User Talk: Martin4647
Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.
{{User:Martin4647/Navigation}}
'''Welcome!'''
Hello, {{BASEPAGENAME}}, and welcome ↗ to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia ↗
- How to edit a page ↗
- Help pages ↗
- Tutorial ↗
- How to write a great article ↗
- Manual of Style ↗
Archive
'''Bots Newsletter''', August 2018
{|style="box-sizing:border-box;background:#f0f8ff; border:1px solid #7Cb9e8; margin:0.5em; padding:0.5em;border-radius: 8px;" role="presentation"
|-
!colspan=2 style="font-size:150%; padding: .4em;"|''Bots Newsletter'', August 2018
|-
| style="padding-left: .6em;" | right|100px ↗
Greetings!
Here is the 6th issue of the ''Bots Newsletter''. You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future newsletters by adding/removing your name from this list ↗.
Highlights for this newsletter include:
;ARBCOM
- Nothing particular important happened. Those who care already know, those who don't know wouldn't care. The curious can dig ARBCOM archives themselves.
;BAG
- There were no changes in BAG membership ↗ since the last ''Bots Newsletter''. Headbomb went from semi-active to active.
- In the last 3 months, only 3 BAG members have closed requests - help is needed with the backlog ↗.
;BOTREQs and BRFAs
As of writing, we have...
- 24 active BOTREQs ↗, please help if you can!
- 5 open BRFAs and 3 BRFAs in need of BAG attention (see live status ↗).
- 54 approved bot tasks ↗ since the start of 2018. Of note, Community Tech bot 5 ↗ (the #10 Wish on the 2017 Community Survey ↗) was approved to notify users concerning problematic images and files from Wikimedia Commons ↗.
- If you're a bot operator that can help ↗ with Tidy/Linter error cleanup (see discussion ↗, discussion ↗), please file a BRFA ↗!
- 8 inactive bots have been deflagged (see discussion ↗, discussion ↗, discussion ↗).
;Discussions
These are some of the discussions that happened / are still happening since the last ''Bots Newsletter''. Many are stale, but some are still active.
- Use of tags by bots ↗ – Exploring the use of a new 'bot' tag.
- Mass page moves ↗ – Bot policy question/clarification about mass moves.
- Creation of redirects ↗ – Bot policy question/clarification about the creation of redirects.
- Guidance on disruptive use of semi–automated tools? ↗ – Related to meatbots (see also MOS discussion ↗, which resulted in small addition to MOS:VAR ↗).
- Discussion concerning WP:BOTFLAG/WP:RC ↗ – A reminder that bots should use the bot flag when it makes sense to use it (see also VPT discussion ↗ and CREATEBOT update ↗).
- Out of curiosity... (to all bot operators) ↗ – BotPasswords vs OAuth usage amongst bot operators.
- Introducing Toolhub ↗ – Toolhub ↗ is looking for feedback.
;New things
- {{tl|Automated tools}}, a new template linking to user-activated tools and scripts has been created. It can be used in articles previews, and can be placed on any non-mainspace page/template (e.g. {{tl|Draft article}}) to provide convenient links to editors.
- AWB 5.10.0.0 ↗ is out, after nearly 20 months without updates. If you run an old version, you will be prompted to install the new version automatically. See the changelog ↗ for what's new. Note that the next version ↗ will require .NET Framework 4.5 ↗. Many thanks to Reedy and the AWB team.
- BotWatch ↗, "a listing of editors that have made >2 edits per minute [without] a bot flag", is being developed by SQL (see discussion ↗).
- Massive updates and improvements have been made to Citation bot in the past few months (see discussions, discussions, discussions). You can activate the bot here ↗, amongst other methods.
- HTML Tidy ↗ has been phased out ↗ (see Tech News #28 ↗).
- {{tl|Newbot}} has been reorganized a bit (diff ↗). In particular, it links to previously approved BRFAs (see discussion ↗).
- Wikipedia:Bots#See also ↗ has been reorganized a bit (diff ↗).
- The bot dictionary ↗ has two new entries, ''context bot ↗'' and ''context-sensitive edit ↗''.
- The bot request header ↗ has been updated to include better guidance (see discussion ↗).
- The subcategories of :Category:Wikipedia bot requests for approval ↗ have been sorted in a consistent manner to make past BRFAs easier to find.
----
<small>(You can subscribe or unsubscribe from future newsletters by adding or removing your name from this list ↗.)</small>
|}
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Bots/Spam&oldid=855421238 -->
Ivan
Now hang on. What if there was parenthesis. Parenthesis are used to express an after thought. Like for an example: "My dad ate my cookie (which was my favorite cookie)". It's not completely relevant but at the same time still relevant. It's different when you say instead "(Cars are my favorite machine)" That's really irrelevant. So mine wasn't irrelevant rather just an extra note. Maybe go as far as making a trivia section and put the information in their instead. Flasty Jam 2 (talk) 22:50, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
{{Ivmbox|Hello, Martin4647. Voting in the '''2018 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''voting page ↗'''. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2018/Coordination/MMS/07&oldid=866998231 -->
''Bots Newsletter ↗'', August 2019
{|style="box-sizing:border-box;background:#f0f8ff; border:1px solid #7Cb9e8; margin:0.5em; padding:0.5em;border-radius: 8px;" role="presentation"
|-
!colspan=2 style="font-size:150%; padding: .4em;"|''Bots Newsletter'', August 2019
|-
| style="padding-left: .6em;" | right|100px ↗
Greetings!
Here is the 7th issue of the ''Bots Newsletter'', a lot happened since last year's newsletter ↗! You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future newsletters by adding/removing your name from this list ↗.
Highlights for this newsletter include:
;ARBCOM
- Nothing of note happened. Just like we like it.
;BAG
- Several (1 ↗ + 12 ↗ = 13) users have been retired/resigned from the BAG due to inactivity, per our new activity requirements ↗ (discussion ↗).
BAG members are expected to be active on Wikipedia to have their finger on the pulse of the community. After two years without any bot-related activity (such as posting on bot-related pages ↗, posting on a bot's talk page, or operating a bot), BAG members will be retired from BAG following a one-week notice. Retired members can re-apply for BAG membership as normal if they wish to rejoin the BAG.</blockquote>
- Two BAG members retired
- * {{User|Madman}} retired ↗.
- * {{User|BU Rob13}} vanished ↗ and retired ↗.
- Three new BAG members have been voted in, welcome to the BAG!
- * {{User|Primefac}} joined on 2018-12-12 (RfBAG ↗). Primefac operates {{User|PrimeBOT}} which does a plethora of tasks.
- * {{User|TheSandDoctor}} joined on 2019-01-21 (RfBAG ↗). TheSandDoctor operates several bots including {{User|DeprecatedFixerBot}}.
- * {{User|Enterprisey}} joined on 2019-08-07 (RfBAG ↗). Enterprisey operates {{User|EnterpriseyBot}}, which does a plethora of tasks, {{User|RemindMeBot}} which posts reminders, and codes several scripts.
We thank former members for their service and wish Madman a happy retirement. We note that Madman and BU Rob13 were not inactive and could resume their BAG positions if they so wished, should their retirements happens to be temporary.
;BOTDICT
Two new entries feature in the bots dictionary ↗
- ''Editor-hostile wikitext'' ↗ – describes wikitext structuring that is editor hostile, even if it renders correctly
- ''Spectrum of usefulness'' ↗ – describes how tasks are deemed useful or not
;BOTPOL
- Activity requirements ↗: BAG members now have an activity requirement. The requirements are very light, one only needs to be involved in a bot-related area at some point within the last two years. For purpose of meeting these requirements, discussing a bot-related matter anywhere on Wikipedia counts, as does operating a bot (RFC ↗).
- Copyvio flag ↗: Bot accounts may be additionally marked by a bureaucrat ↗ upon BAG request as being in the "copyviobot" user group ↗ on Wikipedia. This flag allows using the API to add metadata to edits for use in the New pages feed (discussion ↗). There is currently 1 ↗ bot using this functionality.
- Mass creation ↗: The restriction on mass-creation (semi-automated or automated) was extended from ''articles'', to ''all content-pages ↗''. There are subtleties, but ''content'' here broadly means whatever a reader could land on when browsing the mainspace in normal circumstances (e.g. Mainspace, Books, most Categories, Portals, ...). There is also a warning that WP:MEATBOT ↗ still applies in other areas (e.g. Redirects, Wikipedia namespace, Help, maintenance categories, ...) not explicitely covered by WP:MASSCREATION ↗.
;BOTREQs and BRFAs
As of writing, we have...
- 20 active BOTREQs ↗, please help if you can!
- 14 open BRFAs and 1 BRFA in need of BAG attention (see live status ↗).
- In 2018, 96 bot task were approved ↗. An AWB ↗ search shows approximately 29 were withdrawn/expired, and 6 were denied.
- Since the start of 2019, 97 bot task were approved ↗. Logs show 15 were withdrawn/expired ↗, and 15 were denied ↗.
- 10 inactive bots have been deflagged (see discussion ↗). 5 other bots have been deflagged per operator requests or similar (see discussion ↗).
;New things
- All bot-related discussion pages now have a centralized and searchable archive box ↗ (see discussion ↗). Discussions are searchable per noticeboard, or globally.
- {{tl|Bot}} now supports {{para|status|expired}} (see discussion ↗). This led to the deletion of :Category:Indefinitely blocked Wikipedia bots ↗ as useless (see discussion ↗).
- WP:BOTREQ ↗ now mentions WP:SCRIPTREQ ↗ and WP:AWBTASKS ↗ as alternatives to bot requests.
- The bot creation guide ↗ now mentions bot flags ↗, and two new languages Awk ↗ and MATLAB ↗. Other minor tweaks have been made.
- AAlertBot has received major code updates. In particular, WP:AALERTS ↗ will now report splits ↗, mergers ↗, and AFC submissions ↗.
- Citation bot has received several updates (User talk:Citation bot/Archive 10/11/12/13/14/15/16/17). In particular, the bot stopped the automated removal of {{para|publisher}} from {{tl|cite journal}}, and stopped the automated addition of CiteSeerX ↗ links, and now uses OAuth ↗ to authenticate those who make requests of the bot.
;Other discussions
These are some of the discussions that happened / are still happening since the last ''Bots Newsletter''. Many are stale, but some are still active.
- Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard/Archive 12#Adminbots requests page ↗
- Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard/Archive 12#Double-redirect tagging (2019) ↗
- Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard/Archive 12#Long and Winding Road to Parsoid ↗
- Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard/Archive 13#Bot-like user scripts ↗
- Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard/Archive 13#WP:URLREQ ↗
- Wikipedia:Bots/Noticeboard/Archive 13#Wikipedia:Bots/Status ↗
- Wikipedia talk:Bot Approvals Group#Minimum edits ↗
- Wikipedia talk:Bot policy#Minor update to WP:BOTISSUE ↗
- Wikipedia talk:Bot policy#Semi-automated Portal creation ↗
- Wikipedia talk:Bot policy#Clarification on "Bots operated by multiple users" ↗
- Wikipedia talk:Bot policy#Bots triggered by multiple users ↗
- Wikipedia talk:Bots#How to use Special:ApiFeatureUsage ↗
See also the latest discussions at the bot noticeboard ↗.
Thank you! <small>edited by: <span style="font-variant:small-caps; whitespace:nowrap;">Headbomb</span> 17:24, 7 August 2019 (UTC)</small>
----
<small>(You can subscribe or unsubscribe from future newsletters by adding or removing your name from this list ↗.)</small>
|}
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Bots/Spam&oldid=908687641 -->
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''2019 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2019|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2019|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
</td></tr>
</table>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2019/Coordination/MMS/02&oldid=926750292 -->
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''2020 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2020|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2020|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
</td></tr>
</table>
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2020/Coordination/MMS/02&oldid=990308077 -->
Disambiguation link notification for May 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of number-one country singles of 2021 (Canada) ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Made for You ↗<!-- ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/List_of_number-one_country_singles_of_2021_%28Canada%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/List_of_number-one_country_singles_of_2021_%28Canada%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver])-->. Such links are usually incorrect ↗, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. <small>(Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.)</small>
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 26 May 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 3
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Texas to Tennessee ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Knox ↗<!-- ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Texas_to_Tennessee check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Texas_to_Tennessee?client=notify fix with Dab solver])-->.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Proposed deletion ↗ of :Weekends Look a Little Different These Days ↗
left|link=|alt=Notice|48px| ↗
The article :Weekends Look a Little Different These Days ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗ because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''poorly referenced'''</blockquote>
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons ↗.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the article's talk page ↗.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion process ↗es exist. In particular, the speedy deletion ↗ process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> Jax 0677 (talk) 13:23, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Please update access-dates
Hi. When you update peaks like this ↗ on song articles, please update the access-date. Thanks. <b><span style="color: #FF6347;">Ss</span><small><span style="color: #1E90FF;">112</span></small></b> 05:06, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''2021 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2021|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2021|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 23 November 2021 (UTC)</small>
</td></tr>
</table>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2021/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1056563129 -->
Please add subsections for weekly charts if you're going to year-end subsections
Also, wikitables require captions now per MOS:TABLECAPTION ↗. It would've been very helpful if you could've done this yourself seeing as most country song articles released in the last year already had them. Please bear this in mind for the future. Thank you. <b><span style="color: #FF6347;">Ss</span><small><span style="color: #1E90FF;">112</span></small></b> 00:36, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
''Bots Newsletter'', December 2021
{|style="box-sizing:border-box;background:#f0f8ff; border:1px solid #7Cb9e8; margin:0.5em; padding:0.5em;border-radius:8px;" role="presentation"
|-
!colspan=2 style="font-size:150%; padding: .4em;"|''Bots Newsletter'', December 2021
|-
| style="padding-left: .6em;" | right|100px ↗
{{Image frame
| caption = BRFA activity by month
| content =
{{Graph:Chart
| type = stackedarea
| width = 200
| height = 100
| xAxisAngle = -70
| colors =
#98fb98,
#fb9898,
#9898fb,
#a0a6b0
| x = Sep 19,Oct 19,Nov 19,Dec 19
| y1 = 5,10,3,7
| y2 = 2,0,0,1
| y3 = 2,0,1,0
| y4 = 0,0,0,2
}}
}}
Welcome to the eighth issue of the English Wikipedia's ''Bots Newsletter'', your source for all things bot ↗. Maintainers disappeared to parts unknown... bots awakening from the slumber of æons... hundreds of thousands of short descriptions... these stories, ''and more'', are brought to you by Wikipedia's most distinguished newsletter about bots.
Our last issue ↗ was in August 2019, so there's quite a bit of catching up to do. Due to the vast quantity of things that have happened, the next few issues will only cover a few months at a time. This month, we'll go from September 2019 through the end of the year. I won't bore you with further introductions — instead, I'll bore you with a newsletter about bots.
<span style="font-size:125%">'''Overall'''</span><br />
- Between September and December 2019, there were 33 BRFA ↗s. Of these, {{yeac}} 25 were approved, and 8 were unsuccessful ({{nayd}} 3 denied, {{idkc}} 3 withdrawn, and 20px|alt=Expired|link= ↗ 2 expired).
<span style="font-size:125%">'''September 2019'''</span>
thumb|Look! It's moving. It's alive. It's alive... It's alive, it's moving, it's alive, it's alive, it's alive, ''it's alive'', '''''IT'S ALIVE!''''' ↗
- {{yeac}} Monkbot 16 ↗, DannyS712 bot 60 ↗, Ahechtbot 6 ↗, PearBOT 3 ↗, Qbugbot 3 ↗ · {{nayd}} DannyS712 bot 5 ↗, PkbwcgsBot 24 ↗ · {{idkc}} DannyS712 bot 61 ↗, TheSandBot 4 ↗
- '''TParis goes away, UTRSBot goes kaput''': Beeblebrox noted ↗ that the bot for maintaining on-wiki records of UTRS ↗ appeals stopped working a while ago. TParis, the semi-retired user who had previously run it, said they were "unlikely to return to actively editing Wikipedia", and the bot had been vanquished by trolls submitting bogus UTRS requests on behalf of real blocked users. While OAuth ↗ was a potential fix, neither maintainer had time to implement it. TParis offered to access to the UTRS WMFLabs account to any admin identified with the WMF: "I miss you guys a whole lot [...] but I've also moved on with my life. Good luck, let me know how I can help". Ultimately, SQL ended up in charge. Some progress was made, and the bot continued to work another couple months — but as of press time, UTRSBot has not edited since November 2019.
- '''Article-measuring contest resumed''': The list of Wikipedians by article count ↗, which had lain dead for several years, was triumphantly resurrected by GreenC following a bot request ↗.
<span style="font-size:125%">'''October 2019'''</span>
- {{yeac}} OAbot 3 ↗, DannyS712 bot 47 ↗, Pathbot 2 ↗, PearBOT 2 ↗, DannyS712 bot 59 ↗, DannyS712 bot 62 ↗, HasteurBot 14 ↗, PearBOT 4 ↗, WOSlinkerBot 4 ↗, MilHistBot 5 ↗
- '''Curb Safe Charmer adopts reFill''': TAnthony pointed out ↗ that reFill 2 ↗'s bug reports were going unanswered; creator Zhaofeng Li had retired from Wikipedia, and a maintainer was needed. As of June 2021, Curb Safe Charmer had taken up the mantle ↗, saying: "Not that I have all the skills needed but better me than nobody! 'Maintainer' might be too strong a term though. Volunteers welcome!" <br />
<span style="font-size:125%">'''November 2019'''</span>
thumb|Now you're thinking with portals. ↗
- {{yeac}} BHGbot 4 ↗, YiFeiBot 2 ↗, DannyS712 bot III 64 ↗ · {{idkc}} PearBOT ↗
- '''Old bots do new tricks''': DannyS712 bot III 64 ↗ prowled redirects, YiFeiBot 2 ↗ archived GoCE ↗ requests, and BHGbot 4 ↗ removed links to portals ↗ deleted at MfD ↗ (until its authorization was revoked in January at operator BrownHairedGirl's request ↗).
<span style="font-size:125%">'''December 2019'''</span>
- {{yeac}} DemonDays64 Bot ↗, DannyS712 bot III 66 ↗, Bot1058 6 ↗, Monkbot 15 ↗, MilHistBot 6 ↗, PearBOT 5 ↗, DannyS712 bot IV 65 ↗ · {{nayd}} SportsStatsBot ↗ ·20px|alt=Expired|link= ↗ Xinbenlv bot ↗, SteveBot 8 ↗
- '''Redirects to be autopatrolled''': A RfC took place ↗ at WP:NPP ↗, closing with unanimous consensus that new redirects ↗ should be automatically marked as patrolled ↗ by bot. DannyS712 wasted no time, and submitted DannyS712 bot III 66 ↗ the next day; it passed two days after that.
- '''200,000 bios get short descs''': Along a similar vein, Bot1058 6 ↗ was approved to remove disambiguation pages from :Category:Monitored short pages ↗ and a new bot (DemonDays64 Bot ↗) changed lots of http ↗ links to https ↗ using JavaScript Wiki Browser ↗. One particularly neat task, PearBOT 5 ↗, automatically generated short descriptions ↗ for more than 200,000 biographies.
<span style="font-size:150%">'''In the next issue of ''Bots Newsletter'':'''</span><br />
What's next for our intrepid band of coders, maintainers and approvers?
- What happens when two bots want to clerk the same page?
- What happens when an adminbot goes hog wild?
- Will reFill ever get fixed?
- What's up with ListeriaBot, anyway?
- Python 3.4 deprecation? In ''my'' PyWikiBot? (It's more likely than you think!)
Signing off... '''jp'''×'''g''' 04:29, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
----
<small>(You can subscribe or unsubscribe from future newsletters by adding or removing your name from this list ↗.)</small>
|}
<!-- Message sent by User:JPxG@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Bots/Spam&oldid=1059552212 -->
Bots Newsletter, January 2022
{|style="box-sizing:border-box;background:#f0f8ff; border:1px solid #7Cb9e8; margin:0.5em; padding:0.5em;border-radius:8px;" role="presentation"
|-
!colspan=2 style="font-size:150%; padding: .4em;"|''Bots Newsletter'', January 2022
|-
| style="padding-left: .6em;" | right|100px ↗
{{Image frame
| caption = BRFA activity by month
| content =
{{Graph:Chart
| type = stackedarea
| width = 200
| height = 100
| xAxisAngle = -70
| colors =
#98fb98,
#fb9898,
#9898fb,
#a0a6b0
| x = Jan 20,Feb 20,Mar 20,Apr 20,May 20,Jun 20
| y1 = 3,6,12,13,14,11
| y2 = 2,1,0,1,3,1
| y3 = 0,0,0,0,1,1
| y4 = 0,0,1,1,0,0
}}
}}
Welcome to the ninth issue of the English Wikipedia's ''Bots Newsletter'', your source for all things bot ↗. Vicious bot-on-bot edit warring... superseded tasks... policy proposals... these stories, and more, are brought to you by Wikipedia's most distinguished newsletter about bots.
After a long hiatus between August 2019 and December 2021, there's quite a bit of ground to cover. Due to the vastness, I decided in December to split the coverage up into a few installments that covered six months each. Some people thought this was a good idea, since covering an entire year in a single issue would make it unmanageably large. Others thought this was stupid, since they were getting talk page messages about crap from almost three years ago. Ultimately, the question of whether each issue covers six months or a year is only relevant for a couple more of them, and then the problem will be behind us forever.
Of course, you can also look on the bright side – we are making progress, and this issue will only be about crap from almost ''two'' years ago. Today we will pick up where we left off in December, and go through the first half of 2020.
<span style="font-size:150%">'''Overall'''</span><br />
In the first half of 2020, there were 71 BRFA ↗s. Of these, {{yeac}} 59 were approved, and 12 were unsuccessful (with {{nayd}} 8 denied, {{idkc}} 2 withdrawn, and 20px|alt=Expired|link= ↗ 2 expired).
<span style="font-size:125%">'''January 2020'''</span>
{{multiple image
| total_width = 400
| height1 = 60
| height2 = 60
| height3 = 60
| height4 = 60
| image1=Albino Olive Python (Liasis olivaceus).jpg | alt1=A python
| image2=Albino Olive Python (Liasis olivaceus).jpg | alt2=A python
| image3=Albino Olive Python (Liasis olivaceus).jpg | alt3=A python
| image4=Albino Olive Python (Liasis olivaceus) (cropped to 40%).jpg | alt4=0.4 pythons
| footer = Yeah, you're not gonna be able to get away with this anymore.
}}
- {{yeac}} ST47Bot ↗, Seppi333Bot ↗, Qbugbot 4 ↗ · {{nayd}} PkbwcgsBot 25 ↗, PkbwcgsBot 26 ↗
- A new Pywikibot ↗ release dropped support for Python 3.4 ↗, and it was expected that support for Python 2.7 ↗ would be removed in coming updates. Toolforge ↗ itself planned to drop Python 2 support in 2022.
- Two new bots dropped in January 2020: ST47Bot ↗, the successor to STBot, and Seppi333Bot ↗, whose task was to perform a weekly update of four "massive" wikitables for WikiProject Molecular Biology ↗.
- Cydebot, an adminbot ↗ operated by Cyde since 2006, was blocked ↗ after going berserk on categories that hadn't yet been CfD ↗'d.
<span style="font-size:125%">'''February 2020'''</span>
thumb|upright=0.6|Speaking of WikiProject Molecular Biology, ''Listeria'' went wild in February ↗
- {{yeac}} AnomieBOT 78 ↗, Cewbot 2 ↗, DannyS712 bot 67 ↗, DannyS712 bot III 63 ↗, PearBOT 6 ↗, DemonDays64 Bot 2 ↗ · {{nayd}} PearBOT ↗
- On February 1, some concerns ↗ were raised about ListeriaBot performing "nonsense" edits. Semi-active operator Magnus Manske (who originally coded the Phase II software|precursor ↗ of MediaWiki ↗) was pinged. Meanwhile, the bot was temporarily <span class="plainlinks">blocked ↗</span> for several hours until the issue was diagnosed and resolved.
- On February 18, ST47Bot ↗ got into a <span class="plainlinks">tussle ↗</span> with Amalthea (bot), and had to be partially-blocked from Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cases/Overview ↗.
<span style="font-size:125%">'''March 2020'''</span>
- {{yeac}} MajavahBot ↗, SDZeroBot ↗, TheSandBot 6 ↗, TheSandBot 7 ↗, Bitbotje ↗, FACBot 6 ↗, TheSandBot 8 ↗, Qbugbot 5 ↗, Cewbot 3 ↗, SDZeroBot 2 ↗, PrimeBOT 31 ↗, WikiCleanerBot 12 ↗ ·20px|alt=Expired|link= ↗ AntiCompositeBot ↗
- In March, a long discussion ↗ was started at Wikipedia talk:Bot policy ↗ by Skdb about the troubling trend of bots "expiring" without explanation after their owners became inactive. This can happen for a variety of reasons -- API ↗ changes break code, hosting providers' software updates break code, hosting accounts lapse, software changes make bots' edits unnecessary, and policy changes make bots' edits unwanted. The most promising solution seemed to be Toolforge ↗ hosting (although it has some problems of its own, like the occasional necessity of refactoring code).
- Some of the twelve bot tasks approved this month were TheSandBot 6 ↗ (removing blocked users from :Category:Wikipedia usernames with possible policy issues ↗), and TheSandBot 7 ↗ (removing ''unblocked'' users from :Category:Wikipedians who are indefinitely blocked for promotional user names ↗). SDZeroBot 2 ↗ was approved to refine geographic stub tags. New bots approved this month were MajavahBot ↗ (to patrol WP:EFFPR ↗), SDZeroBot ↗ (to merge stub tags), and Bitbotje ↗ (fixing DISPLAYTITLE modifications, DEFAULTSORT errors and broken behavior switches in draftspace ↗).
thumb|''Listeria'' being examined ↗
- {{yeac}} TheSandBot 9 ↗, BHGbot 5 ↗, DannyS712 bot 69 ↗, SDZeroBot 3 ↗, ST47ProxyBot ↗, WugBot 4 ↗, SDZeroBot 4 ↗, DatBot 10 ↗, WikiCleanerBot 11 ↗, WikiCleanerBot 13 ↗, WikiCleanerBot 14 ↗, AntiCompositeBot 2 ↗, Cewbot 4 ↗ · {{nayd}} DaedanBot 1 ↗ ·20px|alt=Expired|link= ↗ Creffbot ↗
- A discussion ↗ on the bot noticeboard, "Re-examination of ListeriaBot", was started by Barkeep49, who pointed out repeated operation outside the scope of its BRFA (i.e. editing pages in mainspace, and adding non-free images ↗ to others). Some said it was doing good work, and others said it was operating beyond its remit. It was <span class="plainlinks">blocked ↗</span> on April 10; the next day it was unblocked, reblocked from article space, reblocked "for specified non-editing actions", unblocked, and indeffed. The next week, several safeguards ↗ were implemented in its code by Magnus; the bot was allowed to roam free once more on April 18.
- ST47ProxyBot ↗ joined the stable in April, after a BRFA started in December was finally completed. As an adminbot, it was authorized to block IP address ↗es belonging to open proxies ↗, public VPN service ↗s, and web host ↗s. New tasks approved for existing bots included BHGbot 5 ↗ (diffusing ↗ categories), TheSandBot 9 ↗ (taking over some tasks from the inactive RonBot), and WugBot 4 ↗ (updating data at {{tl|Interactive COVID-19 maps}}). Also, DatBot 10 ↗ was approved to scale down non-free SVG ↗s — I didn't even know that was a thing.
- A discussion ↗ at Wikipedia talk:Bot policy ↗ was started by Thryduulf about whether WP:BOTCOMM ↗ should explicitly specify that bot operators must be responsive to concerns raised on English Wikipedia specifically (as opposed to Phabricator ↗, SourceForge ↗, Toolforge ↗, et cetera). Eventually, the policy was amended to its current form ↗:
<span style="font-size:125%">'''May 2020'''</span>
thumb|upright=0.75|We heard you like bots, so we made a bot that reports the status of your bots, so now you can use bots while you use bots ↗
- {{yeac}} MajavahBot 3 ↗, DannyS712 bot 70 ↗, CitationCleanerBot 5 ↗, Dreamy Jazz Bot 4 ↗, QEDKbot ↗, William Avery Bot 2 ↗, DannyS712 bot 68 ↗, PrimeBOT 32 ↗, TheSandBot 10 ↗, Bot1058 7 ↗, BHGbot 6 ↗, EaglesBot 2 ↗, Cewbot 5 ↗, WikiCleanerBot 17 ↗ · {{nayd}} MDanielsBot ↗, PhuzBot 3 ↗, Gedimon ↗ · {{idkc}} PearBOT 7 ↗
- MajavahBot 3 ↗, an impressively meta bot task, was approved this month for maintaining a list of bots running on the English Wikipedia. The page, located at User:MajavahBot/Bot status report, is updated every 24 hours; it contains a list of all accounts with the bot flag, as well as their operator, edit count, last activity date, last edit date, last logged action date, user groups and block status.
- Other approvals for this month were William Avery Bot 2 ↗ (processing redirects in {{tl|R from scientific name}}), DannyS712 bot 68 ↗ (allowing users to schedule bot reminders for themselves), TheSandBot 10 ↗ (removing blocked/locked users from :Category:User talk pages with conflict of interest notices ↗), Bot1058 7 ↗ (updating Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests/Permalink ↗), Dreamy Jazz Bot 4 ↗ (adding <nowiki>{{</nowiki>WikiProject Biography ↗|living=no<nowiki>}}</nowiki> to talk pages where their associated article is in a year of death category), and QEDKbot ↗ (deleting and nominating empty categories).
- General syntax fixing tasks were approved for DannyS712 bot 70 ↗, CitationCleanerBot 5 ↗, PrimeBOT 32 ↗, BHGbot 6 ↗, Cewbot 5 ↗, and EaglesBot 2 ↗, as well as WikiCleanerBot 15 ↗, 16 ↗, and 17 ↗.
- Seven bots who fell below activity requirements ↗ (with neither the bots nor their operators having any edits or logged actions in two years) had their bot flags removed. They were NekoBot, Robert SkyBot, DASHBotAV, VoxelBot, JackieBot, ReferenceBot, and CensusBot.
- On May 12, EmausBot was blocked ↗.
<span style="font-size:125%">'''June 2020'''</span>
thumb|A partial block averted at the eleventh hour for the robot that makes Legos ↗
- {{yeac}} QEDKbot 2 ↗, AnomieBOT 79 ↗, WOSlinkerBot 6 ↗, Yapperbot 2 ↗, Yapperbot ↗, AnomieBOT 80 ↗, Dreamy Jazz Bot 5 ↗, WikiCleanerBot 18 ↗, HasteurBot 15 ↗, MusikBot II 4 ↗, NoSandboxesHere ↗ · {{nayd}} RedWarn ↗ · {{idkc}} Seppi333Bot 2 ↗
- In July 2017, Headbomb made a proposal ↗ that a section of the Wikipedia:Dashboard ↗ be devoted to bots and technical issues. In November 2019, Lua ↗ code was written superseding Legobot's tasks on that page, and operator Legoktm was asked to stop them so that the new code could be deployed. After no response to pings, a partial-block ↗ of Legobot for the dashboard was proposed. Some months later, on June 16, Headbomb said: "A full block serves nothing. A partial block solves all current issues [...] Just fucking do it. It's been 3 years now." The next day, however, Legoktm disabled the task, and the dashboard was successfully refactored.
- On June 7, RexxS blocked Citation bot for disruptive editing ↗, saying it was "still removing links after request to stop". A couple weeks later, a discussion on the bots noticeboard ↗ was opened, saying "it is a widely-used and useful bot, but it has one of the longest block logs for any recently-operating bot on Wikipedia". While its last BRFA approval was in 2011, its code and functionality had changed dramatically since then, and AntiCompositeNumber requested that BAG require a new BRFA. Maintainer AManWithNoPlan responded that most blocks were from years ago (when it lacked a proper test suite ↗), and problems since then had mostly been one-off errors (like a June 2019 incident ↗ in which a LTA ↗ had "weaponized" the bot to harass editors).
- David Tornheim ↗ opened a discussion about whether bots based on closed-source code should be permitted ↗, and proposed that they not. He cited a recent case in which a maintainer had said "I can only suppose that the code that is available on GitHub is not the actual code that was running on [the bot]". Some disagreed: Naypta said that "I like free software as much as the next person, and I strongly believe that bot operators should make their bot code public, but I don't think it should be that they must do so".
- Two new bots had their first BRFAs approved: Yapperbot ↗, to replace Legobot for handling the Feedback Request Service ↗, and NoSandboxesHere ↗, to remove {{tl|user sandbox}} from articles in draftspace using :Category:Non-userspace pages using User sandbox ↗.
<span style="font-size:150%">'''Conclusion'''</span><br />
- What's next for our intrepid band of coders, maintainers and approvers?
:*What's the deal with all those book links that InternetArchiveBot is adding to articles?
:*Should we keep using Gerrit for MediaWiki?
:*What if we had a day for bots to make cosmetic edits?
These questions will be answered — and new questions raised — by the February 2022 ''Bots Newsletter''. Tune in, or miss out!
Signing off... <span style="font-variant:small-caps; whitespace:nowrap;">'''jp'''×'''g'''</span> 23:22, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
----
<small>(You can subscribe or unsubscribe from future newsletters by adding or removing your name from this list ↗.)</small>
|}
<!-- Message sent by User:JPxG@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Bots/Spam&oldid=1066996263 -->
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px;">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2022 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2022|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2022|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)</small>
</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2022/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1124425183 -->
Columns for charts
Hi Martin. When adding column formatting to music articles, please ensure the col-start and col-2 templates go ''above'' the weekly charts heading like this ↗, otherwise the headings are uneven. Obviously the weekly charts and year-end charts headings being on the same line visually is preferable (where possible) over an uneven divide. Thanks. <b><span style="color: #FF6347;">Ss</span><small><span style="color: #1E90FF;">112</span></small></b> 12:25, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
:Martin, please remember to update the access-date when you update chart peaks on articles. I previously asked you to do this in July 2021. Thanks. <b><span style="color: #FF6347;">Ss</span><small><span style="color: #1E90FF;">112</span></small></b> 03:37, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2023 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2023|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small>
</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2023/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1187132049 -->
Kenny Chesney's Country Airplay number ones
Hi there, just to let you know I have put back the wording as it was before about Chesney's 33 number ones based on country radio airplay for the following reason: the situation here is a bit odd and confusing - a chart called Country Airplay has only existed since 2012, but Billboard have apparently retroactively declared that all Hot Country Songs number ones between 1990 and 2012 (when that chart was based on radio plays) ''also'' count as Country Airplay number ones, even though the former chart sill exists and the latter was not published at the time. I therefore used intentionally vague wording to skirt this issue, as while Chesney has had 33 number ones based on country radio airplay, he has ''not'' had 33 number ones on a chart which was called "Country Airplay" at the time of its publication. Hope that makes sense. Maybe it's worth asking at WT:CHARTS ↗ how to handle this....? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:01, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2024 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2024|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>
</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1258243447 -->
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 18 November 2025 (UTC)</small>
</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2025/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1322758067 -->
Happy First Edit Anniversary Martin4647 🎉
Hey @Martin4647. Your wiki edit anniversary is today, marking 19 years of dedicated contributions to English Wikipedia. Your passion for sharing knowledge and your remarkable contributions have not only enriched the project, but also inspired countless others to contribute. Thank you for your amazing contributions. Wishing you many more wonderful years ahead in the Wiki journey. :) -<span style="color:#990000">❙❚❚</span><span style="color:#339966">❙❙</span><span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:#000"> GnOeee </span><span style="color:#006699">❚❙❚</span><span style="color:#339966">❙❙</span> ✉ 19:22, 22 November 2025 (UTC)