User Talk: BobKilcoyne
Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.
Thank you
Just wanted to say thank you for adding Assemblies of Yahweh to the Bethel, Berks County, Pennsylvania ↗ page, although it was a few years back, it still was a pleasant surprise. Keep up the good work. In Citer (talk) 10:29, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
You're welcome - Happy Christmas. BobKilcoyne (talk) 10:41, 25 December 2019 (UTC)
Proposed deletion ↗ of :Menachem ↗
left|link=|alt=Notice|48px| ↗
The article :Menachem ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗ because of the following concern:
<blockquote>Superfluous article based upon an alternate (and less accurate) transliteration of the Hebrew name Menahem (disambiguation) ↗ {{lang|he|מנחם}}; both are acceptable (and mostly interchangeable) transliterations of the exact same name and should all be listed in one place.</blockquote>
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons ↗.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the article's talk page ↗.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion process ↗es exist. In particular, the speedy deletion ↗ process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> StonyBrook (talk) 01:26, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
Just to be clear, I am proposing that Menachem ↗ be eventually redirected to Menahem (disambiguation) ↗ after the entire list is moved. StonyBrook (talk) 01:26, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
Merger discussion for Menachem ↗
50px|frameless|left ↗ An article that you have been involved in editing—Menachem ↗—has been '''proposed for merging ↗''' with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion ↗. Thank you. StonyBrook (talk) 23:10, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
Daniel mundane
Hi Bob. The word "mundane" was being used in the sense of earthly rather than boring, but since you're not the first to object I'm happy to remove it. Achar Sva (talk) 09:02, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
:Thank you, Achar Sva. Actually, I thought the words "an account of the activities and visions of Daniel" should be retained as they provide a succinct and objective summary of the contents of the book, as well as the message. I agree about the message but I would balance this with the contents. - BobKilcoyne (talk) 04:51, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
::Ok, I've fixed that up now.Achar Sva (talk) 11:32, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Precious
{{user precious|header=Bible verses, psalms and business|thanks=for quality articles such as Stop Hate UK ↗, Economic and financial standing ↗, The Thistle and the Cedar ↗ and Termination for convenience ↗, for beginning some such as Jeremiah 43 ↗, for {{diff|Matthew 12|1008621662||expanding Bible verses}}, with exquisite edit summaries, - Bob,}}
You are recipient no. 2561 ↗ of Precious, a prize of QAI ↗. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:42, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
::Thank you for this, Gerda Arendt. -BobKilcoyne (talk) 07:07, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
List of OMB Circulars
Thank you -- this is an important list.
I had such an adverse experience trying to create the article "Executive_Order_12866 ↗" that I gave up trying to edit. Use this information if it floats your boat.
If I were still editing, I would add OMB Bulletins to the list? From https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/information-for-agencies/bulletins The ones whose lifetimes extends past a single fiscal year include --
Revised Delineations of Metropolitan Statistical Areas, Micropolitan Statistical Areas, and Combined Statistical Areas, and Guidance on Uses of Delineations of These Areas https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/Bulletin-20-01.pdf
OMB Bulletin No. 17-03, Audit Requirements for Federal Financial Statements, https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/whitehouse.gov/files/omb/memoranda/2008/audit_bulletin_2007_final_amended_v2_clean.pdf
Final Bulletin for Agency Good Guidance Practices, 72 Fed Reg 43432, https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2007-01-25/pdf/E7-1066.pdf https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/whitehouse.gov/files/omb/memoranda/2007/m07-07.pdf
Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/whitehouse.gov/files/omb/memoranda/2005/m05-03.pdf
Form and Content of Agency Financial Statements https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/bulletins_b01-09.pdf
Thank you.
Copying licensed material requires attribution
Hi. I see in a recent addition to :British government response to the COVID-19 pandemic ↗ you included material from a webpage that is available under a compatible Creative Commons Licence. That's okay, but you have to give attribution so that our readers are made aware that you copied the prose rather than wrote it yourself. It's also required under the terms of the license. I've added the attribution for this particular instance. Please make sure that you follow this licensing requirement when copying from compatibly-licensed material in the future. — Diannaa (talk) 21:05, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
:Diannaa, thanks for this but do you really think that the attribution needs to be added at the end of every line? This seems to me to be rather excessive. - BobKilcoyne (talk) 05:55, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
::Oh I see it now. You have an attribution template at the beginning of the citation, so one is not actually needed where I added it. Sorry for the mistake.— Diannaa (talk) 14:16, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
::Thanks - so which place would be best for the attribution, at '''the beginning of the citation''', after the fourth bullet point in this section, or somewhere else? - BobKilcoyne (talk) 16:51, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
:::The wording of the template you used indicates it's intended for use at the beginning of the citation. I had not seen this particular template before; that's why I didn't notice it there. The way I do it adds attribution at the end of the citation. Both are okay. — Diannaa (talk) 20:21, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
{{User QAIbox/auto|years=One}} --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:32, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
:Gerda Arendt, how kind of you. BobKilcoyne (talk) 16:12, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
:@Gerda Arendt Bigrichie44 (talk) 10:00, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
{{User QAIbox
| title = July songs
| image = Lady's mantle, Eberbach.jpg
| image_upright = 0.8
}}
:: Its a pleasure to watch your steady improvements of the psalms articles! (forgot to sign) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:12, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
:::Thank you! BobKilcoyne (talk) 06:05, 6 July 2022 (UTC)
Copyright problem: Martin Barnes (Engineer)
30px|link=|alt=Control copyright icon ↗ Hello BobKilcoyne! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Martin Barnes (Engineer) ↗, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted material from other websites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://www.apm.org.uk/news/a-tribute-to-apm-founder-dr-martin-barnes-cbe, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies ↗. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate your contributions, copying content from other websites is unlawful and against Wikipedia's copyright policy ↗. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are likely to lose their editing privileges ↗.
If you believe that the article is ''not'' a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:
- Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License ↗ (CC BY-SA 3.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:Martin Barnes (Engineer) ↗ and send an email with confirmation of permission to "[mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org {{nospam|permissions-en|wikimedia.org}}]". Make sure they quote the exact page name, '''Martin Barnes (Engineer)''', in their email. '''See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission ↗ for instructions.'''
- If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org {{nospam|permissions-en|wikimedia.org}}] ''or'' a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation ↗ permitting re-use ''under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License ↗ and GNU Free Documentation License ↗'', and note that you have done so on Talk:Martin Barnes (Engineer) ↗. '''See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials ↗ for instructions.'''
- If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "''under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License ↗ (CC BY-SA), version 3.0''", or that the work is ''released into the public domain'', or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Martin Barnes (Engineer) ↗ with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.
See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries ↗ for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.
Otherwise, you may rewrite this article from scratch. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [{{fullurl:Talk:Martin Barnes (Engineer)/Temp|action=edit&preload=Template:Copyvio/preload}} this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Martin Barnes (Engineer) ↗ saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.
Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing!<!-- Template:Nothanks-web --> You can view the overlap with the source webpage using Earwig's tool ↗.— Diannaa (talk) 14:16, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
:Diannaa, I have created a new version of this article at Talk:Martin Barnes (Engineer)/Temp ↗ without the texts highlighted as raising copyright issues. BobKilcoyne (talk) 03:36, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
::Thanks, I will look at it tomorrow.— Diannaa (talk) 03:50, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
:::Sorry but it's not ready yet. Please review the comparison using Earwig's tool ↗.— Diannaa (talk) 20:34, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
:::I've made some amendments, although they have had remarkably little impact on the Earwig's tool score. However, I'm on holiday now for two weeks and will not have much opportunity to revisit this until after Easter. - BobKilcoyne (talk) 04:53, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
Removal of maintenance template for List of Statutory Instruments of the United Kingdom, 2017
I've removed the wikilinks template that you added to the article List of Statutory Instruments of the United Kingdom, 2017 ↗, since I believe that there are a sufficient number of links to other pages on the article now. Please let me know if you have any objections to this, or still think there should be more links. Nabikunyoi (talk) 23:38, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
- Agreed, many thanks for this, also noted that a large number of links have been added to the 2016 ↗, 2019 ↗ and 2020 ↗ pages and the wikilinks template has been removed from these articles accordingly. - BobKilcoyne (talk) 03:02, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Contract theory (law) ↗ moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Contract theory (law) ↗, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable ↗, independent sources ↗. <small>(? ↗)</small> Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability ↗ is of central importance ↗ on Wikipedia). In addition, this article reads like an essay, so please review WP:NOTESSAY ↗. I've moved your draft to draftspace ↗ (with a prefix of "<code>Draft:</code>" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline ↗ and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. '''<span style="color:#536895;">Onel</span><span style="color:#ffb300;">5969</span>''' <sup><i style="color:blue">TT me</i></sup> 12:33, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
Glad you liked the edit to Canada Steamships article
My wife and I walked across part of Yorkshire, doing the coast-to-coast. Loved it! Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 00:37, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
{{User QAIbox/auto|years=Two}}
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:46, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
:Thank you, good to hear from you! BobKilcoyne (talk) 09:15, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Contract theory (law) ↗
25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, BobKilcoyne. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Contract theory (law) ↗, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted ↗, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it ↗ again or request ↗ that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted ↗ so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:03, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
Doha Declaration
Thank you for your work on the disambiguation page Doha Declaration ↗. Are you able to help fix ↗ the incoming links by diverting them to the correct article? Doha Declaration is currently our most mislinked ↗ disambiguation page. Certes (talk) 00:26, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
::Will do, BobKilcoyne (talk) 05:36, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
Welcome to the drive!
Welcome, welcome, welcome BobKilcoyne! I'm glad that you are joining the
drive ↗! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.
{{center|{{Clickable button 2|Special:RandomInCategory/All articles lacking sources|Fix a random page lacking sources|class=mw-ui-progressive}}|style=margin:1em}}CactiStaccingCrane (talk)18:40, 1 February 2024 UTC ↗ <span class="plainlinks" style="font-size:85%;">//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:BobKilcoyne&action=purge refresh ↗</span>{{small|via JWB and Geardona (talk to me?)}}
Invitation to join New pages patrol
<div style="border:2px solid #90C0FF; background:#F0F0FF; width:99%; padding:4px">
right|175px ↗
Hello BobKilcoyne!
- The New Pages Patrol ↗ is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
- We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting ↗.
- Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
- Kindly read the tutorial ↗ before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page ↗ with questions.
- If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider '''applying here''' ↗.
</div>
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:EN-Jungwon@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Coordination/Invite_list_3&oldid=1209520564 -->
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hi BobKilcoyne. Thank you for your work on Factors Act 1889 ↗. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol ↗ and left the following comment:
{{Bq|1=Thank you for creating the article! May you have a blessed day on the beginning of this year!}}
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|<nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>SunDawn<nowiki>}}</nowiki>}}. <small>(Message delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)</small><!-- Template:Sentnote-NPF -->
<span style="background-color:black; color:orange;">✠ SunDawn ✠</span> <span style="color:blue;"><span style="font-size:85%;">(contact)</span></span> 00:37, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
Thanks
Thanks for contributing on the Russian invasion of Ukraine page-move discussion. I hope you don't mind that I've moved your !vote to the correct section so that it is counted properly. FOARP (talk) 11:41, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
:Thank you, FOARP, much appreciated. BobKilcoyne (talk) 11:59, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
WikiProject Christianity
I was wondering if you are still interested in WikiProject Christianity ↗.
Please respond to this within a week if you are still interested in helping out. If you do not respond within a week you will be classified as inactive on the WikiProject member list. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con ↗ 19:43, 27 February 2025 (UTC)
:Yes. BobKilcoyne (talk) 04:40, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
::Ok great! I have a post on the project's planning page ↗ that you may want to check out. Sheriff U3 | Talk | Con ↗ 05:36, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
''Ichthus'' Special Edition
<!-- BANNER ACROSS TOP OF ISSUE -->
<table width="100%" cellpadding="5" cellspacing="10" style="border-style:ridge ; border-width:0.9px; border-color:#B621FE; background-image: linear-gradient(#0BA5BD,#583ADF)>
<td height='10' colspan='3'></td>
<td width='125'>220px ↗</td>
<td>
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span style="font-family: Bebas Neue ; color:#ffffff; font-size:30pt;text-align:center;"><p>{{underline|'''A Special Edition of'''}}</p></span>
<span style="font-family: Bebas Neue ; color:#ffffff; font-size:56pt;text-align:center;"><p>{{underline|'''<big>I</big>CHTHUS'''}}</p></span>
</div>
</td>
<td width='125'>120px|WikiProject Christianity ↗
<div style="font-family:Mate SC;font-size:15px;color:black;text-align:center;background-image: linear-gradient(to right, #ffdddd, #583ADF);">'''Special Edition'''</div>
</td>
</table>
<!-- LEFT-HAND SIDE -->
<div style="float:left; width:49%;">
{{large|'''Project Resurrection!'''}}<br>
<small>By FarmerUpbeat</small>
WikiProject Christianity is being revitalized! After an initiative led by Sheriff U3 to categorize participants as active or inactive, as well as organizing roles for those who are active, WP:X members are hopeful for the future of the project as we move into a new era. Any questions about this may be directed to Sheriff U3 ↗ as we move into this new era of the WikiProject!
WikiProject member
FarmerUpbeat has been selected as the new newsletter editor, and greets the readers of ''Ichthus'' with benedictions.
This has been a special edition of ''Ichthus'', official newsletter of WikiProject:Christianity. A '''full edition''' will come in April, stay tuned!
<!-- Article here -->
</div>
<!-- RIGHT-HAND SIDE -->
<div style="float:right; width:49%;">
{{large|'''Scripture Verse'''}}<br>
{{Blockquote
|text=Restore us, O LORD God of hosts; let your face shine, that we may be saved.
|author=Psalm 80:19 ↗, NRSVue
}}
<!-- Article here -->
{{large|'''Help wanted!'''}}<br>
We're looking for writers to contribute to ''Ichthus''. Do you have a project that you'd like to highlight? An issue that you'd like to bring to light? Post your inquiries or submission here ↗.
</div>
<div style="clear:both; width:100%;">
<!-- BOTTOM -->
-----
<div class="center"><small>''Ichthus'' is published by WikiProject Christianity ↗ • Get answers to questions about Christianity here ↗<br>Discuss any of the above stories here ↗ • For submissions contact the Newsroom ↗ • Unsubscribe here ↗<br>Delivered: 22:49, 5 March 2025 (UTC)</small></div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Queen of Hearts@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Christianity/Outreach/Full_content_delivery&oldid=1278301047 -->
Removal of the word 'Jesus'
Hello Bob, I noticed you removed the work 'Jesus' ↗ in one of the links for Christ in the Joseph Franklin Rutherford ↗ article. Was just wondering why. My thinking was that the name of Jesus should occur at least once in any article where Christianity is a topic, such that it is for the Rutherford article. Best, -- ''Gwillhickers'' (talk) 17:14, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
:Hi, ''Gwillhickers'', thanks for getting in touch. There are five references to Jesus in the body of the article. The first one refers to him as "Jesus Christ" and this wikilinks to the article Jesus ↗. The link I removed was in the citation for P.S.L. Johnson's ''The Present Truth and Herald of Christ's Epiphany'', where there is no need for a link. Have a good afternoon! BobKilcoyne (talk) 17:48, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
:::Oh my. Don't know how I missed all that. I suspect that when I typed in a search word I typed it wrong. Thanks for looking out. God Speed. -- ''Gwillhickers'' (talk) 18:41, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
:::No problem, take care! BobKilcoyne (talk) 18:51, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
{{User QAIbox/auto|years=Five}}
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:08, 21 March 2026 (UTC)
Copyright problem: Catholic lay organisations
30px|link=|alt=Control copyright icon ↗ Hello BobKilcoyne! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Catholic lay organisations ↗, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted material from other websites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from http://www.geocities.ws/lauho08/apostolate_of_the_laity_vatican_ii.html, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies ↗. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate your contributions, copying content from other websites is unlawful and against Wikipedia's copyright policy ↗. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are likely to lose their editing privileges ↗.
If you believe that the article is {{em|not}} a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:
- Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License ↗ (CC BY-SA 4.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:Catholic lay organisations ↗ and send an email with confirmation of permission to "[mailto:%70%65%72%6d%69%73%73%69%6f%6e%73%2d%65%6e%40%77%69%6b%69%6d%65%64%69%61%2e%6f%72%67 <span class="nowrap" style="color:#3365BA">permissions-en15px|@|link= ↗wikimedia.org</span>]". Make sure they quote the exact page name, '''Catholic lay organisations''', in their email. '''See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission ↗ for instructions.'''
- If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to [mailto:%70%65%72%6d%69%73%73%69%6f%6e%73%2d%65%6e%40%77%69%6b%69%6d%65%64%69%61%2e%6f%72%67 <span class="nowrap" style="color:#3365BA">permissions-en15px|@|link= ↗wikimedia.org</span>] ''or'' a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation ↗ permitting re-use ''under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License ↗ and GNU Free Documentation License ↗'', and note that you have done so on Talk:Catholic lay organisations ↗. '''See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials ↗ for instructions.'''
- If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "''under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License ↗ (CC BY-SA), version 4.0''", or that the work is ''released into the public domain'', or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Catholic lay organisations ↗ with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.
See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries ↗ for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.
Otherwise, you may rewrite this article from scratch. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [{{fullurl:Talk:Catholic lay organisations/Temp|action=edit&preload=Template:Copyvio/preload}} this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Catholic lay organisations ↗ saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.
Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing!<!-- Template:Nothanks-web --><span id="WhiteTailedEagle:1779042144860:User_talkFTTCLNBobKilcoyne" class="FTTCmt"> — 🦅<b style="color:#A0522D;">''White-tailed eagle''</b><sup style="color:#000000;">'''''Talk to the eagle'''''</sup><small>'''''Stalking eagle'''''</small> ↗ 18:22, 17 May 2026 (UTC)</span>
adding LLM generated text to articles
25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm Western Liberal for Life. An edit that you recently made to :Royal National Institute of Blind People ↗ seemed to be generated using a large language model ↗ (an "AI chatbot ↗" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is not allowed on Wikipedia ↗, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources ↗ and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted ↗. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or ask your questions at the Teahouse ↗, a friendly place for new users. The RNIB's "Out of Sight" campaign argues for greater priority to be attached to vision rehabilitation ↗ services.<ref>Visionary - Linking Local Sight Loss Charities, RNIB Out Of Sight Campaign ↗, updated on 21 March 2023, accessed on 24 April 2026</ref> An RNIB report published in 2025, ''Life on Pause'', used Freedom of Information Act ↗ requests for local authority data covering 2023/24 and found that over 80% of English local authorities had delays in starting assessments for visual rehabilitation and in one fifth of local authorities, people waited for more than one year before service provision began.<ref>Visionary - Linking Local Sight Loss Charities, Life on Pause report released ↗, published on 31 October 2025, accessed on 22 June 2026</ref>{{PAGENAME}} ↗<!-- Template:uw-ai1 -->
Proposed deletion ↗ of :Genesis 25 ↗
left|link=|alt=Notice|48px| ↗
The article :Genesis 25 ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗ because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''No references, not really a stub even, almost feels like a dab page.'''</blockquote>
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the article's talk page ↗.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion process ↗es exist. In particular, articles for deletion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion based on established criteria ↗.
If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion ↗ of the article at any time.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> WikipediholicRat (talk) 12:41, 1 July 2026 (UTC)