W
Active Editors
Back to Profile

User Talk: Kku

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

{{User:MiszaBot/config
| algo = old(20d)
| archive = User talk:Kku/Archive %(counter)d
| counter = 2
| maxarchivesize = 150K
| archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}}
| minthreadstoarchive = 1
| minthreadsleft = 4
}}
{{Talk header|noarchive=no}}

{| style="float:right; margin: 5px 10px 5px 25px;"
|-
|colspan=3|<!--{{archives|auto=short|search=yes|bot=MiszaBot III|age=14}} -->
|-
|width=25px| &nbsp;
|width=80px|{{Looshpah IV}}
|width=25px| &nbsp;
|}

Article Licensing



Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license ↗ all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons ↗ Attribution-Share Alike (''CC-by-sa'') v1.0 and v2.0 License ↗s or into the public domain ↗ if they prefer. The ''CC-by-sa'' license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL ↗, but it allows '''other projects''', such as WikiTravel ↗, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 ↗ Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at ''minimum'' those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the "'''<nowiki>{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}</nowiki>'''" template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace ↗. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

:'''Option 1'''
:<nowiki>I agree to multi-license ↗ all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:</nowiki>
:<nowiki>{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}</nowiki>
'''OR'''
:'''Option 2'''
:<nowiki>I agree to multi-license ↗ all my contributions to any U.S. state ↗, county, or city article as described below:</nowiki>
:<nowiki>{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}</nowiki>

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace "'''<nowiki>{{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}}</nowiki>'''" with "'''<nowiki>{{MultiLicensePD}}</nowiki>'''". If you only prefer using the GFDL ↗, I would like to know that too. ''Please let me know'' what you think at my '''talk page'''. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment ↗| talk)

Disambiguation link notification for November 28



Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Spring Web Flow ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MVC ↗ (check to confirm ↗&nbsp;|&nbsp;fix with Dab solver ↗). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.</small>
{{bots|deny=DPL bot}}

Merger proposal



Proposal to merge some small forestry articles


Maybe you edit on forestry was small but as it was fairly recent and I am struggling to get comments from that wikiproject perhaps you would like to comment on
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Ecoforestry#Merge_proposal