User Talk: Ch3rk.essk0

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

Map

The map i used is infact used for the Chechen Princedom or "Okotskaya" land which infact is in most russian sourced called "ЧЕЧЕНСКАЯ КНЯЖЕСТВО" the maps also come from russian history books Moltenn9 (talk) 21:50, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

:The page literally says AND cites what Russians called the principality of chechens— Okoki, Okotskaya Zemlya, or even sometimes Okochenya. the name "чеченская княжество" is not recorded in any historical or contemporary sources; websites do NOT count as reliable sources for something as important as borders. Also your maps are always inconsistent, just because a map comes from books it doesnt mean its true.
:*The maps author is unknown
:*There are no sources cited
:*Dagestan had MANY other principalities/states at the time
:*The Tarki Shamkhalate ↗ itself claimed control over Chechens (read ''"Chechens: A handbook"'' by Amjad Jaimoukha and check this source;<ref>{{Cite web|title=Феодальные междоусобицы в Кабарде в начале XVIII века|url=https://blago-kavkaz.ru/4578|website=blago-kavkaz.ru|access-date=2025-11-30|language=ru-RU}}</ref>)
:*The map is PURELY self-published
:*The borders are anachronistic and too 'clear' which is not possible for a tribal confederation
:*The map shows a ABSOLUTE unified Chechnya, although it never existed; as it is a principality— a.k.a, it is unification of Chechen free societies much like Western Circassia, not a single unified country.
:These maps are very, very historially inaccurate— i get you're trying to expand your history, but ill have to kindly ask you to stop with the wrong maps, again, Okotskaya Principality was never that large.. no Caucasian 'state' was. Ch3rk.essk0 (talk) 22:07, 21 May 2026 (UTC)
::Large? Are you mixxing up something the map? Moltenn9 (talk) 23:06, 21 May 2026 (UTC)
:::huh? idk what ur saying but look at other things i said Ch3rk.essk0 (talk) 23:29, 21 May 2026 (UTC)
::::You said no Caucasian state was "that large" where is it large? The Chechen Principality had central chechnya to north ossetia then middle and south of dagestan Moltenn9 (talk) 07:52, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
:::::Do you even know how maps work? Also they did not have North Ossetia; that comes from a single book which is only anout Chechen legends.
:::::"Shikh Okotsky emerged as one of Russia’s most influential allies in the Caucasus, with his authority '''extending over Aukh, the lowland regions of Chechnya, and parts of northern Dagestan.'''"<ref>Akhmadov, Ya. Z. (2005). "Akkins". Encyclopedia of the Cultures of the Peoples of Southern Russia. Vol. I: Peoples of Southern Russia. page 48-49, Rostov-on-Don: SKNTs VSh. ISBN 5-87872-089-2.</ref>
:::::THIS is the Largest Okotskaya has ever been and even this does make the state control all of these regions, I assure you, you do not know how maps work; guessing what maps from 500 years ago can be really tricky. You can't make maps without having professional mapping experience, sorry. I'll for the fourth time ask you to stop using any maps on internet; Many are wrong and misleading, thank you ❤️‍🩹 Ch3rk.essk0 (talk) 12:26, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
::::::Very wrong. After the Gazikumukh war Chechens conquered most of Dagestan and reached the Caspian sea, research. Moltenn9 (talk) 13:04, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
:::::::...That war is a legend.. You're obviosly very biased and obviously fed by tiktok, therefore I'll stop talking to you, have a nice day! Ch3rk.essk0 (talk) 13:13, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
::::::::Thats what they all say, "Chechnya wasnt that and that", have a good day tho Moltenn9 (talk) 13:24, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Collegium of Foreign Affairs ↗, links pointing to the disambiguation pages Peter I ↗ and Mikhail Vorontsov ↗ were added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Battle of The Mzymta River ↗

48px|left|alt=|link= ↗

Hello, Ch3rk.essk0. This message concerns the Articles for Creation ↗ submission or draft ↗ page you started, "Battle of The Mzymta River ↗".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy ↗, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply {{edit|Draft:Battle of The Mzymta River|edit the submission}}, and remove the {{tlc|db-afc}}, {{tlc|db-draft}}, or {{tlc|db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can '''request its undeletion''' ↗. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia!  DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 10:25, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of :Turkshad's campaign in Crimea (576–581) ↗ for deletion

<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0;">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :Turkshad's campaign in Crimea (576–581) ↗ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗ or whether it should be deleted ↗.

The article is being discussed at '''Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Turkshad's campaign in Crimea (576–581) ↗''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines ↗.

Users may still edit the article ↗, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.</div> Guile's Theme (talk) 02:00, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

I am gonna undertake serious testing of your articles

I will review all your articles and subject them to serious scrutiny, because there are reasons to think that they don't meet Wikipedia requirements. One of the feature is the use of the terms such as "war", "invasion", "campaign" to refer to rather small and historically insignificant raids, thus not meeting notability (WP:NOTE) standarts. Also, it must be checked weather reliable and independent sources are cited (not some self-published unknown POV-pushing authors and websites), whether they use such terms to describe these events, and how significant is the coverage of these events to warrant creation of entire new articles, which you have been engaging in. There is reasonable ground to think that there are multiple problems related with WP:OR as well. One common feature of your articles is that they focuse on writing about "Circassian victories" against neighboring peoples (Ingush, Chechens, Georgians, etc.), which gives strong vibes of agenda-advancing POV pushing, possibly violating NPOV rule. Therefore, I think there is a reasonable ground to question your mass addition of new articles on contensious topics and to thoroughly examine them for possible violations of multiple Wikipedia rules. Rutdam (talk) 14:57, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

:...huh? I don't know what you're saying tbh. what specific pages are you talking aboutCh3rk.essk0 (talk) 15:07, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
::Multiple pages you have created about "wars", "invasions", "campaigns", while they are usually some small, historically in overall insignificant marauding raids not leading to any territorial or other changes and not meeting notability and other requirements for separate articles. For example, this article ↗. Rutdam (talk) 15:15, 30 June 2026 (UTC)
:::Ah.. honestly I don't completely deny that it's not notable, I dont feel like there is a reason to just delete it but if thats necessary I don't think I can disagree, it can be added in the History section of Circassia ↗ and Georgia maybe. Ch3rk.essk0 (talk) 15:42, 30 June 2026 (UTC)

Hey man, just wanted to tell ya im currently in chechnya so i cant use telegram here, im gonna redownload it once im back Moltenn9 (talk) 14:24, 8 July 2026 (UTC)

:Ooh, i see, have fun there Ch3rk.essk0 (talk) 16:32, 8 July 2026 (UTC)
:when are you downloading telegram Ch3rk.essk0 (talk) 21:11, 10 July 2026 (UTC)
::Probably 20th Moltenn9 (talk) 21:34, 10 July 2026 (UTC)

Impressed

bro im really impressed with what you did with my page, huge thanks man Moltenn9 (talk) 07:26, 11 July 2026 (UTC)