W
Active Editors
Back to Profile

User Talk: Laterthanyouthink

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

{{Talk header}}
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis
| age =2160
| archiveprefix =User talk:Laterthanyouthink/Archive
| numberstart =1
| maxarchsize =75000
| header ={{Archive}}
| minkeepthreads =5
| format = %%i
}}{{Archives|bot=ClueBot III|age=90}}
<!-- Template:Setup cluebot archiving -->

A kitten of appreciation



left|150px ↗
I admire your work on Wikipedia and I hope to reach your level of editingness one day! :)

Fearsunandrain (talk) 09:26, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
<br style="clear: both;"/>

:Thank you very much for the note and kitten, and thanks for becoming an editor here. I hope that you enjoy it. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 12:48, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

New pages patrol May 2026 Backlog drive



{| style="border: 2px solid #36c; border-radius: 4px; background: linear-gradient(to right, #ffffff, #eaf3ff); padding: 10px; color: #000;"
| style="vertical-align: middle; font-size: 130%" | May 2026 Backlog Drive ↗ | <span style="font-size: 85%">'''New pages patrol ↗''' </span>
| rowspan=3 | right|100px ↗
|-
|
|-
|colspan=2 style="font-size:85%; padding-top:15px;"|You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here. ↗
|}
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:24, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1350894664 -->

Nomination of :Caíseal Mór ↗ for deletion


<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :Caíseal Mór ↗, to which you have significantly contributed ↗, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗ or if it should be deleted ↗.

The discussion will take place at '''Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Caíseal Mór ↗''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by ''SDZeroBot'' (talk) 01:02, 30 April 2026 (UTC)<!-- User:SDZeroBot/AfD notifier/template -->

Women in Red – May 2026



{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" |
|rowspan="2" |
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | right|75px ↗'''<big>Women in Red ↗</big>''' <big>|</big> <small>May 2026, Vol 12, Issue 5, Nos 358, 359, 370, 371, 372</small>
<br />
'''Online events:'''

'''Announcements from other communities:'''

'''Tip of the month:'''

'''Other ways to participate:'''
frameless|15px ↗ Instagram ↗ '''|'''
frameless|15px ↗ Pinterest ↗
|}
--Chocmilk03 (talk 04:45, 30 April 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging
<!-- Message sent by User:Chocmilk03@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Outreach/E-L&oldid=1347866657 -->

FTS disambiguation



Flying Training School ↗ aka FTS ↗ disambiguation page

{{quote|''Reverted'' good faith ↗ ''edits by'' WendlingCrusader ↗ ''(''talk''): FTS not mentioned in the target article (and there should be only 1 blue link per entry, per'' WP:DAB ↗'').''}}
Clearly I made an error adding the additional blue links to RAF ↗ and RAAF ↗, and I accept that. FWIW I was trying to avoid writing out ''Royal Air Force'' and ''Royal Australian Air Force'' in full; perhaps it should read "as used by various air forces", although that form of words seems lacking somehow. Perhaps you have a better suggestion?

However, regarding your point that FTS is ''not mentioned in the target article'', it is mentioned 57 times in the primary target page, 10 times in RAF, and 3 times in RAAF, more if you count both 'FTS' and the 'Flying Training School' in full.

Perhaps what should have happened is the removal of the two additional blue links (my error, agreed), leaving the remainder. But that still leaves your comment; what am I missing here?
WendlingCrusader (talk) 19:46, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

:"Flying training school" is mentioned, but the initialism "FTS" needs to be mentioned and cited as an abbreviation of that term, to show that it is used.
:(No need to spell out the names of the air forces, but maybe using "various" is better - perhaps used in Canada, India, or NZ as well?) Laterthanyouthink (talk) 22:09, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

New Page Patrol Newsletter - May 2026



<div style="border:2px solid #90C0FF; background:#F0F0FF; width:99%; padding:4px">
<!-- do not use ;Header to make bold headers per H:DL ↗, causes errors for screen readers -->
Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}},

thumb|400px|New Page Review queue November 2025 - May 2026 ↗

'''Backlog update'''

At the time of this message, there are 15,282 articles and 32,951 redirects awaiting review.

After the January–February drive the article backlog was reduced to 15,179 articles and the redirect backlog to 19,053 respectively. Great job! However, both queues are growing rapidly and any additional reviews are highly appreciated.

'''2024 and 2025 NPP Awards'''

74px|left ↗{{no ping|JTtheOG}} was selected as the NPP reviewer of the year for both 2024 and 2025, for reviewing the most articles amongst all reviewers.
{{no ping|Hey man im josh}} and {{no ping|MPGuy2824}} won the Redirect Ninja Master Award for 2024 and 2025 respectively, for reviewing the most redirects.

Overall in 2024, one Platinum, two Gold, eight Silver, 12 Bronze and 45 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 66 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year. In 2025, one Platinum, ten Silver, 13 Bronze and 38 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 38 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year.

{{no ping|BoyTheKingCanDance}}, {{no ping|Rosiestep}}, {{no ping|SunDawn}}, and {{no ping|Vanderwaalforces}} were inducted into the NPP Hall of Fame ↗ for having two separate years of 2,000+ article reviews.

'''January–February backlog drive'''

The experimental two-month long backlog drive concluded with 183 reviewers patrolling over 27,761 articles and 35,309 redirects, earning over 36,836 points. Congratulations to {{no ping|JTtheOG}}, who achieved first place with 6,484.6 points in this drive.

'''May backlog drive'''

An article-only backlog drive is currently underway. We are hoping to make a big dent in the backlog. You can read more about it or join at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Backlog drives/May 2026 ↗.

'''PageTriage'''

An attempt was made to get the New Pages Feed ↗ to sort by date marked as reviewed instead of date created. However we had to revert it due to bugs. We may try again in the future. You can subscribe to the Phabricator ticket ↗ if you're interested in following along.

{{refbegin}}
'''Reminders:'''

{{refend}}
</div>

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:37, 14 May 2026 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Novem Linguae@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Reviewers/Newsletter_list&oldid=1353812553 -->

June 2026 GAN Backlog Drive



{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ; background-color: #FFF; padding:10px 15px 0; color: black"
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em; font-size:130%" |'''Good article nominations ↗ |''' <span style="font-size:85%">June 2026 Backlog Drive</span>
|rowspan=3|right|75px ↗
|-
|'''June 2026 Backlog Drive:'''
Do you want to become more experienced in the GA process?
Interested in taking part? You can '''sign up here ↗'''.
|-
|colspan=2|'''Other ways to participate:'''
|-
|colspan=2 style="font-size:85%; padding-top:15px;"|You're receiving this message because you have participated in a good article review this year or participated in the previous backlog drive.
|}

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:59, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:TechnoSquirrel69@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_articles/GAN_Backlog_Drives/June_2026/Mass_message_list&oldid=1356124266 -->

Women in Red - June 2026



{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" |
|rowspan="2" |
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | right|75px ↗'''<big>Women in Red ↗</big>''' <big>|</big> <small>June 2026, Vol 12, Issue 6, Nos 358, 359, 373, 374, 375</small>
<br />
'''Online events:'''
{{hidden|Announcements, tips, participation...|
'''Announcements from other communities:'''

'''Tip of the month:'''

'''Other ways to participate:'''
|} --Rosiestep (talk) 22:51, 25 May 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging
<!-- Message sent by User:Rosiestep@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Outreach/E-L&oldid=1354822499 -->

Adelaide edit-a-thon 6, 12 June 2026


{{Wikipedia:Meetup/Adelaide/Invite}}
Hi Laterthanyouthink, it would be great to have your participation in this training session next week. Registration details and more resources are on the event page ↗. Cheers, Bahudhara (talk) 05:24, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of :List of Test cricket records at the Adelaide Oval ↗ for deletion


<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0;">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :List of Test cricket records at the Adelaide Oval ↗ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗ or whether it should be deleted ↗.

The article is being discussed at '''Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Test cricket records at the Adelaide Oval ↗''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines ↗.

Users may still edit the article ↗, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the AfD notice from the article until the discussion is closed.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> <span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;background-color: #0000ff;color: white">Jack</span> (<span style="color: #0000ff">talk</span>) 03:01, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Rhoda Roberts ↗ is under review



Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Rhoda Roberts ↗ is <span class="nowrap">20px|alt=|link= ↗ </span>'''under review'''. See '''Talk:Rhoda Roberts/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.<!-- Template:GANotice default --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham</small> -- Simongraham (talk) 18:46, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Rhoda Roberts ↗ is on hold



Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Rhoda Roberts ↗ has been placed <span class="nowrap">20px|alt=|link= ↗ </span>'''on hold''', as the article needs some changes. See '''Talk:Rhoda Roberts/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail.<!-- Template:GANotice |result=hold --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham</small> -- Simongraham (talk) 20:46, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

July 2026



<section begin="July" />
{| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" |
|rowspan="2" |
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | right|75px ↗'''<big>Women in Red ↗</big>''' <big>|</big> <small>July 2026, Vol 12, Issue 7, Nos 358, 359, 376, 377</small>
'''Events:'''

{{hidden|Announcements, tips, participation...|
'''Announcements from other communities:'''
|frameless|100px|right ↗

'''Tip of the month:'''

'''Other ways to participate:'''
|}<section end="July" />

--MSGJ (talk 22:14, 28 June 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging
<!-- Message sent by User:MSGJ@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Outreach/E-L&oldid=1358220945 -->

B. Wongar



I noticed that you added this change "known by his pen name B. Wongar and Bozic Wongar". Later, you aded "He also wrote under the name "Bozic Wongar"[4], too. Ref. [4] is wrong in two ways - the Trove site actually advertise the "Dingoes Den" book and in the Notes section said "Sreten Bozic (1932-2026) wrote under the name B. Wongar and Bozic Wongar". An ad should not be referenced, and a full list of Wongar's works, published in English, can be seen in the AustLit database ↗. Browsing the list we see that B. Wongar wrote always under B. Wongar name except i two cases when he used his real name - Sreten Božić. Sreten Božić and Alan Marshall co-authored the books Aboriginal Myths (1972) and A Stone in My Pocket (1974).

As to his autobiography, the Dingoes Den novel, I have the novel copy in German. All I can see in that copy, related to his pen name, is,

"Zu jener Zeit hatte ich schon einen Namen angenomen - >B< für Bozic und Wongar. Das war der Name, der man mir 1970 im Arnhem Land gegeben hatte." B. Wongar Dingoes Den Books on Demand, Oct 10, 2013 p. 159

Google translate:

By that time, I had already adopted a name—"B" for Bozic and Wongar. That was the name I had been given in Arnhem Land in 1970.

I'd like to suggest that you accordingly update this biography. Thank you. &#126;2026-20428-62 ↗ (talk) 06:15, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

:Please write this on the talk page of the relevant article, and I will get back to it and have closer look at some point. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 06:47, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
::Thanks for showing cooperativity. Here is a bit broader request for correcctions and improvements ↗ &#126;2026-20428-62 ↗ (talk) 16:02, 29 June 2026 (UTC)
In case you don't know, you should be aware of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vujkovica brdo ↗ and their involvement with the Wongar article and its old WP:INUNIVERSE ↗ versions. I'm pretty sure the recent temp accounts that you've been interacting with are socks of the same person. You appear to be doing this already, but check the sources carefully yourself rather than taking things at face value. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:42, 9 July 2026 (UTC)

:{{u|David Eppstein}} - thank you. I was not aware of the long history of the investigations, but did suspect this contributor of being a single-issue editor, for whatever reason... I started working on matching content to citations though, having previously attended to some style issues on the article. I may do a bit more, now that I have found more citations, but won't be just updating per this user's suggestions willy-nilly, don't worry! Laterthanyouthink (talk) 07:14, 9 July 2026 (UTC)

Jonas L. Grönström



I just bagged {{noping|Jonas L. Grönström|label1=this user}} adding unsourced and poorly sourced film information again and am tempted to send him to ANI. I know you've reverted him for MOS issues in the past, but I wanted to ask you for an opinion: do you think it's time we report him for persistence and failure to discuss? <span style="font-size:1.2em;font-family:eurofurence;background:#368ec9;color:white">Jalen Barks</span> <span style="background:#6babd6;color:black">(Woof)</span> 19:35, 2 July 2026 (UTC)

:Hi {{u|JalenBarks}}. Hmmm, I'm not sure if he meets the threshold for WP:ANI ↗, but tbh I'm not that familiar with it as only used it a couple of times ages ago... Perhaps - as suggested on that page, try contacting an admin first for advice, or post it at the Teahouse? Laterthanyouthink (talk) 00:41, 3 July 2026 (UTC)

Image addition may have been overlooked



Hi! I hope you're doing well.

I just wanted to mention that the edit you reverted on the page Ahmed Kathrada ↗ did include an image along with a description of the event. It seems it may not have been visible when you reviewed the edit, so I thought I'd bring it to your attention in case it was overlooked.

If you have a chance, would you mind taking another look? Thank you very much for your time and for all your work maintaining the project. Letherian3 (talk) 10:49, 5 July 2026 (UTC)

:Hi {{u|Letherian3}}. Thanks for alerting me to this, I appreciate it. My bad. It was a while ago and I don't recall doing it, but I see that in my haste to revert uncited info, I missed seeing the image there. I have now restored the photo and found some citations and more information about that conference. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 02:50, 6 July 2026 (UTC)

Your nomination of Rhoda Roberts ↗ has passed



Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Rhoda Roberts ↗ has <span class="nowrap">20px|alt=|link= ↗ </span>'''passed'''; congratulations! See '''Talk:Rhoda Roberts/GA1{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. If the article is eligible to appear ↗ in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it ↗ within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing ↗ somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down.<!-- Template:GANotice |result=pass --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Simongraham</small> -- Simongraham (talk) 06:26, 6 July 2026 (UTC)

:{{u|Simongraham}}, I have nominated it for DYK. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 23:56, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

Adelaide edit-a-thon 7, 10 July 2026


{{Wikipedia:Meetup/Adelaide/Invite}}
Hi Laterthanyouthink, it would be great to have your participation again in this training session on Friday. Registration details for in-person or Zoom session and more resources are on the event page ↗. Cheers, Bahudhara (talk) 07:14, 6 July 2026 (UTC)
<br clear=all>

:Thanks {{u|Bahudhara}}. I'll email you tomorrow about this. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 23:57, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

Nomination of :Freedom and Unity Front ↗ for deletion


<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :Freedom and Unity Front ↗, to which you have significantly contributed ↗, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗ or if it should be deleted ↗.

The discussion will take place at '''Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Freedom and Unity Front ↗''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by ''SDZeroBot'' (talk) 01:04, 7 July 2026 (UTC)<!-- User:SDZeroBot/AfD notifier/template -->

A comment you made



{{Tq|It appears that you are not here to build an encyclopaedia.}} Yes, you are correct. It is not entirely clear to me if all of the ranty users of that talkpage over the last 5&ndash;10 years are this person ↗ but there's definitely no real point in engaging with them in any case. --JBL (talk ↗) 23:57, 9 July 2026 (UTC)

:Thank you. That page is still a bit of a jumble, and David Eppstein alerted me to the sockpuppet investigations yesterday (see above). Laterthanyouthink (talk) 00:05, 10 July 2026 (UTC)
::Ah, sorry, I missed that! Thanks, and happy editing, --JBL (talk ↗) 00:33, 10 July 2026 (UTC)