User Talk: FredTC

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

A belated welcome!

thumb|300px|Sorry for the belated welcome, but the cookies are still warm! File:Face-smile.svg|25px ↗ ↗Here's wishing you a belated ↗ welcome to Wikipedia ↗, FredTC. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions ↗. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Introduction ↗

The five pillars of Wikipedia ↗

How to edit a page ↗

Help pages ↗

How to write a great article ↗

Editor's index to Wikipedia ↗

Also, when you post on talk pages ↗ you should sign your name ↗ using four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian ↗! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on {{#if: Green Giant|my talk page|my talk page}}, consult Wikipedia:Questions ↗, or place {{tl|helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! '''<span style="text-shadow:#C0C0C0 0.2em 0.2em 0.2em"><span style="color:#0F0;">Green Giant</span> supports <span style="color:#00F;">NonFreeWiki</span> ↗ (<span style="color:#F00;">talk</span>)</span>''' 17:12, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Discussion started by Emotionhaha55

@FredTC : As your comment of "Your edits on the pages Bhumibol Adulyadej and Vajiralongkorn" topic on my talk page. I am a Thai person who is interested about history of Royalty and King of Thailand. So, I saw some part of the contents had incorrect meaning and did not have any references as well. Therefore I edited those because I think information in Wikipedia should be real and correct information and has clearly references for being the useful articles to others. This is the reason why I edited, and I would like to confirm that is not the censorship. Emotionhaha55 (talk) 08:51, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''2019 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2019|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2019|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
</td></tr>
</table>

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''2020 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2020|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2020|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
</td></tr>
</table>

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''2021 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2021|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2021|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 23 November 2021 (UTC)</small>
</td></tr>
</table>

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px;">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2022 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2022|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2022|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2023 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2023|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>

Pita Limjaroenrat

Excuse me, could you please help me organize the grammar of Pita Limjaroenrat ↗'s article? Pandemonium91871 (talk) 14:04, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

:Sorry, I'm not a native English speaker, so I don't feel qualified to do such a thing in such a big article. FredTC (talk) 14:56, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2024 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2024|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 18 November 2025 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>

Discussion started by F4T4L1TyVincenT

@FredTC : Thank you for your feedback.

I understand your concern, but I do not think the edit should be reverted solely because the skyline photo was taken at night. The article is about Bangkok as a city, not specifically about Bangkok during the daytime.

Across Wikipedia, many capital-city and major-city articles use skyline images taken at night when those images are of high quality, visually representative, and provide a balanced overview of the city. The key consideration is whether the image helps illustrate the subject effectively, rather than whether it was taken during the day or at night.

My intention in adding the image was to improve the visual presentation of the article and to showcase a recognizable and representative view of Bangkok. In my view, the image is aesthetically appropriate, encyclopedic in nature, and consistent with image choices used in many other city articles across Wikipedia.

For these reasons, I would appreciate it if you could reconsider the revert and evaluate the image based on its suitability and encyclopedic value rather than the time of day it was taken.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————

Bedankt voor uw feedback.

Ik begrijp uw bezwaar, maar ik denk niet dat de bewerking uitsluitend ongedaan gemaakt zou moeten worden omdat de skylinefoto 's nachts is genomen. Het artikel gaat over Bangkok als stad en niet specifiek over Bangkok overdag.

Op Wikipedia gebruiken veel artikelen over hoofdsteden en grote steden skylinefoto's die 's nachts zijn gemaakt, wanneer deze foto's van hoge kwaliteit zijn, representatief zijn voor de stad en een goed algemeen beeld geven van het onderwerp. Het belangrijkste criterium is of de afbeelding het onderwerp op een effectieve manier illustreert, niet of zij overdag of 's nachts is genomen.

Mijn bedoeling met het toevoegen van de afbeelding was om de visuele presentatie van het artikel te verbeteren en een herkenbaar en representatief beeld van Bangkok te tonen. Naar mijn mening is de afbeelding esthetisch passend, encyclopedisch relevant en in overeenstemming met de beeldkeuzes die in veel andere stadsartikelen op Wikipedia worden gebruikt.

Om die redenen zou ik het op prijs stellen als u de terugdraaiing opnieuw zou willen overwegen en de afbeelding zou beoordelen op haar geschiktheid en encyclopedische waarde, in plaats van op het tijdstip waarop de foto is genomen.

Hartelijk dank voor uw tijd en overweging.

F4T4L1TyVincenT (talk) 23:45, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

:@F4T4L1TyVincenT ↗: You started this discussion in a wrong way. A new discussion has to be placed at the bottom of the talk page, so I moved it. FredTC (talk) 06:25, 22 June 2026 (UTC)
:@F4T4L1TyVincenT ↗: I started a discussion about this at Talk:Bangkok ↗. FredTC (talk) 10:44, 22 June 2026 (UTC)