An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Painted ceiling ↗, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Assumption ↗ was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 7 February 2026 (UTC)

Dumbarton Oaks ↗

Hi there Johnbod. I was looking at this page to see if there were any photos by Wikipedians and, to my surprise, saw that you had taken quite a number. I don't suppose you happened to capture this piece ↗? I'd like to add it to the gallery at serpent labret with articulated tongue ↗, but the museum will not license their own photos. Cheers, --Usernameunique (talk) 22:30, 12 February 2026 (UTC)
:I'm pretty sure not - sorry. Just about everything usable is in Category:Johnbod_does_Washington ↗. Assuming it's on display, you could ask the DC group if someone can go along. Johnbod (talk) 22:40, 12 February 2026 (UTC)
::Good idea! Turns out someone lives a ten-minute walk away, and was able to take a photo. --Usernameunique (talk) 16:03, 16 February 2026 (UTC)
:::Glad that worked out. Go Georgetown! I don't take photos these days, as they are so bad - things like your labret are actually very hard to do well. But I was pleased to see that Dumbarton Oaks birthing figure ↗ has had an article for 10 years, presumably only because of my rather poor photo. I don't think I knew that. Johnbod (talk) 16:42, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hodegetria ↗, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Santa Maria dell'Itria ↗ was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 14 February 2026 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Walter Deverell

25px ↗ Hello! Your submission of Walter Deverell ↗ at the Did You Know nominations page ↗ has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at '''your nomination's entry ↗''' and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!  22:08, 17 February 2026 (UTC)4meter4 (talk) 4meter4 (talk) 22:08, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Christian interpolations in The Twelve Caesars ↗

I've reverted this ↗ at once, rather than open talk page discussion first, because the article you cited didn't include either claim, and the claims are rather extraordinary. But I have now opened Talk:The Twelve Caesars#Christian interpolations ↗, so if you or the TA can add anything there, it could affect several of our articles. NebY (talk) 14:44, 21 February 2026 (UTC)
:I think the issue is that modern editions silently leave these out, understandably, and they are just ignored in historians' discussions. I don't think I'm going to delve into this. Johnbod (talk) 17:51, 21 February 2026 (UTC)

DYK for John Robert Cozens

{{ivmbox
|image = Updated DYK query.svg
|imagesize=40px
|image class=skin-invert
|text = On 4 March 2026 ↗, '''Did you know ↗''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''John Robert Cozens ↗''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that a '''John Robert Cozens ↗''' painting set the record auction price for an 18th-century English watercolour at £2.4 million?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/John Robert Cozens ↗. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, John Robert Cozens ↗), and the hook may be added to the statistics page ↗ after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it ↗.
}} '''Hurricane''''''Zeta'''C ↗ 00:02, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

DYK for Walter Deverell

{{ivmbox
|image = Updated DYK query.svg
|imagesize=40px
|image class=skin-invert
|text = On 5 March 2026 ↗, '''Did you know ↗''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''Walter Deverell ↗''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that the only painting '''Walter Deverell ↗''' ever sold, ''A Pet'', was bought by William Holman Hunt ↗ and John Everett Millais ↗ as an "act of charity"?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bosco Nordio ↗. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Walter Deverell ↗), and the hook may be added to the statistics page ↗ after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it ↗.
}}  — Amakuru (talk) 12:33, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Portrait miniature

Hi, I see you created the redirect Painting in little ↗ to Portrait miniature ↗; the redirect is now linked to the Wikidata item {{Q|282129}}. Would you agree that the other articles on that Wikidata item are the same subject as Portrait miniature ↗? Melozone crissalis (talk) 23:41, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
:Well, mostly, but they might just be very small paintings of any subject, not just portraits. Johnbod (talk) 00:02, 17 March 2026 (UTC)
::Thanks for the input. Melozone crissalis (talk) 00:07, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Meigle 2 ↗

Hi Johnbod! I noticed you reverted the edit made by Stinglehammer on the Meigle 2 article. Just for some context, I'm a student new to Wikipedia, researching Pictish stones for an Award project with the University of Edinburgh. I'd been chatting with Stinglehammer about adding a map with a location marker to the page and he kindly added it for me as an example so I could add the same to other articles I'd created. I just wanted to check what your reasons were for reverting the changes and whether perhaps there's a better way of creating maps etc that I'm unaware of. Thanks :) Aliceinpictland (talk) 17:04, 19 March 2026 (UTC)
:Revisited - the issue wasn't the map, which I've restored, but the bolding of Daniel Stone ↗, which redirects to a different page (rightly or wrongly). Johnbod (talk) 17:50, 19 March 2026 (UTC)
::That makes sense. Thank you! Aliceinpictland (talk) 19:19, 19 March 2026 (UTC)

The Core Contest returns

The Core Contest ↗—Wikipedia's most exciting contest—returns again this year from April 15 to May 31. The goal: to improve vital ↗ or other core articles, with a focus on those in the worst state of disrepair. Editing can be done individually, but in the past groups have also successfully competed. There is {{GBP|300}} of prize money divided among editors who provide the "best additive encyclopedic value". '''Signups are open now ↗'''. Cheers from the judges, Femke, Casliber, Aza24.

If you wish to start or stop receiving news about The Core Contest, please add or remove yourself from the delivery list ↗.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:20, 24 March 2026 (UTC)

Roman and Byzantine domes article split

Hi Johnbod, any further thoughts about this discussion ↗? Are you ok the the proposal to split the article into an overview/influence article titled "Roman and Byzantine domes" and a series of century-specific daughter articles with most of the detail? AmateurEditor (talk) 02:35, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sarcophagus of the Spouses ↗, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kline ↗ was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:47, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion ↗ of :Chous ↗

left|link=|alt=Notice|48px| ↗

The article :Chous ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗ because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Unable to find notability in Google Search, News, Books, and Scholar references'''</blockquote>

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the article's talk page ↗.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion process ↗es exist. In particular, articles for deletion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion based on established criteria ↗.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion ↗ of the article at any time.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history ↗ for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:30, 5 April 2026 (UTC)
:I just restored the redirect we've had for 10 years. Johnbod (talk) 00:37, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

Came here tenuously...

... but I greatly appreciate your ''Fast Show'' reference on your user page. Anyway, I'm off now to fix the drainage in the lower field, sir. Mac Edmunds (talk) 22:02, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
::Glad you liked it! That was .... nice. Johnbod (talk) 02:16, 11 April 2026 (UTC)

:Category:Islamic arts of the book ↗ has been nominated for merging

<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>:Category:Islamic arts of the book ↗ has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization ↗ guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at '''the category's entry ↗''' on the categories for discussion ↗ page. Thank you. PARAKANYAA (talk) 16:13, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Help needed

thumb|Blue_and_white_mosque_lamp._Circa_1505_CE._Iznik,_glazed._Museum_of_Islamic_Art_(Tiled_Kiosk),_Istanbul,_Turkey ↗

I want to add this image in the infobox of the article Blue and white pottery ↗, along with the pre-existing image, but I am unable to do so. Hu741f4 (talk) 22:26, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
:Yeah - you need thumb, for one. Johnbod (talk) 23:02, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
::I think it should go in the article, but not in the infobox. At present the article is very short on text on Islamic pottery. Johnbod (talk) 23:10, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

Walter Deverell typo?

Hi there. You added the following to Walter Deverell ↗: "a wierd Arab band ...", sourced from Hilton. Is the misspelling of 'weird' a typo, or should it be followed by a 'sic'? Masato.harada (talk) 15:41, 24 April 2026 (UTC)
:No, just a typo. Johnbod (talk) 17:59, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Figurines template

Hi, there, could you explain me this edit ↗ and why you summarized it as "this make little sense"? Which criteria did you use to order the topics?

Moreover, why did you supress the :Mycenaean figurine on tripod ↗ article from the list? Fma12 (talk) 08:34, 6 May 2026 (UTC)
:For historic types, covering a range of some 4,000 years, a rough chronological approach seems called for, rather alphabetic. This doesn't apply to other sections. I wasn't aware I had "suppressed" :Mycenaean figurine on tripod ↗ - feel free to put it back. Johnbod (talk) 14:03, 6 May 2026 (UTC)
::Thanks for the explanation, it's all clear now. BTW, quotation marks around ''suppressed'' are not necessary because as a non-native English speaker ({{flagicon|ARG}}), I may commit mistakes (just like you did erasing the Mycenaean article from the template). Thanks again. Fma12 (talk) 17:41, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

Notice of noticeboard discussion

link=|25px|alt=Information icon ↗ There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrative action review ↗ regarding an action which you performed. The thread is May 2026 Rollback by Johnbod ↗. Shogeneral (talk) 07:40, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

Looking for an art historical term

thumb|upright ↗
Do you know whether there's a technical term for this attitude/pose in art, or how I might go about finding it? Standing figure, one foot lifted up onto an object, usually leaning on the forearm on the same side of the body? To me the stance signals "surveying one's domain", or an explorer's pose or oversight, but I'm wondering if there's a term for it as there is for ''orans'' or ''contrapposto''. I have been flailing about looking, but since I don't know what to call it, I don't know what to call it.

Apologies if this seems random; yours is the first Wikipedian name that comes to my mind on art historical topics. Cynwolfe (talk) 15:57, 18 May 2026 (UTC)
:Not that I'm aware of, but there might be, especially in numismatics - they have a bunch of specialist terms for iconography. Don't know who to ask on that. Maybe look in auction/dealer catalogues online. Sorry. Johnbod (talk) 16:02, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rosalind (As You Like It) ↗, a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Fletcher ↗ was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:12, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

Las Meninas scheduled for TFA

This is to let you know that Las Meninas ↗ has been scheduled as today's featured article ↗ for 25 July 2026. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/July 2026 ↗, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/July 2026 ↗. Please keep an eye on that page, as notifications of copy edits to or queries about the draft blurb may be posted there. I also suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors ↗ from two days before it appears on the Main Page. Thanks, and congratulations on your work! Z1720 (talk) 16:39, 29 May 2026 (UTC)

June 2026

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm Royz-vi Tsibele. I noticed that you made a comment on the page :Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruth and Elmer Wellin Museum of Art ↗ that didn't seem very civil ↗, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page ↗. ''If you disagree with another editor's opinion, you do not have to use charged language like "nonsense" and "if you worked more in this area you'd know that" to make that known.''  Royz-vi Tsibele (talk) 23:49, 26 June 2026 (UTC)
:You have rather sneakily used "personal attack" in you edit summary, but not in your actual comment here. This is less than ideal. Calling a comment "nonsense" is not a personal attack, as you'll probably come to understand as you get more experience editing. Johnbod (talk) 12:20, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

link=|25px|alt=Information icon ↗ There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents ↗ regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Johnbod and civility ↗. Lavalizard101 (talk) WP:SOLIDARITY ↗ 15:00, 27 June 2026 (UTC)

July 2026

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Please do not attack ↗ other editors, as you did at :Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruth and Elmer Wellin Museum of Art ↗. Comment on ''content'', not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool ↗ and keep this in mind while editing. ''Again, please refrain from engaging in rude/uncivil conduct on this page. There is no need to decry other users as "self-proclaimed AFD specialists" to get your points across effectively.'' Royz-vi Tsibele (talk) 01:57, 2 July 2026 (UTC)
:The ANI section above demonstrated very effectively that you and other editors have an understanding of what a "personal attack" is that differs greatly from what the community thinks. I suggest you refrain from posting these notices until this ceases to be the case. Johnbod (talk) 03:59, 2 July 2026 (UTC)
::The result of the ANI discussion was a request that you and Lavalizard101 chill out and edit in a productive manner. Lavalizard101 obliged; this comment ↗ shows that you have not. Your additional remark was both unnecessary to the discussion and seemed intentionally provocative.
::Also, the term "personal attack" is written in the edit summary automatically by Twinkle ↗; that's not from me. Your conduct does not necessarily have to extend into personal attacks to be considered rude/uncivil. Royz-vi Tsibele (talk) 15:37, 2 July 2026 (UTC)
:::Wikipedia:No personal attacks ↗ please! You are certainly responsible for your edit summary! Don't try to blame Twinkle. Lavalizard has dropped out of the page completely, probably from understandable embarrassment. You might consider doing the same. Johnbod (talk) 20:54, 2 July 2026 (UTC)
::::Pinging @Lavalizard101 in case he wants to refute that. As for me, I'm going to stop feeding the trolls ↗ and do something more productive with my time on Wikipedia. Royz-vi Tsibele (talk) 22:22, 2 July 2026 (UTC)
:::::Did you read the essay that you linked to, feeding the trolls ↗, Royz-vi Tsibele? If you're concerned about personal attacks from other users, you should be completely ashamed of implying that Johnbod is a troll. Bishonen | tålk 22:48, 2 July 2026 (UTC).
::::I dropped out of the discussion to prevent it turning into just me and John bludgeoning the discussion and to try and dissipate some of the heat that was building up in the discussion. And yes twinkle auto makes edit summaries when using the Twinkle warnings which cannot be changed. Also I agree with Bish on this Roy, linking to DFTT implies you think John might be trolling which he is not. Lavalizard101 (talk) WP:SOLIDARITY ↗ 10:40, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
:::::Another excellent reason for not using the Twinkle warnings - you can make a personal attack without apparently intending to, but are still responsible for it. Johnbod (talk) 15:13, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
:::::Linking to DFTT was a step too far, I'll admit that. But I would hope my frustration was understandable given the ridiculousness of this whole situation.
:::::I will not justify Johnbod's newest cheeky comment with a response. Royz-vi Tsibele (talk) 16:08, 3 July 2026 (UTC)