W
Active Editors
Back to Profile

User Talk: Guylaen

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

{{Wikibreak}}
{{Archive box
|search=yes
|collapsible=yes
|bot=MiszaBot III
|age=61
|numbers0=yes
|title=Archives         ↗
|style= background: #ffffff; font color: black; visited: black;
}

|
{{Nowrap|'''2021''': {{Archives by months|2021|numbers0=yes}}}}
{{Nowrap|'''2022''': {{Archives by months|2022|numbers0=yes}}}}
{{Nowrap|'''2023''': {{Archives by months|2023|numbers0=yes}}}}
{{Nowrap|'''2024''': {{Archives by months|2024|numbers0=yes}}}}
{{Nowrap|'''2025''': {{Archives by months|2025|numbers0=yes}}}}
<!-- {{Nowrap|'''2026''': {{Archives by months|2025|numbers0=yes}}}} -->
}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
| algo=old(61d)
| archive=User talk:Guylaen/Archives/%(year)d/%(month)02d
| minthreadsleft=5
| minthreadstoarchive=1
}}

Ambong Rebellion ↗ moved to draftspace



Thanks for your contributions to Ambong Rebellion ↗. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because '''it needs more sources to establish notability'''.
I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page ↗.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 06:21, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

:You really care that much about stubs not having more than one source, eh? It shouldn't need ANY, it's a stub. Guylaen (talk) 06:32, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
::Please see wikipedia guidelines on notability. Notability in the English Wikipedia ↗ Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 06:35, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
:::Please see Wikipedia:Make stubs ↗ "...even a small number..." Guylaen (talk) 06:40, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
::::'''Stubs still need to demonstrate notability through reliable sources''', regardless of length. Wikipedia:Make stubs ↗ encourages creating short articles, but that page also assumes the topic already meets Wikipedia:Notability ↗. A stub on a non-notable topic is still a candidate for removal. '''The sourcing requirement isn't about length, it's about whether the subject warrants an article at all.''' I am making it easier for you. Fix the draft, and you can move it to main space after an AfC review. If not it might be a candidate for speedy deletion. See Wikipedia:Speedy deletion criterion for unsourced articles ↗ Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 06:45, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
:::::OK, well, finals are this week. I'll get to it later some time. Gods, I wish people respected stubs more. Guylaen (talk) 15:18, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
::::::Its not about it being a stub or not. There are plenty of notable stubs out there. We need sources to verify notability. It has nothing to do with it being a stub Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 03:02, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

May 2026



25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm Flyingphoenixchips. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, :DraftːAmbong Rebellion ↗, but the source cited does not verify that content ↗. It has been removed for now, but if you would like to include a citation ↗ that '''directly supports''' the content and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners ↗. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-fv1 --> Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 06:34, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

:Did you not read the source? Guylaen (talk) 06:44, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
::You actually have to read the source. Guylaen (talk) 06:44, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started



Hi Guylaen. Thank you for your work on Rebuilding of Cyrene ↗. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol ↗ and left the following comment:

{{Bq|1=This article remains rather short, and so I've merged it Cyrene ↗ where it can be better considered in context.}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|<nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>Klbrain<nowiki>}}</nowiki>}}. <small>(Message delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)</small><!-- Template:Sentnote-NPF -->

Klbrain (talk) 17:10, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

:@Flyingphoenixchips, See what I mean. This one here was a stub for less than a year.
:Instead of expanding it, they merged it. This is what I mean by people not respecting stubs. The standard rule for stubs should be expansion, not deletion. I'm not angry, just frustrated. Guylaen (talk) 19:20, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
::I think I just generally dislike deletionism as a philosophy. Guylaen (talk) 19:21, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
::well it is what it is. I feel this ngl. Flyingphoenixchips (talk) 00:12, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started



Hi Guylaen. Thank you for your work on Puroh Expedition ↗. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol ↗ and left the following comment:

{{Bq|1=Thank you for writing the article. Have a nice Sunday!}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|<nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>SunDawn<nowiki>}}</nowiki>}}. <small>(Message delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)</small><!-- Template:Sentnote-NPF -->

<span style="color:orange; background-color:black;">&maltese; '''SunDawn''' &maltese;</span> <span style="color:white; background-color:#2a3f7a;">Contact me!</span> 13:56, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started



Hi Guylaen. Thank you for your work on Colonial Annual Reports ↗. Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol ↗ and left the following comment:

{{Bq|1=Thanks for creating this stub for a long-running and important report series from HM Stationary Series. With only one source, its rather thin; adding some sources other than the National Archives (which is excellent, of course) would be helpful.}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|<nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>Klbrain<nowiki>}}</nowiki>}}. <small>(Message delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)</small><!-- Template:Sentnote-NPF -->

Klbrain (talk) 19:04, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Timeline of intelligence in the United States ↗


25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, Guylaen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Timeline of intelligence in the United States ↗, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted ↗, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it ↗ again&#32;or request ↗ that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted ↗ so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:07, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

Claude Dansey ↗ - Stray words (section Deputy Chief of the Secret Intelligence Service)



I notice in this short section that between the first paragraph and the second are two stray wikilinked words The Buffs ↗. As that period covered by the section is from 1939 to his death in 1947, did he have anything to do with that regiment during the period? If not, then that can be deleted. I am told it was added in this edit ↗ by you, according to DuncanHill (see Talk page to that article).Cloptonson (talk) 07:42, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

:Replied on relevant talk page. Guylaen (talk) 14:14, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

Use of primary sources



Note that on a breaking news story like Bricks & Minifigs–Reckless Ben controversy ↗, Wikipedia has to be especially careful when writing about living people, and should be cautious how it uses primary sources. Court records can't be cited by themselves per WP:BLPPRIMARY ↗, and YouTube commentary channels fall under WP:SPS ↗ when discussing living people, even if the host is a recognised expert in the field. Belbury (talk) 15:32, 11 June 2026 (UTC)

:Please ping me on the relevant talk page. Guylaen (talk) 15:34, 11 June 2026 (UTC)
::There's no open discussion on it, I'd just reverted the paragraph you added to Bricks & Minifigs–Reckless Ben controversy ↗, under those two policies. Appreciate your work on the article and wanted to make sure that you were aware of them. Belbury (talk) 15:44, 11 June 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 21



An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Freemasonry in Cuba ↗, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fernando Poo ↗ was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

:Rectified. Guylaen (talk) 07:23, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Draw out of a hat ↗


25px|alt=|link= ↗ Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have '''automatically detected''' that this edit ↗ performed by you, on the page :Draw out of a hat ↗, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive ↗, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/Boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Guylaen&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d={{FULLPAGENAMEE:Draw out of a hat}}&preloadparams%5b%5d=1360556961 report it to my operator].
Thanks, <!-- User:Qwerfjkl (bot)/inform -->Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 06:52, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

:Rectified. Please use a different bot next time to fix the error instead of cluttering my talk page. Guylaen (talk) 07:22, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Timeline of intelligence in the United States ↗


48px|left|alt=|link= ↗

Hello, Guylaen. This message concerns the Articles for Creation ↗ submission or draft ↗ page you started, "Timeline of intelligence in the United States ↗".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy ↗, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply {{edit|Draft:Timeline of intelligence in the United States|edit the submission}}, and remove the {{tlc|db-afc}}, {{tlc|db-draft}}, or {{tlc|db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can '''request its undeletion''' ↗. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! <!-- Template:Db-draft-notice --> DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 12:25, 26 June 2026 (UTC)

Hi



I saw that you're working on the article about Freemasonry in Cuba. Once you're done, would you translate the article about socialism of Germany ↗? Thank you (gracias) &#126;2026-36833-55 ↗ (talk) 23:51, 26 June 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started



Hi Guylaen. Thank you for your work on Old business ↗. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol ↗ and left the following comment:

{{Bq|1=none of these actually have the term mentioned. It would be surprising ↗ to readers.}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|<nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>MPGuy2824<nowiki>}}</nowiki>}}. <small>(Message delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)</small><!-- Template:Sentnote-NPF -->

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 02:36, 30 June 2026 (UTC)