User Talk: Elium2

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

Guidelines/Rules

This is my talkpage, so I would like to set down a few general rules and guidelines. Mainly, it would be great if all could try to use correct grammar and spelling unless inventing a new word or something. Actually, that's all for now … By the way, I guess I should sign here, but there is no reason to link to my own talkpage here, so I won't.

=User talk:Elium2 continued=

I put this section title in

Hello, and welcometo wikipedia! Thanks for your edit to the page on List of elements by name ↗ buti noticed that you hadn't filled in the edit summary box. The edit summary box helps other editors to see what changes you have made to the page so that it is easier to reverse vandalism and see how pages are progressing. Please fill out the edit summary at the bottom of the page in the future. --Allie cabab (talk) 21:09, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

CfD nomination of :Category:User:Elium2 ↗

I have nominated {{lc|User:Elium2}} for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page ↗. Thank you. — '''ξ'''xplicit 01:45, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
:Elium2, I just wanted to let you know that you can continue to keep track of pages in your userspace using the Special:PrefixIndex ↗ function; for example, Special:PrefixIndex/User:Elium2 ↗. Cheers, –'''BLACK FALCON''' (TALK) 05:56, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
::Thanks, Black Falcon. Is it really necessary for me to sign? Elium2 (talk) 19:02, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
:::You're welcome. To sign what? –'''BLACK FALCON''' (TALK) 00:43, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
::::My post. Elium2 (talk) 22:02, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
:::::Yes, essentially. It's not a problem if you occasionally forget to sign, but it is good practice (see Wikipedia:Signatures ↗) to sign your posts so that other editors can easily identify with whom they are conversing. Cheers, –'''BLACK FALCON''' (TALK) 02:11, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

Userboxes

Am I allowed to post userboxes describing me, but not made by me (currently at User:Elium2/Userboxes_Describing_User_Elium2), directly on my userpage? If not, is there some way to ''quickly'' copy the categories the userboxes put me, as a user, in? Thanks for any answers. User:Elium2 13:14, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

:I fail to see why you couldn't. There are many wikipedians who have userboxes not made by them on their userpages (including me!). I have actually read all your userboxes on that said page, and personally, I would keep it seperate for the fun of seeing who reads them all. Anyway, hope this helps. Mr little irish(talk) 11:10, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

::Thanks a lot. User:Elium2 19:30, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

::Also, I'm amazed you took the time to read all of those! I have like a hundred! User:Elium2 13:52, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open! ↗

{{Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Foster v. Chatman has been nominated for Did You Know

{{ivmbox
| 1 = Hello, Elium2. Foster v. Chatman ↗, an article you either created or to which you significantly contributed,has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page ↗ as part of {{DYK blue}}. You can see the hook and the discussion '''here ↗'''. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. APersonBot (talk!) 12:00, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
|2=Updated DYK query.svg
|imagesize=40px
}}

DYK for Foster v. Chatman

{{ivmbox
|image = Updated DYK query.svg
|imagesize=40px
|text = On 3 June 2016 ↗, '''Did you know ↗''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''Foster v. Chatman ↗''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that despite the U.S. Supreme Court ↗ holding in '''''Foster v. Chatman ↗''''' that prosecutors purposefully discriminated against black jurors ↗ in his trial, Timothy Foster's death sentence ↗ might not be overturned?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Foster v. Chatman ↗. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, [//tools.wmflabs.org/pageviews#start=2016-05-24&end=2016-06-13&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Foster_v._Chatman Foster v. Chatman]), and it may be added to the statistics page ↗ if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page ↗.
}} — Maile (talk) 12:01, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016 ↗: Voting now open!

{{Ivmbox|Hello, Elium2. Voting in the '''2016 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements ↗ and submit your choices on '''the voting page ↗'''. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}

ArbCom Elections 2016 ↗: Voting now open!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

{{Ivmbox|Hello, Elium2. Voting in the '''2017 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''voting page ↗'''. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

{{Ivmbox|Hello, Elium2. Voting in the '''2018 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''voting page ↗'''. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}

Disambiguation link notification for October 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wilkinson County, Georgia ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jason Carter ↗ ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Wilkinson_County%2C_Georgia check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Wilkinson_County%2C_Georgia?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect ↗, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:13, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''2019 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2019|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2019|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
</td></tr>
</table>

Article Two of the United States Constitution ↗ WP:CP ↗ listing- Not seeing vio

I'm looking at the article in earwig, and I see no violation ↗. Am I missing something? Thanks, 💵Money💵emoji💵Talk💸Help out at CCI! 20:06, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

:You are missing something, yeah. It looks like Earwig isn't properly pulling the text from its viewer. If you go to the Heritage link directly and look at the paragraph beginning “The Executive Vesting Clause's general rule…”, the entire paragraph from “is subject to two important limitations” on appears on the Wikipedia page. There's a fair bit of non-copied text between “under the Articles” and “Second, specific constitutional provisions…” on the Wikipedia page, which was added after the original act of copying. Elium2 (talk) 23:22, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
::Ok, I think I removed all of it in this edit, ↗ was that it? 💵Money💵emoji💵Talk💸Help out at CCI! 01:14, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
:::That's all of it, as far as I'm aware, but removing it disrupts the flow of the non-copied parts. It works out okay with the second copied chunk, but not so much with the first. To deal with this, I added a line saying: “Article I grants certain powers ↗ to Congress, and the Vesting Clause does not reassign those powers to the President.” I think that deals with the copyright issue. Elium2 (talk) 03:05, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
::::Good then- this particular vio was pretty nasty, I'm honestly not even sure how you found it. Thanks for your assistance, 💵Money💵emoji💵Talk💸Help out at CCI! 03:10, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
:::::Neither am I, actually. I think the tone struck me as a bit off, and when I saw the Heritage source linked, I figured I'd take a look for neutrality reasons, since they're a conservative think tank. Instead (well, maybe in addition) I found a copyright issue! Thanks for helping resolve the issue. Elium2 (talk) 18:05, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Elium2!

<div style="border: 3px solid #FFD700; background-color: #FFFAF0; padding:0.2em 0.4em; height:auto; min-height:173px; border-radius: 1em; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75);" class="plainlinks">
left|x173px ↗x173px|right ↗
{{Paragraph break}}
{{Center|{{resize|179%|'''''Happy New Year ↗!'''''}}}}
'''Elium2''', Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year ↗, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
 💵Money💵emoji💵Talk💸Help out at CCI! 12:56, 2 January 2020 (UTC) 
</div>
   ''{{resize|88%|Send New Year cheer by adding {{tls|Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.}}''
{{clear}}
:Thank you so much! Elium2 (talk) 03:55, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Invitation to join the Dr. Blofeld CCI cleanup effort ↗

{| class="messagebox standard-talk"|align="center"
|75px ↗
|Hello. You are invited to join the '''Dr. Blofeld CCI cleanup effort ↗''', a project which aims to cleanup and resolve the largest copyright investigation on the site. Directions on how to help are at the main cleanup page ↗. It is ok if you choose not to assist, as a large amount of people are already helping out- but your contributions would be appreciated, even if you make just a few. 💴Money💶💵emoji💷Talk💸Help out at CCI! 00:39, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
|}

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''2020 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2020|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2020|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:27, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
</td></tr>
</table>