User Talk: Election Bro

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

Welcome!

Hi Election Bro! I noticed your contributions ↗ and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

{{Clickable button 2|Help:Introduction|Learn more about editing|class=mw-ui-progressive|style=margin-left: 1.6em;}}

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia ↗ page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

{{Clickable button 2|Wikipedia:Teahouse|Get help at the Teahouse|style=margin-left: 1.6em;}}

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

{{Clickable button 2|Wikipedia:Task Center|Volunteer at the Task Center|style=margin-left: 1.6em;}}

Happy editing!  <span style="font-family:DejaVu Sans; color: #333300">gobonobo</span> <sup>+</sup> <sup>c</sup> ↗ 10:01, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

please use edit summaries

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello. Thank you for your contributions ↗ to Wikipedia ↗. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary ↗. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief ↗.

The edit summary field looks like this:
{{The edit-summary field/OOUI}}

'''Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make.''' With a Wikipedia account ↗ you can give yourself a reminder by setting {{myprefs|3|check={{int:tog-forceeditsummary}}}}, and then click the "{{int:saveprefs}}" button.
Thanks!{{sp}} -- mikeblas (talk) 14:17, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

October 2024

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions ↗, such as the edit(s) you made to :2024 United States presidential election in Pennsylvania ↗, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted ↗. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines ↗. You can find information about these at our welcome page ↗ which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia ↗. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page ↗. Restored your unexplained removal of "Redfield & Wilton Strategies" poll in "Kamala Harris vs. Donald Trump" table. Though its already covered in "Kamala Harris vs. Donald Trump vs. Cornel West vs. Jill Stein vs. Chase Oliver" poll table, it's necessary to update it in "head-to-head" poll table also. Compare with other polls like"Bloomberg/Morning Consult" and "Franklin & Marshall College" data - they are there in both tables.JoshuaJ28 (talk) 02:51, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

:Bloomberg/MC and F&M are in both tables because those polls tested the head to head race and the full ballot with all candidates. It doesn't make sense for Redfield and North Star Opinion Research to go in the head to head table since they only polled the full ballot. Election Bro (talk) 07:31, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
::Nationwide opinion polling for the 2024 United States presidential election ↗ page (e.g.: ABC News, CNN, YouGov/The Economist) and many other election pages use "full-ballot" polls in the "head-to-head" table. It does makes sense. Also, "270 to win" and "Nate Silver Bulletin" use those full-ballot poll data to calculate "head-to-head" aggregates.
::If you want only "head-to-head" polls should be there, you have to reach consensus ↗ through RfC ↗ in the respective talk page, instead of removing them continuously. JoshuaJ28 (talk) 12:30, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2024 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2024|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>

Hi

Could you added the "DEFINITIVE" voters polls in the Michigan Senate and Gubernatorial races too? from Detroit-Regional-Chamber_Glengariff-Group_May-2025-Political-Survey-Report.pdf ↗

Can you please tell me how can I add polls like you with the formatting and everything? Theofunny (talk) 19:10, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 18 November 2025 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>