W
Active Editors
Back to Profile

User Talk: H-eros-mus-tri-se

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

CS1 error on University of Michigan ↗


25px|alt=|link= ↗ Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have '''automatically detected''' that this edit ↗ performed by you, on the page :University of Michigan ↗, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive ↗, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20H-eros-mus-tri-se&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d={{FULLPAGENAMEE:University of Michigan}}&preloadparams%5b%5d=1188623242 report it to my operator].
Thanks, <!-- User:Qwerfjkl (bot)/inform -->Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:46, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

2023 Conflict of interest notice with the University of Michigan ↗



25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, H-eros-mus-tri-se. We welcome ↗ your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about ↗ on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest ↗ (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the '''conflict of interest guideline ↗''' and FAQ for organizations ↗ for more information. We ask that you:


In addition, you are '''required''' by the Wikimedia Foundation ↗'s terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure ↗.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.<!-- THE FOLLOWING CATEGORY SHOULD BE REMOVED IF THE USER IS BLOCKED, OR IT IS DECIDED THAT THIS USER DOES NOT HAVE A COI, OR THIS TEMPLATE HAS BEEN IN PLACE FOR A WHILE WITH NO ACTION. -->{{#ifexpr: ({{#time: U | now}} - 1701971478) < 13150000 | {{PAGENAME}} ↗ | }}<!-- Template:uw-coi --> GuardianH (talk) 17:21, 7 December 2023 (UTC)

2024 Conflict of interest notice with the University of Michigan ↗



H-eros-mus-tri-se Do you have any connection with the University of Michigan ↗? GuardianH (talk) 19:54, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

:What is your definition of "connection"? Do you mean I got paid for editing? Then, no. H-eros-mus-tri-se (talk) 00:22, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
::@H-eros-mus-tri-se Do you have any connection to the university that may prompt a conflict of interest? A connection that would influence your editing in any way less than objective — i.e., to paint the university in a favorable or promotional manner. GuardianH (talk) 05:31, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
:::No, in the case of financial conflict of interest. H-eros-mus-tri-se (talk) 21:04, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
::::I never asked about a financial conflict of interest, just any conflict of interest. Do you have ''any'' conflict of interest? @H-eros-mus-tri-se GuardianH (talk) 02:12, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
:::::This is a vague question. Be specific. Everything is connected to everything else with overlapping interests. If you are seeking meaningless answers, my response would be "NO." H-eros-mus-tri-se (talk) 07:27, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

{{outdent}} Stop dancing around the question. Do you have a conflict of interest ↗ with the University of Michigan? ElKevbo (talk) 22:59, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

:no H-eros-mus-tri-se (talk) 23:41, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

April 2024



25px|alt=Information icon|link= ↗ Hello. Thank you for your contributions ↗ to Wikipedia ↗. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary ↗. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief ↗.

The edit summary field looks like this:
{{The edit-summary field/OOUI}}

'''Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make.''' With a Wikipedia account ↗ you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting {{myprefs|3|check=Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary}}, and then click the "Save" button.
Thanks!{{sp}}<!-- Template:uw-editsummary --> ElKevbo (talk) 22:59, 12 April 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 29



Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of University of Michigan business alumni ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page First State Bank ↗. Such links are usually incorrect ↗, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. <small>(Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.)</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 16



An automated process has detected that when you recently edited University of Michigan ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alumni Field ↗.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:46, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright



30px|link=|alt=Control copyright icon ↗ Hello H-eros-mus-tri-se! Your additions to :University of Michigan–Dearborn ↗ have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted ↗ content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain ↗ or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible ↗ copyright license. (''To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission ↗''.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright ↗ and plagiarism ↗ issues. Here are the key points:
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked ↗ from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-copyright-new --> — Diannaa (talk) 22:28, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message



<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2024 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2024|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/09&oldid=1258243804 -->

Disambiguation link notification for February 23



An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Julie Biteen ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nathan Lewis ↗.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia


25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Thank you for your contributions ↗ to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved content from :History of the University of Michigan ↗ into :University of Michigan ↗. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content (here or elsewhere), Wikipedia's licensing ↗ does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary ↗ at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking ↗ to the copied page, e.g., <code>copied content from <nowiki>page name ↗</nowiki>; see that page's history for attribution</code>. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{tl|copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia ↗. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-copying --> -- mikeblas (talk) 21:50, 16 August 2025 (UTC)

Use of primary sources and Further reading section



Hi, I’d like to address a recurring issue with your edits to the University of Michigan ↗ article.

1. Overuse of primary sources ↗:<br/>
From the beginning, much of the article has relied heavily on primary sources published by the university itself (e.g., catalogs, by-laws, registers). While Wikipedia does not prohibit primary sources, the guideline at WP:PRIMARY ↗ makes it clear that they must be used with great caution, and articles on universities should primarily be based on independent, secondary sources that provide analysis and context. Please stop adding more university-published primary sources as references — this practice makes the article read like institutional self-promotion rather than an encyclopedic entry.

2. Misuse of Further reading:<br/>
Your recent edits to the Further reading section have introduced material that is not appropriate under Wikipedia:Further reading ↗. Specifically:<br/>
+ Topicality: <u>“''A large part, if not all, of the work should be directly about the subject of the article''.”</u> Works such as General by-laws, registers, and newsletters are administrative documents, not scholarly works about the university.
Reliable: “Preference is normally given to high-quality reliable sources.” Primary records from the 19th century and internal regulations are not high-quality secondary sources.<br/>
+ Balanced: <u>“''Works named in this section should present a neutral view of the subject''.”</u> Adding children’s books (e.g., University of Michigan 101) clearly fails this requirement.<br/>
+ Limited: <u>“''Wikipedia is not a catalogue of all existing works… preference should normally be given to notable works over non-notable works.''”</u> A large dump of archival primary documents clutters the section and violates this principle.<br/>
===> Further reading is intended for secondary, scholarly, high-quality works that readers can consult for deeper understanding. Primary administrative records and children’s books simply do not fit.

In addition, moving two Further reading items into the Bibliography section is also incorrect. Per WP:BIBLIOGRAPHY ↗, that section is reserved for works actually used to build the article’s content, not for general background reading.

3. Structure:<br/>
You also created unnecessary sub-sections (“Primary sources,” “For young readers,” “Scholarly studies”), which is not the standard layout. Per guideline: “The Further reading section of an article contains a bulleted list of a reasonable number of works… The section is one of the optional standard appendices and footers. These appear in a defined order at the bottom of the article.” Your restructuring departs from this standard and makes the section messy.

👉 In short:<br/>
+ Please stop adding new university-published primary sources as references unless there are no alternative secondary sources available.<br/>
+ Remove non-appropriate works (administrative records, children’s books) from Further reading.<br/>
+ Restore Further reading to a simple, clean bulleted list of notable, secondary, scholarly works.<br/>

If the article continues to rely so heavily on university-published primary sources, it risks being tagged for overuse of primary sources. Even if I do not place such a maintenance tag, at some point another editor will — because this problem is very visible in the current sourcing. That is not the direction we want a Featured-quality university article to go.

You may want to take a look at how other high-quality articles (for example, Normandy landings ↗) handle their Bibliography and Further reading sections. Those articles rely on independent, secondary scholarly works, presented cleanly in a bulleted list. That model could easily be followed here to improve sourcing and organization. CalCoWSpiBudSu (talk) 16:18, 9 September 2025 (UTC)

:Also, I understand you may have a personal attachment to the university, but if the article is not built according to guidelines it will only create problems later. Even when I added well-sourced secondary references, they were still challenged due to long-standing editorial disputes and bias. That is why it is important to keep this section strictly aligned with policy. CalCoWSpiBudSu (talk) 16:37, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
::Thank you for the information. The article certainly requires the expertise of experienced editors to enhance its overall quality. H-eros-mus-tri-se (talk) 06:12, 11 September 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 23



An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of University of Michigan business alumni ↗, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Henry Ward ↗ and Jeff Lawson ↗.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:59, 23 September 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 8



An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of University of Michigan faculty and staff ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Richard Robson ↗.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message



<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 18 November 2025 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2025/Coordination/MM/08&oldid=1322758940 -->

Disambiguation link notification for December 16



An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of University of Michigan business alumni ↗, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Henry Ward ↗ and Jeff Lawson ↗.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 16 December 2025 (UTC)

January 2026



30px|link=|alt=Copyright problem icon ↗ Your edit to :History of the University of Michigan ↗ has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted ↗ material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission ↗ from the copyright holder. If you {{em|are}} the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials ↗ for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate ↗ and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of {{em|information}}, but not as a source of {{em|content}}, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy '''will be blocked from editing ↗'''. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources ↗ for more information. <!-- Template:uw-copyright --> — Diannaa&nbsp;<span style="color:red">🍁</span>&nbsp;(talk) 01:54, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

:I treated the page as a sandbox and will rewrite it shortly. I will be more cautious. Thank you. H-eros-mus-tri-se (talk) 06:15, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 4



An automated process has detected that when you recently edited History of the University of Michigan ↗, a link pointing to the disambiguation page High Mass ↗ was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 4 February 2026 (UTC)