User Talk: Hh1718

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

Hh1718, you are invited to the Teahouse!

{| style="margin: 1em 4em;"
|- valign="top"
| alt=Teahouse logo|link=w:en:WP:Teahouse|File:WP teahouse logo 2.png by User:Heatherawalls, licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 ↗
| <div style="background-color:#f4f3f0; color: #393D38; padding: 0.4em 1em;border-radius:10px; font-size: 1.1em;">
Hi '''Hh1718'''! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. <br />Be our guest at the Teahouse ↗! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like {{noping|Lectonar}} (talk ↗).

<div class="submit ui-button ui-widget ui-state-default ui-corner-all ui-button-text-only" role="button" aria-disabled="false" style="float: left;"><span class="ui-button-text">Visit the Teahouse ↗</span></div>

<div style="text-align:right;">We hope to see you there!

<small>Delivered by {{noping|HostBot}} on behalf of the Teahouse hosts ↗</small>

<small>20:04, 23 August 2017 (UTC)</small></div>
</div>
|}
Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation ↗

Invitation to join Wikiproject Military History

<div class="plainlinks" style="margin: 0.5em; border: 2px lightsteelblue solid; background: whitesmoke; padding: 1em;" >
'''Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}}!''' Thank you for your contributions ↗.right|48px ↗

If you would be interested in joining a group of editors dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history, please take a look at the Military history WikiProject ↗—we would be delighted to have you! If you like what you see, please sign your name here ↗, and a project coordinator will soon be along with a formal welcome. Regards, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me ↗) 04:55, 28 August 2017 (UTC)</div>

Anarchism

right|frameless|100px ↗ Hi Hh1718,

I saw your work ↗ on articles related to anarchism and wanted to say hello, as I work in the topic area too. If you haven't already, you might want to {{watch|Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anarchism}} our noticeboard for Wikipedia's coverage of anarchism ↗, which is a great place to ask questions, collaborate, discuss style/structure precedent, and stay informed about content related to anarchism. Take a look for yourself!

And if you're looking for other juicy places to edit, consider expanding a stub ↗, adopting a cleanup category ↗, or participating in one of our current formal discussions ↗.

Feel free to say hi on my talk page and let me know if these links were helpful (or at least interesting). Hope to see you around. <span style="background:#F3F3F3; padding:3px 9px 4px"><span style='font:bold small-caps 1.2em sans-serif;color:#871E8D'>czar</span></span> 00:23, 23 April 2020 (UTC)
: I know I had asked about receiving a peer review ↗ but if you're potentially interested in ''giving'' a review, one was just requested for Talk:Spanish Civil War ↗. FYI :) <span style="background:#F3F3F3; padding:3px 9px 4px"><span style='font:bold small-caps 1.2em sans-serif;color:#871E8D'>czar</span></span> 15:03, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
::Hello Czar, thanks for the invitation, it is always nice to learn someone thinks I might be of some use. 1) when it comes to Anarchism, I know close to nothing and can hardly contribute. I wrote the piece on 1936 coup attempt in Catalonia because I got interested in the episode itself, especially that there was little I combed out of the web, so following 4 days search I gathered enough info to feel that maybe I can write a dedicated piece myself; 2) as to peer reviewing of the Spanish-Civil-War-related articles, frankly speaking, I have no guts to try. I find engaging in editorial debates on WP emotionally exhausting and my wife even says I am getting nasty afterwards. I do WP stuff in my free time and I try to approach it as a pleasure. I have great admiration for people who do competent peer reviews just for the sake of improving the entries written by someone else, not to advance any specific agenda, but I am afraid I lack many features to enter this category. Regards, --Hh1718 (talk) 15:47, 25 May 2020 (UTC)
::: I hear you and no worries. It sounds like you've had a few bad disputes so far—sorry to hear that. While I too prefer to write articles in isolation, I've also found interaction with other editors over peer review to be rewarding. As a focused collaboration, reviews are less tendentious than stewarding/watching articles, which tends towards disputes over inserting content. If you have any interest in the Civil War, no pressure but just wanted to send my encouragement. Wikipedia is built by bold ↗ amateurs working in their spare time so no advanced expertise required and experienced editors know to be patient ↗. See you around, <span style="background:#F3F3F3; padding:3px 9px 4px"><span style='font:bold small-caps 1.2em sans-serif;color:#871E8D'>czar</span></span> 16:07, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''2021 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2021|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2021|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 23 November 2021 (UTC)</small>
</td></tr>
</table>

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px;">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2022 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2022|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2022|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>

Street

Hi. Very nice work on Jakšto Street ↗, superinteresting. I'd highly recommend you to nominate it at T:TDYK ↗. The only change I'd suggest is to switch Cyrillic alphabet into parenthesis and use transliteration in italics in main text. -- Soman (talk) 13:00, 11 May 2023 (UTC)
:Hello Soman, glad you liked it. As to your suggestions: 1) no, I'd prefer not to get my articles splashed or flagged on WP front page. You see, I suspect it would trigger lots of corrections and improvements by people who have never heard of Jakšto Street. I would prefer that the article is visited by people who have some genuine interest in the topic; 2) I am not sure what the WP rule about using Cyrillic names in English-language WP is. If it is recommended they get transliterated, I would be happy to comply. Otherwise, I have a vague sense that using Cyrillic adds the feel-and-touch and some local flavor, especially that I use also German, Lithuanian and Polish names. regards,--Hh1718 (talk) 15:05, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2023 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2023|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>

Fall of Barcelona

Hello,

Per the message you left at AFC/R ↗, I've moved Fall of Barcelona (1939) ↗ to Fall of Barcelona ↗. Thanks for writing such a great article! ~ <b style="color: #00733f">Eejit43</b> (<span style="color: #00733f">talk</span>) 13:12, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

:You can request that an article be moved to another name with the WP:Requested moves ↗ process. That would move the "(1939)" page to the page without the parenthetical disambiguator. Typically, this would involve opening a new topic section on the relevant talk page (such as Talk:Fall of Barcelona (1939) ↗ and then {{tlsx|Requested move|Fall of Barcelona|reason why this article should be renamed}} and pressing save without having a section header (it gets autogenerated with the subst-template) -- 65.92.247.66 ↗ (talk) 21:28, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

FWIW, WP:Village pump (miscellaneous) ↗, WP:Helpdesk ↗ and WP:Teahouse ↗, can also provide you with instructions on how to proceed. -- 65.92.247.66 ↗ (talk) 03:55, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

::Hello Eejit43 and dear 65.92.247.66, thanks for your help. I am not entirely sure I like dropping "(1939)" from the title of this entry. You see, I intended the title of "Fall of Barcelona (1939)" with a view of potential future articles on other falls of Barcelona, e.g. in 1714 or 1808. For the time being "Fall of Barcelona" is OK, but once some good soul bothers to release an entry "Fall of Barcelona (1714)" there might be a need to change the title. regards,--Hh1718 (talk) 07:24, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
:::Understood! As of right now, per the naming conventions ↗, the disambiguator is unnecessary. If those other articles are created, then if there is no primary topic ↗ we can disambiguate between those titles. In the meantime, feel free to add a hatnote ↗ to the article pointing to other targets. Thanks! : ~ <b style="color: #00733f">Eejit43</b> (<span style="color: #00733f">talk</span>) 14:04, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2024 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2024|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>

Disambiguation link notification for March 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of massacres in Spain ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cuenca ↗. Such links are usually incorrect ↗, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. <small>(Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.)</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

Undefined sfn references in Spanish Civil War

Hi, in this edit ↗ to Spanish Civil War ↗ you use <nowiki>{{sfn|Halperin|2004|p=211}}</nowiki> and <nowiki>{{sfn|Nicolson|1966|p=211}}</nowiki>. Unfortunately neither "Halperin 2004" nor "Nicolson 1966" are listed. This means that nobody can look the references up, and the article is added to :Category:Harv and Sfn no-target errors ↗. If you could supply the missing sources it would be appreciated. DuncanHill (talk) 22:16, 20 March 2025 (UTC)

:Hello DuncanHill,
:thanks for the note.
:My original edit contained all references needed, but following editions made by User:Nikkimaria they disappeared. As he/she insists on deleting the entire section, this issue apparently needs to be tackled within a somewhat broader framework (see article's talk page ↗). Sure if you have comments to add, this will be appreciated.
:regards, Hh1718 (talk) 06:59, 21 March 2025 (UTC)
::You've done it again here ↗. Your edit DOES NOT contain the sources. DuncanHill (talk) 11:34, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Hh1718. Thank you for your work on Timeline of the Spanish July 1936 coup ↗. Another editor, Scope creep, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol ↗ and left the following comment:

{{Bq|1=This article needs a lot more reference, 1 per event. Its currently mostly conjecture at the moment.}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|<nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>Scope creep<nowiki>}}</nowiki>}}. <small>(Message delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)</small>

'''<span style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px black; font-family:Papyrus"><span style="color:#3399ff">scope_creep</span><sup>Talk</sup></span>''' 23:08, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 18 November 2025 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Hh1718. Thank you for your work on Mérida Offensive ↗. Another editor, Scope creep, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol ↗ and left the following comment:

{{Bq|1=Great article.}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|<nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>Scope creep<nowiki>}}</nowiki>}}. <small>(Message delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)</small>

'''<span style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px black; font-family:Papyrus"><span style="color:#3399ff">scope_creep</span><sup>Talk</sup></span>''' 21:38, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Hh1718. Thank you for your work on Vicente Noguera Bonora ↗. Another editor, Scope creep, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol ↗ and left the following comment:

{{Bq|1=Great piece of history.}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|<nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>Scope creep<nowiki>}}</nowiki>}}. <small>(Message delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)</small>

'''<span style="text-shadow:7px 7px 8px black; font-family:Papyrus"><span style="color:#3399ff">scope_creep</span><sup>Talk</sup></span>''' 16:43, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

June 2026

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, Hh1718, welcome to Wikipedia ↗ and thank you for your contributions ↗. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts ↗ usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing ↗. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose ↗ these connections before editing further. Thank you. In solidarity ↗, asilvering (talk) 13:05, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
:Hello User:Asilvering. I have already addressed your concerns when responding from another account. This is to note that I do not see the issue the way you do. The page you pointed me to as a reference states clearly that the WP policy does not allow "misuse of multiple accounts", but not that it does not allow using multiple accounts. I do not think I am misusing multiple accounts, as I do not use them for any sinister purposes listed (evading bans, posing as another person when advancing own arguments in talk pages or other discussions, reviving old-dead issues, organising fake campaigns etc). For your information: the purpose of me using multiple accounts is to protect my privacy. I write on few rather niche topics, which renders me potentially vulnerable to identification in real life. I believe WP is committed to protect the privacy of its editors. Regards, --Hh1718 (talk) 09:12, 26 June 2026 (UTC)
::Indeed, I do care about editor privacy, and that is why I have not listed your other accounts, filed an SPI report, or blocked you (yet). However, I also care very much about editor safety, and that is one reason why I am particularly concerned to see the use of multiple accounts by a person who has been blocked on another project for intimidation and harassment.
::If your intent has been to prevent someone from associating your accounts with one another for personal security reasons, you have done very poorly. You have chosen usernames that are easy to associate with one another, and edited - frequently - on the same articles with multiple accounts, sometimes even within minutes of each other. Your interest in Carlism and the Spanish Civil War is obvious across multiple accounts. The accounts you have used to edit other topics ''still'' have overlap with your Spain accounts. This includes the one you've asked to keep. I don't think this is wise. If you're willing to take advice, here is mine: your accounts are burned. Abandon them, all of them. Log out of every one and don't ever return to any of them. Start fresh, on new accounts, with names that have no relationship to each other. These accounts must ''completely'' avoid each other - don't edit on similar topics, let alone the same pages. Don't ever edit on Commons again, unless you plan to appeal your decade-old block there first; as long as you have an outstanding block there, they can block all of your accounts the moment they notice one, your accounts will again be associated with each other, and you'll have to start all over again.
::Good luck. In solidarity ↗, asilvering (talk) 00:21, 27 June 2026 (UTC)
:::Hello User:Asilvering. thanks for your suggestions. They might be and probably are useful for someone who intends to play a hide-and-seek game. This is not my intention. I believe it is perfectly legitimate to use multiple accounts; I do not intend any foul play, and hence I do not see why I should do hide-and-seek, fool around, and try to outsmart the system. So, I think I will not take advantage of your advice. As I believe I am not breaching the rules, I do not see why anyone should take any measures against me. Regards, --Hh1718 (talk) 11:23, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
::::Well, I tried. And you yourself are welcome to try that on the unblocks admins. In solidarity ↗, asilvering (talk) 12:04, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

{{checkuserblock-account|sig=In solidarity ↗, asilvering (talk) 12:03, 28 June 2026 (UTC)|spi=Dd1495|indef=yes|master=Dd1495}}