User Talk: Lividowly64

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

Welcome!

<div class="skin-invert" style="width: 99%; color: #111; box-shadow: 0 1px 3px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.35); border-radius: 2px;">
<div style="overflow:hidden; height:auto; background: #fff; width: 100%; padding-bottom:18px;">
<div style="font-size: 24px; margin-top: 24px;margin-left: 16px; margin-right: 16px; font-family: 'Linux Libertine',Georgia,Times,serif; line-height: 1.2em;">right|86px|class=skin-invert ↗
Hello, Lividowly64!</div>
<div style="font-size: 18px; padding-top: 0px; margin-left: 16px; font-family: 'Linux Libertine',Georgia,Times,serif; line-height:1.2em; color: #666; ">
I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.
</div></div>

<div style="vertical-align:middle; color: black; background-color:#fff">
<div style="display: flex; flex-flow: row wrap; background-color:#e7e7e7; padding: 10px; padding-left: 20px; ">
<div style="flex: 1 1 300px;">
<div style="font-size: 18px; font-family: 'Linux Libertine',Georgia,Times,serif; line-height:1.2em; font-weight:normal;">51px|alt=|link= ↗ Getting Started</div>
<div style="padding-left: 56px; margin-right: 50px; margin-top: -15px;">

'''Tutorial''' ↗ Learn everything you need to know to get started.
{{center|Introduction to contributing ↗}}
{{columns-list|colwidth=15em|

Editing ↗

Referencing ↗

Images ↗

Tables ↗

Policies and guidelines ↗

Talk pages ↗

Navigating ↗

Manual of Style ↗

}}
----
'''The Teahouse''' ↗ Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.
----
'''The Task Center''' ↗ Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.
</div>
</div>

<div style="flex: 1 1 300px;">
<div style="font-size: 18px; font-family: 'Linux Libertine',Georgia,Times,serif; line-height:1.2em; font-weight:normal;">51px|alt=|link= ↗Tips</div>
<div style="padding-left: 56px; margin-top: -15px; padding-right: 28px;">

Don't be afraid to edit! ↗ Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.

It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.

If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page ↗. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus ↗.

Always use edit summaries ↗ to explain your changes.

When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source ↗.

If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide ↗ and disclose your connection.

Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

</div>
</div>
</div>
<div style="padding: 10px; padding-left: 20px; ">
<div style="text-align: center;">
</div>
<div style="font-size: 18px; padding-top: 0px; font-family: 'Linux Libertine',Georgia,Times,serif; line-height:1.2em; ">

Happy editing! Cheers, Taabii (talk) 13:48, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
</div>

</div>
</div>
</div>

January 2025

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, Lividowly64, welcome to Wikipedia ↗ and thank you for your contributions ↗. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as {{User|Lividowly (Sonic Punch)}}. Our policy on multiple accounts ↗ usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing ↗. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose ↗ these connections. Thank you. —'''TechnoSquirrel69''' ('''sigh''') 16:52, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

:@TechnoSquirrel69 about the multiple accounts. I do not have access to Lividowly (Sonic Punch) because I lost the email associated with the username so i made a new one Lividowly (Sonic Punch) (talk) 20:12, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
::You've posted this message with the "Sonic Punch" account. Either way, I would recommend you create user pages for each of the accounts identifying the connection between them and refrain from using more than one at a time in order to avoid the appearance of sockpuppetry. If you have any questions, feel free to leave a message at the Teahouse ↗ and an experienced editor will help you out. —'''TechnoSquirrel69''' ('''sigh''') 21:09, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
:::is this the reason why I'm unable to post non free content images Lividowly64 (talk) 15:50, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

heads-ups of varyingly low minority

really, just good things to remember when adding stuff

remember to italicize titles of works. this includes "anton" in the context of the franchise (though not when just referring to the rrrred guy)

either go easy on primary sources ↗ like tweets, or if you want to use a lot of them, it may be a good idea to separate them from secondary ones. in general, an article having more primary sources than secondary ones doesn't make for a good look

the possessive form of "it" is "its". you don't say "him's", do you?

'''consarn ↗ (speak evil) ↗ (see evil) ↗''' 12:24, 24 January 2025 (UTC)

i really hate to say it, but...

you really need to take the manual of style ↗ into account, and get a better grasp of the english language. on top of what i mentioned before...

remember to maintain formal wording ↗, avoiding terms such as "mom" or "kid" outside of quotations

watch your typos. namely...

* morden → modern

* it's (as the possessive form of "it") → its (yes, i know i already said it, but it really grinds my gears, bigs my bath, reds my guy, blasts my anton...)

* occurrense → occurrence

* recieved → received (though this one is a little understandable, i make this mistake all the time, and need the funny red squiggly lines to notice it)

* stared → stated

watch for repetition ({{Font|text="He felt it that decision improved the soundtrack significantly with his decision."|font=mingli u|color=#691337}})

watch for any given page's variant of english ↗. some are written in tea english ↗, some in burger english ↗, and some even in maple syrup english ↗. antonblast ↗, in this case, is written in murican english

use some more commas lol, ain't no one got the lungs to read this stuff

again, go easy on primary sources like interviews, tweets, and kickstarter. at the moment, there are more primary sources than secondary ones

it can be a little tiring to have to look at every single one of your edits to antonblast for grammatical mistakes. count this as a formal warning if you're in the mood, don't if you're not '''consarn ↗ (speak evil) ↗ (see evil) ↗''' 14:38, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Antonball Deluxe ↗ has been accepted

<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:#E6FFE6; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">50px|left ↗ '''Antonball Deluxe ↗, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.''' 

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. 

The article has been assessed as '''Start-Class''', which is recorded on its talk page ↗. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop ↗ over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme ↗ to see how you can improve the article.

<div class="autoconfirmed-show">Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself ↗ without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation ↗ if you prefer.</div>

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the '''[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Antonball_Deluxe help desk]'''. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself ↗ without posting a request to Articles for creation ↗.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider {{leave feedback/link|page=Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation|text=leaving us some feedback}}.

Thanks again, and happy editing!
Jovanmilic97 (talk) 18:32, 8 February 2025 (UTC)</div>

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Undertale Overworld.jpg

64px|left|alt=|link= ↗
Thank you for uploading ''':File:Undertale Overworld.jpg ↗'''. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content ↗. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline ↗ is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag ↗; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page ↗. Thank you. —'''TechnoSquirrel69''' ('''sigh''') 16:19, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

February 2025

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style ↗ that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in :Friday Night Funkin' ↗, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page ↗ to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 17:44, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

:i did mention before that they really should go easy on primary sources, but it doesn't seem to be going anywhere '''consarn ↗ (speak evil) ↗ (see evil) ↗''' 18:46, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

25px|alt=Warning icon ↗ Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy ↗ by adding your personal analysis or synthesis ↗ into articles, as you did at :Friday Night Funkin' ↗, you may be blocked from editing ↗.  soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A '''TALK''' 12:59, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

:dude have you not noticed that there's another citation that cites twitter as well as my edit. right by citation of weekend 1's release. how is it that weekend 1's twitter citation is fine and dandy but this isn't Lividowly64 (talk) 13:16, 12 February 2025 (UTC)
::It's literally right here. on the fnf wikipedia page "On April 30, 2024, the ninth level of the game, titled "WeekEnd 1", was released. This major update to the game featured characters from the ''Pico's School ↗'' series: Pico, Nene, and Darnell.<ref>{{Cite tweet |number=1785472037550465042 |user=FNF_Developers |title=FIRST UPDATE OF NEW RETURN |access-date=April 20, 2024}}</ref>" This is hyprocritical. Lividowly64 (talk) 13:18, 12 February 2025 (UTC)
::that one isn't exactly fine or dandy either, primary sources are best used extremely sparingly. someone should probably do something about it, and maybe get something better than the current citation 16 '''consarn ↗ (speak evil) ↗ (see evil) ↗''' 13:20, 12 February 2025 (UTC)
:::and on that note, that paragraph was also followed by unsourced credits, and an entirely unsourced paragraph. off with their heads until non-primary sources can be found, i guess '''consarn ↗ (speak evil) ↗ (see evil) ↗''' 13:23, 12 February 2025 (UTC)
:::You also might want to look up what hypocrisy means. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A '''TALK''' 13:32, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

30px|alt=Stop icon ↗ You may be '''blocked from editing ↗ without further warning''' the next time you disrupt ↗ Wikipedia.  soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A '''TALK''' 12:06, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

::I think you're trying to help, but what you're doing is not helping. You've been warned before about trivial coverage and you made an article that is barebones, without any reliable source whatsoever. The WP:BURDEN ↗ is on you, not the other way around. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A '''TALK''' 12:08, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
:::Ok then, how is List of ''Dragon Ball'' soundtracks ↗ wikipedia page fine and that also only has primary sources but this isn't, Pizza Tower is a popular enough game to a get a wikipedia page on it's music like with Undertale and Deltarune Lividowly64 (talk) 12:14, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
::::funnily enough, that list has two templates specifying exactly why it, as it is, is not fine (plus at least one more i could add). popularity ultimately has nothing to do with notability (specifically as defined by wikipedia) ↗, which is a problem that's currently been plaguing touhou project ↗ in particular (which is at least bigger than pizza tower, antonblast, and deltarune combined, so it should have loads of independent coverage... but actually seems to be sorely lacking in that regard). what everyone's been trying to say is that wikipedia relies on ''secondary'' ↗ sources, with primary ↗ ones being used mostly to supplement them with uncontroversial info (if they're used at all). also the possessive form of "it" is "its" ↗, that's gonna grind my gears, iron my hands, devil my gardens, slowroast my sewer, gnome my forest, red my nightless castle, and betray my panic for the rest of eternity '''consarn ↗ (prison phone) ↗ (crime record) ↗''' 12:37, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
:::::See WP:WHATABOUTX ↗. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A '''TALK''' 13:13, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
::::::really, almost every instance of "what about" arguments that i've seen has led me to stuff that's ''also'' in need of improving, but that's probably besides the point '''consarn ↗ (prison phone) ↗ (crime record) ↗''' 13:22, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
:I again had to undo one of your edits. A developer making a new game that is not connected to ''Pizza Tower'' shouldn't be mentioned in the article. A tweet is a primary source and that is original research. Please, take a moment to read the guidelines. You're not helping. Wikipedia is not a fansite or a blog. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A '''TALK''' 14:37, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

{{reflist}}

Orphaned non-free image File:Undertale Overworld.jpg

35px|text-top|left|⚠|link= ↗ Thanks for uploading ''':File:Undertale Overworld.jpg ↗'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use ↗. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media ↗).

Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:41, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: List of Pizza Tower Soundtracks ↗ (February 26)

<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> 50px|left ↗Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation ↗ has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by Liance was:

{{divbox|gray|3=This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article ↗—that is, they do not show ''significant'' coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in ''published'', ''reliable'' ↗, ''secondary'' ↗ sources that are ''independent ↗'' of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics ↗). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help ↗ and learn about mistakes to avoid ↗ when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit ''after they have been resolved''.
{{clear}}

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of Pizza Tower Soundtracks ↗ and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.

If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted ↗.

If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior ↗ associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:List_of_Pizza_Tower_Soundtracks '''Articles for creation help desk'''], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Liance&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:List_of_Pizza_Tower_Soundtracks '''reviewer's talk page'''] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors ↗.

~Liancetalk 20:24, 26 February 2025 (UTC)</div>

{| style="margin: 0.4em 2em;"
|- style="vertical-align: top;"
| alt=Teahouse logo ↗
| <div style="background-color:#e1e6db; color: #393D38; padding: 1em; font-size: 1.1em; border-radius:10px;box-shadow:-2px -2px 1px #8e8a78;">Hello, '''Lividowly64'''!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the '''Articles for creation help desk ↗'''. If you have any ''other'' questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the '''Teahouse ↗''', a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ~Liancetalk 20:24, 26 February 2025 (UTC)</div>
|}
Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC ↗

Orphaned non-free image File:Pizza Tower Soundtrack Album Cover.png

35px|text-top|left|⚠|link= ↗ Thanks for uploading ''':File:Pizza Tower Soundtrack Album Cover.png ↗'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use ↗. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media ↗).

Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:43, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Deltarune Concept Art.png

35px|text-top|left|⚠|link= ↗ Thanks for uploading ''':File:Deltarune Concept Art.png ↗'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use ↗. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media ↗).

Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:12, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

March 2025

Hello, I'm Serge, an Admin here on Wikipedia.

# Please see MOS:VG ↗ and WP:IUP ↗. We need to limit non-free images on articles. That means only one cover art. Do not overtly violate the image policy and manual of style again.
# See the concept of WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS ↗. Just because you observe something somewhere, doesn't make it right, and doesn't justify doing it elsewhere. You may have simply observed an error that needs fixing. Or there could be context that makes a difference. It's not enough to simply say "I saw it somewhere, so I'm justified in doing the same here".
# I'm a bit concerned, between this, and the number of warnings you've gotten on this talk page in a relatively short amount of time. I realize that it takes time to learn how Wikipedia works, but you need to make a greater effort to learn things. If issues like this keep occurring, and it doesn't appear that you're making an effort to improve, you could be in danger of getting your account temporarily blocked from editing. So please change this.

Thank you. Sergecross73 msg me 15:38, 13 March 2025 (UTC)

:Their behaviour continues, {{u|Sergecross73}}. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A '''TALK''' 15:07, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
::Yes, I'm concerned about this unexplained edit ↗. A bit concerning you felt this was a reliable source ↗ too. I need you to explain these edits, Lividowly64. Sergecross73 msg me 16:39, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
:::@Sergecross73 it isn't a reliable source? Lividowly64 (talk) 19:01, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
::::How do you identify reliable sources? This appears to be a basic blog literally anyone could open up and write. Sergecross73 msg me 20:43, 14 March 2025 (UTC)
:::::Is this really all the explanation you have for these two edits? Sergecross73 msg me 22:51, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
::::::Okay, if you don't wish to engage, fine, but the next time you add an obviously unreliable/unusable source, your account is going to be temporarily blocked from editing, because upon reviewing your edits, I don't believe you've made any effort to understand what sources Wikpiedia deems usable, and that's not acceptable. I recommend studying WP:RS ↗ and WP:VG/S ↗. Sergecross73 msg me 19:00, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
:since it's been continuing, i'll drop some stuff
:* wp:sps ↗: info on the use of self-published sources (like blogs and stuff)
:* wp:vgsources ↗: a good ol' list of sources based on their reliability (or lack thereof). if a source isn't there and doesn't meet any criteria for a pretty much guaranteed unreliable source, it might be a good idea to bring it up for discussion
:the latter is a really good link to have in hand, so i'd almost recommend keeping it in your bookmarks or something '''consarn ↗ (prison phone) ↗ (crime record) ↗''' 14:32, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

Mindwave

Firstly, thank you for helping the Mindwave (video game) ↗ draft and helping it reach a completed state. Despite this, I would like to point out that you probably should've chosen the "Submit for review" option instead, as drafts don't usually just get published right away and need to be reviewed in some form to check that they are suitable for the mainspace. Especially since I specifically stated in my last edit summary that the draft was "very close to being ready for submission". However, I see no issues with the article as is, so there should be no trouble for now. Please take this into account in future, as I notice that a lot of your other edits have been seen as non-constructive. Thanks again for your help, and I hope that you continue to contribute to the article in a constructive manner ↗ going forward! SleepDeprivedGinger (talk) 20:48, 13 March 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Sonic 1 JP Cover Art.png

35px|text-top|left|⚠|link= ↗ Thanks for uploading ''':File:Sonic 1 JP Cover Art.png ↗'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use ↗. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media ↗).

Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:33, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Sonic 2 JP Cover Art.jpg

35px|text-top|left|⚠|link= ↗ Thanks for uploading ''':File:Sonic 2 JP Cover Art.jpg ↗'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use ↗. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media ↗).

Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

Blocked

This edit ↗ introduced unsourced content to Wikipedia. As your talk page shows ↗, you've received countless warnings about unsourced or poorly sourced content additions to Wikipedia, and have generally refused to engage in discussion about it. Since discussion has failed to stop your disruptive editing, blocks will start being enforced to stop it. You are blocked for '''3 days'''. When you return, I hope that you'll make sure all edits have reliable sources that verify all information added. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 18:12, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

:@Sergecross73 how is this an unreliable source?? I literally used the source that was already in the article that was already classfied as a primary source, a source from scott the woz himself???? listen I get why I was warned in the past but this makes no sense. please unblock me, I literally haven't done anything wrong today. Lividowly64 (talk) 21:34, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
::You did not add a source for the addition "''Woz as well as sneak peeks to new ''Scott the Woz'' episodes"''. Sergecross73 msg me 21:39, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
:::@Sergecross73 oh that was a mistake that honestly i somehow forgot to put a citation for that. Lividowly64 (talk) 21:43, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
::::Well, you've been given a lot of guidance about our sourcing policies and guidelines on this talk page, so this'll be a good time to stop and take some time to learn them. Sergecross73 msg me 21:49, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

:::::Hi {{u|Sergecross73}}. With this edit ↗, it looks like Lividowly64 still does not understand (or does not want to understand) what a reliable source is. soetermans. ↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A '''TALK''' 14:45, 24 March 2025 (UTC)
::::::Agreed, especially since I specifically expressed concern about their belief that that source was reliable/usable, and they refused to meaningfully engage. Blocked again, this time for '''1 week'''. Sergecross73 msg me 14:50, 24 March 2025 (UTC)
:::::::d*ng, that's a bummer. admittedly, i'm not entirely sure if this is an idht ↗ issue or just an overly excited editor, but either way, i'm not a fan of having to review someone's edits
:::::::to lividowly, one good thing to keep in mind when seeing a source you ''know'' is unreliable (which i will be actively surprised if you didn't, considering how clear guidelines are about this) in an article is to remove it (or ideally replace it with one you know is reliable), as opposed to using its use as justification to use it more '''consarn ↗ (prison phone) ↗ (crime record) ↗''' 15:17, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Mettaton ↗ (June 10)

''in-depth ↗'' (not just passing mentions about the subject)

''reliable'' ↗

''secondary'' ↗

''independent'' ↗ of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid ↗ when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}} The comment the reviewer left was:

{{divbox|blue|3=Character notability against the WP:GNG ↗ is always a tricky thing, but I'd say this unfortunately falls pretty short. The article is significantly plot heavy (see WP:NOTPLOT ↗) and despite the content suggesting the character is "generally well received" and therefore has secondary reception, the 'Reception' section is really a 'Promotion' section where all of the reliable sourcing is about figurine production. There's just not enough here to suggest the character is notable. Is there significant coverage ↗ from reliable sources like those in WP:VG/S ↗ about the character?}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit ''after they have been resolved''.
{{clear}}

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mettaton ↗ and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.

If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted ↗.

If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior ↗ associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Mettaton '''Articles for creation help desk'''], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Vrxces&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Mettaton '''reviewer's talk page'''] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors ↗.

ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 21:23, 10 June 2025 (UTC)</div>

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Mettaton ↗ (June 18)

''in-depth ↗'' (not just passing mentions about the subject)

''reliable'' ↗

''secondary'' ↗

''independent'' ↗ of the subject

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mettaton ↗ and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.

If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted ↗.

If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior ↗ associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Mettaton '''Articles for creation help desk'''], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:CanonNi&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Mettaton '''reviewer's talk page'''] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors ↗.

''''''[[<big>User:CanonNi</big>]]'''''' (💬 • ✍️ ↗) 01:05, 18 June 2025 (UTC)</div>

Orphaned non-free image File:God Damn it kris where the fuck are we meme.jpeg

35px|text-top|left|⚠|link= ↗ Thanks for uploading ''':File:God Damn it kris where the fuck are we meme.jpeg ↗'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use ↗. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media ↗).

Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:15, 1 July 2025 (UTC)

:Kris_(Deltarune) ↗ has an RfC ↗

<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>''':Kris_(Deltarune) ↗''' has an RfC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the '''discussion page ↗'''. Thank you. Eldomtom2 (talk) 01:28, 6 July 2025 (UTC)

July 2025

alt=Information icon|25x25px ↗ not actually using a template for this (because i haven't found it), but...

please don't publish drafts to mainspace after they've been declined, especially not without addressing the concerns that led to its declining. in those cases, it's preferable to work on the draft in draftspace and continue with the afc process '''consarn ↗ (grave) ↗ (obituary) ↗''' 00:22, 7 July 2025 (UTC)

:This is doubly true if said drafts have sourcing issues, as you're responsible for that if you're the one doing the publishing, and you've already got 2 blocks in for unsourced/poorly sourced editing. You need to be very careful on this sort of stuff. Sergecross73 msg me 15:35, 7 July 2025 (UTC)
::oh that's where the claim of you warning me this month came from. I'll admit, I completely missed this warning Lividowly64 (talk) 17:47, 18 July 2025 (UTC)

Blocked

I did a review of your recent edits. It looks like you've repeatedly added unsourced content to articles. You've been warned and even blocked twice for this. I don't know how to make it any more clear to you that this is not acceptable. You're blocked for '''1 month'''. The next one will be indefinite, so please finally address this should you return after your block. Sergecross73 msg me 13:12, 18 July 2025 (UTC)

:as someone who's been involved in this for a while, i'll admittedly disagree with this block's rationale (though not with the block itself). i think the problem was less "unsourced content", and more "overreliance on primary sources" (plus the rare copyvio i guess). granted, there was a fair bit of the former, but the latter was definitely worse, as it affected articles that were good enough just as much as ones that weren't
:...then again, whichever you think the bigger problem was, it was still repeated and not properly addressed, so i'd appreciate an attempt at discussing it '''consarn ↗ (grave) ↗ (obituary) ↗''' 14:14, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
::I'm referring to recent edits that were entirely unsourced, such as this ↗ or edits that added blocks of unsourced content such as this ↗. Their first block, as seen in the prior section also called "Blocked", was in regards to unsourced edits, and even if the second block was more about using poor sources, the progression from "poorly sourced" to back to "entirely unsourced" is absolutely not the correct direction for someone with 2 prior blocks about sourcing. Sergecross73 msg me 14:59, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
:@Sergecross73 when have I added unsourced content. most of the time I use secondary sources while I frequently use primary sources for specific articles. and as for the fnf Wikipedia page. I've added indicators to my sources to express that they're primary sources. Lividowly64 (talk) 15:20, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
::I've learned from my bans and have been more careful to not ensure my edits are of the highest quality. I am genuinely confused on what I've done wrong here Lividowly64 (talk) 15:22, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
:::I just linked 2 examples directly above.
:::# This ↗ added content without a source.
:::# This ↗ edit added a number of blocks of text without any source present. Sergecross73 msg me 15:30, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
::::That is only two examples of me not putting sources. I understand you might have a problem with it but you make out to be a frequent situation. And in my defense i didnt think it needed citations as i thought it was general knowledge of the game like listing the amount of levels in a game. I understand you had a problem but to go as far as banning me for editing and even further to ban for a solid month for two instances out of hundreds of edits of no citations, i believe is questionable. Plus other ediors have reverted some of my changes, which i didnt challenge because they too updated the page to be more up to date and not outdated. Lividowly64 (talk) 15:42, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
:::::those are a weird case, as per wp:plotcite ↗, you can sometimes add a small amount of info to an article's plot summary and just pretend it's sourced to the subject itself, and that part of the guide is usually also applied to gameplay summaries... but to my knowledge, those aren't in the game yet, so that doesn't really apply here either way. of course, ''if'' secondary sources comment on the upcoming content of that game with the spooky month guys are found, it can then be added, but only to the extent to which they comment on it (or briefer if possible)
:::::in this case, though, they also face another problem, and that's the relatively strict definition of fancruft ↗. intricacies of this sort, unless proven notable, should be kept to a minimum. your edits tend to introduce a lot of info that isn't vital for a basic understanding of something, and they often have primary or no sources behind them, which is why they're usually followed by other people cleaning the ensuing content up or reverting it entirely
:::::also, you're blocked ↗, not banned ↗, there's a difference 'round these parts '''consarn ↗ (grave) ↗ (obituary) ↗''' 17:01, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
{{unblock reviewed| reason=I believe I should be unbanned and that me getting banned is unfair. (I will be repeating what i have said earlier) I have been banned for a month due to "repeatedly added unsourced content to articles." and "poorly sourced" by @Sergecross73. I know I have been banned twice but unlike the previous times where I understand what I have done was wrong, this time I believe the claims for getting myself banned is false and overexaggerated, I know I have responded a little bit rudely in my past bans so I'll ensure I'll be responding as polite as I can, I apologize if it may seem I'm being rude.
I'll respond to the first claims first to which Sergecross73 has claimed I "repeatedly added unsourced content to articles." This is false. Sergecross73 has made it out to be that I've in their words "repeatedly" added unsourced content but in reality, they have only given out two examples of this case in here ↗ and here ↗. which is not repeatedly but more so of a rare occurrence. I'll admit that I should've used sources to back up my claims but in my defense i didnt think it needed sources as my edits were at the beginning of the page where usually there isn't usually citations that is my bad. But this is not a repeatedly occurrence, in actuality, it's the opposite that being very rare. In the majority of my edits besides the two, Sergecross73 has listed, or other edits I don't remember or which Sergecross73 hasn't listed. It is always been backed with a source from a single to multiple depending on the amount I add to a page. This can be seen in my edits in the development section in Deltarune ↗, the development and music section in Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney ↗ and even in the page, that I have recieved this ban for, Friday Night Funkin' ↗ where although at first my edits weren't properly sourced have been recently marked with by myself with a primary source indicator to alert readers that the sources are primary which unlike my past edits to the page, haven't been reverted thanks to the indicator.
Now, I'll respond to the second claim that my edits are "poorly sourced" This must be referring to the primary sources in the FNF page, this is not a case of poor sources as even tho it's mostly primary sources, I have as said earlier marked the sources as such. I understand that there's a priority of secondary sources over primary as they're more credible well depending on the site and etc. Unfortunately with the FNF page, there isn't that many secondary sources for FNF especially in recent years. I have searched for secondary sources and unfortunately I cannot find them so I had no other choice to use primary sources but I have marked them which hasn't been reverted. Additionally as I stated earlier the other pages, I edit mostly contain secondary sources with a decent amount of primary sources.
I hope to have this banned be reverted and I will make sure I cite all my edits for now on unless its to fix grammar. Or at the very least, have the ban be shortened down to a week, as I believe a month ban is extreme especially with my agruements against my ban.Lividowly64 (talk) 16:16, 18 July 2025 (UTC)|decline=You are blocked ↗, not banned ↗, blocks and bans are different. I can't say that I disagree with the blocking admin. You seem to be saying that this is unfair because some of your edits are fine- that doesn't matter if you consistently make errors without some effort at improvement. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 09:04, 19 July 2025 (UTC) }}
:To recap:
::After a series of warnings related to no/poor sourcing and original research, the issues did not improve, so they were blocked twice.
::I gave them a warning about sourcing again earlier this month when I saw that they they've tried to publish poorly sourced drafts that keep getting rejected.
::They didn't response after a couple weeks, so I did a spot check today, and low and behold, I found multiple instances of unsourced content additions again ''after'' my comment earlier this month.
:This is absolutely a recurring issue that this editor refuses to take seriously. Blocks get successively longer with each one, so that's why this one was upped to a month. Sergecross73 msg me 16:27, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
::@Sergecross73 I have checked and you have not commented earlier this month, unless you have a link to such instance. also the claim "I found multiple instances of unsourced content additions again after my comment earlier this month." is false, or I'd like to believe it is. you have only stated that I have included two instances of unsourced content. I would like to see more instances of me putting out unsourced content. Lividowly64 (talk) 16:35, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
:::I commented in the section "July 2025" directly above your block notification. Sergecross73 msg me 16:39, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
::@Sergecross73 however i agree that I shouldn't have published some of my drafts without using the review button. I apologize for that Lividowly64 (talk) 16:37, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
::@Sergecross73 But the claim you're making that I have done multiple instances of unsourced content is not true. Lividowly64 (talk) 16:38, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
:::It's incorrect to claim this is an isolated occurrence. 2 violations was simply enough to warrant the block considering how many warnings and blocks already issued. There's more.
:::* July 14th - this edit ↗ introduced unsourced content. (''However remants of the "Cowboy segment" can still be seen in-game during the TV World area and Tenna's boss fight in Chapter 3.'')
:::* July 12th - This edit ↗ added (example bloat) without a source.
:::The more I dig, the more I find. Sergecross73 msg me 16:39, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
::::the example in July 12th, is not something that needs a citation. It's a villain that vegeta has faced in Dragon Ball daima. Despite Moro and Granloah not having character pages or anything linked relating them, that didnt get cited. There is no need for a citation in that edit. Lividowly64 (talk) 17:14, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
:::::sometimes it's unnessarcy for things to be sourced, it's okay for sometimes for things like referring to the villains a character has faced has no citation or something mostly unused appearing in some form. Look at the story section of alot of Wikipedia pages. They don't usually have any citations Lividowly64 (talk) 17:18, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
::::::Or at most only a little bit of citations Lividowly64 (talk) 17:22, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
::::also those two "violations" are incredibly minor and were resolved with my sourcing or another editor removing the infomation altogether. You are making this into a much bigger deal than it actually is Lividowly64 (talk) 17:20, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
:::::You've been repeatedly warned. You've been blocked twice. And after catching you attempting to publish poorly sourced drafts earlier this month, I found ''four examples'' of further violations today. And you're trying to frame this as some sort of wrongful block? Sergecross73 msg me 17:33, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
::::::Yes, I have been warned in the past, been blocked twice in the past. That's old news and i have made sure to be careful. And yes I did publish a draft earlier this month my bad. But I didn't get banned for publishing a draft, i got banned over 4 edits that when you really think about are minor mistakes and aren't frequent. And one of those violations: on July 12 doesn't need a citation. Its not like i have mostly write edits without citations. 97 to 99 percent of my edits contains a citation. Lividowly64 (talk) 17:40, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
:::::::And yes i am arguing it is a wrongful block Lividowly64 (talk) 17:41, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
::::::::The other warnings and bans were justified but this one isn't, you could've just warned me to not post edits with no citations unless they absolutely don't need one Lividowly64 (talk) 17:43, 18 July 2025 (UTC)
:::::::::I don't know what else to say other than "that's not how it works". Hopefully whoever reviews your unblock request can get through to you better than I've been able to. Sergecross73 msg me 17:58, 18 July 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:List of Pizza Tower Soundtracks ↗

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, Lividowly64. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of Pizza Tower Soundtracks ↗, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted ↗, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it ↗ again or request ↗ that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted ↗ so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:06, 4 August 2025 (UTC)

File:DELTARUNE Chapter 3-4 OST - Dark Sanctuary.ogg listed for discussion

30px|left ↗ A file that you uploaded or altered, :File:DELTARUNE Chapter 3-4 OST - Dark Sanctuary.ogg ↗, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion ↗. Please see the '''discussion''' ↗ to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.  '''λ''' '''Negative''''''MP1''' 21:43, 5 September 2025 (UTC)

File:Deltarune Cover Art.png listed for discussion

30px|left ↗ A file that you uploaded or altered, :File:Deltarune Cover Art.png ↗, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion ↗. Please see the '''discussion''' ↗ to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.  🌙'''Eclipse''' (she/they/all neos ↗ • talk • edits ↗) 11:16, 16 September 2025 (UTC)

Final warning on unsourced editing

I'm concerned that, after all of these warnings and blocks, it appears you've added unsourced content to an article yet again ↗. If it happens again, your account will receive a long-term block. You've ''got'' to stop doing this. Sergecross73 msg me 15:37, 16 September 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Deltarune Cover Art.png

35px|text-top|left|⚠|link= ↗ Thanks for uploading ''':File:Deltarune Cover Art.png ↗'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use ↗. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media ↗).

Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:09, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

Asking

Hello lividowly, can you please talk neutral without these words like lmao, lol, saying internet slang or swear words. Also, don't you not understand what does reliable source mean?? Shaqil (talk) 08:27, 30 October 2025 (UTC)

:i'll partially object to that first part. some unseriousness is allowed around here, and i'd be hard-pressed to find someone who doesn't know what "sus" means in the modern internet context (and also jealous of them). that is to say, the words being used aren't the problem. also, he hasn't edited in 9 days, so i'm not entirely sure what you'd be referring to here '''consarn ↗ (talck) ↗ (contirbuton s) ↗''' 11:57, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
:@Thebaldball what did i do recently that didn't include reliable sources? Lividowly64 (talk) 18:02, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
::forget the story, I'm a shame. TBB (talk) 16:51, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
:::a little late to the party, sir '''consarn ↗ (talk beige) ↗ (count ribs) ↗''' 17:06, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Undertale (song) ↗ (November 10)

''in-depth ↗'' (not just passing mentions about the subject)

''reliable'' ↗

''secondary'' ↗

''independent'' ↗ of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid ↗ when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit ''after they have been resolved''.
{{clear}}

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Undertale (song) ↗ and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.

If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted ↗.

If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior ↗ associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Undertale_(song) '''Articles for creation help desk'''], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Cukie_Gherkin&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Undertale_(song) '''reviewer's talk page'''] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors ↗.

Cukie Gherkin (talk) 18:18, 10 November 2025 (UTC)</div>

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

</div>
</div>

Just checking if you remember your draft for Ralsei.

I improved it a little. Draft:Ralsei ↗ TalkTuahLunchly (talk) 06:11, 28 December 2025 (UTC)

CS1 error on The Amazing Digital Circus ↗

25px|alt=|link= ↗ Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have '''automatically detected''' that this edit ↗ performed by you, on the page :The Amazing Digital Circus ↗, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A dates ↗ error. References show this error when one of the date-containing parameters is incorrectly formatted. Please edit the article to correct the date and ensure it is formatted to follow the Wikipedia Manual of Style's guidance on dates ↗. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Amazing_Digital_Circus&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1335018894%7CThe%20Amazing%20Digital%20Circus%5D%5D Ask for help])

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive ↗, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/Boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Lividowly64&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d={{FULLPAGENAMEE:The Amazing Digital Circus}}&preloadparams%5b%5d=1335018894 report it to my operator].
Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:53, 26 January 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney Trilogy HD ↗

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, Lividowly64. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney Trilogy HD ↗, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted ↗, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it ↗ again or request ↗ that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted ↗ so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:09, 28 January 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Pomni ↗ (February 12)

<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: var(--background-color-warning-subtle, #fdf2d5); color: inherit; padding: 0.5em 1em; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> 50px|left ↗Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation ↗ has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reasons left by ScalarFactor were:

{{divbox|gray|3=This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources ↗. ''Reliable'' sources are required so that information can be verified ↗. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners ↗ and Citing sources ↗.|}}{{divbox|gray|3=This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article ↗. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

''in-depth ↗'' (not just passing mentions about the subject)

''reliable'' ↗

''secondary'' ↗

''independent'' ↗ of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid ↗ when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it ''after they have been resolved''.
{{clear}}

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pomni ↗ and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.

If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted ↗.

If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior ↗ associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Pomni '''Articles for creation help desk'''], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:ScalarFactor&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Pomni '''reviewer's talk page'''] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors ↗.

ScalarFactor (talk) 22:13, 12 February 2026 (UTC)</div>

Your draft article, Draft:Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney Trilogy HD ↗

48px|left|alt=|link= ↗

Hello, Lividowly64. This message concerns the Articles for Creation ↗ submission or draft ↗ page you started, "Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney Trilogy HD ↗".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy ↗, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply {{edit|Draft:Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney Trilogy HD|edit the submission}}, and remove the {{tlc|db-afc}}, {{tlc|db-draft}}, or {{tlc|db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can '''request its undeletion''' ↗. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia!  DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 21:24, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Pomni ↗ (March 6)

''in-depth ↗'' (not just passing mentions about the subject)

''reliable'' ↗

''secondary'' ↗

''independent'' ↗ of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid ↗ when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}}{{divbox|gray|3=This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources ↗. ''Reliable'' sources are required so that information can be verified ↗. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners ↗ and Citing sources ↗.|}} The comment the reviewer left was:

{{divbox|blue|3=A number of unsourced statements and sections (Notably role and characteristics) and a number of dubious sources and trivial mentions used. I'm not seeing a lot of WP:SIGCOV ↗ which indicates why she is separately notable of her home material.}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it ''after they have been resolved''.
{{clear}}

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pomni ↗ and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.

If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted ↗.

If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior ↗ associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Pomni '''Articles for creation help desk'''], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Pokelego999&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Pomni '''reviewer's talk page'''] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors ↗.

Magneton Considerer: '''Pokelego999''' (Talk ↗) (Contribs ↗) 00:53, 6 March 2026 (UTC)</div>

Orphaned non-free image File:Pomni Render.png

35px|text-top|left|⚠|link= ↗ Thanks for uploading ''':File:Pomni Render.png ↗'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use ↗. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media ↗).

Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:05, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Friday Night Funkin' Week 3 Screenshot.jpg

35px|text-top|left|⚠|link= ↗ Thanks for uploading ''':File:Friday Night Funkin' Week 3 Screenshot.jpg ↗'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use ↗. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media ↗).

Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:58, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Undertale (song) ↗

48px|left|alt=|link= ↗

Hello, Lividowly64. This message concerns the Articles for Creation ↗ submission or draft ↗ page you started, "Undertale ↗".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy ↗, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply {{edit|Draft:Undertale (song)|edit the submission}}, and remove the {{tlc|db-afc}}, {{tlc|db-draft}}, or {{tlc|db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can '''request its undeletion''' ↗. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia!  DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 15:25, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Pomni ↗ (June 26)

<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: var(--background-color-warning-subtle, #fdf2d5); color: inherit; padding: 0.5em 1em; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">'''Draft declined'''{{pb}}50px|left ↗Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation ↗ has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.{{pb}}
<nowiki> </nowiki>'''Feedback'''{{pb}}The reviewer, Vrxces, left the following feedback:
{{divbox|gray|3=This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion ↗. The draft requires multiple published secondary ↗ sources that:

provide ''significant coverage ↗'': discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;

are ''reliable ↗'': from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;

are ''independent ↗'': not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet ''all three'' of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.|}}{{divbox|blue|3=I think there needs to be more work on identifying the WP:SIGCOV ↗ that forms sustained commentary or discussion on Pomni as a character. Character article notability can be a bit fickle, but based on AFC and AFD elsewhere, the standard does seem to sit where reliable sources have discussed the character specifically in or outside context of their media. When you look at the sources here, they're not really directly about the subject. It's not enough to coalesce sources that say "there's Pomni merchandise" or "people dress up as Pomni" or "people make memes of Pomni", much as they're welcome parts of a character article. What are the best sources cited ↗ that discuss the character? Are there other sources of analysis out there?}}

'''Next steps'''

Edit Draft:Pomni ↗ to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.

When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the '''Resubmit''' button.

If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted ↗.

'''Need help?'''

For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know ↗.

You can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Pomni '''Articles for creation help desk'''], or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Vrxces&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Pomni '''reviewer's talk page'''].

'''Scam warning'''

If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia ↗.

VRXCES (talk) 11:55, 26 June 2026 (UTC)</div>

User Talk: Lividowly64

Welcome!

January 2025

heads-ups of varyingly low minority

i really hate to say it, but...

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Antonball Deluxe ↗ has been accepted

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Undertale Overworld.jpg

February 2025

Orphaned non-free image File:Undertale Overworld.jpg

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: List of Pizza Tower Soundtracks ↗ (February 26)

Orphaned non-free image File:Pizza Tower Soundtrack Album Cover.png

Orphaned non-free image File:Deltarune Concept Art.png

March 2025

Mindwave

Orphaned non-free image File:Sonic 1 JP Cover Art.png

Orphaned non-free image File:Sonic 2 JP Cover Art.jpg

Blocked

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Mettaton ↗ (June 10)

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Mettaton ↗ (June 18)

Orphaned non-free image File:God Damn it kris where the fuck are we meme.jpeg

:Kris_(Deltarune) ↗ has an RfC ↗

July 2025

Blocked

Concern regarding Draft:List of Pizza Tower Soundtracks ↗

File:DELTARUNE Chapter 3-4 OST - Dark Sanctuary.ogg listed for discussion

File:Deltarune Cover Art.png listed for discussion

Final warning on unsourced editing

Orphaned non-free image File:Deltarune Cover Art.png

Asking

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Undertale (song) ↗ (November 10)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Just checking if you remember your draft for Ralsei.

CS1 error on The Amazing Digital Circus ↗

Concern regarding Draft:Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney Trilogy HD ↗

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Pomni ↗ (February 12)

Your draft article, Draft:Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney Trilogy HD ↗

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Pomni ↗ (March 6)

Orphaned non-free image File:Pomni Render.png

Orphaned non-free image File:Friday Night Funkin&#39; Week 3 Screenshot.jpg

Your draft article, Draft:Undertale (song) ↗

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Pomni ↗ (June 26)

Orphaned non-free image File:Friday Night Funkin' Week 3 Screenshot.jpg