W
Active Editors
Back to Profile

User Talk: H3nrique Bregie

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.


License tagging for File:José Manuel Bolieiro (cropped).PNG


Thanks for uploading :File:José Manuel Bolieiro (cropped).PNG ↗. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags ↗ to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list ↗, click on this link ↗, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions ↗. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:31, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 17



Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2026 Portuguese presidential election ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page João Ferreira ↗<!-- ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/2026_Portuguese_presidential_election check to confirm]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/2026_Portuguese_presidential_election?client=notify fix with Dab solver])-->. Such links are usually incorrect ↗, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. <small>(Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.)</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

July 2022



25px|alt=|link= ↗ Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that in <span class="plainlinks">this edit ↗</span> to :Portugal ↗, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary ↗. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page ↗. Thank you. <!-- Template:Huggle/warn-delete-1 --><!-- Template:uw-delete1 -->Adakiko (talk) 11:38, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Stop edit-warring



Please, stop edit-warring over Portuguese opinion polling articles. You were bold in conducting your edits, but those were contested, so now you should seek a consensus rather than keeping edit-warring (see WP:BRD ↗). On your particular comments, opinion polling tables are not listings of events. Some users unilaterally added these across Wikipedia throughout the years, but the current trend is for these to be removed over a large number of issues (I can explain further if necessary). Opinion polling for the next United Kingdom general election ↗ has a very specific consensus which is not exportable to other articles (though you may notice in the talk page that a number of new events were proposed AND rejected. This is not something you can apply to other articles). In the case of Opinion polling for the 2011 Portuguese legislative election ↗, that is one of these few instances in which events were unilaterally added and not removed, though it's curious you use that as an argument for adding events into the rest of the polling pages and not the other way around (using the fact that 2019, 2022 and next do not show events in order to remove the events from 2011, which is the actual correct thing to do. We could also cite 2015, 2009 or 2005 as examples of polling articles not citing events. 2011 was not following consensus, thus not an example to follow). Hope this was clarifying. Cheers! '''<span style="color:#E65B00;">Impru</span><span style="color:#0018A8;">20</span>'''<sup>talk</sup> 18:58, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message



<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px;">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2022 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2022|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2022|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2022/Coordination/MM/08&oldid=1124425185 -->

Rui Rocha ↗ moved to draftspace



Thanks for creating Rui Rocha ↗. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because '''it has no sources'''.
Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page ↗.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. I dream of horses (Contribs) ↗ (Talk) 00:32, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 6



An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Seven Wonders of Portugal ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mafra ↗<!-- ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Seven_Wonders_of_Portugal check to confirm]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Seven_Wonders_of_Portugal?client=notify fix with Dab solver])-->.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 7



An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mariana Mortágua ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alvito ↗<!-- ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Mariana_Mort%C3%A1gua check to confirm]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Mariana_Mort%C3%A1gua?client=notify fix with Dab solver])-->.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message



<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2023 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2023|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Illusion Flame@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2023/Coordination/MM/08&oldid=1187132475 -->

":Next Azorean regional election ↗" listed at Redirects for discussion ↗


30px ↗
The redirect <span class="plainlinks">[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Next_Azorean_regional_election&redirect=no Next Azorean regional election]</span> has been listed at redirects for discussion ↗ to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines ↗. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 18#Next Azorean regional election}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> <span style="color:#259a83">Rusalkii</span> (talk) 21:22, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 26



An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 14th Legislature of the Third Portuguese Republic ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page António Filipe ↗.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

Your attempt to move an article using copy/paste/delete



Please read Wikipedia:Moving a page ↗. I reverted your attempt to move José Manuel Barroso ↗ for the reasons explained in that article.

See also WP: consensus ↗. 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 08:05, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started



Hi H3nrique Bregie. Thank you for your work on Filipe Sousa (politician) ↗. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol ↗ and left the following comment:

{{Bq|1=Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|<nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>SunDawn<nowiki>}}</nowiki>}}. <small>(Message delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)</small><!-- Template:Sentnote-NPF -->

<span style="background-color:black; color:orange;">&maltese; SunDawn &maltese;</span> <span style="color:blue;"><span style="font-size:85%;">(contact)</span></span> 03:24, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Portuguese constituencies



Hi, I wanted to explain my reverts of your additions to the Portuguese constituencies articles as you may it view it as harsh. The content you added was a reptition of content that was already given in the articles. If you were adding the current MPs, then this information is given in the infobox under "Deputies". But having checked your addition to the Assembly of the Republic website, they weren't the current MPs. Most probably they were the MPs elected at the election but this is also a repetition as this information is given in the results section in the article. Also, when you add a list of content please sort them into a logical order, such as alpahbetical, that everyone can understand. Please remember that Wikipedia has a global readership, not just followers of Portuguese politics. Thank you. Obi2canibe ↗ (talk) 10:27, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

:I think you got it wrong, that information weren't the elected MPs, they were the current MPs, I checked that information from https://www.parlamento.pt/DeputadoGP/Paginas/Plenario.aspx. I know that information was avaliable in the infobox, but the infobox should reflect the information from the rest of the article, and as such I was adding that information to the article itself.
:Also, I think the order in the infobox looked more arbitrary than that of my tables. My tables listed the MPs first by the party (from most to less voted) and then by the order of the actual party list. I think that information is also very important to be in the article, and I think that order is more relevant than alphabetical order.
:I personally don't think my edits have made it any harder for everyone to read and understand the page. If someone is checking a page about a constituency, they might like to check the list of current MPs.
:I get that perhaps you might not agree with me that the tables were the best way to add that information to the article, but I think we can discuss a better way to add that information in a way that it becomes more compreensible and accessible to the general public. H3nrique Bregie (talk) 12:55, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

::Okay, there are the current MPs, it would have helped if you had provided the source when you added the content to the articles. Yes, the infobox should reflect the content of the article but the content you added was right next to the infobox so it was unnecessary duplication. The order in the infobox isn't arbitrary, it was in alphabetical order by surname which is the standard way English Wikipedia sorts biographical articles. You may think that the order in which the MPs were elected is very important but I doubt most readers would share your view. If they are searching for an individual they would be able to find them quickly if they are sorted by name but not if they're sorted by your preferred order--Obi2canibe ↗ (talk) 18:55, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
:::I think that sorting every MP by the order in the party list is more relevant than by surname alphabetically. Maybe one way to change that would be making the table sortable, that way it could be arranged in alphabetical order. And if the tables are readded I will add a source, that's not really complicated and I should have thought about doing so in the first place.
:::I just think that the information should be in the page in a way that could be easier for readers to see and understand, if you think there's a different solution then I'm all ears. H3nrique Bregie (talk) 20:20, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

::::We'll have to agree to disagree on the issue of whether anyone really cares which order the candidates were elected.--Obi2canibe ↗ (talk) 19:00, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message



<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2024 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2024|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/07&oldid=1258243692 -->

CS1 error on 10th Legislature of the Third Portuguese Republic ↗


25px|alt=|link= ↗ Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have '''automatically detected''' that this edit ↗ performed by you, on the page :10th Legislature of the Third Portuguese Republic ↗, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive ↗, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20H3nrique_Bregie&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d={{FULLPAGENAMEE:10th Legislature of the Third Portuguese Republic}}&preloadparams%5b%5d=1270452746 report it to my operator].
Thanks, <!-- User:Qwerfjkl (bot)/inform -->Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:32, 19 January 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started



Hi H3nrique Bregie. Thank you for your work on Paulo Estêvão ↗. Another editor, Moriwen, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol ↗ and left the following comment:

{{Bq|1=Solid stub! Thanks for creating.}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|<nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>Moriwen<nowiki>}}</nowiki>}}. <small>(Message delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)</small><!-- Template:Sentnote-NPF -->

— Moriwen (talk) 18:17, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

Next Madeiran regional election ↗ moved to draftspace



Thanks for your contributions to Next Madeiran regional election ↗. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because '''it needs more sources to establish notability''' and '''it is WP:TOOSOON ↗ for an article'''.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page ↗.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 21:04, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

June 2025



25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello. I have noticed that you {{usertalk other|Bregie|PATH}} often ↗|often}} edit without using an edit summary ↗. Please do your best to '''always fill in the summary field'''. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences ↗. Thanks! <!-- Template:Uw-editsummary2 --> Legend of 14 (talk) 18:46, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

Opinion polling for the next Portuguese legislative election ↗ moved to draftspace



Thanks for your contributions to Opinion polling for the next Portuguese legislative election ↗. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because '''it needs more sources to establish notability'''.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page ↗.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. '''<span style="color:#536895;">Onel</span><span style="color:#ffb300;">5969</span>''' <sup><i style="color:blue">TT me</i></sup> 15:34, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:2021–2025 Portuguese political crisis ↗


25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, H3nrique Bregie. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2021–2025 Portuguese political crisis ↗, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted ↗, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it ↗ again&#32;or request ↗ that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted ↗ so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:07, 11 November 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message



<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 18 November 2025 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2025/Coordination/MM/07&oldid=1322758895 -->

Disambiguation link notification for December 2



An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Porto Municipal Chamber ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pedro Duarte ↗.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

Madeiran next election page



Hi there @H3nrique Bregie, a user sent, for some unknown reason, the next Madeiran election page again for review. I have already re-submitted it again. Cheers Tuesp1985 (talk) 19:46, 27 December 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started



Hi H3nrique Bregie. Thank you for your work on Gonçalo Lopes ↗. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol ↗ and left the following comment:

{{Bq|1=Thank you for creating the article! Have a blessed day!}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|<nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>SunDawn<nowiki>}}</nowiki>}}. <small>(Message delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)</small><!-- Template:Sentnote-NPF -->

<span style="color:orange; background-color:black;">&maltese; '''SunDawn''' &maltese;</span> <span style="color:white; background-color:#2a3f7a;">Contact me!</span> 03:43, 1 January 2026 (UTC)

2026 election graph



Hi there @H3nrique Bregie, as Games30Top isn't responding or updating his graph, could you update yours and, if possible, make the lines like in the Marcelo approval graph, more smooth? I'll await a response. Cheers Tuesp1985 (talk) 00:31, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

:The thing about the Marcelo approval graph is that it has nine years of monthly polls to fill the graph, which leads to a more accurate progression in the lines. Now, when it comes to the presidential election the volume of polls is much smaller and as such I don't know how to make a model with curved lines that would work. I tried to fix some stuff, but I also couldn't extend the graph until Election Day without the lines extending until then. What do you think of this version?
:700px ↗<br> H3nrique Bregie (talk) 01:00, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
::Right. I think the lines are better. Just would make one more change, if possible, to extend the axis to election day and add a vertical line, like in the next Portuguese legislative election graph. If that's not possible, no worries, it can be posted like it is. Tuesp1985 (talk) 01:23, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
:::Hi there @H3nrique Bregie. Just a heads up, after you updated the 2026 election and Marcelo approval's graphics, a few lines appeared on the bottom that should be deleted. Cheers Tuesp1985 (talk) 01:19, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
::Hi there @H3nrique Bregie, sorry for being a bore but, because of the close numbers between the candidates, wouldn't it be better to lower the thickness of the trending lines, to something similar with other polling graphics. What do you think? Cheers Tuesp1985 (talk) 13:20, 17 January 2026 (UTC)
:::@H3nrique Bregie, I think the election results dots should be bigger, don't you think? Tuesp1985 (talk) 00:40, 21 January 2026 (UTC)
::::Done! H3nrique Bregie (talk) 19:32, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

Hope you're well



Hi there @H3nrique Bregie, I see you logged in again. I know you are from the Leiria area and hope everything is fine with you and your family and friends. Take care and be safe. Cheers! Tuesp1985 (talk) 23:52, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

:Hey, thank you very much! I'm fine, and so is my family. I'm still out of electricity but fortunately I can now get service, so everything is getting back on strack. Cheers! H3nrique Bregie (talk) 11:38, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

ITN recognition for 2026 Portuguese presidential election ↗



{{ivmbox
|1=On 12 February 2026, '''''In the news ↗''''' was updated with an item that involved the article '''''2026 Portuguese presidential election ↗''''', which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page ↗. Stephen 11:48, 12 February 2026 (UTC)
|2={{Ambox globe current red}}
|imagesize=50px
}}<!-- Template:ITN notice -->

Speedy deletion ↗ nomination of :Category:Portuguese female rappers ↗


48px|left|alt=|link= ↗

A tag has been placed on :Category:Portuguese female rappers ↗ indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category ↗, a category redirect ↗, under discussion at Categories for discussion ↗, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may '''contest the nomination''' by visiting the page ↗ and removing the speedy deletion tag. <!-- Template:Db-catempty-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">'''''L'''''iz</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">'''''Read!''''' ↗ '''''Talk!'''''</sup> 23:20, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 26



An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2001 Portuguese local elections ↗, a link pointing to the disambiguation page São Pedro do Sul ↗ was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Presidential standard of Portugal ↗ moved to draftspace



Thanks for your contributions to Presidential standard of Portugal ↗. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because '''it has no sources'''.
I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page ↗.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Boynamedsue (talk) 20:27, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Sintra elections



To the average reader these numbers are meaningless without some explanation. Remember this is the Engish language Wikipedia and only a very small proportion of readers will have any idea about Portuguese local politics. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 14:43, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

:I added the information that the parties are sorted from left to right, which should be helpful. About the rest, I just added the same information that is in the Lisbon ↗ and Porto ↗ articles. I'm planning to create other articles about Sintra's local elections, which will be linked there, but that's still a work in progress. H3nrique Bregie (talk) 14:56, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
::Some clue as to what the numbers and colours mean would help. Murgatroyd49 (talk) 14:59, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: 2021–2025 Portuguese political crisis ↗ (May 20)


<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: var(--background-color-warning-subtle, #fdf2d5); color: inherit; padding: 0.5em 1em; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">'''Draft declined'''{{pb}}50px|left ↗Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation ↗ has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.{{pb}}
<nowiki> </nowiki>'''Feedback'''{{pb}}The reviewer, Devonian Wombat, left the following feedback:
{{divbox|gray|3=This draft reads like an essay or opinion piece. Wikipedia is not a place for original research or personal opinions ↗. The draft should:

Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources ↗ that discuss the subject.|}}<!--
--
-->{{divbox|blue|3=This appears to be WP:OR ↗. Article is a massive collection of largely disconnected news stories.}}

'''Next steps'''

'''Need help?'''

'''Scam warning'''
Devonian Wombat (talk) 12:34, 20 May 2026 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC decline-->

{| style="margin: 0.4em 2em;"
|- style="vertical-align: top;"
| alt=Teahouse logo ↗
| <div style="background-color:#e1e6db; color: #393D38; padding: 1em; font-size: 1.1em; border-radius:10px;box-shadow:-2px -2px 1px #8e8a78;">Hello, '''H3nrique Bregie'''!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the '''Articles for creation help desk ↗'''. If you have any ''other'' questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the '''Teahouse ↗''', a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Devonian Wombat (talk) 12:34, 20 May 2026 (UTC)</div>
|}<!-- Wikipedia:Teahouse/AfC Invitation -->
Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC ↗

I have sent you a note about a page you started



Hi H3nrique Bregie. Thank you for your work on 2001 Porto local election ↗. Another editor, CostalCal, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol ↗ and left the following comment:

{{Bq|1=Good articles!}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|<nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>CostalCal<nowiki>}}</nowiki>}}. <small>(Message delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)</small><!-- Template:Sentnote-NPF -->

CostalCal (talk) 04:55, 21 June 2026 (UTC)