User Talk: OfficialURL
Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.
Your signature
Hi! Please consider changing your signature to comply with MOS:CONTRAST ↗ and WP:SIGAPP ↗. It appears your signature has a fragment of 1, which fails the requirements of WCAG ↗ (One of these colors is shown here ↗). Thanks for your time and complicance in this matter. <span style="font-size:1.2em;font-family:eurofurence;background:#368ec9;color:black">Jalen Folf</span> <span style="background:#6babd6;color:black">(talk)</span> 23:18, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
I've toned it down. All the colors should be compliant with AA under any common background on Wikipedia. Thanks for informing me on the issue. – <span style="background-image:-webkit-linear-gradient(left,#cd0000,#686800,#007600,#007171,#4646ff,#b400b4,#cd0000);color:transparent;background-clip:text">OfficialURL</span> (talk ↗) 23:57, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Signatures#Guidelines_and_policies ↗ states that {{tq|A customised signature should make it easy to identify your username}}. Please comply with that guideline. — '''<span style="color: #1009bf;">J</span><span style="color: #137412;">947</span>''' <sup>(user | cont ↗ | ess)</sup>, at 22:53, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
{{ping|J947}} My signature is just my username stylized. Isn't it already pretty recognizable? – <span style="background-image:-webkit-linear-gradient(left,#cd0000,#686800,#007600,#007171,#4646ff,#b400b4,#cd0000);color:transparent;background-clip:text">OfficialURL</span> (talk ↗) 23:29, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
- For some reason all I see is the colours and the talk link. — '''<span style="color: #1009bf;">J</span><span style="color: #137412;">947</span>''' <sup>(user | cont ↗ | ess)</sup>, at 23:33, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
- * {{ping|J947}} Apparently this was a browser compatibility problem. I've changed my signature a bit. It should work on all major browsers, while still retaining AA compatibility from earlier on this thread. – <span style="background-image:-webkit-linear-gradient(left,#cd0000,#686800,#007600,#007171,#4646ff,#b400b4,#cd0000);color:white;"><b>OfficialURL</b></span> (talk ↗) 00:18, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
- ** Thanks, that works for me now. :) — '''<span style="color: #1009bf;">J</span><span style="color: #137412;">947</span>''' <sup>(user | cont ↗ | ess)</sup>, at 02:11, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
snub disphenoid
I have an animation of a disphenoid being snub, I hope you're interested in the file. Where can I send a file to you? The unknown player (talk) 03:33, 20 July 2020 (UTC)
CSS weirdness (and margin real estate)
Hi, when you add new images to articles, please check how your change affects the page layout. Your innocuous introduction of STL models to Rhombicuboctahedron ↗ and Rhombicosidodecahedron ↗ turned out to be surprisingly destructive. Please also check if this happened to you in other articles. (In Compound of five cubes ↗ you added it below the box. That works.)<br>
In any case, 3D models are not very useful as thumbnails on a page. In articles where space for images is rare, they should instead be linked under the introductory image in the box. (Just like animations.) Greetings, Watchduck <small>(quack)</small> 01:57, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
: Fair enough. I might have gotten too used to editing the stub articles for the uniforms. Should've been more careful with space in this case. I'll see how I can add them as links if I find time for it. – <span style="background-image:-webkit-linear-gradient(left,#cd0000,#686800,#007600,#007171,#4646ff,#b400b4,#cd0000);color:white;"><b>OfficialURL</b></span> (talk ↗) 18:13, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
Your latest edits about Normal space
Hi. I am curious why you removed the parentheses around some of the sentences in your latest edits of Normal space ↗. These were really parenthetical remarks, in the sense that they did not add anything to the understanding of the corresponding paragraph, but were just adding extra optional information. Also, by removing the parentheses around {{tq|In fancier terms, disjoint closed sets ...}} you make it seeem that that sentence is a reformulation of the previous one {{tq|In fact, we can take the values ...}}, but in fact it is not. It refers to the sentence before that, and should be moved accordingly. Anyway, why are these parentheses bothering you? Regards. PatrickR2 (talk) 19:05, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
: Hi, sorry for the late reply. I thought it was a bit cumbersome to have such long expressions parenthesized. But it's really no big deal one way or the other. – <span style='color:#795cb2;font-family:"Dancing Script","Brush Script MT",cursive'><b><i>viiii</i></b></span> (talk ↗) 01:37, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Uniform polyhedra
Hello! You talked to me a long time ago. I haven't been looking at polyhedra for a long time. But the last few weeks I have been playing around a little with them again. The result can be found on https://github.com/mtkos/uniform. It is only about non-snub star polyhedra
: This some pretty cool stuff. Sorry I'm only seeing it now. – <span style='color:#795cb2;font-family:"Dancing Script","Brush Script MT",cursive'><b><i>viiii</i></b></span> (talk ↗) 01:36, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
:I have done the snub ones also now: https://github.com/mtkos/snub (as yet without duals) Mennotk (talk) 15:36, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
{{NoACEMM}}