User Talk: Jamie Eilat

{{Archives}}

Golden first KPOP at Oscars

It seems that if the song is stated as the 'first' Kpop win on Grammys, then it should be listed as the first Kpop at the Oscars cited here at ABC: https://abc7chicago.com/live-updates/oscars-2026-live-updates-see-winners-best-moments-98th-academy-awards-hollywood/18673293/entry/18673424/ ↗. Possibly also in each article maybe: the song article, the soundtrack article, the film article. ErnestKrause (talk) 19:44, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

:That source there definitely seems sufficient; I've gone & re-added it as a first into the lead of the "Golden" article + added it to the accolades section of the film article. — Jamie Eilat (talk) 20:35, 18 March 2026 (UTC)
::It looks pretty good; that was quite a performance from them at the Oscars. Cheeers. ErnestKrause (talk) 15:15, 19 March 2026 (UTC)
Separately, your move of the salary of the directors to the sequel draft article. It raises the question of are the directors entitled to the profits from KPOP1 and should this be a part of KPOP1. Since the draft sequel article will likely need a year or two before reaching main space, then my thought is that its worthwhile to include some version of the profits which they desereved and received in the KPOP1 article. Any thoughts? ErnestKrause (talk) 13:08, 27 March 2026 (UTC)
:Hi JamieEilat; I'm looking at the plot changes made by Fruitful 2 days ago and I'm not sure they make the article better; could you glance at them? ErnestKrause (talk) 11:56, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

TFA

Thank you today for KPop Demon Hunters ↗, about a "well-received popular culture and media arts film"! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:59, 20 June 2026 (UTC)

Could you please add this poll to the 2026 United States Senate election in Michigan ↗

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/docs/2026/MITCHELL_MI_Poll_Press_Release_6-17-2026_7PM.pdf
This poll, its primary election numbers are added in the primary election section but general election number is missing. ~2026-35422-06 ↗ (talk) 04:48, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

:{{hidden ping|~2026-35422-06}}{{Done}} — Jamie Eilat (talk) 13:07, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

":Talk:Abigail "Pomni" Brooks ↗" listed at Redirects for discussion ↗

30px ↗
The redirect <span class="plainlinks">[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Abigail_%22Pomni%22_Brooks&redirect=no Talk:Abigail "Pomni" Brooks]</span> has been listed at redirects for discussion ↗ to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines ↗. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{section link|1=Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 June 27#Talk:Abigail "Pomni" Brooks}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> Red Shogun412 (talk • contribs ↗) 18:21, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

Please verify sources before reverting

Hi. Regarding the Bilibili source, I'd appreciate it if you could investigate sources more carefully before reverting in the future. The cited URL is an official Bilibili Bangumi media page, not a user-uploaded video. Because of that, the rationale that it was "clearly just a random reupload" doesn't appear to be supported by the source itself. VitoxxMass (talk) 18:47, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

:{{reply to|VitoxxMass}} I want to both apologize, and attempt to explain how this misunderstanding occurred. The link that you provided in the citation failed to load at all on my end, so I attempted to directly search through Bilibili's website, using the title you provided for the citation as a search term, to try to find what you were citing. However, the only videos that appeared for me from that search ↗ were indeed reuploads from random users, which led me to incorrectly assume that one of these was what you were citing. I have now though gone further into the website, and managed to locate a working page that included the official upload of the episode to the site, which I now understand is what you were actually citing. Again, I want to apologize. — Jamie Eilat (talk) 19:44, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
::That is fine, and for your effort I've thanked you in the article VitoxxMass (talk) 22:32, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

3RR reminder

Hi,

Please look over WP:3RR ↗ in regards to your recent edits at the 2026 United States Senate election in Maine ↗ article. Thanks, David O. Johnson (talk) 12:29, 9 July 2026 (UTC)

:I am aware of WP:3RR, and do try to be mindful of it. If there are any recent edits/reverts to the page from me that you may have had a particular concern over in regard to 3RR, would you mind pointing to them? — Jamie Eilat (talk) 13:36, 9 July 2026 (UTC)

::There were more than three reversions: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2026_United_States_Senate_election_in_Maine&diff=prev&oldid=1363238694 ↗, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2026_United_States_Senate_election_in_Maine&diff=1363239899&oldid=1363239794 ↗, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2026_United_States_Senate_election_in_Maine&diff=1363258828&oldid=1363258453 ↗, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2026_United_States_Senate_election_in_Maine&diff=1363259663&oldid=1363259072 ↗, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2026_United_States_Senate_election_in_Maine&diff=1363264733&oldid=1363264656 ↗. Thanks, David O. Johnson (talk) 21:03, 9 July 2026 (UTC)

I found something really bad on the Infowars article lol

Yo, I don't really edit wikipedia or use any of the advanced features or whatever but I read it a lot and I was on the Infowars article and I found a horrendous couple sentences that have been left unchanged for like a year. Infowars#Removals from other websites ↗ If you look at the ending of the second paragraph in this section it doesn't make sense and needs to be rewritten. I would just fix this myself if I could but the page is protected, I didn't know what to do so I just went to the edit history and told a couple people who had edited it about this, so by the time you see this it might already be fixed. Anyway that's all, thanks for your time lol DrumstickJar (talk) 05:15, 11 July 2026 (UTC)

:DrumstickJar sent the same message to me. For the life of me I can't find anything that "doesn't make sense" anywhere in that section. Do you see anything? --Guy Macon (talk) 07:06, 11 July 2026 (UTC)