User Talk: HitroMilanese

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

{{DISPLAYTITLE:User talk:'''HitroMilanese'''}}
<div style="position:fixed; right:0; bottom:0; display:block;">40px ↗ 40px ↗40px ↗ 40px ↗40px ↗ 40px ↗40px ↗ 40px ↗</div>
150px|link=Main Page ↗
<table width="100%" height="100%"><tr><td bgcolor="#bbddff"><center><div style="width:750px;background:cream;color:black;padding:20px;
text-align:left;font-size:9pt;a:link:#5B0081;a:visited:#5B0081;">
{{message|bgcolor = red|color = white|linkcolor = yellow}}
{{Archives|collapsed=yes|image=none|search=no|
#Beginning-Sep 2008
#Sep 2008-July 2009
#July 2009-Aug 2009
#Aug 2009-Dec 2013
#Dec 2013-Jan 2014
#Jan 2014-Feb 2014
#Feb 2014-Apr 2015
#Apr 2015-June 2016
#June 2016-Apr 2017
#May 2017-Mar 2018
#Apr 2018-Oct 2018
#Nov 2018-Jan 2019
#Jan 2019-Jun 2019
#Jul 2019-Jul 2020
#Aug 2020-Oct 2020
#Oct 2020-Dec 2020
#Dec 2020-Feb 2021
#Feb 2021-May 2021
#May 2021-Aug 2021
#Aug 2021-Dec 2021
#Jan 2022-Apr 2022
#Apr 2022-Oct 2022
#Nov 2022-Mar 2023
#Apr 2023-Jan 2024
#Feb 2024-May 2024
}}

May 2024 NPP backlog drive – Points award

{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" | 100px ↗
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" |
'''The New Page Patroller's Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray; width:100%;" | This award is given in recognition to HitroMilanese for accumulating at least 100 points during the May 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions helped play a part in the 14,452 reviews completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 18:58, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
|}

Decline of Chief Dr. (Sir) Godwin Ubaka Okeke, MON profile

Good day, thank you so much for your quick review. please, could you please assist me? kindly drop your email or any contact. thanks alot as i await your prompt response. Dekozy (talk) 13:56, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

:@Dekozy
:Hello there,
:How can I assist you? You may contact me anytime here. Regards Hitro talk ↗ 14:00, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
::Please, I need your assistance on how to make the profile worth publishing on wikipedia. Dekozy (talk) 14:03, 15 June 2024 (UTC)
:::Please review WP:YFA ↗ thoroughly, it provides all the essential information you need to create an article on Wikipedia. Hitro talk ↗ 14:13, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

Why was this page declined

Hi @HitroMilanese Could you please drop an email as to why this page has been declined as all the relevant fields have been put up as per the existing rules of Wikipedia SSChhetri (talk) 09:30, 16 June 2024 (UTC)

:@SSChhetri
:Hi there,
:Unfortunately, your article has been declined for several reasons.
:Firstly, the subject of your article does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. For inclusion, subjects must satisfy the criteria outlined in the general notability guideline ↗ and the specific notability guideline for authors WP:NAUTHOR ↗. Please review these guidelines carefully.
:Secondly, a significant portion of the draft lacks proper sourcing. To demonstrate notability and ensure verifiability, it is essential to include references from independent and reliable sources ↗. You also need to see WP:REFBEG ↗ for placing your citations properly at the end of sentences.
:Additionally, it appears that the article may be an autobiography. Autobiographies are generally discouraged on Wikipedia because maintaining neutrality and verifiability is challenging, and there are numerous potential issues associated with self-written entries.
:I hope this explanation clarifies the reasons for the decline. Regards. Hitro talk ↗ 18:10, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

PAR Technology Draft AfC

Hi there, thank you for reviewing my first Wikipedia article submission!

For some background/context, I had initially tabled my suggestion to the Deletion review folks here who seemed open to having a draft submitted: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2024_June_13

I understood that my article may have read more like an advertisement. I had tried to be as simple and objective as possible with my language, and to cite reputable independent sources for my content to demonstrate notability. Any feedback would be welcomed on which parts may have sounded like an ad. Maybe I missed the mark being too detailed to try and showcase notability? Happy to delete and edit it as necessary. LeLiPAR (talk) 20:41, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

:Hello there,
:The version of the draft that I declined was promotional. I see that CSD has been declined after your improvement. I am not fully convinced that it is meeting WP:NCOMPANY ↗ therefore I will leave this draft for a fresh pair of eyes. Regards. Hitro talk ↗ 17:47, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

Review sources

Hello, can you review the sources of this article and confirm its acceptance Draft:Mohamed Aarab ↗ DRsabire (talk) 12:19, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

Moved to draft page of my article

Hi please send your review comments about why you rejected my article main page "Muthamilselvi" First tamil woman scaled mount everest. TheValorWomanMTS (talk) 11:24, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

:Hello there,
:Firstly, it appears that you have either written an autobiography or have a significant conflict of interest (COI ↗) with the subject. COI editing is discouraged on Wikipedia. I have left a message on your talk page regarding COI; please read it along with the associated links. Drafts with potential COI must go through the Articles for Creation (AfC) process.
:Secondly, many of the claims in your draft lack proper sourcing. Please refer to Wikipedia's verifiability policy ↗ and support your statements with citations from independent and reliable sources ↗. Additionally, see the guidelines on inline citations ↗ and ensure that citations are placed correctly at the end of the relevant sentences, rather than clustered at the bottom of the draft.
:I would like to note that the notability of the subject has not been challenged. The primary issue is the lack of references. Please address these concerns and resubmit your draft for another review.
:Regards. Hitro talk ↗ 11:35, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
::Hi hitro, thank you . i will check and will do the needful. TheValorWomanMTS (talk) 11:41, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Draft:The Wikipedia

Hi, I really want to do a sponsor on Wikipedia to welcome people to Wikipedia, honest.
By The Allay King 118.210.162.3 ↗ (talk) 11:02, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

:Hi,
:You may want to join Wikipedia Welcoming Committee ↗. Here you can welcome new user and help them. Regards. Hitro talk ↗ 11:12, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

Larry Lipshultz Wikipedia

Hi, you had left a comment on this draft a few months ago. I made the changes requested and wanted to know if you could review it again. Thanks! Oppename (talk) 16:06, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

:Hello there,
:I see that you have updated the references. The draft is waiting to be reviewed, I will leave it for another reviewer as I am unable to verify all the sources at the moment. Regards. Hitro talk ↗ 11:03, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
::okay Mr. HitroMilanese, Thankyou Anoopshukla12 (talk) 16:59, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

Unknown

Why was this page deleted sir, first of all this page was deleted due to speedy deletion, then this page was published again after correction, still it was deleted, how can I see it live । thankyou Anoopshukla12 (talk) 09:57, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

:Hi there,
:Most of your articles or drafts have been deleted due to promotional content or lack of notability. Please see WP:YFA ↗ before attempting another topic. Regards. Hitro talk ↗ 11:07, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

New article

HI @HitroMilanese

I have created a new page on Bengali series Kaantaye Kaantaye ↗.

Request you to look into it and suggest what I could do to make it better and if possible review it.

Thanks a bunch Filmy World (talk) 01:19, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

:@Filmyworldwiki
:Hi there,
:Thank you for your efforts in creating this article. However, the series has not yet been released and most of the presented sources are announcements. I recommend adding reviews from independent and reliable sources as soon as they become available to ensure the subject's notability is well-supported. Regards. Hitro talk ↗ 11:34, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

AfC dispute: Roger Bright

Hi! I would like to dispute your recent rejection of the AfC draft for Roger Bright. You claimed he does not fill Wikipedia's notability requirements for musicians, however he fulfills the following requirements as I explain in the brackets following the requirement:

# Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable ↗, not self-published ↗, and are independent of ↗ the musician or ensemble itself [he has full page articles about himself from the International Polka Association, the Cleveland-Style Polka Hall of Fame, and the Racine Journal Times, among others]
# Has released two or more albums on a major record label ↗ or on one of the more important indie labels (i.e., an independent label with a history of more than a few years, and with a roster of performers, many of whom are independently notable) [has released 35 records on Cuca Records ↗, an important independent record label]
# Is an ensemble that contains two or more independently notable musicians, or is a musician who has been a reasonably prominent member of two or more independently notable ensembles [He has performed in ensembles with Joey Miskulin ↗, Frankie Yankovic ↗, and Slavko Avsenik ↗, all of whom are independently notable musicians]
# Has become one of the most prominent representatives of a notable style or the most prominent of the local scene of a city [the most prominent representative of both the city of New Glarus ↗ and of polka music in New Glarus]
# Has won first, second, or third place in a major music competition [Not strictly a competition, but I believe being inducted into 3 different Polka Hall of Fames counts as "winning" those competitions]
# Has performed music for a work of media that is notable, such as a theme for a network television show, performance in a television show or notable film, inclusion on a notable compilation album [has performed on the Tonight Show with Johnny Carson ↗, the Phil Donahue Show ↗, and the Charlotte Peters ↗ Show, among others]

A musician is notable for Wikipedia if they meet at least one of those requirements, and Roger Bright meets six. I resubmitted my article, so I hope you take the chance to reassess your decision. Thanks! Zhuvelo (talk) 16:47, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Garrett_Armfield

Hello,

First of all thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I see you are the editor of UFC Bantamweight Garrett Armfield's draft. I have edited the draft and added references to the text which was originally written by the fighter himself. I have had issues with his last fight: I added it, but the row was added horizontally instead of vertically.

If you'd be so kind as to help me with it, I would really appreciate it, and I am sure Garrett Armfield (who is aware of my effort to get his Wikipedia article up) would be, too.

Thanks LongTimeLurkerFirstTimeUser (talk) 17:45, 11 August 2024 (UTC)

New pages patrol September 2024 Backlog drive

{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ; background-color: #FFF; color: #000; padding:10px 15px 0"
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em; font-size:130%" |'''New pages patrol ↗ |''' September 2024 Backlog Drive ↗
|rowspan=3|right|80px ↗
|-
|

On 1 September 2024, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin.

Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled.

Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.

Each article review will earn 1 point, and each redirect review will earn 0.2 points.

Interested in taking part? '''Sign up here ↗'''.

|-
|colspan=2 style="font-size:85%; padding-top:15px;"|You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. ↗
|}
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 26 August 2024 (UTC)

help

Hello I want to start my wiki journey, I see a lot of miss-information, edits that need to be fixed as well as wikis that should be added, can you please help me on my journey? Popalien (talk) 17:07, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

:Hi!!
:How can I help you?
:I wanted to let you know that I've been quite busy with offline commitments and haven't been able to log in regularly over the past few weeks. If you need immediate assistance, I recommend reaching out to the WP:TEAHOUSE ↗ for help. Regards. Hitro talk ↗ 11:34, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

Could you assist and help me improve my draft?

@HitroMilanese Hey sorry to bother you, I'm extremely new to this platform and I was wondering if you could help with my current draft at the moment. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Agla%C3%A9_de_Gramont ↗ I specifically need help with citations and references. If you can help that would be awesome. Asdf;jldsafdl (talk) 04:03, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

How

how does a comet appears not meet the notability guide lines Relishmelon (talk) 19:27, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

:its a beloved piece of indie music, that should get an article along with some of the other songs that the shins have gotten an article for Relishmelon (talk) 19:30, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
::Hi there,
::Please see WP:NSONG ↗ and let me know how this song meets the criteria outlined there? All the provided sources focus on the album, with none specifically covering this song. Regards. Hitro talk ↗ 10:04, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for the kind help.

{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" | 100px ↗
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Barnstar of Diligence'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Thanks for helping me. I was unaware that you took huge effort ↗ when someone draftified an article "W.i.S.H. ↗" created by me. Thanks a lot. Waonderer (talk) 07:23, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
|}

:Thanks a lot. Hitro talk ↗ 14:38, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

Reason for creating page

Hi, sir. The main reason for creating this page is recognition. That actor voiced the characters of the most popular Indian produced animation tv series which ran for more than 5 years including films. While searching the internet for his interviews and articles, I found that there is photo of another Bengali actor with same name, instead of this comedian in the Motu Patlu cast and crew page. That is a big mistake people will think that Bengali actor's contribution while the real one is unkown. So I am still searching for official sites mentioning his works and similar things to make his Wikipedia page approved. Menarie221 (talk) 05:45, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Frederic Kimball

Hello
Why do you say my sources are not reliable, it is all in an article from Variety, a well known cinema publication. I did put the reference under Frankybonesmister (talk) 14:31, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

:Hello there,
:Large portion of the submission still appears unsourced. Please see WP:REFBEG ↗ and place your citations properly so that the claims can be verified. In order to demonstrate notability, it is also recommended to add multiple sources where the topic has received significant coverage ↗. Regards. Hitro talk ↗ 14:38, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

Request on 20:09:58, 2 November 2024 for assistance on AfC ↗ submission by Esassaman

{{anchor|20:09:58, 2 November 2024 review of submission by Esassaman}}
{{Lafc|username=Esassaman|ts=20:09:58, 2 November 2024|declinedtalk=Draft:Johnny_Ray_Jones}}
{{SAFESUBST:Void|

Thank you for taking the time to review this article. I am just not understanding how to meet the "significant coverage" bar here. Johnny's works have been reviewed in quite a few online and paper magazines (https://johnnyrayjones.com/press). There are 37 links to verifyable reviews of his past three CD releases. They are all independant sources, though most of them are small publishers (blues magazines or blues music related websites). They are all secondardy and independant. Should I just link to that press page in the article as a reference? Or are those kinds of music reviews just not meeting the bar for "significant coverage"? It just seems odd that some of the musicians that played on his albums have very short wikipedia pages with no CDs of their own released, only "appeared on" credits, but not the main guy. I feel like I'm missing something or just did something wrong in the way I wrote the article, I'm not very experienced with wikipedia biography authoring.

Esassaman (talk) 20:09, 2 November 2024 (UTC)

:Hello there,
:The draft contains a total of 14 sources, and apart from Allmusic, none appear reliable ↗ by Wikipedia standards. The two ''Allmusic'' sources are merely listings without album reviews (excluding user-generated content). You may want to highlight the top three sources ↗ on the draft's talk page where the subject has received significant coverage ↗ for reviewers to consider before making a decision. Given the current state, it doesn't seem the subject meets WP:NSINGER ↗ or WP:GNG ↗. However, I’ll leave it for fresh eyes if you choose to resubmit. Regards. Hitro talk ↗ 13:53, 3 November 2024 (UTC)

Robertson draft

Hi @HitroMilanese,

I'm sorry for not responding to your message on my talk page. Initially, the message does appear like a warning or an advice, and I didn't know it would result in moving the page to draft. In such cases, for example, you wrote "Did you observe that the subject is also the article’s author? Personally, I would have declined it and requested additional references. Please be mindful of your Schumacher's level velocity, as it may not be beneficial to the project. Regards", and I think that the question is somewhat off since I accessed all the sources. Personal thinking may not be the scope of the encyclopedia, and per AFC, we should try as much as possible to help new editors. Belive me, its rare to see new editors <s>wrote</s> write so well like that one. I loved the draft and did a WP:BEFORE ↗ (incase of AFD) before accepting, and subsequently tagging. I respect you so much and would always love to see more encouragement from you. If you still object the mainspace moving, then WP:AFD ↗. Cheers! Safari Scribe'''''Edits!''''' ↗ '''''Talk!''''' 00:05, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

:@SafariScribe
:Hello there,
:Firstly, instead of involving a third party, if you had discussed it with me, we could have resolved the issue ↗ in a much better way. Redraftifying was not as wrong as it was made to appear. It is a part of an essay not a policy or guideline.
:Secondly, Wikipedia:Before ↗ exclusively deals with AfDs. It is out of scope of my understanding why do people bring it in discussions outside at AfDs. There is Wikipedia:BURDEN ↗ which is part of the Wikipedia's core policy. '''The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material.''' So when I questioned the sourcing, it was your responsibility to demonstrate notability and refute my claims because you restored the material—not mine to take it to AfD and waste the community's time, '''specially when we are dealing with AfC drafts'''. {{tq|If what is written in the submission meets the notability guidelines ↗, but the submission lacks references to evidence this, then the underlying issue is inadequate verification ↗ and the submission should be declined for that reason.}} You can not and should not bring Wikipedia:Before ↗ or Wikipedia:NEXIST ↗ while accepting or declining drafts. I might have been wrong in assessing the sources, but one of the reference from 7 was authored by the subject, one was Wikipedia:PRIMARY ↗ from ESSTS website. Unless, I have fixed the sourcing and demonstrated the notability clearly myself, I would not have accepted it. You might have different view which we could have discussed.
:I know it is rare for new editors to write so well; at the same time, I am also aware of how well COI or paid editors write using disposable new accounts. I hope there is no disagreement on this fact.
:I do understand that you are doing good for the project which is most important. At the end of the day, it is your overall work that matters not these small disputes. Have a wonderful day ahead. Regards. Hitro talk ↗ 08:14, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

my draft

I know you did not approve of my draft but why did you delete it completle i wanted to make my draft better so maybe it would have approve I know I will have to make it a new one and make it better but if i had my old one it could have been a base to the new one. The wiki has a dark side (talk) 19:51, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

:Hello there,
:Please see Wikipedia:Do not create hoaxes ↗. Regards. Hitro talk ↗ 19:56, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Sherlock & Co.(podcast)

What are reliable sources for media such as this, please elaborate. @HitroMilanese Arc1210 (talk) 10:56, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

:Hi there,
:Any reputable media outlet where this podcast has been reviewed would be a good start, such as ''The Guardian'', ''The Independent'', ''New Statesman'' etc. IMDb is not a reliable source as it is user generated ↗. You may check WP:RSPS ↗ for list of some reliable as well as unreliable sources. You may also check the articles in Category:British podcasts to understand what sort of sourcing is acceptable. Regards. Hitro talk ↗ 11:35, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
:: I got one ↗, but how is this to be used for the credulity of the podcast? and how do I get poster/logo of the podcast without © issues as Wikimedia doesn't have a fair use option Arc1210 (talk) 11:41, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
:::@Arc1210
:::I am unable to read the article currently because my subscription to ''The Times'' has expired. However, it seems that this article discusses the podcast significantly.
:::Please refer to WP:UPI ↗ for instructions related to the Wikipedia image uploading process. Regards. Hitro talk ↗ 08:59, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
::::so, I just cite it would that do? Arc1210 (talk) 09:28, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
:::::I've included one source from ''Esquire'' and another from ''The Guardian''. I'll leave this for review by another editor. Regards. Hitro talk ↗ 10:55, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
::::::Thanks Arc1210 (talk) 10:57, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

Request on 14:44:51, 17 November 2024 for assistance on AfC ↗ submission by Krishna.cell

{{anchor|14:44:51, 17 November 2024 review of submission by Krishna.cell}}
{{Lafc|username=Krishna.cell|ts=14:44:51, 17 November 2024|declinedtalk=Draft:YMCA_Framework}}



Hello Hitro,

Thank you for reaching out and providing guidance regarding the article draft process. I appreciate the suggestions to visit the Articles for Creation help desk and the Teahouse for further assistance.

This article represents a new concept or thought, and I’m unsure how to navigate the approval process effectively. I’d greatly appreciate any clarification or help in getting it approved. Since this is an initial idea, I’m open to refining and improving it based on feedback.

Thank you for your time and support!
Krishna.cell (talk) 14:44, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

:@Krishna.cell
:Hi there,
:On Wikipedia, only articles about notable topics ↗ are accepted in the mainspace. To demonstrate notability, it is important to include references from multiple independent and reliable sources ↗ that provide significant coverage ↗ of the topic. This requirement is explained in Wikipedia's general notability guideline ↗. I recommend reviewing the guideline and ensuring the topic's notability is established before proceeding. I also suggest you to check WP:YFA ↗ to understand how to create your first article. Regards. Hitro talk ↗ 16:11, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

Hunts Point Express

Hi,
I'm puzzled by your remark in rejecting this post that the articles cited make only passing reference to the subject. The 1100-Word NYT article cited in footnote 1 is entirely about The Hunts Point Express, its reporters and editor. Moreover, the article is similar to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mott_Haven_Herald which has been on Wikipedia for years. The other citations concern the editors of the publication. I'd appreciate an explanation to help me improve the article. Adamsguy (talk) 19:27, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

:Hello there,
:I have commented on draft regarding this topic.
:Regarding the existence of similar articles, I would like to note that plenty of articles exist that probably should not. Equally, because articles must wait for someone who is interested in the subject to notice they are missing before they are created, a lot of articles do not exist that probably should. So just pointing out that an article on a similar subject exists does not prove that the article in question should also exist; it is quite possible that the other article should also be deleted but nobody has noticed it and listed it for deletion yet. Regards. Hitro talk ↗ 07:27, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2024 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2024|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

</div>
</div>

AN/I notice

link=|25px|alt=Information icon ↗ There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents ↗ regarding the hoaxes regarding Indian politics, one of which you nominated for deletion. The thread is Creation of (apparent) hoaxes about Indian politics ↗. Thank you. JJPMaster ↗ (she ↗/they ↗) 02:48, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

Request to review Page Devendra Kothe

Hello Moderator,

Greetings!

The Subject in question - Devendra Kothe, is now elected as Member of the Legislative Assembly which makes his page eligible to satisfy, WP:NPOL.

Kindly, review and approve the page Devendra Kothe.

Thank you,
Mohit Mohit Gandmal (talk) 11:20, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

:@Mohit Gandmal
:Hi there,
:It seems that another reviewer has already examined this and requested a merge. Appropriate action will be taken soon. Regards. Hitro talk ↗ 15:21, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
::Hi '''Hitro''',
::Thank you for reverting.
::In case you find the time to read,
::The new page Devendra Rajesh Kothe(which is duplicate of Devendra Kothe created on 20-November-2024) is created at later date, that's today 25th-Nov-2024.
::For the duplicate page, Wikipedia says:
::Duplicate: There are two or more pages on exactly the same subject, with the same scope.
::If a duplicate article was recently created, it may also be a candidate for speedy deletion under CSD A10 criteria.
::
::WP:MERGEREASON ↗
::WP:OVERLAP ↗
::WP:DUP ↗
::Requesting your attention. Mohit Gandmal (talk) 15:26, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
:::A10 applies only when both articles are in the mainspace. In this case, since one of them is in the draftspace, merging the draft into the mainspace article seems to be the most appropriate course of action. Regards. Hitro talk ↗ 15:39, 25 November 2024 (UTC)

Inquiry About Feedback on Draft Submission

Dear HitroMilanese,

Thank you for taking the time to review my draft submission. I understand that the initial version appeared more promotional than encyclopedic, and I have since worked on revising the content to align with Wikipedia's guidelines.

Selsmart by Attero is a notable initiative addressing the growing challenge of e-waste recycling in India. I believe this platform holds significant value in terms of environmental impact and technological innovation. I have ensured that the revised content includes reliable third-party sources and is presented in a neutral tone.

I would greatly appreciate any further feedback or guidance to ensure compliance with Wikipedia's policies. Please let me know if additional adjustments are necessary for resubmission.

Thank you for your time and support. Selsmart by Attero (talk) 10:31, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

:(Blocked.) -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:49, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

Declination of draft

{{ping|HitroMilanese}}
Hello Hitro,

I recently had re-submitted for the re-review for an article to be published. I read the reason of the declination, I updated it. I want you to inspect it once and guide the changes and updates needed. Draft:Shrihari Diggavi ↗ SNV008 (talk) 16:57, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

:Hi @SNV008
:None of your presented sources appear reliable. This will not be accepted in this kind of sourcing. Please see WP:GNG ↗ and demonstrate notability accordingly. Facebook and Instagram are not considered reliable sources ↗ so avoid them. Regards. Hitro talk ↗ 18:21, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

New pages patrol January 2025 Backlog drive

{| style="border: 2px solid #36c; border-radius: 4px; background: linear-gradient(to right, #ffffff, #eaf3ff); padding: 10px; color: #000;"
| style="vertical-align: middle; font-size: 130%" | January 2025 Backlog Drive ↗ | '''New pages patrol ↗''' 
| rowspan=3 | right|100px ↗
|-
|

On 1 January 2025, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin in hopes of addressing the growing backlog.

Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled.

Each article review will earn 1 point, while each redirect review will earn 0.2 points.

Streak awards ↗ will be given out based on consistently hitting point thresholds for each week of the drive.

Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles ↗ previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.

Interested in taking part? '''Sign up here ↗'''.

|-
|colspan=2 style="font-size:85%; padding-top:15px;"|You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. ↗
|}
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:53, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Top AfC Editor

{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:top;" | 110px ↗

|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: bottom; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Articles for Creation Barnstar 2024 Top Editor'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: center; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | In 2024 you were one of the top AfC editors ↗, thank you! --Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 13:31, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
|}

:@Ozzie10aaaa Ohh..thanks a lot :) Hitro talk ↗ 10:12, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

Happy Holidays

{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 4px solid #FFD700;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 2px;" | 211px ↗
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 2px 2px 0 2px; height: 1.5em;" | '''Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2025!'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" |
----
'''Hello HitroMilanese, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion ↗. Spread the WikiLove ↗ by wishing another user a Merry Christmas ↗ and a Happy New Year ↗, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2025. Happy editing,''' 
Abishe (talk) 22:41, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

''{{resize|96%|Spread the love by adding {{tls|Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.}}''
|} Abishe (talk) 22:41, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

:@Abishe Merry Christmas! May the blessings of the season be with you. Hitro talk ↗ 10:11, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

Draft:BrijMohan Singh

Hello, Thank you for your comment on Draft:BrijMohan Singh ↗. I went through your comment, on the draft. You can go through this BIHAR VIDHAN SABHA/Former MLA ↗. This is list prepared by Bihar Legislative Assembly on its official website. It is written in Hindi. This proves that he had been elected four times, for a better understanding you can check Aurangabad, Bihar Assembly constituency ↗. Thanks and Regards, Taabii (talk) 12:01, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

:Hi, Thank you for pointing out the sources but I am still having trouble in translating the names. I will leave this for another reviewer. Regards. Hitro talk ↗ 14:02, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
::@HitroMilanese Yes, Sure. Thank you. Happy Holidays and Winters. Taabii (talk) 16:26, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion ↗ of :Katja Nyberg (disambiguation) ↗

left|link=|alt=Notice|48px| ↗

The article :Katja Nyberg (disambiguation) ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗ because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Disambiguation page not required (WP:ONEOTHER ↗). Primary topic article has a hatnote to the only other use.'''</blockquote>

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons ↗.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the article's talk page ↗.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion process ↗es exist. In particular, the speedy deletion ↗ process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 13:44, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Conservatorio Francesco Venezze

Hello, could you please help me for publishing the voice you rejected by telling what exactly I have to add? Thank you Ghettolied (talk) 14:05, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

January 2025 NPP backlog drive – Points award

{| class="barnstar" style="border:1px solid gray; background:#fdffe7;"
|-
|rowspan="2" style="padding-right:5px;" | 100px ↗

|style="font-size:1.65em; padding:0; height: 1.1em;" | The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
|-
|style="border-top: 1px solid gray;" | This award is given in recognition to HitroMilanese for accumulating at least 10 points during the January 2025 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions helped play a part in the 16,000+ articles and 14,000+ redirects reviewed (for a total of 19,791.2 points) completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 19:37, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
|}

Oversonic Robotics decliened.

Hi,
can you please explain me further on why the page has been declined? It is quite well described and i attached a lot of references to verify the page is talking correctly about an existing company. 2001:B07:A96:384:22B6:7A5D:D5:2652 ↗ (talk) 13:38, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

:Hello there,
:First, as I mentioned on the page, please review WP:REFB ↗ and ensure proper source citation so that reviewers can verify the claims made in the article. Second, refer to WP:NCOMPANY ↗ specially WP:ORGCRIT ↗ and establish notability accordingly.
:At present, the draft lacks an encyclopaedic tone and comes across as promotional. The sections on "Products," "Applications" and "Certifications" are particularly problematic in this regard and suitable for company's website not Wikipedia.
:Regards Hitro talk ↗ 13:52, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

Another thing to watch for

Hi Hitro, can I ask you to watch out for something else, especially when you check new drafts? Sometimes we get children writing their personal information such as date of birth and name and location on wikipedia. When that happens, and I recently noted it on a page you'd declined, can you email WP:Oversight ↗ to get it suppressed? Thanks and happy editing ''ϢereSpielChequers'' 11:32, 15 February 2025 (UTC)

:@WereSpielChequers
:Hi there,
:I usually keep that in mind, but I may have missed it this time. Thanks for the reminder! Hitro talk ↗ 09:13, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

Draft rejected for Review

Hello HitroMilanese, You rejected last year Draft:Cedric Koukjian ↗ for reasons of Notability. The whole draft has been rewritten since then with new references. Could you have a look and let me know if it would meet the standards now and be possibly accepted? Thank you Aston3421 (talk) 08:29, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

:@Aston3421
:Hi there,
:I guess the draft has been accepted now. Regards. Hitro talk ↗ 09:14, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

BankSathi Article Review Request

I'd love your thoughts on the BankSathi ↗ article; can you give it a review? MH-wiki2025 (talk) 12:52, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

The European Destubathon

You are invited to participate in '''The European Destubathon ↗''' in April. Almost $3000 in Amazon voucher prizes which can be used to buy books for content, though it can also be treated as an editathon if you're not interested in competing! Minimum content to be added to each article just to ensure that they're over a stub. Entries at the end of the contest will be tipped into the 50,000 Destubbing Challenge and European Challenge. Previous contests were really enjoyable and I'm hoping this one will be too! Sign up if interested. Thanks! ♦ ''Dr. Blofeld'' 17:05, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

The addition to my biography has been declined due to not having "reliable sources". I don't understand. The reliable sources are references to a published book entitled Handy, D. Antoinette (1981). Black Women in American Bands & Orchestras. The Scarecrow Press. pp. 36, 53, 124 ISBN-10: 0-8108-1346-7). How much more reliable can one get?

I have been asked by those who have read my Wikipedia to elaborate on my younger years. "I" am the reliable source, as is references to the Library of Congress. So, I would appreciate your definition of "reliable sources" when a published book and the Library of Congress have the information I have written in the draft. Please advise. Yvonne S. Thornton (talk) 16:53, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

Request on 08:15:19, 22 March 2025 for assistance on AfC ↗ submission by Publicappearance12

{{anchor|08:15:19, 22 March 2025 review of submission by Publicappearance12}}
{{Lafc|username=Publicappearance12|ts=08:15:19, 22 March 2025|declinedtalk=Draft:Brandon_Lattu}}


Hi, I dont inderstand how my submission lacks notability, I site many solo and exhibition shows the artist has participated in at notable galleries and museums internationally over the past two decades. I also site independent and notable magazines the artist has been covered in such as Artforum and E-flux. I don't see how these qualifications don't make them a notable enough contemporary artist.

Publicappearance12 (talk) 08:15, 22 March 2025 (UTC)

:@Publicappearance12
:Hi there,
:Please review WP:NARTIST ↗ and let me know how he meets the criteria outlined in this guideline.
:Regards Hitro talk ↗ 10:13, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

Peter F. Carls submission

Thank you for taking a look at my submission on Peter F. Carls, I'm unsure on what you mean as in his field of expertise Dr. Carls is world renowned as a surgeon and also in research and development, with over 40 peer reviewed works (which I can link too and also supply pdf versions if required) as proof. PioneerMV (talk) 06:38, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

New pages patrol May 2025 Backlog drive

{| style="border: 2px solid #36c; border-radius: 4px; background: linear-gradient(to right, #ffffff, #eaf3ff); padding: 10px; color: #000;"
| style="vertical-align: middle; font-size: 130%" | May 2025 Backlog Drive ↗ | '''New pages patrol ↗''' 
| rowspan=3 | right|100px ↗
|-
|

On 1 May 2025, a one-month backlog drive for New Pages Patrol will begin.

Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.

Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.

Each review will earn 1 point.

Interested in taking part? '''Sign up here ↗'''.

|-
|colspan=2 style="font-size:85%; padding-top:15px;"|You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. ↗
|}
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:25, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Lindie_Botes

Hi, and thank you for the review of my submission https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Lindie_Botes

I understand your concerns, and I have now tried to support the information previously sourced from LinkedIn by adding references to other sources. However, for content such as TV interviews, those recordings are not always preserved, and YouTube is often the only place where they remain accessible. The same applies to SoundCloud (there is only one link, by the way); it’s a podcast with a substantial following that I’ve cited. Although they also publish on other platforms like Spotify, the content is essentially the same, so I chose not to change that particular link.

With the above in mind, I kindly ask you to re-evaluate the recent changes when you have a moment. Thank you in advance! Punarinta (talk) 15:29, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

The World Destubathon ↗

You are invited to participate in The World Destubathon. It's currently planned for June 16-July 13, partly due to me having hayfever during that period and not wanting to run it throughout July or August in the hotter summer and will be run then unless multiple editors object. There is currently $3338 going into it, with $500 the top prize. As 250 countries and entities is too much to patrol, entries will be by user, but there is $500 going into prizes for editors covering the most countries. Sign up if interested! ♦ ''Dr. Blofeld'' 13:15, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

Page Declined

Hello, I'm not sure why my page was not accepted. My sources are published, independent, and as far as I can ascertain - reliable, so what's the problem? Franch friend (talk) 06:56, 8 August 2025 (UTC)

:@Franch friend
:Hello there,
:Please see WP:RSPYT ↗.
:Regards Hitro talk ↗ 13:46, 10 August 2025 (UTC)

Move Draft JioStar to JioStar main space

“Move to JioStar"
That is not true, since a google search for Jiostar would lead you to hundreds of very recent articles which refer to the company as Jiostar. On the other hand, a search for Dinsey Star either leads to very few articles from 2024 mentioning the name of the company as such or mostly to totally unrelated articles about actors starring in Disney movies.
When the company calls itself Jiostar, when all news sources refer to it as Jiostar, when the audiences that this company serves know it as Jiostar, I don't understand why the wikipedia article has to be called Disney Star.
'''NOTE:- JioStar operates only in India & There is no company named Disney Star now in the world. so what's the point of keeping Disney Star article'''
first of all you can move the Draft:JioStar ↗ Draft article to JioStar ↗ main space and start redirect from Disney Star ↗ to JioStar ↗ so there will be no similar article with separate name.
Ajitsinghbhagat (talk) 18:40, 14 August 2025 (UTC)

:@Ajitsinghbhagat: You are welcome to contest an AfC review being declined and ask for a new review, but attempting to get an article in draftspace moved to the mainspace like this without any actual improvements to satisfy the AfC reviewer's concerns are fruitless. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines which need to be followed. — ''Trailblazer'''''101'''🔥 (discuss · contribs ↗) 05:10, 15 August 2025 (UTC)
:@Ajitsinghbhagat
:Hello there,
:Even if your points are valid this is not the correct way to create or rename articles. Wikipedia aims to preserve the historical record so changes to article titles must follow established processes. I recommend taking your case to the dispute resolution noticeboard ↗ where you can present your arguments for discussion and consensus. Regards. Hitro talk ↗ 09:59, 15 August 2025 (UTC)
::User:Ajitsinghbhagat, User:HitroMilanese - I mostly agree that AFC is not the correct way to rename articles, but DRN is not a forum to discuss acceptance of draft articles. The way to rename articles is a Move Request ↗, and I am closing the DRN ↗ request because I am recommending a Move Request ↗. DRN was a reasonable suggestion, because one of the (unofficial but actual) functions of DRN is to advise what the proper mechanism is. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:55, 16 August 2025 (UTC)
:::@Robert McClenon
:::Hi. Thank you for your message. There has already been extensive discussion on this matter at the talk page of the Disney Star article ↗, although I was not involved in that discussion. My suggestion to take this to DRN was not based on the AfC submission but on the ongoing dispute there, and in fact one of the users also recommended DRN at the talk page. Since the proposed move has been objected to by multiple contributors, several times, it is evident that consensus has not yet been reached. I believe the best course of action would be to wait for clear consensus and then move the existing article to JioStar if agreement is achieved. Regards. Hitro talk ↗ 17:35, 16 August 2025 (UTC)

Further Discussion at Talk:Disney Star ↗

Thank you for your comments. I have tried to start a new discussion of whether to split ↗ Disney Star ↗ into two articles at Talk:Disney Star ↗. If the disruptive discussion continues anywhere else, I will have to open a thread at WP:ANI ↗, but I am not addressing that comment to you. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:29, 16 August 2025 (UTC)

Move request accepted please move to mainspace

as DRN request,move request got accepted for Draft:JioStar ↗,please move it to JioStar ↗ mainspace Ajitsinghbhagat (talk) 17:07, 16 August 2025 (UTC)

:@Ajitsinghbhagat
:Hello there,
:Robert McClenon has clearly mentioned - {{tq|This would be a move that should be discussed, so the best procedure would probably be for the filing editor to file a Move Requestto rename the article. There are other possible forums for this discussion, but a Move Request seems like the best. }} He did not suggest that the move request has been accepted. I understand that you firmly believe the article should be moved to "JioStar," and I may also be inclined towards that view, but consensus is essential, especially when multiple editors are in disagreement. Regards. Hitro talk ↗ 17:46, 16 August 2025 (UTC)
::User:Ajitsinghbhagat- As User:HitroMilanese explains, neither I nor anyone else accepted a move or rename request. I will review the discussion at the talk page shortly and will comment further. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:52, 16 August 2025 (UTC)

New pages patrol September 2025 Backlog drive

{| style="border: 2px solid #36c; border-radius: 4px; background: linear-gradient(to right, #ffffff, #eaf3ff); padding: 10px; color: #000;"
| style="vertical-align: middle; font-size: 130%" | September 2025 Backlog Drive ↗ | '''New pages patrol ↗''' 
| rowspan=3 | right|100px ↗
|-
|

On 1 September 2025, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.

Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.

Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.

Each review will earn 1 point.

Interested in taking part? '''Sign up here ↗'''.

|-
|colspan=2 style="font-size:85%; padding-top:15px;"|You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. ↗
|}
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:31, 23 August 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Kyrgosia ↗

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, HitroMilanese. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kyrgosia ↗, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted ↗, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it ↗ again or request ↗ that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted ↗ so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:08, 28 August 2025 (UTC)

For submission

Hi,
I’ve recently created a draft about Andre Benz’s record company, Broke Records. Could you kindly review it and let me know if it’s suitable for submission? If needed, I’d really appreciate your help in improving the draft. Here’s the link to it - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Shawnaxon/sandbox. Thank you in advance for your time and support. Shawnaxon (talk) 14:24, 26 September 2025 (UTC)

:@Shawnaxon
:Hello there,
:I am a bit occupied today, so I will be able to review this in 3 to 4 hours or tomorrow. In the meantime, you may consider submitting the draft, as there are multiple reviewers who can assist you.
:Regards Hitro talk ↗ 09:23, 27 September 2025 (UTC)
::@Shawnaxon
::Hello there,
::Apologies for the delayed response. I believe the sources you have presented are sufficient and you may go ahead and submit it for review. I’ve been quite busy lately, which is why I wasn’t able to log in earlier. Regards. Hitro talk ↗ 13:45, 3 October 2025 (UTC)
Hi, Thank you for your time and assistance, I really appreciate it. i am not able to find the submit button, can you please help me with this? I will really be grateful. Thanks. Shawnaxon (talk) 09:33, 6 October 2025 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Kyrgosia ↗

48px|left|alt=|link= ↗
Hello, HitroMilanese. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation ↗ submission or draft ↗ page you started, "Kyrgosia ↗".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion ↗. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.  '''''L'''''iz '''''Read!''''' ↗ '''''Talk!''''' 16:38, 28 September 2025 (UTC)

About Pork Bafat

Hello,

Mr. milanese ... Im a guy from mangaluru who is trying to give others information about our city. wiki is a universal website and i wanted almost everything in the world to be on wiki. ive even added a reliable newspaper.

i hope you understand my concern

' Tyasathi (talk) 09:37, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

:Hello there,
:Thank you for your contribution. Please let me know how can I help you?
:Regards Hitro talk ↗ 09:04, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
::can you please approve the article Tyasathi (talk) 09:14, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

</div>
</div>

RE: Draft:Expereo

Hi Hitro,

Thank you for taking the time to review my draft. I’d like to revise it properly, but I’m not entirely sure what specific changes are needed for the article to meet the requirements for approval.

Could you please outline the concrete steps you would recommend I take to bring the draft up to an acceptable standard? For example, what should be revised, added, removed, or improved to address your concerns?

Any clear guidance you can provide would be greatly appreciated so I can make the next revision as effective as possible.

Thanks again for your help.

Best,
Nic Nitiwat.Nisapakultorn (talk) 11:35, 8 December 2025 (UTC)

:Hello there,
:First, I suggest that you review WP:THREE ↗ and identify the three strongest sources that you believe demonstrate significant coverage of the subject. Please list these sources on the article’s talk page.
:At present, the sources included in the draft are insufficient to establish notability under WP:CORP ↗. Some of them are unreliable, or just PR stuff. Regards. Hitro talk ↗ 14:37, 17 December 2025 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

{| style="background-color: var(--background-color-success-subtle, #fdffe7); border: 1px solid var(--border-color-success, #fceb92); color: var(--color-base, #202122);"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | 100px ↗
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Tireless Contributor Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Thank you for your-wiki contributions, including Jacques Baud ↗. ApoieRacional (talk) 13:28, 18 December 2025 (UTC)
|}

Thanks for reviewing

Hi Hitro,

I wanted to thank you for taking the time to review my draft. Your suggestions were very helpful, and I have updated the article accordingly. I’ve tried to address all of the points you mentioned, including improving the neutrality and adding references where needed.

I really appreciate your feedback and guidance. Please let me know if you notice anything else that could be improved or clarified. I look forward to continuing to work collaboratively to improve the content.

Cheers! Coulisse12 (talk) 10:15, 19 December 2025 (UTC)

New pages patrol January–February 2026 Backlog drive

{| style="border: 1px solid #eaecf0; background: #f0feff; color: #202122; padding: 1.5em; margin-bottom: 1.5em; border-radius: 6px; box-shadow: 0 1px 4px rgba(0,0,0,0.08);"
| style="vertical-align: middle; font-size: 150%; font-weight: 600;" | January–February 2026 Backlog Drive ↗ | New pages patrol ↗
| rowspan=3 | right|100px ↗
|-
|
New Pages Patrol is hosting a one-time, two-month experimental backlog drive aimed at reducing the backlog. This will be a combo drive: both articles and redirects will earn points.

The drive will run from 1 January to 28 February 2026.

The drive is divided into two phases. Participants may take part in either phase or across both phases, depending on availability.

Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled during the drive.

Two-month drive-exclusive barnstars will be awarded to eligible participants.

Each article review earns 1 point, while each redirect review earns 0.2 points.

Streak awards ↗ will be granted based on consistently meeting weekly point thresholds.

Barnstars will also be awarded for re-reviewing articles ↗ previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.

Interested in participating? '''Sign up here ↗'''.

|-
|colspan=2 style="font-size:90%; color:#54595d; padding-top:15px;"|You are receiving this message because you are a New Pages Patrol reviewer. To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself from here ↗.
|}
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:22, 27 December 2025 (UTC)

Request on 14:31:40, 4 January 2026 for assistance on AfC ↗ submission by Kickpointy

{{anchor|14:31:40, 4 January 2026 review of submission by Kickpointy}}
{{Lafc|username=Kickpointy|ts=14:31:40, 4 January 2026|declinedtalk=Draft:Student_1}}



Hi, Hitro. I'm requesting that you, or another editor who is familiar with the WikiProject Hip-hop, take a second look at the references here - as they certainly meet the WP:MUSICBIO guidelines (specifically, criteria #1, but also criteria #7). Your comment "does not appear to..." suggests that you didn't spend any time looking at it, or are not familiar with the genre and its reputable outlets.

The subject has received repeated and sustained coverage from Minnesota Public Radio’s The Current (2018, 2022), University of Minnesota's Carbon Sound (2022, 2024), Star Tribune (Minneapolis' largest newspaper), City Pages (Minneapolis' largest magazine), First Avenue (the largest independent music venue in the country), Lyrical Lemonade, Elevator Magazine, SwidLife, Go 95.3 (KTCZ-FM), among others. These sources provide in-depth discussion of the subject’s music, live performances, releases, and career development rather than routine listings or trivial mentions.

Nearly all of these sources have Wikipedia pages of their own, which supports the assertion that my submission not being notable is unsubstantiated.

In addition, "student 1" is hyperlinked on two other notable pages, Tierra Whack ↗ and Soundset ↗, a clear signal that he was notable enough not to be omitted in the creation of those.

Coverage includes:

• Editorial features and reviews (The Current, Carbon Sound, Swidlife, Elevator Magazine)

• Festival and performance coverage (City Pages, SXSW, First Avenue)

• Broadcast interviews (Go 95.3 / KTCZ-FM)

• National tastemaker coverage (Lyrical Lemonade)

The sources span from 2017 through 2024, demonstrating ongoing relevance and a sustained public profile rather than a single promotional cycle.

Kickpointy (talk) 14:31, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

:Hello there,
:I reviewed the sources, but they do not meet WP:RS ↗ or WP:SIGCOV ↗ requirements for establishing notability under WP:GNG ↗ and WP:MUSICBIO ↗. Much of the coverage consists of promotional or primary material, including interviews and artist profiles without clear author bylines or editorial oversight. Mentions or links from other articles do not establish notability.
:You may resubmit the article so that it can be reviewed by another editor. Regards. Hitro talk ↗ 20:37, 4 January 2026 (UTC)

Top AfC Editor

Conflict of interest and sourcing request

I have disclosed a conflict of interest regarding the subject of this article.

I understand that the draft was declined due to insufficient independent reliable sources to establish notability. I am in the process of gathering additional third-party sources (such as newspaper coverage, exhibition catalogues, and institutional publications) related to the subject’s artistic career.

I request that an uninvolved editor review the sources listed below and incorporate them into the article as appropriate, in accordance with Wikipedia’s conflict of interest guideline.

Fahad Sws (talk) 12:45, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

January–February 2026 NPP drive - Phase 2

thumb|right|270px|NPP unreviewed article statistics as of February 02, 2026 ↗
Welcome to Phase 2 of the January–February 2026 NPP drive ↗. During Phase 1, we reviewed 16,658 articles and 4,416 redirects, and there is currently a backlog of 16,475 articles and 23,782 redirects in the queue. Fantastic job! Completing 22,502 patrols in the first phase made a significant dent in the backlog. Let's keep our foot on the gas for Phase 2, and I hope we can achieve even more reviews than Phase 1. Best of luck!
<div class="center" style="width:auto; margin-left:auto; margin-right:auto;">{{Clickable button 2|Special:NewPagesFeed|Start patrolling!|class=mw-ui-progressive}}</div>
{{clear}}
You are receiving this message because you added your name to the participants list ↗.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:21, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

José Sanjurjo Rodríquez

Thanks for looking at the page and being so responsive. Really my aim is just translate the existing page into English. The original page does have sources and the translation should as well- not sure where the misstep is.

https://gl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jos%C3%A9_Sanjurjo_Rodr%C3%ADguez Historiograph56 (talk) 09:34, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

:@Historiograph56
:Hello there,
:I understand that your intention is to translate the existing Portuguese page into English. However, on Wikipedia, a translation is not automatically accepted just because the original article exists in another language.
:Each language edition of Wikipedia works independently and follows its own policies and guidelines. The English Wikipedia has specific standards for notability ↗, reliable sources ↗, verifiability ↗ and reference formatting. Even if the Portuguese article has sources, those sources must still meet the English Wikipedia’s reliable source guidelines and be properly formatted according to its citation standards.
:Regards Hitro talk ↗ 09:12, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

Review waiting, following up

Hello, Just checking—should I wait for the review, or is there anything I need to address in the meantime?

Thanks a lot. Giaveda (talk) 16:28, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

:Hi there,
:You should wait for the review. Regards. Hitro talk ↗ 10:17, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

CLOWD9

Hi Hitro, I previously just re-edited the sources for the article after a rejection last week for my first draft, and I took great care to ensure the press references were all independent and not paid references, which I believe they are. It would be very helpful if you could explain how all the references listed are not independent, international news journals, as to my knowledge and dealings with them, they are all independent and respected within the Fintech industry. Any help, would be appreciated. I have re-written this as coldly as I could. If you think there is a better way to do it, please let me know. Thank you, Cosmo Cosmospens (talk) 13:13, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

:@Cosmospens
:Hello there,
:A significant portion of the sources cited such as Finextra, Fintech Futures, IBS Intelligence etc. appear to be based on press releases or company announcements. Per WP:IRS ↗, such coverage is generally considered routine or promotional in nature and does not demonstrate the level of independent editorial analysis required to establish notability. Regards. Hitro talk ↗ 10:03, 19 April 2026 (UTC)
::Hi Hitro, this independent editorial came in, and is unpaid, profiling CLOWD9. Is this the sort of source that is regarded as a Primary or Secondary? https://thefuturismtoday.com/fintech/clowd9-cloud-native-payment/
::Thanks,
::Cosmo Cosmospens (talk) 12:15, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Martin Georgiev (composer) ↗, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Varna ↗ was added. Such links are usually incorrect ↗, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 22:01, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

New pages patrol May 2026 Backlog drive

{| style="border: 2px solid #36c; border-radius: 4px; background: linear-gradient(to right, #ffffff, #eaf3ff); padding: 10px; color: #000;"
| style="vertical-align: middle; font-size: 130%" | May 2026 Backlog Drive ↗ | '''New pages patrol ↗''' 
| rowspan=3 | right|100px ↗
|-
|

On 1 May 2026, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.

Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.

Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.

Each review will earn 1 point.

Interested in taking part? '''Sign up here ↗'''.

|-
|colspan=2 style="font-size:85%; padding-top:15px;"|You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. ↗
|}
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:23, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

Draft:Gabe Simon (music producer)

Hi. Thank you for reviewing my draft. I really appreciate it. I have improved this article too and i would be grateful if you may look at it as well. I have fixed all the issues pointed out by the reviewers. Thanks again for your time. Kiopastro (talk) 11:35, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

:Hello there,
:I will look into this. There are some important claims behind paywall, I'll verify them then see what can be done. Regards. Hitro talk ↗ 12:43, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

Subject: Draft:Moonjuice — updated with press citations

Hello HitroMilanese, thank you for your review. I have updated Draft:Moonjuice with independent press citations that were not in the original submission, including reviews from The Courier-Mail (21 March 2003, Pulse section), TimeOff Magazine (two reviews by Adam Curley and Liam O'Neill, June and July 2003), and The Oracle (7 February 2003, Craig Spann). These are print publications from 2003 so they do not have online URLs but are legitimate independent sources. I have resubmitted the draft. Could you please take another look? Thank you. BrisbaneRock99 BrisbaneRock99 (talk) 04:42, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

:Hello there,
:Additional references are still required. Please remove references from Wikipedia and band's official website, they are not considered reliable ↗. Please check WP:BAND ↗ and demonstrate notability accordingly. Hitro talk ↗ 10:58, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

Draft: Blokees

Hello I've made attempts to change the Blokees sources. When you get a chance can you take a look at it please? I hope I did it correctly this time. ~2026-26703-24 ↗ (talk) 02:13, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

Draft: St. Anthony of Makati Montessori, Inc.

Hey there HitroMilanese!

Thank you for reviewing my draft article, Draft:St. Anthony of Makati Montessori, Inc.

I understand the concern regarding Wikipedia’s notability requirements and the need for multiple reliable, independent secondary sources. I am currently working on locating additional published coverage from reputable sources that meet these standards.

I would like to respectfully note that creating this article helps preserve the documented history and contributions of the institution as an established educational school in Makati, similar to other schools such as Don Bosco Technical Institute of Makati that are also documented on Wikipedia.

I will continue improving the draft to ensure it fully complies with Wikipedia’s guidelines. Thank you for your time and consideration.
WikiPH 3 (talk) 10:02, 10 May 2026 (UTC)

New Page Patrol Newsletter - May 2026

<div style="border:2px solid #90C0FF; background:#F0F0FF; width:99%; padding:4px">

Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}},

thumb|400px|New Page Review queue November 2025 - May 2026 ↗

'''Backlog update'''

At the time of this message, there are 15,282 articles and 32,951 redirects awaiting review.

After the January–February drive the article backlog was reduced to 15,179 articles and the redirect backlog to 19,053 respectively. Great job! However, both queues are growing rapidly and any additional reviews are highly appreciated.

'''2024 and 2025 NPP Awards'''

74px|left ↗{{no ping|JTtheOG}} was selected as the NPP reviewer of the year for both 2024 and 2025, for reviewing the most articles amongst all reviewers.
{{no ping|Hey man im josh}} and {{no ping|MPGuy2824}} won the Redirect Ninja Master Award for 2024 and 2025 respectively, for reviewing the most redirects.

Overall in 2024, one Platinum, two Gold, eight Silver, 12 Bronze and 45 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 66 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year. In 2025, one Platinum, ten Silver, 13 Bronze and 38 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 38 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year.

{{no ping|BoyTheKingCanDance}}, {{no ping|Rosiestep}}, {{no ping|SunDawn}}, and {{no ping|Vanderwaalforces}} were inducted into the NPP Hall of Fame ↗ for having two separate years of 2,000+ article reviews.

'''January–February backlog drive'''

The experimental two-month long backlog drive concluded with 183 reviewers patrolling over 27,761 articles and 35,309 redirects, earning over 36,836 points. Congratulations to {{no ping|JTtheOG}}, who achieved first place with 6,484.6 points in this drive.

'''May backlog drive'''

An article-only backlog drive is currently underway. We are hoping to make a big dent in the backlog. You can read more about it or join at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Backlog drives/May 2026 ↗.

'''PageTriage'''

An attempt was made to get the New Pages Feed ↗ to sort by date marked as reviewed instead of date created. However we had to revert it due to bugs. We may try again in the future. You can subscribe to the Phabricator ticket ↗ if you're interested in following along.

{{refbegin}}
'''Reminders:'''

You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord ↗.

Consider adding the project discussion page ↗ to your watchlist.

To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here ↗.

{{refend}}
</div>

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:37, 14 May 2026 (UTC)


== May 2026 NPP backlog drive – Points award ==
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:top;" | 160px ↗
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: bottom; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Invisible Barnstar '''  
|-
|style="vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | This award is given in recognition of HitroMilanese for accumulating at least 5 points in the May 2026 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions helped review 14884 articles during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and helping reduce the backlog! – '''Dream'''Rimmer ■ 15:58, 12 June 2026 (UTC)
|}

Pyar Ka Mausam (1969)

Greetings!

I have improved the Wikipedia page of 1969 Indian Hindi-language musical romance film, Pyar Ka Mausam ↗. Added 5 citations.

HitroMilanese, could you please have a look at it again, if possible? Do you think it is good enough now? If not, what more could be done for further improvement?

Thank you! 💜 Honeybrowneyes (talk) 04:36, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

:@Honeybrowneyes
:Nice work. Thanks Hitro talk ↗ 11:23, 21 June 2026 (UTC)
::Thank you so much!!! Grateful for your reply and appreciation. 💜💜💜 Honeybrowneyes (talk) 11:28, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

Horror Dadz Wiki Page

Would you please, Explain to me how multiple journal website such as Dread Central, Horror Society, Fangoria etc aren't credible resources? Was it because they were article based? I'm trying to understand your rejection of the submitted page, and I am not following/ N15Media (talk) 17:01, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

:I went through and Refactored draft to resolve WP:NCOMPANY and WP:POV concerns I believe, if you would take a look at this. I didn't remove some cites, I just added more that I believe cover what you meant (Please let me know). I then removed all promotional language ("puffery"), eliminated speculative future content/timelines (WP:CRYSTAL), and added multiple independent, third-party secondary sources from established horror journalism outlets to firmly demonstrate notability. N15Media (talk) 17:48, 22 June 2026 (UTC)
::@N15Media
::Hello there,
::None of the presented sources show significant coverage ↗ about the company. They are certainly reliable but they are not adding anything to the notability of the company. To be honest, these references are contributing mostly to the notability of the films that they are reviewing or discussing about. Please introduce sources that covers the company in elaborated manner, not just passing mentions. Regards. Hitro talk ↗ 10:22, 25 June 2026 (UTC)
:::Hello,
:::Did the added articles help that? MediaInsightMan (talk) 22:13, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

Review - Kucharek (brand)

Good afternoon,

I am writing to you with a request for help and specific guidance. I am submitting an article about the Kucharek brand (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Kucharek_(brand) for the second time, and unfortunately the text still does not meet Wikipedia’s requirements. Could you please indicate, for example, specific passages that I should remove or change so that the article can be accepted?

I am also trying to understand the mechanism behind how this type of article works. Why, for example, was Kamis (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kamis) accepted with only three sources? The first source comes from the Wayback Machine, and the second article is already quite outdated. Moreover, there is an error at the very beginning, because Kamis has not been a Polish brand for a long time.

Similarly, McCormick (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McCormick_%26_Company), which largely uses archived sources from its own website, even though one of the arguments for rejecting the Kucharek text at some point was not to use any references in any way connected to the company.

https://web.archive.org/web/20081029055837/http://www.mccormickcorporation.com/Corporate/layouts/companyHistory1950_1969.aspx

https://web.archive.org/web/20081029055842/http://www.mccormickcorporation.com/Corporate/layouts/companyHistory1970_1979.aspx

https://web.archive.org/web/20081029055857/http://www.mccormickcorporation.com/Corporate/layouts/companyHistory2000_present.aspx

Kamis is also listed in the category of Polish brands, which is also outdated, as the brand has a branch in Poland but is owned by McCormick.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Polish_brands

Regards DoradcaSmaku1 (talk) 12:06, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

:@DoradcaSmaku1
:Hello there,
:Regarding establishing notability for the draft, currently in concern, you should check WP:NCOMPANY ↗ and specially WP:CORPDEPTH ↗.
:Regarding existance of other article: - Plenty of articles exist that probably should not. Equally, because articles must wait for someone who is interested in the subject to notice they are missing before they are created, a lot of articles do not exist that probably should. So just pointing out that an article on a similar subject exists does not prove that the article in question should also exist; it is quite possible that the other article should also be deleted but nobody has noticed it and listed it for deletion yet.
:End of the day, the drafts related to companies or brands, must meet either WP:NCOMPANY ↗ or WP:GNG ↗ for inclusion into Wikipedia.
:Regards. Hitro talk ↗ 11:38, 26 June 2026 (UTC)
::Thank you for your response, I have read these articles but still I feel that I need your help. Could you point out which sources and fragments of the article have to be removed or changed? DoradcaSmaku1 (talk) 11:50, 26 June 2026 (UTC)
::Also can you show me examples of brand articles which were recently added and accepted? I feel that it would be helpful to see articles which fully meet the Wikipedia requirements. DoradcaSmaku1 (talk) 11:59, 26 June 2026 (UTC)

Draft Revision

Thank you for the helpful feedback regarding the promotional tone. I have completely rewritten the draft to strictly meet Wikipedia's neutral point of view (NPOV) guidelines. I have removed all unverified claims (such as client counts), stripped out all subjective marketing language, and refocused the text purely on verified historical facts and technical services. The page is anchored by an independent national media feature in the ''Daily Mirror''. I would appreciate a fresh review of this revised, encyclopedic version. Thank you. Stevesimswebdesign (talk) 11:25, 26 June 2026 (UTC)

:@Stevesimswebdesign
:Hi there,
:I have responded on the draft page. Regards. Hitro talk ↗ 11:33, 26 June 2026 (UTC)

Draft:Ljubomir Kovachev

Dear HitroMilanese,
Thank you again for reviewing my draft. Following your feedback, I have rewritten it as a short, neutral stub and limited the content to verifiable facts supported only by published, reliable sources (peer‑reviewed journal articles, a monograph, a handbook chapter from the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, and a Springer monograph that cites my work). I have removed personal letters and other unsuitable material.
I understand that Wikipedia also requires multiple independent, secondary sources that provide significant coverage of a person, beyond their own publications. At this time, I do not have substantial additional secondary coverage about myself.
Could you please let me know whether, in this situation, it would be better not to resubmit this draft again and instead focus my editing on improving existing articles in my areas of expertise (for example, inguinal hernia and abdominal wall surgery)?
Best regards, KovachevL KovachevL (talk) 12:19, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

:@KovachevL
:Dear KovachevL,
:Thank you for your message.
:After reviewing the draft, I found of that most, if not all, of the sources currently provided appear to be authored by the subject. However, Wikipedia's notability guidelines ↗ require significant coverage ↗ in reliable, independent secondary sources ↗. To establish notability, references should discuss the subject in detail and be written by unaffiliated third parties. Sources created by, about, or closely associated with the subject generally cannot be used to demonstrate notability on their own.
:However, I have noticed that you have resubmitted the draft. I will leave it for the fresh pair of eyes. Regards. Hitro talk ↗ 09:57, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
:Dear HitroMilanese,
:Thanks for the answer. For various reasons, I have not had the opportunity to establish direct contacts and exchange experiences with colleagues from all over the world. I have followed a lot of scientific information, not only in surgery. And due to the size of my country, I have not had the opportunity to gather what is necessary for significant statistical significance of the results. In ResearchGate, I have put things that are interesting, non-standard and have given results in insoluble cases. In the memoir I mentioned, I have given a number of examples, where if each of them I had the opportunity to multiply as statistics, I would now be accepted on Wikipedia without any problems. But in medicine there is a proven truth that two and two do not make four. It struck me that three of the most famous authorities in one of the areas in which I achieved competence: Lloyd Nyhus, Robert Condon and Rene Stoppa are not listed on Wikipedia. But the rules are the rules. I wish you to achieve the goals you have dedicated yourself to. In a progressively unpredictable world.
:Best regards, Ljubomir Kovachev KovachevL (talk) 11:11, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

About Draft:Chintaram

The book appears to satisfy the notability guideline for books, as it has been the subject of at least two non-trivial published works from sources independent of the book itself, namely Dainik Bhaskar and Keertiman News.

I have also removed the Instagram references, even though they were official accounts of government personalities, to avoid any concerns regarding source reliability.

The Dainik Bhaskar article provides substantial coverage of the book, including comments and a review by the former Chief Minister of Chhattisgarh. Although the article is behind a paywall and I was unable to archive it despite several attempts, it remains a reliable source.

The Keertiman News article is also dedicated to the book and provides significant independent coverage rather than a mere passing mention. Therefore, these two independent sources satisfy the book notability guideline. PathakNar (talk) 09:10, 29 June 2026 (UTC)