User Talk: Janan2025

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

False album edition being kept on page

Hello, on the page Technique (album) ↗, there is an unidentified user who keeps adding their own "edition" tracklist and release date across the page. When in fact this does not exist and is not officially related to any releases by the band. I'm speaking to you now because I saw that you reverted edits made to this page to claiming that it "wasn't vandalism", while it is still something fictitious with no credible citations and needs to be taken down. An editing war is also happening under the same purposes on this page: Brotherhood (New Order album) ↗. TheBorderline (talk) 15:51, 8 July 2025 (UTC)

Apologies

I've seen now what is going on with the Kostas Sloukas ↗ page and I apologize. There was a vandal (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:2A02:587:4E0D:7100:A9FB:748C:7EEC:464) that wrecked the page before you reverted the edits. Sorry. Panosgatto (talk) 11:27, 28 July 2025 (UTC)

Please detail

Please detail what content I may have removed in my edit of Catlin. Vsmith (talk) 20:40, 30 July 2025 (UTC)

Peter Mensch

Source cited has no reference or conversation about cheating. Its unsourced allegation Blu beerd (talk) 00:11, 16 August 2025 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

left|link= ↗
:::::'''Hi Janan2025!''' We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
::::::* The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page ↗
::::::* The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge ↗
::::::* The Teahouse new editor help space ↗
::::::* Wikipedia Help pages ↗
{{Wikipedia:TWA/Navigation2}}
-- 21:18, 24 August 2025 (UTC)

Why was my edit on the DeviantArt removed?

I don't understand why my edit on DeviantArt was taken off?! I was only adding a small detail on an issue with that site that is even noted and sourced, and some bot takes it off.@ 2601:246:C000:470:A915:2C37:B7F5:4F5B ↗ (talk) 22:33, 6 September 2025 (UTC)

:Janan abla “bir bot bunu kaldırmış” derken ne demek istiyorsun acaba? 78.163.34.32 ↗ (talk) 21:19, 9 September 2025 (UTC)

Felipe Correa ↗

Hi {{u|Janan2025}}, regarding Special:Diff/1314068171 ↗, please have a look at WP:BLPPRIMARY ↗. I understand the reason for the revert but you are legally responsible ↗ for material you restore, so even if a removal lacks an explicit justification, the heading of the restored section might have justified a second look. Best regards, ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:12, 29 September 2025 (UTC)

What was it again?

Hi, you contacted me regarding a change I made to the V/H/S (franchise) ↗ page that didn’t have a source. I’m more than willing to admit to my error, but I have admittedly forgotten what change I made that could’ve been objectionable. If you could let me know what it was, then I’d be very grateful. 82.7.111.191 ↗ (talk) 21:29, 4 October 2025 (UTC)

:Hello. Did you ask what change you made? The change that you made was removing content from the page without an explanation. I would appreciate if you explained next time, the reason for removing content. Thanks. Janan2025 (talk) 21:52, 15 November 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 18 November 2025 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>

Why would you remove the edits I made on Edilberto G. Sandoval's Page?

If you would carefully look at my name, I have primary knowledge that some of the details in the page are quite outdated. There are tons of spelling errors on the page which I need to correct. RexSandoval (talk) 10:33, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

Pointless edits

Why are you editing spaces out of user talk pages? It's harmless, I guess, but what's the point? <small class="autosigned">— Preceding unsigned ↗ comment added by Jpgordon (talk • contribs ↗) 00:37, 29 December 2025 (UTC)</small>

:@Jpgordon Hello. I'm doing it so that the page looks tidy. The point is so that the gap at the top of the page above the month and year isn't too big. That's why I like to do this. It is indeed harmless. Janan2025 (talk) 08:31, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
::OK. I'm finding it to be somewhat disruptive. I spend much of my time patrolling :CAT:RFU ↗. When a disruptive editor has been using the unblock template to vandalize -- I see it several times a day -- the easiest thing is to just roll them back. Your intervening edit makes that process just a little more difficult. Since there's no purpose to it, please desist from tidying pages of blocked users in this way. There's a lot more important stuff to do on Wikipedia. --jpgordon<sup><small>𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇</small></sup> 04:29, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Janan2025!

<div style="border: 3px solid #FFD700; background-color: #FFFAF0; padding:0.2em 0.4em; height:auto; min-height:173px; border-radius:1em; box-shadow:.1em .1em .5em rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.75); box-shadow:.1em .1em .5em light-dark(rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.75), rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.75));" class="plainlinks">
left|x173px ↗x173px|right ↗
{{Paragraph break}}
{{Center|{{resize|179%|'''''Happy New Year ↗!'''''}}}}
'''Janan2025''',<br />Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year ↗, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
<br />Abishe (talk) 16:47, 31 December 2025 (UTC)<br /><br />
</div>
   ''{{resize|88%|Send New Year cheer by adding {{tls|Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.}}''
{{clear}} Abishe (talk) 16:47, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

:@Abishe Thank you! Happy New Year 2026 to you too! Janan2025 (talk) 17:43, 31 December 2025 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Greenland crisis ↗

{{ivmbox
|1=On 19 January 2026, '''''In the news ↗''''' was updated with an item that involved the article '''''Greenland crisis ↗''''', which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page ↗. Andrew ↗🐉(talk ↗) 16:26, 19 January 2026 (UTC)
|2={{Ambox globe current red}}
|imagesize=50px
}}

Questionable edit

Recently you edited the Alemtsehay Wedajo ↗ page by removing a Citation Needed tag. As far as I am aware, the citation needed tag was there because the source provided was a biography and may potentially violate Wikipedia's reliable sources policy, and therefore a better source was needed. TheFurryBean (talk) 16:57, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

:If you still believe that edit was justified, that should not be a problem. I added the BLP primary sources tag to the article to let other editors know to find better sources in the future. TheFurryBean (talk) 17:12, 22 January 2026 (UTC)
:Hello. I did this because there was already a source there, so it no longer made sense for the "citation needed" tag to there. Instead, a "better source needed" tag could have been there, or what you added also might have been a good idea. Janan2025 (talk) 17:19, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

This ↗ warning

Hi,
If a user has already been given another level 1 this month or recently, please do not give them another level 1. Give them a level 2 instead. This confuses tools (like RedWarn ↗). <span style="font-family:monospace"><span style="color:#6040bf;font-weight:bold">thetechie@enwiki</span>:~$ <span style="color:#4055bf">she/they</span> | <span style="color:#bf40bf">talk</span></span> 21:23, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

:Hello. It depends on the situation. In this case, on that page, the Level 1 warning was about adding unsourced content over a week ago, and the warning I was giving was about vandalism, so if it's about something else (and especially after over a week), then I think it actually makes sense to give another Level 1 warning on that page, which is what I did. The user hasn't yet received a warning about vandalism, so it wouldn't make sense to give them a warning saying, "Please refrain from making unconstructive edits", as they haven't been warned about it before. Therefore, I think the warning level depends on several factors. In this case, again, I really think it might much more sense to give a Level 1 vandalism warning, not a Level 2 one, as mentioned (and the reason) above. Janan2025 (talk) 21:45, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

Shepherd Rams

The info that I deleted from Shepherd Rams ↗ is duplicated on the page Shepherd Rams football ↗. ~2026-10248-4 ↗ (talk) 00:44, 1 February 2026 (UTC)

A Tale Dark and Grimm

I have a question about the Netflix miniseries A Tale Dark & Grimm ↗. Can you add entire episode summaries to the episode list? I mean, since it is a limited series and not everybody has Netflix. Mr. Doggy Dog (talk) 17:45, 28 May 2026 (UTC)