User Talk: Chaswmsday

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

{{User:MiszaBot/config
| algo=old(90d)
| archive=User talk:Chaswmsday/Archive %(counter)d
| counter=1
| maxarchivesize=200K
| archiveheader={{Archive}}
| minthreadsleft=5
| minthreadstoarchive=2
}}
{{Archives}}

Reply

Lloyd Expressway

Do you live in Evansville, or Southwestern Indiana? I've lived here for nearly 20 years and for as long as I have lived here, The Lloyd Expressway is usually referred to as '''The Lloyd''' and is even often called '''Lloyd Boulevard''' Rhatsa26X (talk) 11:43 30, March 2014 (CDT)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 18 November 2025 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>

Happy First Edit Anniversary Chaswmsday 🎉

Hey @Chaswmsday. Your wiki edit anniversary was 1 day ago, marking 15 years of dedicated contributions to English Wikipedia. Your passion for sharing knowledge and your remarkable contributions have not only enriched the project, but also inspired countless others to contribute. Thank you for your amazing contributions. Wishing you many more wonderful years ahead in the Wiki journey. :) -<span style="color:#990000">❙❚❚</span><span style="color:#339966">❙❙</span><span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#000"> GnOeee </span><span style="color:#006699">❚❙❚</span><span style="color:#339966">❙❙</span> ✉ 18:11, 22 December 2025 (UTC)

Re: My edits to WPTD ↗

You might want to talk with Miss {{ping|Sammi Brie}} about this. Also, WPTD and WPTO ↗ are both good articles ↗. You want to keep them that way. And your talk page is getting long, so I added an archive bot. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 05:40, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

:I'd like to reply to Chas and to you, @Mvcg66b3r.
:Let me get the subchannels and editing section out of the way. You are lucky to get detailed articles on subchannel changes in 2025, so generally information on changes does not remain in an article. There is a reason this structure is not the norm. It's because, well, there's only one John Kiesewetter-type left out there basically. Changes don't usually get media attention now. I'm not sure how to feel, and I'm up late, so I will defer my thoughts on this.
:The other thing I'd like to point out—really, the reason I reply now—is that you, Mvcg, adding an archival bot to a user's talk page, even in good faith, is against our guidelines. WP:OWNTALK ↗ states, {{tq|The length of user talk pages, and the need for archiving, is left up to each editor's own discretion.}} This was not a decision for you to make. <span style="color:#ba4168">Sammi Brie</span> (she/her · t · c ↗) 06:23, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

::I think you're OK to expand on article details if you can find reasonably reliable sources ↗, used cautiously. Granted, I have paid access to local media sources for this article, but some sourcing was older than even their paywall archives; that was likely available behind the newspapers.com paywall. OTOH, I was skeptical about virtual channel claims for KRHD-CD ↗, finding the primary sourcing suspect. So I had an offline exchange with Mark, the webmaster of RabbitEars, about the primacy of FCC data in such matters and edited that article accordingly.
::I'm fairly confident that adding some subchannel info & moving a bit of prose to what, IMHO, are more logical and readable locations shouldn't endanger GA status for this or WPTO ↗.
::I didn't mind Mvcg's archiving of my Talk page; I'm letting it stand. However, a PRIOR heads-up would have been courteous; plus I had to take time to research what turned out to be the unbelievably simple way to add an archive box to my Talk. Thanks! Chaswmsday (talk) 12:01, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

:Category:Radio stations in Elmira and Corning, New York ↗ has been nominated for splitting

<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>:Category:Radio stations in Elmira and Corning, New York ↗ has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization ↗ guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at '''the category's entry ↗''' on the categories for discussion ↗ page. Thank you. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 03:46, 22 May 2026 (UTC)