User Talk: Batman tas

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

Removal of FL tag on List of The Unit episodes ↗

I noticed that you removed the <nowiki>{{Featured list}}</nowiki> from List of The Unit episodes ↗. The list is indeed a featured list. Please see WP:FLRC ↗ if you think that the list should no longer be a featured list. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:37, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Oh, I see now. I thought it was mistaken, because it doesn't contain so much information at all... I'll make the feature link to our Bulgarian wiki list. --Batman tas (talk) 11:39, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Source International broadcasters

Thanks for adding info to the Castle ↗ article, you added a secondary network to Bulgaria. It would be much appreciated if you could provide the source from where you got that information. If you didn't use an English source or can't find one, you can use {{para|language}} with a non-english reference, see {{Cite web ↗}} for more info on citation formatting. Thanks. '''<big><big><sub>X</sub></big></big>'''eworlebi <sup>(t•c ↗)</sup> 10:57, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
: I can add the TV program or a link to Telemaniac.com, but I don't see the point. You won't understand nothing of it. You'll just have to trust me, the series started last night on Nova with different dub of Ars Digital Studio, not like the previos of Alexandra Auido. It airs (on Nova) from Monday to Friday at 21:00 between the third season premieres of ''Ugly Betty ↗'' and the second season premieres of ''Lipstick Jungle ↗''. I will add source only if you so much want, but you'll have to send me a message again. --Batman tas (talk) 11:17, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
:: Please do, I might not understand it, but other might and they can verify the information. Consider using {{para|trans_title}} if (propably) the title is in another language. If it's a schedule it's pretty much self-explanitory, if it's text you could translate the relevant sentence in {{para|quote}}. Thanks. '''<big><big><sub>X</sub></big></big>'''eworlebi <sup>(t•c ↗)</sup> 12:49, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
Done!:) --Batman tas (talk) 17:37, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Medium

You just added a Bulgarian language link for this article. When I click on the link, it doesn't look like an article on Medium. When I do a Google Translate, it tells me that it's a non-existent category, Computer Sciences. Can you either fix this or explain it?--Bbb23 (talk) 23:53, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

I'm doing the article at the moment. I always put the link first and then the article itself. --Batman tas (talk) 23:55, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

:It's commendable of you to create the article, but wouldn't it be better to do the article first? Is there a reason why you insert the link first?--Bbb23 (talk) 00:00, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

I don't know... when I go to some article and want to do a Bulgarian version, I don't go to the BG wiki and write the name. Instead I do the link and open it in a new window. It's faster by this way. Maybe that's the reason. --Batman tas (talk) 00:02, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

:It's not a big deal as long as you create the article fairly quickly, but I suggest you try it the other way. For whatever time it takes you to create the article, it's like having a broken link in the English Wikipedia.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:22, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

February 2011

25px|alt=|link= ↗ Please '''do not add or change content without verifying ↗ it by citing ''reliable'' sources ↗''', as you did to :All Star Superman (film) ↗. Before making any potentially controversial edits ↗, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please '''review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources ↗''' and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.-5- (talk) 07:14, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion ↗ of Georgi Georgiev-Gogo ↗

left|link=|48px| ↗

The article Georgi Georgiev-Gogo ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗ because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created '''biographies of living persons ↗''' must have at least one reference to a reliable source ↗ that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners ↗, or ask at the help desk ↗. Once you have provided at least one reliable source ↗, you may remove the {{tl|prod blp}} tag. '''Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced.''' If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can {{#ifexist:Georgi Georgiev-Gogo|request that it be undeleted|request that it be undeleted ↗}} when you are ready to add one. The Blade of the Northern Lights (<span style="font-family:MS Mincho; color:black;">話して下さい</span>) 22:11, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

source?

Can I have a source for the plot summary?http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Say_the_Word_(The_Walking_Dead)&diff=521818283&oldid=515879818 ↗ thank you. Calendar2 (talk) 16:58, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
:No, because there's no such on the internet. I watched the two episodes earlier today in the studio along with the voice actors. Everything I wrote is true and if it is necessary, remove it until after the showing of the episodes. --Batman tas (talk) 20:58, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
::I won't remove it because I find it awesome as hell, but I am sure someone else will.
::THANK YOU. These plot spoilers are already on several forums.
::When you review other episodes early, please:
::: post them on the wikipedia episode page or
:::you can email me ↗ :) (you have to validate your email first ↗)
::Thank you again. Calendar2 (talk) 21:25, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, but you saying so it not a reliable source. I'm not even necessarily denying what there is not correct or that you're making it all up (I didn't read it because I don't want to be spoiled). Regardless, an article that contains simply a plot summary for an episode that hasn't even aired isn't appropriate for Wikipedia. This is not a blog or a spoilers forum. And we can't even verify what you're saying is even true. There's no reason for those articles to exist at this moment, all they're doing is spoiling the plot for episodes that have not even aired yet. So, please, leave the articles as redirects until the episodes have aired. Drovethrughosts (talk) 22:21, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
:As I wrote: "I won't remove it...but I am sure someone else will." :/
:Per: "This is not a blog or a spoilers forum"
:Where will you post episode 7 and 8? Here is one good alternative ↗.
:After your spoilers are found to be correct everyone will be eager to hear your next spoilers.
:Thank you so much Batman tas! Calendar2 (talk) 22:28, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

I wrote the reviews right after I returnd from the studio because I was too enthusiastic. I have no problem with their removal. Also, sorry if I am going to dissapoint somebody, but I won't be able to be at the dubbing of episodes 7 and 8. They were to be dubbed today (in Bulgaria it is already November 8) but it turned out that they still haven't arrived and maybe will be worked later this week or the next. It is just pure luck that episodes 5 and 6 were dubbed on a day in which I didn't have lectures or any exercises in the university. --Batman tas (talk) 22:48, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
:thank you so much for your gift! I am so excited. God bless Batman tas. Calendar2 (talk) 22:50, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

I also forgot to tell that the woman's name on the phone from episode six is Amy. At least that's what was in the script. There was also Jim, but I'm not sure if it was the man on the phone because I didn't pay attention at the name while the part where he talked to Rick was playing. I just remember this name because one of the actresses asked during the break between the episodes if a guy named Jim has appeared previously. --Batman tas (talk) 23:03, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
:Wow this is golden! Thank you for information, posting this on http://spoilthedead.com/forum where all of your predicitions have gotten close scrutiny and have come out to be true! Spoildead (talk) 17:27, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

OK, I saw the forum and registered. --Batman tas (talk) 18:05, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

We meet again

There isn't anything to discuss at the moment. I just wanted to welcome you to this side of the wiki. This time I will be the one who corrects your grammar.Radiohist (talk) 20:22, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Two-Face (DC Animated Universe).jpg

<span style="font-size:32px; line-height:1em">'''35px|left|⚠|link= ↗'''</span> Thanks for uploading ''':File:Two-Face (DC Animated Universe).jpg ↗'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use ↗. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media ↗).

Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion ↗. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:32, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

: I didn't upload this image so I don't know why I receive your message. --Batman tas (talk) 09:14, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open! ↗

{{Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016 ↗: Voting now open!

{{Ivmbox|Hello, Batman tas. Voting in the '''2016 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements ↗ and submit your choices on '''the voting page ↗'''. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}

Orphaned non-free image File:Batman superman.PNG

<span style="font-size:32px; line-height:1em">'''35px|left|⚠|link= ↗'''</span> Thanks for uploading ''':File:Batman superman.PNG ↗'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use ↗. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media ↗).

Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:06, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
: I think it was for the article of Jim Lee ↗. --Batman tas (talk) 18:57, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Move request

A request to change the title and content of a comics article has begun at Talk:X-Men (film series)#Requested move 7 April 2017 ↗. Any interested WikiProject:Comics editor may comment there within one week. --Tenebrae (talk) 02:51, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

{{Ivmbox|Hello, Batman tas. Voting in the '''2017 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''voting page ↗'''. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

{{Ivmbox|Hello, Batman tas. Voting in the '''2018 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''voting page ↗'''. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''2019 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2019|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2019|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
</td></tr>
</table>

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''2020 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2020|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2020|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
</td></tr>
</table>

December 2020

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm KatnissEverdeen. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, :Scooby-Doo! and Kiss: Rock and Roll Mystery ↗, but you didn't provide a reliable source ↗. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation ↗ and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources ↗. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  <span style="color:#7F00FF">'''Katniss'''</span> <span style="color:#FF007F"> ''May the odds be ever in your favor'' ♥</span> 17:05, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
: KatnissEverdeen, I don't have any sources. I just saw the movie and I wrote down the roles in the Bulgarian voiceover database. As I wrote in my edit summary, both IMDb and Behind the Voice Actors are wrong and should edit their info. --Batman tas (talk) 17:21, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
:: Wikipedia requires you have reliable sources ↗ to change or edit information, so please refrain from changing this information again until you are able to find a source backing up what you are saying. You also say in your edit summary "even the final credits of the movie are wrong," in which you case you absolutely need to find a source if somehow they were miscredited. <span style="color:#7F00FF">'''Katniss'''</span> <span style="color:#FF007F"> ''May the odds be ever in your favor'' ♥</span> 17:24, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
::: Yup, I understand very well. --Batman tas (talk) 19:24, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
:::: KatnissEverdeen, or maybe just Behind the Voice Actors is wrong because on the picture of the witch they have written the name Chikara and on Chikara they have written the name of the witch. I'll try to contact them. --Batman tas (talk) 19:35, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''2021 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2021|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2021|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 23 November 2021 (UTC)</small>
</td></tr>
</table>

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px;">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2022 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2022|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2022|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2023 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2023|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2024 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2024|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 18 November 2025 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>

April 2026

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Please do not remove content or templates ↗ from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at :Superstore (TV series) ↗, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary ↗. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted ↗. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. ''ChatGPT does not dictate Wikipedia policy and should not be used for determining which categories belong on which articles.'' <b>GSK</b> <small>(talk ↗ • edits ↗)</small> 03:01, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
: No, it's not a test edit, but a very real one. The show is not in that category. It may have a couple of characters, but the central point is not the LGBT stuff. So, GSK, you can remove it again. --Batman tas (talk) 03:07, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
:: GSK, let's discuss everything here before I've gone for another edit and before you blame me for something that I don't do. Is that ok for you? --Batman tas (talk) 14:28, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
::: Between my last revert of your edit and now, I've sought a second opinion from an administrator to determine if using ChatGPT (or any LLM) for determining what belongs in an article and what doesn't (whether it be a category or not) is against Wikipedia policy. Given Wikipedia's stance on LLMs being used in editing as a whole ↗, I would be inclined to agree that an LLM should '''not''' be used to determine what belongs in an article and what does not. Further, claiming that ChatGPT {{tq|q=yes|gives objective answers}} is just plain misleading as it is widely known that AI can and does make mistakes, and can reinforce biases and stereotypes in its answers. In fact, studies were performed recently by the BBC and by WSU, respectively, that showed LLMs can make mistakes up to 45% of the time when used for news content<ref>https://www.bbc.co.uk/mediacentre/2025/new-ebu-research-ai-assistants-news-content</ref> and up to 20% when used for general purpose content<ref>https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2026/03/260317064452.htm</ref>. You should not be relying on LLMs to determine how Wikipedia articles are written or what categories are included (or not included). <b>GSK</b> <small>(talk ↗ • edits ↗)</small> 14:36, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
::: The administrator I asked for a second opinion has replied here ↗ if you're interested. <b>GSK</b> <small>(talk ↗ • edits ↗)</small> 14:40, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
::::Just to quickly summarize: yes, we are not going to the results of LLM to determine categories. And the relation between Irving and Burt, while not the major plot of the story, is a significant factor in Irving's character growth so this would make the show related to LGBT topic categories. M<span style="font-variant: small-caps">asem</span> (t ↗) 15:27, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
::::: Manticore, I have seen all episodes of Nip/Tuck ↗. Ava is in the second season and it is revealed she is male in the very last episode of that season. She appears also for a couple of episodes in the last season where it's not even mentioned anymore, so a casual viewer wouldn't even know since she is played by a real woman. A category "Series with LGBT characters" can be added or something like that, but not a full LGBT category because the show is not about that. That applies to all the edits that I did last night. --Batman tas (talk) 18:24, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
:::::: I'm not entirely sure why you're pinging Manticore, seeing as they have not contributed to this specific discussion, but it really doesn't matter whether you've seen something or not as that constitutes original research ↗, which is not accepted in articles. What would be the purpose of a new "Series with LGBT characters" category that the existing LGBT-related categories do not already solve? It sounds like you want to create more work for editors for no other purpose than you don't like LGBT-related media ↗ ({{tq|q=yes|if it was a LGBT show I wouldn't have watched it}}) If that is really the case, then simply don't edit in or pay attention to LGBT topics, but you're trying to solve a problem that doesn't actually exist. <b>GSK</b> <small>(talk ↗ • edits ↗)</small> 19:16, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
::::::: Because clearly we gonna need more people for this discussion. You can see our discussions on the pages of the series The Walking Dead and Entourage. LGBT-related show is a show where the main characters are homosexual and the main topic of the show is their problems related to LGBT. Like Queer as Folk and L Word. --Batman tas (talk) 19:42, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
::::::::I'll repeat what I said on Talk:The Boys (TV series) ↗: The categories are "LGBT-related", not "LGBT-themed". Assuming the purpose of these categories is to be able to find any shows with LGBT-related content, they should be there. :Category:LGBTQ-related comedy television series ↗ has :List of comedy television series with LGBTQ characters ↗ as a related link, so I think that supports this idea. Tduk (talk) 13:37, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
::::::::: Batman tas, your premise that Lieutenant Gruber on '''Allo 'Allo! ↗'' is straight because he is married to Helga in the last episode does not hold water. It was clearly implied that they are in a lavender marriage ↗, so he is gay.Radiohist (talk) 22:00, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
:::::::::: Radiohist, watch the whole epilogue again (the last ten minutes) and tell me which lines or action clearly implies it. --Batman tas (talk) 03:02, 13 May 2026 (UTC)
::::::::::: Batman tas Every moment of it. Just read what a lavender marriage ↗ is. There is also a reference for this - https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Series/AlloAllo Radiohist (talk) 20:43, 15 May 2026 (UTC)