructive or vandalistic. For this page (Bhatt ↗ or Bhat) as well, we should compare both versions (before and after edit) of the article and then decide whether the changes should be kept or reverted. On this page, his edits made the information more concise, whereas on other pages he made vandalistic changes and even spread misinformation. Many other pages also like the pages of various censuses of India, in which he had written the full conduction dates, were also reverted blanketly. So, anyways, if you find that his edits on this page were constructive after reviewing them, they should be retained. Otherwise, the page should be restored to its original condition, including reverting the renaming if necessary. ~2026-32628-41 ↗ (talk) 14:09, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
Seriously man? Is this another sock. --Cena332 (talk) 14:49, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
:Certainly looks like it. - Arjayay (talk) 14:51, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
::He just said in his comment that on pages 'he made vandalistic changes and even spread misinformation.' wow Cena332 (talk) 14:59, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
:::Sock blocked, requested move closed, and article moved by an Admin - All's Well That Ends Well ↗. - Arjayay (talk) 19:34, 4 July 2026 (UTC)

Betting website developer

i want make new website
I am useing in banglades
Plz give me your number
I will be contract to you ~2026-37534-52 ↗ (talk) 19:31, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

New allegations regarding 3DO.

There are things that need to be added to the article.

Hello. I understand your point, but there are several inconsistencies regarding Throwback's claims.
While Throwback has stated that it owns all the rights and has never sold any of them, new information has emerged over the past two days that appears to contradict those statements.
In reality, the 3DO trademark had been inactive since 2010. After the trademark rights expired, Piko Interactive filed a new application in 2020 and obtained rights only for console manufacturing and hardware-related categories.
In addition, after Empire Interactive brought renewed attention to the 3DO situation, it became apparent that Throwback Entertainment did not have an existing trademark registration for the 3DO name. Instead, Throwback filed its first trademark applications on June 2, 2026, and there was no previous registration under Throwback's name in the trademark database. Furthermore, another company, Prism Entertainment Inc., also filed a new application for the 3DO trademark on June 30, 2026.
These facts appear to conflict with Throwback's public statements. Throwback Entertainment and Limited Run Games have also worked together for years, so it is difficult to view Josh's comments as coming from a completely independent perspective.
Another important detail is that Throwback declared 2024 as its first commercial use of the 3DO trademark. This does not appear to demonstrate continuous trademark ownership or use dating back to the original era of the brand.
Although retro gaming news websites did not report these later developments, I have been following this story closely. Based on the available information, I do not believe the coverage has been fully objective or balanced, as it has largely reflected only one side of the story.

Trademark registrations for the 3DO brand covering the last 30 years: https://www.trademarkelite.com/trademark/trademark-registration/search.aspx?sw=3DO&hline=&light=1

In 2020, Pico Interactive registered the brand from scratch, acquiring it solely for console production: https://www.trademarkelite.com/trademark/trademark-detail/87408482/3DO

When 3DO came back into the spotlight, Prism Entertainment Inc.—a company unrelated to the events—filed an application on June 30th in an attempt to acquire the brand: https://www.trademarkelite.com/trademark/trademark-detail/99913865/3DO

As for Throwback Entertainment, it filed its initial trademark applications on June 2, 2026, and declared 2024 as the date of first use:

https://www.trademarkelite.com/trademark/trademark-detail/99920168/3DO
https://www.trademarkelite.com/trademark/trademark-detail/99920175/3DO Vord45 (talk) 18:04, 6 July 2026 (UTC)

:Vord45 - You can't claim "I understand your point" - as I don't have a point. I have no idea why you have come to my page, as I never edited the 3DO ↗ page, and' until your post, do not think I have ever heard of them. If you want to discuss the article please do so at Talk:3DO ↗, not here. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 18:40, 6 July 2026 (UTC)

Re: Assistance with Edit request to Semi-Protected Jazz ↗ to include a link to Mike Danzi ↗

Ciao Arjayay: I was pleased to learn of your interest in the Wikipedia Jazz Project and the evolution of Jazz as a universal musical language in the the UK, USA and Germany. Alas, I do not have an active Wikipedia account but I've suggested a minor edit request to the semi-protected article Jazz ↗ in order to include a link to the jazz guitarist Mike Danzi ↗<ref>{{cite journal|title=The Jazz Experience in Weimar Germany |last=Kater |first=Michael |journal=German History |publisher=Oxford University Press |volume=6 |issue=2 |date=1 April 1988 |pages=145–158 |quote=American Jazz was imported into Germany in the early 1920s...some two to five years after it had entered Britain or France...genuine American Jazz musicians (such as)... Mike Danzi embarked on a German tour with American bandleader Alex Hyde before deciding to make Berlin his permanent European base....As the great majority of German musicians still found jazz very difficult to master, it was Americans and a few Englishmen who came to dominate the jazz scene of the Roaring Twenties... |doi=10.1093/gh/6.2.145}}</ref><ref>Review of "American Musician in Germany, 1942-1939 Memoirs of the Jazz, Entertainment and Movie World in Berlin During the Weimar Republic and the Nazi Era-and in the United States", ''American Music'', Vol. 6 No. 1 (Spring 198) p. 98-102 Memoirs of Michael Danzi on JSTOR.org ↗</ref><ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=dDIKSt7JR40C&pg=PA121 |title=Jazz Research and Performance Materials |last=Meadows |first=Eddie S. |date=February 27, 1995 |page=121|publisher=Psychology Press |isbn=978-0-8153-0373-2 }}</ref><ref>Center For Jazz Arts: "An American In Berlin" Mike Danzi on centerforjazzarts.org ↗</ref> who was a noted early contributor to the development in Jazz in the USA in the early 1920s. He also performed extensivley in the cafes, cabarets, theaters and films in Germany from 1924 until 1939 when he defiantly refused to use the Hitler salute ↗ in public and fled Nazism ↗ and European facism ↗ to return to the USA. Upon his return he concertized to large audiences on Broadway ↗ as well as in the Off Broadway ↗ theatre and at Radio City Music Hall ↗. His autobiography is still cited as a major valuable research tool for scholars investigating the "transplantation" of the American Jazz genre into Germany prior to the onset of World War II. Some of his performances have been archived so you can also hear Mike Danzi in several historic recordings from Berlin in 1926 with the English trumpeter Howard McFarlane ↗ at the link here:<ref>Howard McFarlane und Mike Danzi auf grammophon-platten.de ↗</ref> Enjoy!
If you have extra time, you might enjoy assisting with adding a link to his biography into the Jazz ↗ article within the section '''THE JAZZ AGE - BEGINNINGS OF EUROPEAN JAZZ''' For details see the request posted on the talk page here at the link here: <ref>Talk page for the article ''Jazz'' ↗</ref> Thanks again in advance for your kind and thoughtful editorial assistance and best wishes for your continued editorial success on Wikipedia.org.!! Respectfully, ~2026-38779-54 ↗ (talk) 14:38, 8 July 2026 (UTC)GCL
{{reflist}} ~2026-38779-54 ↗ (talk) 14:38, 8 July 2026 (UTC)

:Hello ~2026-38779-54 ↗ You state "I was pleased to learn of your interest in the Wikipedia Jazz Project and the evolution of Jazz as a universal musical language in the the UK, USA and Germany." I would be intrigued to know where you learnt that, especially as it is not true. I do know enough about jazz, to know that I don't know enough about jazz, to perform your requested edit. Moreover, your requested edit appears illogical:- "As only a limited number of American jazz records were released in Europe, European jazz traces many of its roots to American artists..." If there were "a limited number of American jazz records released in Europe" how did "European jazz trace its roots to American artists"? Unless they were "visiting artists" or some other (missing) explanation. Best wishes. - Arjayay (talk) 15:22, 8 July 2026 (UTC)
::Ciao Arjayay _ Many thanks for you rapid and kind reply! Kindly accept my sincerest apologies in advance for concluding incorrectly that you have sufficient knowledge of the Jazz genre to execute the suggested edit. I formulated such a hasty conclusion based upon a quick review of some of the articles about musicians which are listed on your User Page- each of which reflects your high level of editorial experience. So sorry for the confusion. You are quite correct to paraphrase Lao-tzu ↗ when he observes that a wise man knows "To Know that you don't know is best...To think that you know when you do not is a disease" (Tao-te Ching ↗, Chapter 71) As for the illogical nature of the suggested edit, I must once again apologize. I did not wish to suggest that the entire sentence which I quoted should be inserted into the JAZZ article as an entirely new addition. Rather, my suggestion was to insert the single additional link to Mike Danzi ↗ into the context of the opening sentence which already appears in the Jazz article. This is based upon the extended number of years Danzi spent performing in Germany (about 16) as facism ↗ took root and subsequently interfered with the "transplantation" of American Jazz into Germany during the interval between World War I and World War II. Stated more succinctly, this would simply require changing the paragraph in question in the section '''THE JAZZ AGE - BEGINNINGS OF EUROPEAN JAZZ''' from:
:: '''As only a limited number of American jazz records were released in Europe, European jazz traces many of its roots to American artists such as James Reese Europe, Paul Whiteman, and Lonnie Johnson ↗, who visited Europe during and after World War I. It was their live performances which inspired European audiences' interest in jazz, as well as the interest in all things American (and therefore exotic) which accompanied the economic and political woes of Europe during this time. The beginnings of a distinct European style of jazz began to emerge in this interwar period'''
::to
::'''As only a limited number of American jazz records were released in Europe, European jazz traces many of its roots to American artists such as James Reese Europe, Paul Whiteman, Mike Danzi ↗ and Lonnie Johnson ↗, who visited Europe during and after World War I. It was their live performances which inspired European audiences' interest in jazz, as well as the interest in all things American (and therefore exotic) which accompanied the economic and political woes of Europe during this time. The beginnings of a distinct European style of jazz began to emerge in this interwar period.'''
::Naturally, links to the appropriate references mentioned above including Danzi's autobiography might also be included. In any case, it was just a passing thought. Many thanks for giving the matter so much thought and attention. It is greatly appreciated. Thanks again for your kind editorial assistance and Happy Editing in the future!. With Best regards ~2026-38975-61 ↗ (talk) 15:07, 9 July 2026 (UTC)GCL

Introductory paragraph

Hello,

I noticed the Egypt national football team ↗ article has no introductory paragraph like all other articles. Please advise a solution.

Thank you Pyramidslover (talk) 15:33, 8 July 2026 (UTC)