User Talk: Brian K. Tyler
Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.
Welcome!
{| style="background-color:#F5FFFA; padding:0;"
|class="MainPageBG" style="border:1px solid lightgrey; background-color:lightgrey; vertical-align:top; color:#000000; font-size:85%"|
{| style="width: 100%; padding: 0px; vertical-align:top; background-color:lavender; padding:0;"
! <div style="margin:0; background-color:white; font-family:sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:normal; border:1px solid lightgrey; text-align:left; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top:0.2em; padding-bottom:0.2em;">Hello, Brian K. Tyler! '''Welcome ↗ to Wikipedia!''' Thank you for your contributions ↗. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place '''<code>{{helpme}}</code>''' on your talk page ↗ and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name ↗ on talk pages by clicking link=Wikipedia:How to sign your posts|alt= ↗ or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted ↗" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject ↗ to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here ↗ for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary ↗ field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! J<small><small>ACKINTHE</small></small>B<small><small>OX</small></small> • <sup><small>TALK</small></sup> 04:55, 16 November 2018 (UTC)</div>
|}
{| width="100%" style="background-color:white;"
|class="MainPageBG" style="width: 55%; border:1px solid white; background-color:lightgrey; vertical-align:top"|
{| style="width: 100%; padding: 0px; vertical-align:top; background-color:Lavender"
! <div style="margin: 0; background-color:white; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid lightgrey; text-align:left; color:grey; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">Getting Started</div>
|-
|style="color:#000"|
- Contributing to Wikipedia ↗ • Tutorial ↗ • Your first article ↗
- The five pillars of Wikipedia ↗ • Simplified ruleset ↗
- How to: edit a page ↗ • upload an image ↗
! <div style="margin: 0; background:white; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid lightgrey; text-align:left; color:grey; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">Getting Help</div>
|-
| style="color:#000"|
- Frequently Asked Questions ↗
- Directories and indexes ↗
- Where to: ask questions ↗ • make requests ↗
- Tip of the day ↗
- Request administrator attention ↗
! <div style="margin: 0; background:white; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid lightgrey; text-align:left; color:grey; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">Policies and Guidelines</div>
|-
| style="color:#000"|
- Neutral point of view ↗ • Reliable sources ↗
- Verifiability ↗ • Citing sources ↗ • No original research ↗
- What Wikipedia is not ↗ • Biographies of living persons ↗
- Manual of Style ↗ (Simplified ↗) • Three-revert rule ↗
- Copyrights ↗ • Non-free content ↗ • Image use policy ↗
- External links ↗ • Spam ↗ • Vandalism ↗ • Sock puppetry ↗
- Deletion policy ↗ • Conflict of interest ↗ • Notability ↗
|}
|class="MainPageBG" style="width: 55%; border:1px solid lightgrey; background-color:Seashell; vertical-align:top"|
{| style="width: 100%; padding: 0px; vertical-align:top; background-color:Seashell"
! <div style="margin: 0; background-color:white; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid lightgrey; text-align:left; color:grey; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">The Community</div>
|-
|style="color:#000"|
- Community Portal ↗ • Adopt-a-user program ↗
- Assume good faith ↗ • Civility ↗ • Etiquette ↗
- No personal attacks ↗ • Resolving disputes ↗
- Build consensus ↗ • Village pump ↗
- IRC channels ↗ • Mailing lists ↗
- ''The Signpost'' (Wikipedia's newspaper) ↗
! <div style="margin: 0; background-color:white; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid lightgrey; text-align:left; color:grey; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">Things to do</div>
|-
|style="color:#000"|
- '''Be bold in editing ↗''' • Help develop an article ↗
- Maintenance ↗ • Peer review ↗ • Requested articles ↗
- Join a WikiProject ↗ • Translating articles ↗
- Cleaning up: General ↗ • Spam ↗ • Vandalism ↗
! <div style="margin: 0; background-color:white; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid lightgrey; text-align:left; color:grey; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">Miscellaneous</div>
|-
|style="color:#000"|
- Categories ↗ • Disambiguity ↗ • Stubs ↗
- User pages ↗ • Talk pages ↗
- Useful templates ↗ • Tools ↗ • User scripts ↗
|}
|}<!--Template:WelcomeMenu-->
Hey
Maybe you'd have more fun on Wikia. After all, they're not picky about verification and reliable sources and stuff like that. Drmies (talk) 03:00, 5 November 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Lego Movie 2: The Second Part ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shawn Patterson ↗ ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/The_Lego_Movie_2:_The_Second_Part check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/The_Lego_Movie_2:_The_Second_Part?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect ↗, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. <small>(Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.)</small>
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:55, 17 March 2020 (UTC)<p>
Thanks for the correction. Brian K. Tyler (talk) 04:23, 25 May 2020 (UTC)</p>
Disambiguation link notification for May 20
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Scoob! ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fred Jones ↗ ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Scoob%21 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Scoob%21?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 20 May 2020 (UTC)<p>
Thanks for the correction. Brian K. Tyler (talk) 04:23, 25 May 2020 (UTC)</p>
June 2020
25px|alt=Warning icon ↗ Please stop your disruptive editing ↗. If you continue to vandalize ↗ Wikipedia, as you did at :Scoob! ↗, you may be blocked from editing ↗. <!-- Template:uw-vandalism3 --> <span style="color:#7F00FF">'''Katniss'''</span> <span style="color:#FF007F"> ''May the odds be ever in your favor'' ♥</span> 15:27, 29 June 2020 (UTC)<p>
I’m Sorry. I only added at the name Crown to Brian’s last name once, because I thought it was more efficient to put in a character’s full name. I never meant to vandalize anything. Brian K. Tyler (talk) 00:39, 30 June 2020 (UTC)</p>
:Apologies then, some other IP addresses have been putting this in recently and I thought you and them were the same person. Generally, even if a character's last name is revealed in another series/film, if it's not revealed in the specific production, then it's not appropriate to add it to the credits on that article. He is not specifically called Brian Crown at all in this film, so best to leave it off. Cheers, <span style="color:#7F00FF">'''Katniss'''</span> <span style="color:#FF007F"> ''May the odds be ever in your favor'' ♥</span> 15:11, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 27
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Princess and the Frog ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter Bartlett ↗<!-- ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/The_Princess_and_the_Frog check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/The_Princess_and_the_Frog?client=notify fix with Dab solver])-->.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''2020 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2020|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2020|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
</td></tr>
</table>
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2020/Coordination/MMS/08&oldid=990308610 -->
December 2020
30px|alt=Stop icon ↗ You may be '''blocked from editing ↗ without further warning''' the next time you add unsourced ↗ material to Wikipedia, as you did at :Bob Bergen ↗. <!-- Template:uw-unsourced4 --> NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:23, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
January 2021
25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source ↗. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources ↗ and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-unsourced2 --> Magitroopa (talk) 20:29, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at :The SpongeBob SquarePants Movie ↗. Your edits appear to be disruptive ↗ and have been or will be reverted ↗.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute ↗ with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page ↗, and seek consensus ↗ with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution ↗ page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards ↗.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents ↗.
February 2021
30px|link= ↗ You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war ↗  according to the reverts you have made on :Rio 2 ↗; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate ↗ with others, to avoid editing disruptively ↗, and to try to reach a consensus ↗, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
# '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;'''
# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.'''
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page ↗ to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard ↗ or seek dispute resolution ↗. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection ↗. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be blocked ↗ from editing.''' <!-- Template:uw-ew --> 174.212.222.48 ↗ (talk) 01:38, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
:May you please just change it back the way it was? The villain Big Boss from Rio 2 was eaten by an anaconda. He did not escape unscathed. Brian K. Tyler (talk) 01:44, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
::Look, you've been here over a year. There's a welcome template at the top of the page and processes to use if you want to change an article. Your suppositions about how you are REQUIRED to interact with other editors are completely incorrect. I'd be more than happy to help you understand your errors, but hey, I'm just an IP. According to you, definitively a vandal. Good luck. 174.212.222.48 ↗ (talk) 01:58, 1 February 2021 (UTC)<p>
But why are you in favor of https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:2604:2D80:E506:F00:3D40:FED0:7AC:E559 ↗ anyway? Brian K. Tyler (talk) 02:39, 1 February 2021 (UTC)</p>
30px|alt=Stop icon ↗ You may be '''blocked from editing ↗ without further warning''' the next time you disrupt ↗ Wikipedia, as you did at :Rio 2 ↗. placing a protection template on an unprotected article is disruptive....but then again, so is edit warring.<!-- Template:uw-generic4 --> <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding unsigned ↗ comment added by 174.212.222.48 ↗ (talk) 02:51, 1 February 2021 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Hello Bryan! I disagree with your edits of (Rio2) As I saw in the movie, Big Boss runs away as Linda and Tulio chase him, and they fail to catch him. I saw no evidence of him being eaten by a snake, and cannot in good conscience allow a poor edit to stand. Hope we can resolve this to avoid any further edit warring and your being blocked. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding unsigned ↗ comment added by 2600:1014:B112:1659:CCC6:94B5:62E2:AAE2 ↗ (talk) 23:22, 1 February 2021 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--><p>
You want evidence? Here it is YouTube https://youtu.be/ifX8YX1oMH4}} </ ref> Brian K. Tyler (talk) 23:30, 1 February 2021 (UTC)</p>
Sorry Bryan, the link you have posted does not work. As I said I watched the movie recently and didn’t see anything resembling a snake eating a man. I am trying to be as courteous and respectful as possible.<p>
<ref> {{Cite web|url= https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ifX8YX1oMH4|title=Rare Villain Defeats: Big Boss|date=July 9, 2017|work=YouTube}}</ ref> Brian K. Tyler (talk) 23:39, 1 February 2021 (UTC)</p><p>
Check out "Rare Villain Deafeats: Big Boss" on YouTube. Brian K. Tyler (talk) 23:41, 1 February 2021 (UTC)</p>
I’m sorry Bryan, I don’t see a snake eating a person in that clip? Maybe I’m confused but could you clarify for me? Do we see a snake eat a person in the clip? Yes or no please<p>
It's not overly explicit because it's a family movie, but it's made clear that the snake ate the person, as he spit out the lollipop he had. Brian K. Tyler (talk) 23:44, 1 February 2021 (UTC)</p><p>
Yes Brian K. Tyler (talk) 23:45, 1 February 2021 (UTC)</p>
- "It's not overly explicit...it's made clear..."--pure original research. Please stop edit warring over that. This is an administrative warning: you are edit warring, editing against consensus, inserting what you yourself say is hypothetical. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 23:47, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
So the answer to my question is no. Are you trying to say it’s impossible to eat a lollipop without eating the person holding it? I’m sorry but I have not seen enough evidence to overturn my original position so far.<p>
The snake is wearing Big Boss's hat, and the lump on the snakes belly is him. So my answer is yes. Brian K. Tyler (talk) 23:49, 1 February 2021 (UTC)</p>
I’m going to go with Drmies here, he has reverted the article back to an acceptable revision done awhile ago by Movielover. Please stop edit warring about your hypothesis and against consensus.<p>
Very well then. As long as someone tries to follow the plot accordingly, I can try not to be engaged in an edit war. Brian K. Tyler (talk) 00:03, 2 February 2021 (UTC)</p>
I’m glad we could successfully resolve this! Good luck with your future editing and be well.
Okay, I would just like to clarify that if you look at the end of this clip {{Cite web |title=Rare Villain Defeats: Big Boss |url= https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ifX8YX1oMH4 |website=YouTube ↗ |access-date=July 9, 2017}}, you can see the snake’s bloated belly with Big Boss's hat on top, and the snake coughs up the lollipop Big Boss tried offering earlier, which clearly means the snake did indeed swallow him whole. If not, then what do you think actually happened? What do you see in this clip? Brian K. Tyler (talk) 01:02, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
No Brian, this is the same argument you made before, as you can see from the thread before this and Drmies said it was insufficient along with being Original Research. It appears with Drmies and several other editors there is a clear consensus here that the snake did not eat anyone. I’m glad we could resolve this again, happy editing.
And JeffUK said that “ Original Research” is absent of any sensible objection or engagement, so the edit I made was base on what actually happened in the movie. If you would just take another look at the clip. Brian K. Tyler (talk) 05:21, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
{{reflist-talk}}
Disambiguation link notification for April 16
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited [[The Lego Batman Movie ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shawn Patterson ↗<!-- ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/The_Lego_Batman_Movie check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/The_Lego_Batman_Movie?client=notify fix with Dab solver])-->.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Go do your homework on how the Walt Disney Company actually functions
Just reverted your edits. Sounds like you haven't spent enough time in Burbank or Glendale, or following the animation industry or the various news sites like AWN, Cartoon Brew, Animation Magazine, and the old Animation Guild blog (I'm not referring to the current one, which is terrible). Disney Animation is the flagship studio that in theory makes brilliant art that also just happens to tell nice stories, brings in big bucks at the box office, and moves merchandise. DTVA and DisneyToon have historically been cash grabs to squeeze more money out of the IP cooked up by Disney Animation. In other words, when the first-tier artists at Disney Animation in Burbank get bored after creating a particular big-budget film that evolves into a franchise, the franchise gets tossed over the fence and then the second-tier artists in Glendale take over to do the lower-budget direct-to-video sequels and television shows. --Coolcaesar (talk) 18:29, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
May 2021
<!--Template:uw-imdb !-->
25px ↗ Hello. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to Jeff Bennett ↗ have been removed because you cited the information you added to IMDb ↗. As discussed at WP:RS/IMDb ↗, IMDb is considered a questionable source, and generally should not be used as a sole reference. You are welcome to re-add the information using a different reliable source, or with an additional source confirming the information from IMDb. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page ↗. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 14:02, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
<div class="user-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #ffefd5; min-height: 40px">40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock ↗<div style="margin-left:45px">You have been '''blocked ↗''' from editing for a period of '''31 hours''' for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons ↗ policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions ↗. </div><div style="margin-left:45px">If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks ↗, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:00, 27 May 2021 (UTC)</div></div><!-- Template:uw-bioblock -->
I'd like to apologize. I honestly thought that if IMDb is not a reliable source, than the Anime News Network might be. But I see now that neither of the are because both sites are where active contributions are made. I promise I will not make another citation link of an unreliable source for a person's biography again. Brian K. Tyler (talk) 02:37, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
: If you don't know whether a source is reliable, you can ask at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard ↗. If you have trouble identifying reliable sources, you should probably stick to newspapers, such as ''The New York Times''. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:47, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Adding a pirate video game website as a reference is not a WP:RS ↗. They have all been removed. Please take the above advice and use the Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard ↗ to learn about appropriate reference sources. Notfrompedro (talk) 21:27, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
September 2021
25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia ↗. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing ↗ other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring ↗" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process ↗, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus ↗ on the talk page ↗.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges ↗ on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring ↗. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule ↗, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-ewsoft --> '''<span style="color:#8b00ff;">Eve</span><span style="color:#6528c2;">rgr</span><span style="color:#3f5184;">een</span><span style="color:#197947;">Fir</span>''' (talk) 22:04, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
I would like to request a protection template for the Daffy Duck ↗ and Tweety ↗ articles, please. Brian K. Tyler (talk) 07:58, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
November, 2021
Could someone please help. I am having disagreements with anonymous users on the projects and timelines Jeff Bergman ↗ voiced Tweety ↗ in, and I’ve doing research as carefully as I could. I tried to reason with these editor, but they seem to totally disregard my reasoning and what I have requested (please to do not revert back to "present" unless you have found another production that came or is set to come after 2018) I would like to have a protection template on the Tweety article and have it last longer. Brian K. Tyler (talk) 20:42, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
:IP editor is not adding any edit summary nor are they responding on your talk page request. So, first you need to stop reverting. Repeated reverts like that are not good behavior. Then ask for protection here ↗. Hemanthah (talk) 09:13, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''2021 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2021|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2021|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 23 November 2021 (UTC)</small>
</td></tr>
</table>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2021/Coordination/MM/07&oldid=1056563443 -->
Disambiguation link notification for November 24
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
:Bugs Bunny ↗<!-- ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Bugs_Bunny check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Bugs_Bunny?client=notify fix with Dab solver])-->
::added a link pointing to Variety ↗
:Daffy Duck ↗<!-- ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Daffy_Duck check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Daffy_Duck?client=notify fix with Dab solver])-->
::added a link pointing to Variety ↗
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
November 2021
25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm Denisarona. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, :Sylvester the Cat ↗, but you didn't provide a reliable source ↗. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation ↗ and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners ↗. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-unsourced1 --> Denisarona (talk) 06:45, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Please do not add or change content, as you did at :Foghorn Leghorn ↗, without citing a reliable source ↗. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources ↗ and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-unsourced2 --> Denisarona (talk) 06:45, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 1
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Marvin the Martian cartoons ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eric Goldberg ↗<!-- ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/List_of_Marvin_the_Martian_cartoons check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/List_of_Marvin_the_Martian_cartoons?client=notify fix with Dab solver])-->.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 1 December 2021 (UTC)
December 2021
30px|alt=Stop icon ↗ You may be '''blocked from editing ↗ without further warning''' the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced ↗ material to Wikipedia, as you did at :Disney Sing-Along Songs ↗. <!-- Template:uw-unsourced4 --> - <span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS"><span style="color:#800000">'''FlightTime'''</span> <small>(<span style="color:#1C0978">'''open channel'''</span>)</small></span> 21:52, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Pete voice
The source you added is not reliable enough. It also states that Bletcher voiced Pete in the Klondike Kid but we know that is not likely true. The authors are just assuming that he did. LittleJerry (talk) 00:55, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
You need to see these shorts yourself, and please do not disrespect who are clearly professional book publishers. Brian K. Tyler (talk) 01:01, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Please engage in the discussion and don't edit war. The book you cited also stated that Bletcher voiced Pete in the Klondike Kid. Why did you randomly choose the Mail Pilot as the first short that Bletcher voiced Pete? You could have easy chosen the Klondike Kid or Building a Building. LittleJerry (talk) 01:09, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
The published book and IMDb among others confirm Billy Bletcher voiced Pete in "The Mail Pilot". As for these others that came before "Shanghaied", the credits seem to vary between Bletcher and Pinto Colvig. Brian K. Tyler (talk) 01:16, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
WP:RFPP ↗
You are filing repeated meritless reports at RFPP. Stop it, or you risk being blocked for abuse of process.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:52, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
I'm really sorry about that. It's just that I’ve been seeing a lot of unsourced and unnecessary edits from an IP editor that wouldn’t even explain why makes these edits, and I fear that the editor might be engaging in an edit war. I will try to make a valid report on this on the proposed articles pages if this actually happens next time. Thank you. Brian K. Tyler (talk) 07:58, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
January 2022
25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Thank you for your contributions ↗ to Wikipedia. In your recent edit to :Shrek Forever After ↗, you added links ↗ to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links ↗ to avoid overlinking. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-linking --> DonIago (talk) 17:26, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
Short description fields
Please keep in mind that the Short description ↗ field should be limited to 40 characters or less when possible. You are hitting a lot of articles and extending this field unnecessarily. --GoneIn60 (talk) 13:22, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
''Shrek'' articles
25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Every few months, you come back and insert "fantasy" as a genre for ''Shrek ↗'' as seen here ↗ and here ↗. Please stop doing this. As a reference, you can view what I posted about the genres here: Talk:Shrek (franchise)#Primary genre across the franchise ↗. Only "comedy" is the common genre reported across various sources. If you think this needs further discussion, please take it to the talk page of the franchise article. Thank you. --GoneIn60 (talk) 16:24, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
August 2022
25px|alt=Warning icon ↗ Please stop your disruptive editing ↗. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced ↗ content, as you did at :Wile E. Coyote and the Road Runner ↗, you may be blocked from editing ↗. ''A TV show credits box on a small Christian review site is not a reliable source for someone's voice acting career.''<!-- Template:uw-unsourced3 --> Lord Belbury (talk) 09:06, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
August 2022
Please bring present back for Tweety and Daffy Duck which is Jeff Bergman's part and removed Bob Bergen's part as Tweety. 166.182.252.240 ↗ (talk) 23:39, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
Brian I get that, I did saw from my other page that you show me last night, but I'm not here for that, Brian K Tyler please bring present back for Tweety and Daffy Duck which Jeff Bergman's part and removed Bob Bergen's part as Tweety, you did say that Bob Bergen can do Tweety up into 31 years from 1990-2021 since it was the was the last tine Bob Bergen voiced Tweety was Space Jam a New legacy premiered before Jeff Bergman and Eric Bauza took over the role of Tweety. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding unsigned ↗ comment added by 166.182.248.219 ↗ (talk) 19:05, 30 August 2022 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Jeff Bergman took over for what again? <ref name="Daffy Duck at BTVA">{{cite web|url=http://www.behindthevoiceactors.com/characters/Looney-Tunes/Daffy-Duck/|title=Voice(s) of Daffy Duck|website=Behind the Voice Actors|language=en-US|access-date=2013-01-10}}</ref> <ref name="Tweety Bird at BTVA">{{cite web|url=https://www.behindthevoiceactors.com/characters/Looney-Tunes/Tweety-Bird/ |title=Tweety Bird Voices (Looney Tunes) |work=Behind The Voice Actors |via=www.behindthevoiceactors.com |access-date=March 20, 2021 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210320175538/https://www.behindthevoiceactors.com/characters/Looney-Tunes/Tweety-Bird/ |archive-date=March 20, 2021}}</ref> Brian K. Tyler (talk) 19:31, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
{{reflist-talk}}
August 2022
Brian I'm sorry this is just my opinion and you take it way too seriously to understand that Jeff Bergman is still the voicing Tweety and Daffy Duck alternating with Eric Bauza for productions and projects, it was not the last time Bergman voiced Tweety and Daffy Duck before or after 2018 or in 2018 or even the Warner Bros World Abu Dhabi aka the Ani-mayhem attraction premired, please I'm trying to be nice to you, I want to bring back the present for Daffy Duck and Tweety which is Jeff Bergman's part and removed present from Bob Bergen's part as Tweety since you want to stick with at least Two or three of the most recent productions and projects in order say, but you can't do that to Jeff Bergman like that. But here's the thing, I'm trying to be nice to you Brian K Tyler but yet again you still take it way too seriously to understand and it makes me so upset that you wanted to go to a different direction which makes me so mad that you wanted to ruin everyone careers, I am trying to tell you Brian K Tyler is just please be a respectful person and stop making it so difficult to make me and other people on Wikipedia mad about you. You did said Bob Bergen can still voice Tweety as he did for 31 years up to Space Jam a New legacy, You should've removed Bob Bergen's part as Tweety since Bob Bergen Hasn't Reportedly voiced Tweety since 2021 after Space Jam a New legacy released before Jeff Bergman and Eric Bauza respectively took over the role of Tweety, I really think we should just stick with what at least two current voice actors for Daffy Duck Jeff Bergman and Eric Bauza for the most recent productions and projects and two current voice actors for Tweety Jeff Bergman and Eric Bauza for the most recent productions and projects in order say since Bob Bergen (while still playing Porky Pig) Hasn't reportedly voiced Tweety since 2021 with Space Jam a New legacy Before Jeff Bergman and Eric Bauza respectively took over the role of Tweety. If there really is more Bergen did afterward, please find a reliable source and create a citation link. Brian K. Tyler, I'm trying to be nice to you is just bring present back for Tweety and Daffy Duck which is Jeff Bergman's part and removed Bob Bergen's part as Tweety, if you want bring the present back for Tweety and Daffy Duck which is Jeff Bergman roles and removed Bob Bergen role as Tweety or if you don't want to bring back the present for Daffy Duck and Tweety which is Jeff Bergman roles and removed Bob Bergen role as Tweety, trying to be nice to you Brian K Tyler just don't make me angry or sad just be a respectful person to me and many other people on Wikipedia to respect me to starting to like you, please think this through your head and make the right choice. 166.182.248.227 ↗ (talk) 00:23, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
I’m sorry, and I don't mean any disrespect, but the three most recent projects that Tweety appeared in are
- ''Space Jam: A New Legacy ↗'' (2021), voiced by Bob Bergen
- ''King Tweety'' (2022), voiced by Eric Bauza
- ''Bugs Bunny Builders ↗'' (2022), voiced by Eric Bauza
And according to Behind the Voice Actors ↗ Jeff Bergman hasn’t reported voiced Tweety<ref name="Tweety Bird at BTVA">{{cite web|url=https://www.behindthevoiceactors.com/characters/Looney-Tunes/Tweety-Bird/ |title=Tweety Bird Voices (Looney Tunes) |work=Behind The Voice Actors |via=www.behindthevoiceactors.com |access-date=March 20, 2021 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210320175538/https://www.behindthevoiceactors.com/characters/Looney-Tunes/Tweety-Bird/ |archive-date=March 20, 2021}}</ref> or Daffy Duck <ref name="Daffy Duck at BTVA">{{cite web|url=http://www.behindthevoiceactors.com/characters/Looney-Tunes/Daffy-Duck/|title=Voice(s) of Daffy Duck|website=Behind the Voice Actors|language=en-US|access-date=2013-01-10}}</ref> in anything released this year, or last year, or this whole decade as of yet. So I’m afraid I don’t yet have a reason to bring “present” back to Bergman’s credits back to the Daffy Duck and Tweety articles. Brian K. Tyler (talk) 05:24, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
I'm sorry Brian K Tyler for being a complete jerk to you, I'm trying to be nice to you is just bring present back for Tweety and Daffy Duck articles which is Jeff Bergman roles and removed Bob Bergen's role as Tweety. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding unsigned ↗ comment added by 166.182.252.48 ↗ (talk) 16:46, 31 August 2022 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
How about we wait until the full cast of ''Tiny Toons Looniversity'', ''Tweety Mysteries'', or ''Bye Bye Bunny: A Looney Tunes Musical'' (if it ever does get released) is announced, and we'll see. Brian K. Tyler (talk) 16:55, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
Please Don't make me mad, I warning you to bring the present back for Tweety and Daffy Duck articles which is Jeff Bergman roles and removed Bob Bergen's role as Tweety. But your right, well have to wait and see about that.
If not, you still continue to be lazy. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding unsigned ↗ comment added by 166.182.250.225 ↗ (talk) 22:46, 31 August 2022 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Brian, trying to be nice to you to not make me mad, I am still warning you to bring the present back for Tweety and Daffy Duck articles which is Jeff Bergman roles and removed Bob Bergen's role as Tweety, I'm just saying Brian but your right well have to wait and see about. Please don't make me upset and please don't make me mad. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding unsigned ↗ comment added by 166.182.87.3 ↗ (talk) 21:28, 5 September 2022 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:OK, I think you've overstepped the mark. As much as I have issues with Brian and his "research methods" (such as they are), THAT was uncalled for. Calling someone a Lesbian just because they are somewhat obstinate? First off, what year is this? Second, how is that even relevant? Third, it frankly says an awful lot more about you than it does of Brian. If you want to criticise someone for sloppy work, fine, but don't resort to ridiculous (and, frankly, slanderous) namecalling. Oh, and Brian... just take the feedback when it's given the first time. Don't drag things out like this. It's what's got you into trouble before. 2A02:C7F:D07:8000:999E:91E7:CB06:5A16 ↗ (talk) 23:30, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
I’m only a “coward” if I give in to these tauntings, which I will not. Brian K. Tyler (talk) 22:17, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
: http://www.behindthevoiceactors.com/characters/Looney-Tunes/Daffy-Duck/ https://www.behindthevoiceactors.com/characters/Looney-Tunes/Tweety-Bird/
: Brian please bring Back present for Jeff Bergman’s Part as Tweety And Daffy Duck and Removed Bob Bergen’s part as Tweety. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding unsigned ↗ comment added by 2604:BFC0:101:FD31:E584:8F05:E889:A7A6 ↗ (talk) 02:14, 5 November 2022 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
{{reflist-talk}}
Brian I'm sorry
Brian I'm sorry I got you so extremely mad about bringing back present for Tweety and Daffy Duck articles for Jeff Bergman's part as Tweety and Daffy Duck and removed Bob Bergen's part as Tweety since you don't care about bringing back present back for Tweety and Daffy Duck. Brian, you really think you want to just stick with Two current voice actors for Tweety Bob Bergen and Eric Bauza and one current voice actor for Daffy Duck Eric Bauza? 166.182.251.130 ↗ (talk) 19:35, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
:Well, I am just following what two or three of the most recent productions say, and personally, I do think two alternate current voice actors for one character is enough. Besides, I don't mean any disrespect for Jeff Bergman. After all, from what I've researched, he is still voicing Sylvester, Foghorn Leghorn, and Elmer Fudd in the evidently still running ''Looney Tunes Cartoons ↗'' and ''Bugs Bunny Builders ↗'' (the latter of which Elmer has not yet appeared in to my knowledge). And he is set to voice Bugs Bunny again in the up coming ''Tiny Toons Looniversity ↗''. All the other Looney Tunes characters he's played, I'm not too sure. Brian K. Tyler (talk) 19:52, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
: Brian no hard feelings, but you don't need to repeat the same word I am just following what two or three of the most productions say, now I'm not trying to be a stupid Idiot here, but I personally think three alternate current voice actors for Tweety Jeff Bergman Bob Bergen and Eric Bauza is enough to do one character and Two alternate current voice actors for Daffy Duck Jeff Bergman and Eric Bauza is enough to do one character. Brian I'm sorry that is just my opinion and whether you like it or not Jeff Bergman is still voicing Tweety and Daffy Duck alternating with Bob Bergen and Eric Bauza for productions and projects. So what do you think about that? <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding unsigned ↗ comment added by 166.182.251.130 ↗ (talk) 20:29, 5 December 2022 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Brian are you going to respond? Considered you to bring the present back for Tweety and Daffy Duck articles which is Jeff Bergman's part as Tweety and Daffy Duck and removed Bob Bergen's part as Tweety. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding unsigned ↗ comment added by 166.182.251.130 ↗ (talk) 22:59, 5 December 2022 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:Why? Brian K. Tyler (talk) 23:03, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
See Brian, not trying to be stupid Idiot to you, but I personally think three alternate current voice actors for Tweety Jeff Bergman Bob Bergen and Eric Bauza should be enough for one character and Two alternate current voice actors for Daffy Duck Jeff Bergman and Eric Bauza should be enough for one character. Brian if you don't like it that's fine. All I want from you to bring back the present back for Tweety and Daffy Duck articles which is Jeff Bergman part as Tweety and Daffy Duck removed Bob Bergen's part as Tweety since Bob Bergen Hasn't Reportedly voiced Tweety since Space Jam a New legacy premiered before Jeff Bergman and Eric Bauza respectively took over the role of Tweety. Brian it is just my opinion whether you like or not Jeff Bergman is still voicing Tweety and Daffy Duck alternating with Bob Bergen and Eric Bauza. If you don't you give Jeff Bergman's part as Tweety and Daffy Duck and removed Bob Bergen's part as Tweety maybe you need to be respectful to Jeff Bergman and Jeff Bergman's characters more not disrespecting Jeff Bergman and Jeff Bergman's characters so much. Look I'm very sorry this is just my opinion and if you don't like my opinion and directions to change it back to the way it was that's fine and since you want to stick with Two Main current voice actors for Tweety Bob Bergen and Eric Bauza and One main current voice actor for Daffy Duck Eric Bauza and you think Jeff Bergman hasn't reportedly voiced Tweety and Daffy Duck in while and you probably don't like Jeff Bergman's Characters Tweety and Daffy Duck which is your opinion and directions to remain the same to what it is That's Fine, however whether you and I agree or disagree from your opinion or my opinion whether you like or not Jeff Bergman can still do the voice of Tweety AND Daffy Duck For productions and projects. Brian, whether I like your opinion or not I just don't care anymore I just don't like your opinion and directions to remain the same what it is which is not the best choice for me to agree or disagree with you. If you don't want Jeff Bergman voiced Tweety and Daffy Duck anymore why are you being so nervous about Bringing back present for Tweety and Daffy Duck which is Jeff Bergman's part and removed Bob Bergen's part? Brian I really want to know the whole truth are you trying to believe That Jeff Bergman is really too old to voiced Tweety and Daffy Duck? Considered your being too harsh on Jeff Bergman characters so much why are you hating Jeff Bergman characters so much it is because he's too old to voiced Tweety and Daffy Duck? We All WANT To Know The Truth Brian? <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding unsigned ↗ comment added by 166.182.251.130 ↗ (talk) 00:24, 6 December 2022 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:Do you think Dee Bradley Baker is still voicing Daffy, or that Billy West is still voicing Elmer Fudd, or that Jeff Bergman is still voicing Pepe Le Pew? Brian K. Tyler (talk) 06:51, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
: Brian I don't care I want to know the truth is why you are disrespecting Jeff Bergman and Jeff Bergman's characters. Look I don't care about Dee Bradley Baker or Billy West voicing characters, All we really want to know the truth is why did you removed Jeff Bergman's part as Tweety and Daffy Duck and You just wanted to stick with Two Main current voice actors for Tweety Bob Bergen and Eric Bauza and one current voice actor for Daffy Duck Eric Bauza. Are You Saying That Jeff Bergman is too old to voiced Tweety and Daffy Duck since you considering these two as their replacement? Are you trying to disrespect Jeff Bergman characters? That's all I want to Know? <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding unsigned ↗ comment added by 166.181.87.15 ↗ (talk) 15:26, 6 December 2022 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Brian do you really want to disrespect Jeff Bergman's characters and Jeff Bergman so much? Considered you don't want to bring back the present for Daffy Duck and Tweety articles which is Jeff Bergman's part as Daffy Duck and Tweety and removed Bob Bergen's part as Tweety. Oh Here's the real question do you really hate me? Do you really don't like my opinion and directions to change it back to present for Tweety and Daffy Duck articles which is Jeff Bergman's part and removed Bob Bergen's part as Tweety? Please Reply or Respond Brian. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding unsigned ↗ comment added by 166.182.80.32 ↗ (talk) 18:53, 6 December 2022 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:I still need evidence as to what Jeff Bergman voiced Daffy Duck or Tweety in after Space Jam: A New Legacy. And no, I am not disrespecting Jeff Bergman. Brian K. Tyler (talk) 20:19, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Brian I get that, but here's the truth yes you are disrespecting Jeff Bergman and Jeff Bergman's characters. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding unsigned ↗ comment added by 166.182.80.32 ↗ (talk) 20:32, 6 December 2022 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:Well, are you respecting Bob Bergen? Brian K. Tyler (talk) 21:26, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
: Brian no hard feelings I still love Bob Bergen but he hasn't reportedly voiced Tweety since Space Jam a New legacy premiered before Jeff Bergman and Eric Bauza respectively took over the role of Tweety. Brian K Tyler are you saying that Jeff Bergman is too old to voiced Tweety and Daffy Duck? <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding unsigned ↗ comment added by 166.182.80.32 ↗ (talk) 22:17, 6 December 2022 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
::Well, maybe, but that really isn't up to either of us, is it? It's more up to studio executives. And like I said, I’m just following what at least three of the most recent productions say, and people generally don't pay as much attention to theme park attractions and commercials as they do to films, television programs, and video games. Brian K. Tyler (talk) 22:35, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
: So are you saying that you don't like Jeff Bergman's Tweety and Daffy Duck voices? <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding unsigned ↗ comment added by 166.182.80.32 ↗ (talk) 22:55, 6 December 2022 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
::Of course I’m not saying that. I'm just saying that from what I've researched, it's been four years since he's reportedly voiced either character. And while ''Space Jam: A New Legacy'' was Bergen's latest role as Tweety, it's only been one year. So how do you know Bergman is still voicing Daffy Duck and Tweety? Brian K. Tyler (talk) 23:09, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Brian your so call researched doesn't work out for me to understand you and yes Jeff Bergman is still voicing Tweety and Daffy Duck alternating with Eric Bauza for productions and projects.
Brian is Bob Bergen still doing Tweety in Bugs Bunny Builders? I haven't Heard Bob Bergen voiced Tweety Since Space Jam a New legacy premiered before Jeff Bergman and Eric Bauza respectively took over the role of Tweety. Bob Bergen did the voice of Tweety for 31 years That's why was his last time voicing Tweety, it's only been one year since he did the last time Bergen voice him. I've been Wondering should Bob Bergen's credited role of Tweety be changed from 1990-present to simply 1990-2021? <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding unsigned ↗ comment added by 166.182.80.32 ↗ (talk) 00:17, 7 December 2022 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:Well, sir/ma’am, if you don’t agree with my research and I don’t agree with yours, then you and I have nothing to say to each other. Brian K. Tyler (talk) 00:29, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
I knew it, you don't agree to me about bringing back present back for Tweety and Daffy Duck articles which is Jeff Bergman's part as Tweety and Daffy Duck and removed Bob Bergen's part as Tweety? You Really Don't Cared about Bringing back present for Tweety and Daffy Duck which is Jeff Bergman roles and removed Bob Bergen's part as Tweety, unfortunately Bob Bergen Hasn't Reportedly voiced Tweety since Space Jam a New legacy premiered before Jeff Bergman and Eric Bauza respectively took over the role of Tweety, I have been Wondering should Bob Bergen's credited role of Tweety be changed from 1990-present to simply 1990-2021? You should stick with my opinion and research. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding unsigned ↗ comment added by 166.182.80.32 ↗ (talk) 16:51, 7 December 2022 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Please respond this question from yesterday Brian. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding unsigned ↗ comment added by 166.182.248.13 ↗ (talk) 16:55, 8 December 2022 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:Unless there’s evidence of what Jeff Bergman voiced Daffy Duck and Tweety in during or after ''Looney Tunes Cartoons'' and/or ''Space Jam: A New Legacy'', I don't see any reason to. Brian K. Tyler (talk) 17:39, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
Brian we don't care just bring present back for Tweety and Daffy Duck articles which is Jeff Bergman's part as Tweety and Daffy Duck and removed Bob Bergen's part as Tweety. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding unsigned ↗ comment added by 166.182.86.131 ↗ (talk) 00:23, 9 December 2022 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Brian please respond this question from last night. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding unsigned ↗ comment added by 166.182.249.2 ↗ (talk) 16:50, 9 December 2022 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
Again please respond this question from last night unless, you don't care about bringing back present back for Tweety and Daffy Duck articles which is Jeff Bergman's part as Tweety and Daffy Duck and removed Bob Bergen's part as Tweety. Brian do you really hate Jeff Bergman's Tweety and Daffy Duck voices? <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding unsigned ↗ comment added by 166.182.255.36 ↗ (talk) 23:59, 9 December 2022 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:I just told you before, no, I don't hate them. But evidence is evidence. Brian K. Tyler (talk) 00:05, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
Yes you still hate Jeff Bergman's Tweety and Daffy Duck voices Brian you are a lair.
::::{{caution|Please remember to assume good faith ↗ and refrain from personal attacks ↗ on other editors as that is considered a specie of disruptive editing ↗. Thank you... -Ad Orientem (talk) 18:36, 10 December 2022 (UTC)}}
::Unless, maybe… you think because the actors in question are still reportedly with the Looney Tunes franchise that they could play any of their characters at any time? Even ones that they haven't played in over three/four years? Brian K. Tyler (talk) 00:07, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
Here's another one for you it's not been three or four years Jeff Bergman has been doing the voice of Tweety AND Daffy Duck as of 2022 and going into 2023 alternating with Bob Bergen and Eric Bauza for productions and projects please Brian bring present back for Tweety and Daffy Duck articles which is Jeff Bergman's part as Tweety and Daffy Duck and removed Bob Bergen's part as Tweety. Please Follow My Research You Mark? Considered My apologies to you Mr Brian K Tyler if you don't want to take my direction and Options about bringing back present back for Tweety and Daffy Duck articles which is Jeff Bergman's part as Tweety and Daffy Duck and removed Bob Bergen's part as Tweety your still going to get your way saying that Jeff Bergman is too old to voiced Tweety and Daffy Duck and keeping your direction thinking two current voice actors for Tweety Bob Bergen and Eric Bauza and one current voice actor for Daffy Duck Eric Bauza would be your opinion to work to many people on Wikipedia, however whether you and I agree or disagree we don't care since you want to remain the same to what it is on both articles you are telling everyone on Wikipedia and saying oh well Jeff Bergman is no longer doing both Tweety and Daffy Duck maybe I want to just stick with Two Voice Actors for Tweety which is your opinion Bob Bergen and Eric Bauza and one voice actor for Daffy Duck which is your other opinion Eric Bauza? are you saying that you don't like Jeff Bergman's Tweety and Daffy Duck since you consider these two as their replacement? Brian Do you really want removed Jeff Bergman's characters? Considered you just want to stick at least two or three of the most recent productions and projects as it says with Bob Bergen's Tweety and Eric Bauza' s Tweety and Eric Bauza' s Daffy Duck? Are you putting these two over Jeff Bergman's Tweety and Daffy Duck Characters? Please Reply or respond Brian and I'm sorry or don't be sorry your driving me crazy.
Brian please respond this question from last night? Considered your so busy making errors on every articles but yet again you are still disrespecting Jeff Bergman like he's too old to voiced Tweety and Daffy Duck which is complete bull. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding unsigned ↗ comment added by 166.182.250.197 ↗ (talk) 15:55, 11 December 2022 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:I just want this conversation to end. Brian K. Tyler (talk) 18:09, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
:Brian we are not going to end this conversation until you bring present back for Tweety and Daffy Duck articles which is Jeff Bergman's part as Tweety and Daffy Duck and removed Bob Bergen's part as Tweety and stop disrespecting Jeff Bergman and his characters. Brian I'm sorry and I apologize for you since you don't care about me. Did you really want removed Jeff Bergman's characters? <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding unsigned ↗ comment added by 166.182.250.31 ↗ (talk) 22:14, 11 December 2022 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
::@162 182... Enough. Brian has indulged this endless badgering ↗ for months. It's time for you to drop the stick ↗ and move on. Your behavior has ceased to be constructive and this needs to stop. Thank you. -Ad Orientem (talk) 23:08, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
Ad Orientem I do apologize for attacking Brian, he's still going to own me apologize for attacking me as well, that Brian needs to bring bring present back for Tweety and Daffy Duck articles which is Jeff Bergman's part and removed Bob Bergen's part as Tweety since Bob Bergen Hasn't Reportedly voiced Tweety since Space Jam a New legacy premiered one year ago before both Jeff Bergman and Eric Bauza respectively took over the role of Tweety. So are you happy that I apologize to Brian K Tyler? <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding unsigned ↗ comment added by 166.182.250.31 ↗ (talk) 23:44, 11 December 2022 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:You need to stop posting on Brian's talk page unless he specifically tells you otherwise. This is not a constructive discussion and hasn't been for some time. This is borderline harassment. See the linked guidelines in my previous comment. You should regard this as a formal {{warnsign}}. -Ad Orientem (talk) 00:20, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
:I Don't know what to say? <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding unsigned ↗ comment added by 166.182.83.50 ↗ (talk) 21:07, 12 December 2022 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
::If you wish to discuss this with me, you may do so on my talk page. Not here. Do not post here again unless Brian specifically says that you may. @Brian, this is your talk page and I don't want you to think I am trying to take over. You are free to tell me to buzz off anytime if you are so inclined. But it's fairly clear to me that this endless back and forth over the same ground has long since ceased to be productive and an honest content dispute has evolved into WP:BADGERING ↗. You can also formally close this discussion if you like using the template <nowiki>{{atop}} and {{abot}}</nowiki>. Or alternatively you can archive it if you so desire. If you have any questions or need any help, just drop me a line or ping me. I'm here to help. -Ad Orientem (talk) 23:21, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
- '''Update''' IP range 166.182.248.0/21 has been blocked x 1 month by {{u|Acroterion}}. If you have any more issues of this nature drop me a line. -Ad Orientem (talk)
- '''Update''' Im not here to tourting you brian but ive got some very bad news Warner Bros Discovery just scrapped which means cancelled Tweety Mysteries last month so it looks like neither Jeff Bergman Bob Bergen or Eric Bauza won't be voicing Tweety in Tweety Mysteries Since Warner Bros Discovery Cancelled The Series, it looks like i was right all along So Brian im very sorry but we need to bring present back for Tweety and Daffy Duck articles for Jeff Bergman's Part as Tweety And Jeff Bergman's Part as Daffy Duck right now? Since Warner Bros Discovery is about to Cancelled upcoming shows, projects and removing upcoming cartoons on streaming services as of now. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding unsigned ↗ comment added by 2604:BFC0:101:FD31:A586:264:B584:A93B ↗ (talk) 23:44, 4 January 2023 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
- :It only tells me what Bergman’s ''not'' voicing Tweety in. Now try telling me what he ''is'' voicing Tweety in, and please be specific. Brian K. Tyler (talk) 00:00, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
- :2604:BFC0:101:FD31::/64 blocked x 3 months for block evasion and harassment. Also extending the previous range block to 3 months. cc ping @Acroterion. -Ad Orientem (talk) 00:18, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
Notifications
Are your notifications turned off? -Ad Orientem (talk) 16:58, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
February 2023
25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm MichaelMaggs. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, :Little Jack Horner ↗, but you didn't provide a reliable source ↗. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation ↗ and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners ↗. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''All added material needs to be sourced, even that on fictional characters. Have a look at MOS:CULTURALREFS ↗. '' <!-- Template:uw-unsourced1 --> MichaelMaggs (talk) 09:54, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
:30px|alt=Stop icon ↗ You may be '''blocked from editing ↗ without further warning''' the next time you vandalize ↗ Wikipedia, as you did at :Little Jack Horner ↗. <!-- Template:uw-vandalism4 --> You had a final warning last year but still continue disruption, including edit-warring and breaking the WP:3RR ↗ rule. Sweetpool50 (talk) 22:01, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
::I'm sorry. It's just that in case you haven't watched ''Puss in Boots: The Last Wist ↗'', describing the movie's version of Big Jack Horner as simply "selfish and egotistical" may be too much of an understatement, given that he was a major antagonist in the movie. And why do we need sources to describe a fictional character? Brian K. Tyler (talk) 22:16, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
:The edit you are trying to force through, despite reversions by two editors, is WP:OFFTOPIC ↗ as well as unsourced ↗. The article is about the nursery rhyme character not the film, which has an article of its own. Your behaviour has now been reported at WP:ANI ↗. Sweetpool50 (talk) 22:29, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
::I understand now, and I apologize. It seems that Wikipedia is not the place for overstatements. I will leave the article alone this time. Brian K. Tyler (talk) 22:34, 17 February 2023 (UTC)
How Rotten Tomatoes works
Dude. In this link ↗ clearly shows that Alice in Wonderland (2010 film) ↗ has a big green "splat" graphic. This is the symbol that Rotten Tomatoes uses to indicate negative reviews. Please see Rotten Tomatoes#Tomatometer Rankings ↗ if you need help understanding this. Your interpretation of what a Rotten Tomatoes score means is unimportant; they've already told us what it means. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:53, 24 February 2023 (UTC)
:You mean to say that the percentage is not nearly as important as the symbol? Because that's not what I've read off of other Wikipedia articles. Brian K. Tyler (talk) 06:01, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
ANI notification
I have asked for you to be blocked. You should respond at WP:ANI#Brian K. Tyler ↗. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:24, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
Frozen (2013 film) ↗ - italics
Hi,
I've just reverted your two recent edits ↗ at "Frozen (2013 film) ↗" and wanted to explain my thinking. MOS:TITLE ↗ recommends the use of italics or quotation marks for different kinds of title, and even explains how to link an italicised title. According to the advice given on that page, "The Snow Queen" should probably use quotation marks rather than italics, but the use of italics is consistent with other examples at "Frozen (2013 film) ↗", so I put things back like they were.
Best wishes, Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 08:29, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
PS Same thing at ''The Little Mermaid'' ↗. Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 08:38, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
So now ↗ we've got "The Snow Queen" once, and ''The Snow Queen'' seventeen times in the same article. Are you going to fix those other seventeen examples or leave them for someone else? Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 00:33, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
Thank you! And apologies for my tone above. It occurs to me that there might be a small problem here ↗ though, where we have quotation marks around a title within a quotation in a box. It doesn't look obtrusive to me, and I'm not sure how to fix it, or indeed whether it's actually a problem. Any thoughts? Jean-de-Nivelle (talk) 09:44, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
Unsourced material
Hello I am going to your edit on the lead and inbox story by ... because they were never cited in neither the infoxbox or the body. Plus there were no reliable source, i.e. magazines, newspaper and the source you cited unfortunately falls short of the criteria of a reliable source. Wingwatchers (talk) 05:44, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
Film credit order
I will kindly ask you not to revert back the film order because your edit is non-constructive and disrupts text consistencies. Thanks Wingwatchers (talk) 00:42, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Changing italics to quotes
Please stop changing the double inverted commas around a film title into quotation marks. They are Wiki markup to make the text ''italic'' as it should be, and not an error in making it "quotes" which it should not be. I have reverted you doing it on Tangled ↗, The Princess and the Frog ↗, and Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs (1937 film) ↗. Cheers! Captainllama (talk) 01:40, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
:What about ''The Little Mermaid ↗'', ''Beauty and the Beast ↗'', ''Aladdin ↗'', and ''Frozen ↗''? I didn't make that change to the first one. Someone else did it before me. Brian K. Tyler (talk) 02:07, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
::Oh I see. I think you misunderstood film title with other works. We italicize film titles but not other work such as Snow Queen because they are not films. Wingwatchers (talk) 05:18, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2023 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2023|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small>
</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2023/Coordination/MM/06&oldid=1187132321 -->
October 2024
25px|alt=Warning icon ↗ Please stop. If you continue to change genres ↗ without discussion or sources, you may be blocked from editing ↗. <!-- Template:uw-genre3 --> <span style="solid;background:#a3b18a; border-radius: 4px; -moz-border-radius: 4px; font-family: Papyrus">'''<span style="color: #606c38">Mike</span> <span style="color:#606c38">Allen</span>'''</span> 22:40, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2024 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2024|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>
</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/06&oldid=1258243641 -->
February 2025
25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, :Eric Bauza ↗, but you didn't provide a reliable source ↗. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation ↗ and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners ↗. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''content added not in cited sources'' <!-- Template:uw-unsourced1 --> Waxworker (talk) 13:39, 11 February 2025 (UTC)
:Isn't the Tiny Toons Looniversity ↗ article itself, and the full episode synopses, enough of a reliable source? Brian K. Tyler (talk) 01:11, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 18 November 2025 (UTC)</small>
</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2025/Coordination/MM/06&oldid=1322758825 -->
Home Alone edits
I've noticed that three times you've edited the pages for Home Alone 1, 2 and 3 so that their short descriptions say that they are films by John Hughes. It is generally agreed that a "film by" credit in a short description refers to the film's director, even if no such rule is written anywhere. He did not direct any of these films, so the short description should not say they are films by him. Mr slav999 (talk) 19:50, 29 March 2026 (UTC)