User Talk: Darknipples

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

{{Under construction|date=June 2026}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
| algo = old(7d)
| archive = User talk:Darknipples/Archive %(counter)d
| counter = 1
| maxarchivesize = 400K
| archiveheader = {{Archive}}
| minthreadstoarchive = 1
| minthreadsleft = 4
}}
{{Archives|bot=Lowercase sigmabot III|age=90}}

Say Hello

A useful link Wikipedia:Template index ↗ or two weight_inline undue inline ↗ weasel inline ↗

Notice

{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.''

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions ↗ is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions ↗ on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies ↗, or the page-specific restrictions ↗, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions ↗ and the Arbitration Committee's ↗ decision here ↗. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
}}

Mary Rosh

https://greensboro.com/scholars-credibility-is-under-the-gun/article_33bea93a-113e-5534-b244-73ec09dd5374.html ↗
https://www.gvpedia.org/gun-myths/missing-survey/ ↗
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/fake-mistake-replicate/ ↗
https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/John_Lott ↗
https://books.google.com/books?id=rYY7AAAAQBAJ&pg=PA138&lpg=PA138&dq=james+lindgren+and+tim+lambert+on+john+lott+discredited&source=bl&ots=h-aulLZyDC&sig=ACfU3U3p_Dsh4re_oN7AflgoG6fwA-0e7w&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjjuPP3g4P2AhVwmWoFHc7dC0sQ6AF6BAgOEAM#v=onepage&q=james%20lindgren%20and%20tim%20lambert%20on%20john%20lott%20discredited&f=false ↗
https://books.google.com/books?id=CYKCCgAAQBAJ&pg=PT99&lpg=PT99&dq=all+surveys+disagree+with+john+lott&source=bl&ots=pGSBkNYsBE&sig=ACfU3U2visQVOUxpZpQ8QkA-ut9HnjC15A&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwitzLfxjIP2AhXvm2oFHdVuAAY4ChDoAXoECBQQAw#v=onepage&q=all%20surveys%20disagree%20with%20john%20lott&f=false ↗
https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/lifestyle/2003/02/01/scholar-invents-fan-to-answer-his-critics/f3ae3f46-68d6-4eee-a65e-1775d45e2133/ ↗
https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.300.5618.393 ↗
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2003/10/double-barreled-double-standards/ ↗
https://psmag.com/magazine/inside-the-mind-of-americas-favorite-gun-researcher ↗
https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w9336/w9336.pdf ↗ "No longer can any plausible case be made on statistical grounds that shall-issue laws are likely to reduce crime for all or even most states"
https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2006-may-31-oe-wiener31-story.html ↗
https://scholar.valpo.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=http://www.armedwithreason.com/&httpsredir=1&article=1854&context=vulr ↗

Brady law

https://scholarship.shu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1647&context=shlj DN (talk) 00:41, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

:https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/bjs/231052.pdf DN (talk) 00:48, 19 June 2026 (UTC)
::https://www.law.virginia.edu/news/200303/study-shows-brady-bill-had-no-impact-gun-homicides DN (talk) 00:50, 19 June 2026 (UTC)
:::https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/192946 DN (talk) 00:50, 19 June 2026 (UTC)
:https://journal.policy-perspectives.org/articles/volume_8_issue_2/10_4079_pp_v8i2_4223.pdf DN (talk) 01:12, 19 June 2026 (UTC)
::https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc805905/ DN (talk) 01:16, 19 June 2026 (UTC)
:https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/COMPS-13729 DN (talk) 01:25, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

https://academic.oup.com/publius/article-abstract/24/3/69/1871335?login=false