W
Active Editors
Back to Profile

User Talk: Ldm1954

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

{{Talk header}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}}
|maxarchivesize = 70K
|counter = 8
|minthreadsleft = 4
|minthreadstoarchive = 1
|algo = old(30d)
|archive = User talk:Ldm1954/Archive %(counter)d
}}

Hideo Aoki



Was not aware of that policy, thanks for the heads up. <span style="color: blue">Lynch</span><span style="color:#FFD700">44</span> 14:29, 11 June 2026 (UTC)

Draft: Hanieh Fattahi



Dear Ldm1954, I just wrote a message to you a few minutes ago. Unfortunately my message was deleted and flagged to be generated by LLM. I am just writing you again to inform you that the message was not generated by AI and I would be very grateful if you could give feedback to the two raised questions that I can improve the draft on Hanieh Fattahi. Thank you in advance. For your convenience I am copying the original message below: Thank you, Ldm1954, for your comments on the article about Hanieh Fattahi.
{{cot|LLM}}
After reading your remarks, I have two questions that I would appreciate your elaborating on before I address them in the draft.
First, you write that:
"She has made a good start, but as yet her citations do not show major peer recognition of her work."
Could you clarify what you mean by peer recognition in this context? Hanieh Fattahi is widely recognized within her field, as evidenced by numerous invited talks at major international conferences and her reputation as a leading figure in ultrafast laser science and metrology. If you are referring primarily to citation counts, I would respectfully note that citations can be a poor measure when comparing researchers across different disciplines. In fields such as nanophotonics, where thousands of research groups are active, citation counts tend to be substantially higher than in more specialized areas. Moreover, citation metrics alone are not generally considered a requirement for Wikipedia notability.
My second question concerns your comment that:
"The Helmholtz Prize is strong, but it is absolutely critical to be accurate about it -- she was senior author of one of the two teams that shared it."
I fully agree that accuracy is essential. However, I would like to better understand the concern here. The Helmholtz Prize is widely regarded as the most prestigious international award in the field of metrology and is often referred to as the "Nobel Prize of Metrology." Professor Fattahi and her research group received the prize in the Applied Metrology category, which represents a highly significant achievement and an important indicator of distinction within the field. While the prize was shared between two teams, her role as the senior author and leader of one of the award-winning teams appears to be a noteworthy accomplishment that should be accurately and appropriately reflected.
Your further clarification on these points would be very helpful in improving the draft and ensuring that it accurately reflects both the available sources and Wikipedia's notability standards.
Thank you again for your thoughtful review and feedback.
{{cob}}
Ghorbani59 (talk) 12:16, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

:Multiple LLM analyses indicate that it was LLM.
:In addition, you have already been answered at the Teahouse and in my comments Ldm1954 (talk) 12:25, 21 June 2026 (UTC)
::One additional comment: Ghorbani59 please read WP:TOOSOON ↗. Your LLM generated WP:Wikilawyering ↗ is not going to change anything. Ldm1954 (talk) 13:27, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

Wikimedians of Chicago Wiknic 2026!



Hello everyone! This is Luiysia again with Wikimedians of Chicago! For our July meetup, we will be having a Wiknic ↗ at Wicker Park on July 25th!

'''Here is the official meetup page ↗,''' where you can see details and register for the event.

See you soon! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:46, 23 June 2026 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:TechnoSquirrel69@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Meetup/Chicago/Invite_list&oldid=1359102010 -->

Feedback about Spiridonov



Dear Ldm1954, good morning!

Some time ago you messaged me that article about Spiridonov needs some work (link https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Ldm1954/Archive_8#Victor_Pavlovich_Spiridonov_-_Draft ↗). I have brought the text in proper shape. Could you have a look and check all details? What do you think about publication of it in main Wikipedia space? Nikolas Sharp (talk) 07:41, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment



48px|left|alt=|link= ↗Your feedback is requested &#32;at '''Talk:Droop quota'''&#32; on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment ↗. Thank you for helping out!<br/><small>You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service ↗ subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name ↗.</small> <!-- Template:FRS notification --><div class="paragraphbreak" style="margin-top:0.5em"></div> SodiumBot (botop|talk ↗|contribs ↗) 10:30, 30 June 2026 (UTC)