W
Active Editors
Back to Profile

User Talk: Li1411

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.


Welcome!



Hello, Li1411, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions ↗, especially your edits to :Daniella Cicarelli ↗. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure ↗, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse ↗ to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center ↗.

Please remember to sign ↗ your messages on talk page ↗s by typing four tilde ↗s (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions ↗, ask me on my talk page ↗, or {{edit|Special:MyTalk|ask for help on your talk page|section=new|preload=Help:Contents/helpmepreload|preloadtitle=Help me!}}, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! <!-- Template:Welcome-retro --> Mvcg66b3r (talk) 14:59, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

:Hello Mvcg66b3r, thank you for the warm welcome and the helpful resources. I appreciate the guidance and links you've shared and look forward to learning more. Thanks again for your support! Li1411 (talk) 16:15, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics


{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = You have recently edited a page related to '''post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people''', a topic designated as '''''contentious ↗'''''. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and <em>does <strong>not</strong> imply that there are any issues with your editing</em>.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as ''contentious topics''. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee ↗. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators ↗ have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit <strong>carefully and constructively</strong>, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

<p>Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics ''procedures'', you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard ↗ or you may learn more about this contentious topic here ↗. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{tl|Ctopics/aware}} template. </p>}}<!-- Derived from Template:Contentious topics/alert/first --> <span style="color:#070">Doug Weller</span> talk 08:51, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

Accidental Revert



Hi Li1311,

I’m a new wiki editor, and I think I accidentally reverted one of your edits today. I’m not sure how it happened, but it showed up in my contribution log. I’m sorry and I hope you know how to revert it. If not, I really hope you can redo your edits and that you understand. Kind regards Ferieninsel001 (talk) 14:02, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

:Hi! Thank you for letting know. I see now - it's a draft I am working on. I will revert your changes, but if you want to participate - you are welcome! Best, Li1411 (talk) 19:12, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

Dmitry Rybolovlev ↗




25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hi Li1411! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of an article several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy ↗ disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages ↗ to try to reach consensus ↗. If you are unable to agree, please use one of the dispute resolution options ↗ to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-ewsoft --> Less Unless (talk) 14:13, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

:30px|link= ↗ You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war ↗. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate ↗ with others, to avoid editing disruptively ↗, and to try to reach a consensus ↗, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:
# '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;'''
# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.'''
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page ↗ to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard ↗ or seek dispute resolution ↗. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection ↗. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be blocked ↗ from editing.''' <!-- Template:uw-ew --> Less Unless (talk) 14:53, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

:Sorry! The user clearly protects the edits made by another user which I believe are biased. Of course I have no poof, but please look at them - the information is clearly not neutral over all 3 related pages. Li1411 (talk) 15:27, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message



<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 18 November 2025 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2025/Coordination/MM/09&oldid=1322758983 -->

Edits which may have used LLMs



25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm Underswamp. An edit that you recently made to :Ivan Illich ↗ seemed to be generated using a large language model ↗ (an "AI chatbot ↗" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is usually unsuitable for an encyclopedia ↗, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources ↗ and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted ↗. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or ask your questions at the Teahouse ↗, a friendly place for new users. Thanks.{{PAGENAME}} ↗<!-- Template:uw-ai1 --> ʊnƌer◙swamȹᵗᵅᵜᵏ 14:09, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

:Hello, thank you for your message. I appreciate you taking the time to review my edits.
:My intention was to make small, incremental improvements to neutrality and wording while following Wikipedia’s standards on verifiability, sourcing, and style. I generally focus on minor changes rather than rewriting large passages, and I try to avoid simply paraphrasing existing sentences or sections.
:I do understand the concern and will continue to be careful that any future edits are based on reliable sources and written in an encyclopedic style.
:Thank you again! Li1411 (talk) 14:36, 18 April 2026 (UTC)