User Talk: Krightonn

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

Disambiguation link notification for January 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited English cricket team in South Africa in 1891–92 ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Ferris ↗. Such links are usually incorrect ↗, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

February 2025

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions ↗ did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted ↗. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines ↗. You can find information about these at our welcome page ↗ which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia ↗. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page ↗. Thank you. adamstom97 (talk) 17:25, 15 February 2025 (UTC)

:Lol, removing unsourced rubbish is apparently not constructive. Policies and guidelines. 🤣 Krightonn (talk) 01:41, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
::The statements you removed are clearly sourced in the viewership sections of each article. I noticed that you didn't remove the viewership summaries for the first three episodes of season two, so you were happy to keep wording that sounds less positive about the show but not anything that sounds positive. WP:NPOV ↗? - adamstom97 (talk) 09:56, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
:::The sources are Amazon making false statements. Why are they there? Krightonn (talk) 15:01, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
::::They are not, the sources are all third-party analytics companies which are used for all streaming series articles that I have seen on Wikipedia. - adamstom97 (talk) 15:24, 16 February 2025 (UTC)
:::::LOL what a load of garbage Krightonn (talk) 22:49, 21 February 2025 (UTC)
::::::That is a concerning response. It is objectively true that the viewership in those articles comes from the same third-party analytics companies that are used for all streaming series articles. If you don't care enough to understand that but are happy to delete the information from those sources anyway, perhaps you are the one that needs to familiarise yourself with Wikipedia guidelines and policies. - adamstom97 (talk) 09:05, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
:::::::Wikipedia uses fake news Krightonn (talk) 23:21, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
::::::::Then clearly Wikipedia isn't the place for you. -- Alex_21 TALK 23:23, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm Alex 21. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, :Reacher (TV series) ↗, but you didn't provide a reliable source ↗. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation ↗ and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners ↗. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  -- Alex_21 TALK 01:36, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

:I see from the above you've already had an issue with our sourcing policies, except this is the opposite to removing sources statements - you need to include a source ''in'' the article to support information you add. -- Alex_21 TALK 01:37, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Scotland women's national rugby union team ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Helen Nelson ↗.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 30 October 2025 (UTC)

July 2026

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions ↗, such as the edit(s) you made to :Jurassic World: Dominion ↗, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted ↗. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines ↗. You can find information about these at our welcome page ↗ which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia ↗. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page ↗. ''Please review MOS:CITELEAD ↗.'' HypnoBlader (talk) 02:15, 6 July 2026 (UTC)

:You made a mistake, it's a bomb. Change it back or I will. Krightonn (talk) 20:58, 6 July 2026 (UTC)
::If you think the film is a box-office bomb, then you need to add a reliable source per WP:CITE ↗ or go to the talk page here ↗ to discuss. HypnoBlader (talk) 21:04, 6 July 2026 (UTC)
:::So I say there is no citation that it is a success and now you are telling me to give a source that it isn't. DO YOU LISTEN TO YOURSELF? Krightonn (talk) 21:05, 6 July 2026 (UTC)
::::As I said, go to the talk page to discuss if the film is a financial success or a box-office bomb. Also, please don't shout ↗. HypnoBlader (talk) 21:08, 6 July 2026 (UTC)
:::::You go to it. You provide a source that is a success. Krightonn (talk) 21:09, 6 July 2026 (UTC)

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Please do not remove content or templates ↗ from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at :Silver Surfer ↗, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary ↗. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted ↗. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. HypnoBlader (talk) 21:06, 6 July 2026 (UTC)

30px|alt=Stop icon ↗ This is your '''last warning'''. If you continue to commit disruptive editing ↗ on Wikipedia again, as you did at :Jurassic World Dominion ↗, you may be '''blocked from editing ↗ without further notice'''.  BattleshipMan (talk) 01:31, 10 July 2026 (UTC)

:That sums you up. Break your own rules then moan when someone calls you out for it. SOURCE youe information because if you think that statement, you are, no offence, an in denial eejit. Krightonn (talk) 16:57, 10 July 2026 (UTC)