User Talk: Jfpierce

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

Hello, welcome ↗ to Wikipedia. You might like to start by reading the tutorial ↗ and introducing yourself at the new users page ↗. If you have any questions, you can ask at the help desk ↗ or on my talk page. Two useful tips are that you can sign your name using four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>) and you can preview your changes before you save using the show preview ↗ button. You can regularly find new tips on the Community Portal ↗. Also, category tags normally go at the end of articles, just before the interlanguage links. I look forward to reading your great articles ↗ and I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian ↗. :) Angela . ↗ 16:05, Aug 28, 2004 (UTC)

Comics Collaboration of the Fortnight ↗

As a member of WikiProject Comics ↗, I thought you might be interested in the Comics Collaboration of the Fortnight ↗ we have set up. Please feel free to vote on the articles listed, although bear in mind that a vote for a particular article means you are pledging to help improve the article. The goal of the collaboration is to improve articles to Featured Article ↗ status, as we feel Comics is under-represented in that area. Thanks for your help. Steve block talk 15:41, 18 September 2005 (UTC)

re: Graphic novel

Yes, true enough. However, "graphic novel" has the connotation of being, well, fiction. Not to mention that the author doesn't use the term (here, paragraph nine ↗) for his work, and for reasons I personally agree with. I think that the word is basically marketing jargon and should be avoided if possible unless it is actually a work of fiction, intended for adults, and the work is usually referred to as such. For example, ''The Sandman ↗'', by Neil Gaiman. I never think of that as a graphic novel, and I remember Neil disliking the term, but as that's exactly the kind of work that "graphic novel" has come to refer to, I accept that other people will use it on the 'pedia. However, works like ''Maus ↗'', ''American Splendor ↗'', and, in this case, ''Palestine ↗'', I argue do not make the "graphic novel" definition as they are not works of fiction. Likewise, I'd say the same for ''Tintin ↗'' or ''Asterix ↗'' as they are not intended for adults (although we still read them :)). Snoutwood (talk) 17:12, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
: Do you mean add a "graphic album" cat to ''Palestine''? I don't know, I've honestly never heard of that phrase. What's wrong with just plain old "comic"? I don't really see a need to separate book-comics from comic-comics, especially seeing as that's what ''Palestine'' was to begin with. Snoutwood (talk) 06:33, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Tomba.jpg

{| align="center" style="background-color: white; border:8px solid red; padding:5px; text-align: center; font-size: larger;"
|30px|Warning sign ↗
|This file may be '''deleted'''.
|}
Thanks for uploading ''':Image:Tomba.jpg ↗'''. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content ↗ carefully, then go to the image description page ↗ and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline ↗ is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion ↗. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page ↗. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:42, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Altcomics.gif

Thanks for uploading ''':Image:Altcomics.gif ↗'''. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content ↗ carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline ↗ is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion ↗. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page ↗. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:41, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mrdomino.jpg

Thanks for uploading ''':Image:Mrdomino.jpg ↗'''. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content ↗ carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline ↗ is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion ↗. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page ↗. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 17:10, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

left|150px ↗
Good job starting an article on Richard Bradford. Red Sky rawks!

TCO (talk) 02:06, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
<br style="clear: both;"/>

ArbCom elections are now open! ↗

Hi,<br>
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election ↗. The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements ↗ and submit your choices on the voting page ↗. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 18 November 2025 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Jfpierce. Thank you for your work on 1991 in science fiction ↗. Another editor, Uncle Bash007, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol ↗ and left the following comment:

{{Bq|1=Congrats and thank you for creating this page..}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|<nowiki>{{Re|</nowiki>Uncle Bash007<nowiki>}}</nowiki>}}. <small>(Message delivered via the Page Curation ↗ tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)</small>

Uncle Bash007 (talk) 22:49, 6 December 2025 (UTC)