W
Active Editors
Back to Profile

User Talk: Filipinos19

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.



October 2023


left|25px|alt= ↗ Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to :Clements twins ↗ have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
{{clear}}
Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-cluebotwarning1 --><!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 --> ClueBot NG (talk) 14:00, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

Moving article you created



I have moved the article you create Taytum and Oakley Fisher ↗ to Draft:Taytum and Oakley Fisher ↗ because the article does not yet establish our notability guidelines ↗ based on the sources provided. If you have any questions, feel free to reply here, on my talk page, or at this forum ↗. <span style="color:#2015BF"> Sincerely, Novo Tape (She/Her)</span><sup><span style="color:#2015BF">My Talk Page</span></sup> 17:22, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

:Is the page still on Wikipedia? Soy Paula (talk) 17:24, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
::Yes, it can be found at Draft:Taytum and Oakley Fisher ↗ with the history complete. I've moved it to a draft because it is not show enough sources to prove notability ↗, a requirement for all articles. If the sourcing is improved enough to meet the aforementioned guideline, it may again be moved back to Taytum and Oakley Fisher ↗ <span style="color:#2015BF"> Sincerely, Novo Tape (She/Her)</span><sup><span style="color:#2015BF">My Talk Page</span></sup> 17:26, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion ↗ of :Taytum And Oakley ↗


48px|left|alt=|link= ↗
{{Quote box|quote=<p>If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article ↗.</p><p>You may want to consider using the Article Wizard ↗ to help you create articles.</p>|width=20%|align=right}}
The page :Taytum And Oakley ↗ has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗, because the article appeared to be about a real person or group of people that did not credibly indicate ↗ how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion ↗, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable ↗.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the {{Querylink|Special:Log|qs=type=delete&page=Taytum+And+Oakley|deleting administrator}}. <!-- Template:Db-significance-deleted --><!-- Template:Db-csd-deleted-custom --> Primefac (talk) 17:44, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

November 2023


left|25px|alt= ↗ Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to :Maya Le Clark ↗ have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
{{clear}}
Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-cluebotwarning1 --><!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 --> ClueBot NG (talk) 17:58, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Anabella Queen ↗ moved to draftspace



Thanks for your contributions to Anabella Queen ↗. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because '''it has no sources'''.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page ↗.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. <small><b style="color:blue; text-shadow:cyan 0.0em 0.0em 0.1em;">CycloneYoris</b></small> <sup><b style="color:purple">''talk!''</b></sup> 07:49, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of :Anabella Queen ↗ for deletion


<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :Anabella Queen ↗ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗ or whether it should be deleted ↗.

The article will be discussed at '''Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anabella Queen ↗''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> <span style="font-family:Courier;"><b>&nbsp;//&nbsp;Timothy&nbsp;::&nbsp;talk&nbsp;</b></span> 07:07, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion ↗ nomination of :Everleigh Rose ↗


48px|left|alt=|link= ↗
{{Quote box|quote=<p>If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article ↗.</p><p>You may want to consider using the Article Wizard ↗ to help you create articles.</p>|width=20%|align=right}}
A tag has been placed on :Everleigh Rose ↗ requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate ↗ how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion ↗, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable ↗.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by visiting the page ↗ and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the {{Querylink|Special:Log|qs=type=delete&page=Everleigh+Rose|deleting administrator}}. <!-- Template:Db-notability-notice --><!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> Jeraxmoira (talk) 16:11, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of :Taytum And Oakley Fisher ↗ for deletion


<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :Taytum And Oakley Fisher ↗, to which you have significantly contributed ↗, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗ or if it should be deleted ↗.

The discussion will take place at '''Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taytum And Oakley Fisher ↗''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by ''SDZeroBot'' (talk) 01:01, 4 January 2024 (UTC)<!-- User:SDZeroBot/AfD notifier/template -->

September 2025



@Filipinos19 Hello, welcome to Wikipedia. It is best not to edit draft:Salish Matter ↗ as it is an abandoned project with no original research. ~<b style="color:red;">'''''Rafael'''''</b> (He, him) • talk • guestbook • projects 13:29, 13 September 2025 (UTC)

:@Rafaelthegreat: This is not a reason to ask someone to not contribute to an article. In fact, an article with problems needs more attention than an article without problems. Being a draft doesn't change this. --cheesewhisk3rs ≽^•⩊•^≼ ∫ (pester ↗) 16:22, 13 September 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Sean Kaufman ↗ has been accepted


<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:var(--background-color-success-subtle, #dff2eb); padding: 0.5em 1em; color: inherit; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">50px|left ↗ '''Sean Kaufman ↗, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.'''<br />

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

<div class="autoconfirmed-show">Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself ↗ without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation ↗ if you prefer.</div>

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the '''<span class="plainlinks" >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Sean_Kaufman help desk]</span>'''.<span class="unconfirmed-show"> Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself ↗ without posting a request to Articles for creation ↗.</span>

Thanks again, and happy editing!
* Pppery * <sub style="color:#800000">it has begun...</sub> 17:43, 20 September 2025 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC accept-->

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Roommates (upcoming film) ↗ (October 4)


<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: var(--background-color-warning-subtle, #fdf2d5); color: inherit; padding: 0.5em 1em; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> 50px|left ↗Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation ↗ has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by SafariScribe was:

{{divbox|gray|3=This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources ↗. ''Reliable'' sources are required so that information can be verified ↗. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners ↗ and Citing sources ↗.|}}<!--
--
--> Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit ''after they have been resolved''.
{{clear}}

<span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">Safari Scribe</span><sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">'''''Edits!''''' ↗ '''''Talk!'''''</sup> 11:08, 4 October 2025 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC decline-->

{| style="margin: 0.4em 2em;"
|- style="vertical-align: top;"
| alt=Teahouse logo ↗
| <div style="background-color:#e1e6db; color: #393D38; padding: 1em; font-size: 1.1em; border-radius:10px;box-shadow:-2px -2px 1px #8e8a78;">Hello, '''Filipinos19'''!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the '''Articles for creation help desk ↗'''. If you have any ''other'' questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the '''Teahouse ↗''', a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">Safari Scribe</span><sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">'''''Edits!''''' ↗ '''''Talk!'''''</sup> 11:08, 4 October 2025 (UTC)</div>
|}<!-- Wikipedia:Teahouse/AfC Invitation -->
Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC ↗

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Roommates (upcoming film) ↗ (October 7)


<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: var(--background-color-warning-subtle, #fdf2d5); color: inherit; padding: 0.5em 1em; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> 50px|left ↗Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation ↗ has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by CNMall41 was:

{{divbox|gray|3=This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article ↗—that is, they do not show ''significant'' coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in ''published'', ''reliable'' ↗, ''secondary'' ↗ sources that are ''independent ↗'' of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films ↗). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help ↗ and learn about mistakes to avoid ↗ when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}}<!--
--
-->&nbsp;The comment the reviewer left was:

{{divbox|blue|3=Fails WP:NFF ↗. From this source ↗ looks like it may not even release until late 2026.}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit ''after they have been resolved''.
{{clear}}

CNMall41 (talk) 04:06, 7 October 2025 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC decline-->

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Sadie Sandler ↗ has been accepted


<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:var(--background-color-success-subtle, #dff2eb); padding: 0.5em 1em; color: inherit; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">50px|left ↗ '''Sadie Sandler ↗, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.'''<br />

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. <br />

The article has been assessed as '''Start-Class''', which is recorded on its talk page ↗. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop ↗ over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme ↗ to see how you can improve the article.

<div class="autoconfirmed-show">Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself ↗ without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation ↗ if you prefer.</div>

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the '''<span class="plainlinks" >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Sadie_Sandler help desk]</span>'''.<span class="unconfirmed-show"> Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself ↗ without posting a request to Articles for creation ↗.</span>

Thanks again, and happy editing!
<b style="text-shadow: 0px 0px 10px #8e24aa; color: #8e24aa;">Carolina2k22</b> • <span style="color: #8e24aa;">(talk)</span> 13:29, 21 October 2025 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC accept-->

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Piper Rubio ↗ (October 29)


<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: var(--background-color-warning-subtle, #fdf2d5); color: inherit; padding: 0.5em 1em; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> 50px|left ↗Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation ↗ has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by Jcgaylor was:

{{divbox|gray|3=This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article ↗—that is, they do not show ''significant'' coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in ''published'', ''reliable'' ↗, ''secondary'' ↗ sources that are ''independent ↗'' of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people ↗). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help ↗ and learn about mistakes to avoid ↗ when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}}<!--
--
-->&nbsp;The comment the reviewer left was:

{{divbox|blue|3=As stated by prior reviewers and in the article's AfD discussion, there is simply not enough WP:RS ↗ with WP:SIGCOV ↗ to establish that the subject is WP:Notable ↗. None of the sources are directly or primarily about the subject, but her association with a larger project.}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit ''after they have been resolved''.
{{clear}}

Jcgaylor (talk) 00:26, 29 October 2025 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC decline-->

Nomination of :A for Adley ↗ for deletion


<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0;">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :A for Adley ↗ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗ or whether it should be deleted ↗.

The article will be discussed at '''Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A for Adley ↗''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk) 23:38, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message



<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 18 November 2025 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2025/Coordination/MM/08&oldid=1322758940 -->

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Mia Talerico ↗ has been accepted


<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:var(--background-color-success-subtle, #dff2eb); padding: 0.5em 1em; color: inherit; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">50px|left ↗ '''Mia Talerico ↗, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.'''<br />

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. <br />

The article has been assessed as '''Start-Class''', which is recorded on its talk page ↗. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop ↗ over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme ↗ to see how you can improve the article.

<div class="autoconfirmed-show">Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself ↗ without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation ↗ if you prefer.</div>

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the '''<span class="plainlinks" >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Mia_Talerico help desk]</span>'''.<span class="unconfirmed-show"> Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself ↗ without posting a request to Articles for creation ↗.</span>

Thanks again, and happy editing!
– <span style="color:#333">'''brad''v'''''</span> 18:00, 25 November 2025 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC accept-->

January 2026



25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, :Violet McGraw ↗, but you didn't provide a reliable source ↗. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable ↗. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation ↗, your edit is archived in the page history ↗. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-unsourced1 --> Waxworker (talk) 12:30, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Somedays (upcoming film) ↗ (January 22)


<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: var(--background-color-warning-subtle, #fdf2d5); color: inherit; padding: 0.5em 1em; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> 50px|left ↗Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation ↗ has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

{{divbox|gray|3=This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article ↗—that is, they do not show ''significant'' coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in ''published'', ''reliable'' ↗, ''secondary'' ↗ sources that are ''independent ↗'' of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films ↗). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help ↗ and learn about mistakes to avoid ↗ when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}}<!--
--
--> Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it ''after they have been resolved''.
{{clear}}

DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:47, 22 January 2026 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC decline-->

Concern regarding Draft:Anabella Queen ↗


25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, Filipinos19. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Anabella Queen ↗, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted ↗, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it ↗ again&#32;or request ↗ that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted ↗ so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:08, 24 June 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Genuine Fraud (upcoming TV series) ↗


48px|left|alt=|link= ↗

Hello, Filipinos19. This message concerns the Articles for Creation ↗ submission or draft ↗ page you started, "Genuine Fraud ↗".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy ↗, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply {{edit|Draft:Genuine Fraud (upcoming TV series)|edit the submission}}, and remove the {{tlc|db-afc}}, {{tlc|db-draft}}, or {{tlc|db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can '''request its undeletion''' ↗. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! <!-- Template:Db-draft-notice --> DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 04:22, 1 July 2026 (UTC)