User Talk: LaetitiaAlikhan

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

Welcome

Hello, {{reply to|LaetitiaAlikhan}}, thank you for your edits to Baháʼí Faith ↗, and '''''welcome to Wikipedia ↗!''''' I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

'''Be Bold!''' ↗

Learn from others ↗

Be kind to others ↗

Contribute, Contribute, Contribute! ↗

Tell us a bit about yourself ↗

Our great guide to Wikipedia ↗

Tutorials and editing suggestions ↗

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. There's a lot I don't know, but I'm always happy to help. You'd a can also check out the '''Help desk ↗''', where Wikipedians with more experience than me can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type '''<code><nowiki>{{Help me}}</nowiki></code>''' on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing four tildes ↗<nowiki> (~~~~); our software automatically converts it to your username and the date. We're so glad you're here! ~~~~</nowiki>

Edit filter hits

User-generated content ↗ like Alchetron cannot be used as sources in Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie Talk 23:58, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

:@Ohnoitsjamie ok thank you! LaetitiaAlikhan (talk) 01:24, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bene AG ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zell ↗. Such links are usually incorrect ↗, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

March 2025

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Please do not use misleading edit summaries ↗ when making changes to Wikipedia pages, as you did to :Anyang ↗. This behavior is viewed as disruptive ↗, and continuation may result in loss of editing privileges ↗. Thank you. '''Remsense''' ‥ '''论''' 01:38, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

:Can you describe what you mean, which of my edits were misleading? LaetitiaAlikhan (talk) 01:44, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Please do not use misleading edit summaries ↗ when making changes to Wikipedia pages, as you did to :Human Design ↗. This behavior is viewed as disruptive ↗, and continuation may result in loss of editing privileges ↗. Thank you. '''Remsense''' ‥ '''论''' 03:49, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

:Could you please describe what you found misleading so that I don't repeat it? I'm not seeing what I wrote as misleading so if you could clarify that would be helpful. LaetitiaAlikhan (talk) 13:44, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
::Your edits that claim to "correct grammar" almost never do so, but pointlessly rewrite prose where there were no grammar mistakes. Please make more of an effort to explain what error there is and how you're correcting it, because otherwise these changes generally do nothing but make the passage slightly worse to read. '''Remsense''' 🌈 '''论''' 00:12, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
:::Hello, and thank you for your message. The reason I make such adjustments is because the passages are hard to read, or are poorly translated to good working English. I find and correct ambiguous wording, incorrect usage, tense agreement and consistency, incorrect punctuation marks, redundant wording and phrases. I aim for correct grammar and better readability so that those who view the page get the information they need. I will make an effort to explain in more detail what I did, and why I did it. Thanks again for explaining. LaetitiaAlikhan (talk) 00:07, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
::::Unfortunately, you're wrong in your assessment in a great many cases. Like I said, you often make passages far more awkward to read. Please be more selective in doing this going forward. '''Remsense''' 🌈 '''论''' 00:10, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
:::::Thank you, however, I am still unclear what you mean. Would you mind providing me an example of what I edited, and how it was more awkward to read? This way I can understand how to do it properly moving forward. Thank you! LaetitiaAlikhan (talk) 04:09, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
::::::Here is one ↗. The rearranged commas were not improvements, and the terms swapped out were clumsier, to the extent I could not see what about it was meant to be clearer. '''Remsense''' 🌈 '''论''' 04:11, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
:::::::Thank you so much. Now I can see better, I was trying to be fancy when I didn't need to do that. I will do a better job moving forward. I really enjoy editing so I hope I can continue. I appreciate the time you took to help me here. Thank you. LaetitiaAlikhan (talk) 17:30, 6 July 2025 (UTC)

July 2025

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm Tacyarg. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, :Nick Lloyd (historian) ↗, but you didn't provide a reliable source ↗. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable ↗. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation ↗, your edit is archived in the page history ↗. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''The source you added verified the existence of the book, but not the sentence "Lloyd’s book was written as a rebuke ... ".''  Tacyarg (talk) 01:21, 14 July 2025 (UTC)

Mirrors

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Thanks for contributing to the article Korea Polytechnic VI Daegu ↗. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable ↗ and attributed to reliable sources ↗. You have recently used citations which copied, or mirrored ↗, material from Wikipedia. This leads to a circular reference ↗ and is not acceptable. Most mirrors are clearly labeled as such, but some are in violation of our license and do not provide the correct attribution. Please help by adding alternate sources to the article you edited! If you need any help or clarification, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia ↗ or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page ↗, or just ask me. Thank you. ''Sam '''Kuru''' (talk) ↗'' 02:24, 14 July 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Law of Fives ↗ (October 24)

<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: var(--background-color-warning-subtle, #fdf2d5); color: inherit; padding: 0.5em 1em; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> 50px|left ↗Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation ↗ has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by PARAKANYAA was:

{{divbox|gray|3=This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article ↗. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

''in-depth ↗'' (not just passing mentions about the subject)

''reliable'' ↗

''secondary'' ↗

''independent'' ↗ of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid ↗ when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}} The comment the reviewer left was:

{{divbox|blue|3=Not enough sigcov to evidence notability ''outside'' of the Principia Discordia ↗, which already has an article.}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit ''after they have been resolved''.
{{clear}}

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Law of Fives ↗ and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.

If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted ↗.

If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior ↗ associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Law_of_Fives '''Articles for creation help desk'''], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:PARAKANYAA&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Law_of_Fives '''reviewer's talk page'''] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors ↗.

PARAKANYAA (talk) 09:19, 24 October 2025 (UTC)</div>

{| style="margin: 0.4em 2em;"
|- style="vertical-align: top;"
| alt=Teahouse logo ↗
| <div style="background-color:#e1e6db; color: #393D38; padding: 1em; font-size: 1.1em; border-radius:10px;box-shadow:-2px -2px 1px #8e8a78;">Hello, '''LaetitiaAlikhan'''!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the '''Articles for creation help desk ↗'''. If you have any ''other'' questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the '''Teahouse ↗''', a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! PARAKANYAA (talk) 09:19, 24 October 2025 (UTC)</div>
|}
Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC ↗

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

</div>
</div>

Concern regarding Draft:Law of Fives ↗

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, LaetitiaAlikhan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Law of Fives ↗, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted ↗, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it ↗ again or request ↗ that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted ↗ so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:08, 26 March 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Law of Fives ↗

48px|left|alt=|link= ↗

Hello, LaetitiaAlikhan. This message concerns the Articles for Creation ↗ submission or draft ↗ page you started, "Law of Fives ↗".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy ↗, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply {{edit|Draft:Law of Fives|edit the submission}}, and remove the {{tlc|db-afc}}, {{tlc|db-draft}}, or {{tlc|db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can '''request its undeletion''' ↗. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia!  DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 09:26, 24 April 2026 (UTC)