W
Active Editors
Back to Profile

User Talk: Eastiak shoron

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

{{Talk header}}

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion


link=|25px|alt=Information icon ↗
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring ↗ regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring ↗. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Eastiak_shoron reported by User:Aaaas216& (Result: ) ↗. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. Aaaas216&#38; (talk) 21:01, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics


{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = You have recently edited a page related to ''' the Arab–Israeli conflict ↗''', a topic designated as '''''contentious ↗'''''. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and <em>does <strong>not</strong> imply that there are any issues with your editing</em>.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as ''contentious topics''. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee ↗. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators ↗ have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit <strong>carefully and constructively</strong>, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

<p><strong>Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days ↗, and you are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any page within this topic.</strong></p><p>Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics <em>procedures</em>, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard ↗ or you may learn more about this contentious topic ↗. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{tl|Ctopics/aware}} template. </p>}}<!-- Derived from Template:Contentious topics/alert/first -->
:Eastiak shoron, just notifying you that like social groups of South Asia, anything related to the Arab-Israeli conflict, including US-Iran issues such as the current strikes, are limited to extended-confirmed editors. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 08:28, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

Udvash ↗ moved to draftspace



Thanks for your contributions to Udvash ↗. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because '''it has no indication of notability of the subject''', '''it is promotional and reads like an advertisement''', '''it appears to consists of machine-generated text ↗''' and '''it has too many errors of formatting'''.
I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page ↗.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. '''<span style="color:#00d5ff !important">Zack</span><span style="color:#007F94 !important">mann</span>''' (<sup>Talk to me ↗</sup>/<sub><span style="color:orange !important">What I been doing</span> ↗</sub>) 22:10, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of :Udvash ↗ for deletion


<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0;">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :Udvash ↗ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗ or whether it should be deleted ↗.

The article is being discussed at '''Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Udvash ↗''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines ↗.

Users may still edit the article ↗, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> '''<span style="color:#00d5ff !important">Zack</span><span style="color:#007F94 !important">mann</span>''' (<sup>Talk to me ↗</sup>/<sub><span style="color:orange !important">What I been doing</span> ↗</sub>) 02:11, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 15



An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Bangladeshi criminals ↗, links pointing to the disambiguation pages Appellate Division ↗, Pilkhana ↗ and International Crimes Tribunal ↗ were added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

Social Business Day ↗ moved to draftspace



Thanks for your contributions to Social Business Day ↗. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because '''it consists of machine-generated text'''.
I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page ↗.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. &#x2011;&#x2011;gurkubondinn 10:11, 1 July 2026 (UTC)