User Talk: Jfire
Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.
{{usertalkpage}}
{{Ctopics/aware|a-i|ap|e-e}}
{{bots|deny=DPL bot}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|maxarchivesize = 250K
|counter = 1
|algo = old(48h)
|archive = User talk:Jfire/Archive %(counter)d
}}
{{Usertalkback |you=watched |me=watched}}
{{Archive box|Archive 1 ↗}}
Question?
Why did you revert my freedom of speech in china edit? I understand it was a redirect to censorship in China, but I was trying to create a page based off of China's own legal views of freedom of speech, similar to how the united states has freedom of speech in the United States article, which is about United States legal views while also having its own article for censorship in the United States. Jdhsaldjsabfhjdaslg (talk) 04:24, 7 June 2026 (UTC)
:It was a wildly non-neutral content fork that explains only what the law merely purports to protect, while almost completely ignoring the fact that freedom of speech in China is in fact severely restricted and characterized by pervasive state censorship and mass surveillance. Jfire (talk) 04:30, 7 June 2026 (UTC)
::I understand that I originally wrote it using China's legal perspective as the foundation, with the intention of adding more critical viewpoints afterward to make it more neutral. It already acknowledges censorship and China's position that "freedom of speech does not mean free speech" Jdhsaldjsabfhjdaslg (talk) 04:34, 7 June 2026 (UTC)
:::I think a topic as vital as this needs remain neutral and balanced at all times, rather than start out from a state that encompasses only a single perspective. If you want to approach it in a piecemeal fashion, I suggest you either do so in the draft namespace (Draft:Freedom of speech in China ↗) or make edits to the existing content at Human rights in China#Freedom of speech ↗ and then suggest a page split if it becomes too large for the parent article. Jfire (talk) 04:41, 7 June 2026 (UTC)
Afd closes
Hey, give me 5 seconds next time, ok? :) <span class="gfSarekSig">SarekOfVulcan (talk)</span> 23:23, 18 June 2026 (UTC)
:Heh, sorry! Jfire (talk) 23:28, 18 June 2026 (UTC)
How does one initiate an AfD
Please advise, I cannot figure out the process WindBorneListener (talk) 00:56, 20 June 2026 (UTC) re: Canadian Métis Council ↗
:You can find step-by-step instructions here: WP:AFD1 ↗. Another option is to enable Wikipedia:Twinkle ↗, which provides an interface to do all the steps automatically. See this ↗. Jfire (talk) 00:59, 20 June 2026 (UTC)
Official Response about Kai Trump Page Edits
I will have my edits stand as submitted, as they were made carefully and with the intention of preserving accuracy, context, and consistency.
Moreover, I would appreciate the ability to manage and maintain the “Andrew Ramon Suarez” page associated with my account so that data integrity, attribution, and factual accuracy can be preserved going forward.
Quite Frankly: it should be an offer readily available to people of our status to maintain and manage our own accounts. No one truly knows themselves better than themselves. Fact.
Please address this matter promptly.
P.S.
I have also had the issue of not being able to upload more accurate images from my mobile device. Thank you for fixing that issue as well. Your platform probably wouldn't have such a sharp decline and be asking for handouts if you structured it properly and make reasonable decisions based upon the data. (A little free "guidance" for you).
Kindly,
Andrew Ramon Suarez AndrewRamonSuarez (talk) 17:25, 5 July 2026 (UTC)
User ~2026-38365-84
He recently did some edits on the looksmaxx article where he removed content without specifying it, even though the text was sourced, I therefore think he does it in bad faith and through bias. He also edits it incompletely, deleting a part and leaving the other, which is vandalising right? I'd like to hear you opinion on this, since I don't want to be involved in edit warring. Kosmge123 (talk) 00:33, 6 July 2026 (UTC)
:I would consider it vandalism. It's removal of sourced content in a way that breaks citations and links to other articles. Seems to have stopped though. I wouldn't worry about it too much unless it starts up again. Jfire (talk) 00:36, 6 July 2026 (UTC)