User Talk: Evan.oltmanns

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

Speedy deletion nomination of HOMAGE

Hello Evan.oltmanns,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged HOMAGE ↗ for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can <span class="plainlinks">'''contest this deletion ↗'''</span>, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page ↗ if you have questions.

'''<span style="color:#536895;">Onel</span><span style="color:#ffb300;">5969</span>''' <sup><i style="color:blue">TT me</i></sup> 21:00, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

List of cruisers

I appreciate the changes you just made, but since all of these ships have wlinks in the sections immediately above and below, don't you think you might have violated the rule against overlinking? I'm not going to revert you, just asking. Tfdavisatsnetnet (talk) 19:38, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

:I was following the format of the other sections, but now that I look closer, the page as a whole seems to have an odd flow to it with Long Beach (for example) being mentioned and linked to all over the place. Evan.oltmanns (talk) 19:42, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
::Exactly. That 'odd flow' is exactly why there are duplicate links, and yes ''Long Beach'' is the biggest 'offender' being found in more sections than any other ship. I dithered over taking out the nuclear section links, and did it only after getting my knuckles wrapped for similar edits on other pages. So I have no vested interest in being '''''RIGHT''''' about this.
::One thing I will mention is that the 'odd flow' is in part because a simple list, especially if it is very large, is boring. The 'odd flow' is the result of trying to make 'points of interest' for the reader to have their interests sparked. I do hope this works. Thanks! Tfdavisatsnetnet (talk) 22:38, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2023 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2023|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>