W
Active Editors
Back to Profile

User Talk: Mercury543210

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

<br clear="all">
{{Archive box|Archive 1 ↗ (01/07/06 - 30/07/07)<br>Archive 2 ↗ (20/09/07 - 19/11/24)<br>Archive 3 ↗ (05/01/25 - )}}

<br clear="all" />

__TOC__

Leave a message


Section intended for quick notes left by others, which will be removed once acknowledged/dealt with. More substantial comments should be added in the usual way. Thanks.

January 2025



25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm Tgeorgescu. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view ↗. Your recent edit to :First Epistle of Peter ↗ seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page ↗. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-npov1 --> tgeorgescu (talk) 12:59, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

:Hi, Thank you for the very courteous comment on my edit to First Epistle of Peter ↗. I am content with that change.
:On the topic of that page, given that there is a 'Main' page on Authorship of the Petrine epistles ↗ already, I propose removing the paragraphs "New Testament scholar Graham Stanton ↗ ..."; "Another dating issue is ..."; "Others argue that it makes..." and "On the one hand, some ...". Leaving "On the other hand, some scholars argue..." just deleting "On the other hand,".
:In '''general''' the duplication, and often contradictory statements, on the two different pages ('''not''' necessarily in this case) is a pet bugbear of mine. The main page should be a short, simple summary and direct readers to the main article.
:What are your thoughts on this? If you're content with that I could then propose it on the page?
:User: Mercury543210 Mercury543210 (talk) 13:53, 13 January 2025 (UTC)

::Our allegiance, as Wikipedians, is to the mainstream academic view, see WP:CHOPSY ↗. tgeorgescu (talk) 01:04, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
:::Hi, that doesn't really answer my question. Should we shorten, as proposed, the article and focus on authorship issues in the 'Main' page Authorship of the Petrine epistles ↗?
:::BTW I too adhere to CHOPSY though I feel it too restrictive if taken literally. iIt needs to be recognised solely as a shorthand and not ignore other universities, not least in the Netherlands which has some outstanding universities, as I'm sure I don't need to tell you!
:::Thanks Mercury543210 (talk) 11:04, 20 January 2025 (UTC)

Article moved



Just wanted to note that I moved your article of John Riley to: John Riley (painter, born 1928) ↗, since the previous title was malformed due to the lack of spacing between parentheses. <small><b style="color:blue; text-shadow:cyan 0.0em 0.0em 0.1em;">CycloneYoris</b></small> <sup><b style="color:purple">''talk!''</b></sup> 05:10, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

:Thank you. Mercury543210 (talk) 07:48, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
::I've just noticed that the article on the 17th century painter "John Reilly (painter)" seems to have the same name https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Riley_(painter) ↗
::As the link you created
::https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Reilly_(painter) ↗
::That's why I added the birth date, albeit incorrectly.
::Is there any way of disambiguating the two pages? Thanks for your help. Mercury543210 (talk) 08:00, 11 May 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message



<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 18 November 2025 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2025/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1322758067 -->