User Talk: Moguy

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

February 2022

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm ToastGuard. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, :List of atheists in music ↗, but you didn't provide a reliable source ↗. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation ↗ and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners ↗. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  -Toast (talk) 18:39, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

That's Fine

Next time if you want to update information, include a source, or if you are waiting for a source then you can leave a note in the edit summary, there was no such note in yours therefore I removed your edits. -Toast (talk) 23:23, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

Removal of Individual from 2024 Deaths

Who are you to decide whether someone is "famous enough"?
The fact that you use "famous" instead of "notable" suggests you are not in a position to make such a decision. Bryan Krippner (talk) 07:02, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

:I am sorry to use a wrong language. But he wasn't a notable person either. I am a Turkish citizen who is interested in Islamism and even the source of death doesn't give any good reasons why he was famous. It says he was imprisoned after the 1997 Military Memorandum but during that period a lot of common people were imprisoned too. Also the source is a small Kurdish-Islamist news agency with clear biases. They tend to exaggerate their movement. Therefore, I decided to remove him from the Deaths in 2024 list. Thank you. Moguy (talk) 08:07, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited MEPs Against Cancer ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Interest Group ↗.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ali Kazak ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palestine question ↗.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

Brian Dixon

Hello. Why did you remove my edit here ↗? Thanks -- <span style="font-family: Papyrus;">Jack of Oz</span> [[User talk:JackofOz#top|<span style="font-size:85%; font-family: Verdana;"><sup>[pleasantries]</sup></span>]] 08:50, 11 July 2025 (UTC)

:The way you added the title "The Honourable" was wrong; people can assume it as a part of Dixon's real name. Unfortunately, the template that is used in the article does not allow the correct form to add honorary prefixes. Maybe you should add that info to the main text Moguy (talk) 10:22, 11 July 2025 (UTC)

July 2025

30px|alt=Stop icon ↗ Your recent editing history at :Your Party (UK) ↗ shows that you are currently engaged in an '''edit war ↗'''; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the '''talk page ↗''' to work toward making a version that represents consensus ↗ among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done ↗. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard ↗ or seek dispute resolution ↗. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection ↗.

'''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing ↗'''—especially if you violate the three-revert rule ↗, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts ↗ on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. — '''<i style="color:#8000FF">Czello</i>''' <sup>''(<i style="color:#8000FF">music</i>)''</sup> 00:43, 30 July 2025 (UTC)

:I wasn't aware of the three-revert rule. However, the people who opposed my contributions didn't act with good faith at all. They deleted all of my contributions for BS reasons instead of trying to find a middle ground. I won't repeat my mistakes, but I will stand back with my claims unless I find a good reason. Moguy (talk)

Notification

link=|25px|alt=Information icon ↗ There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents ↗ regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. AndyTheGrump (talk) 22:20, 30 July 2025 (UTC)

:Hello, Moguy,
:Please come to ANI to discuss editing issues. This involves you and it's important that you participate. On Wikipedia, "Communication is required". Thank you. <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">'''''L'''''iz</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">'''''Read!''''' ↗ '''''Talk!'''''</sup> 21:55, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 18 November 2025 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>

Hamas most wanted playing cards

Hello, regarding your edit on the "Hamas Most Wanted Playing Cards" page - the cowboy deck should list "Fathi Hamad", not "Ghazi Hamad". I don’t have the privileges to edit it, so I’d appreciate if you could fix it. Snackbar.me2 (talk) 09:18, 19 December 2025 (UTC)

:Thank you for notifying me! I corrected it. Moguy (talk) 22:06, 19 December 2025 (UTC)

Disappearance of Tara Calico

your edit ↗ restored to the article the claim that Tara Calico is or was 5.5 inches to 5.7 inches tall and your edit summary claims {{tq|Doesn't have to cited}} but doesnt address the other reason i provided in my edit summary which is that the claim is dubious. if it is true that she is 5.5 inches to 5.7 inches tall, then that would be an extraordinary claim that would need to be cited. why would you restore that? ~2026-15516-4 ↗ (talk) 03:55, 22 February 2026 (UTC)
:someone else has re-removed the claim but it would be interesting why you would restore such a thing to wikipedia. ~2026-15516-4 ↗ (talk) 05:52, 22 February 2026 (UTC)
::At a guess, Moguy read it as 5ft 5 in to 5ft 7 in. It was added in February last year, and nobody else noticed either. AndyTheGrump (talk) 06:04, 22 February 2026 (UTC)
:::User:AndyTheGrump: i sure did and Moguy here reverted me. ~2026-15516-4 ↗ (talk) 06:55, 22 February 2026 (UTC)
::::Yes, we can see that. Thank you for spotting it. Clearly not everyone is as observant as you are. AndyTheGrump (talk) 06:59, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

You may be eligible to vote in the U4C election

<section begin="announcement-content" />
I am contacting you because you previously voted in elections related to the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ↗. You may be eligible to vote in the current U4C election, which is open now and closes on 2 June 2026. You can find out more about the candidates and the election on the election page on Meta ↗, and from there you can access the vote itself. Your participation in these elections is important to the governance of Wikimedia communities, and your time spent learning about the candidates and voting is appreciated.

-- In cooperation with the U4C, Keegan (WMF) ↗ (talk ↗)<section end="announcement-content" />

Keegan (WMF) ↗ (talk ↗) 16:35, 20 May 2026 (UTC)