User Talk: Orlandov123
Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.
Welcome!
Hi Orlandov123! I noticed your contributions ↗ and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
{{Clickable button|Help:Introduction|Learn more about editing|class=mw-ui-progressive|style=margin-left: 1.6em;}}
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia ↗ page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
{{Clickable button|Wikipedia:Teahouse|Get help at the Teahouse|style=margin-left: 1.6em;}}
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
{{Clickable button|Wikipedia:Task Center|Volunteer at the Task Center|style=margin-left: 1.6em;}}
Happy editing! <!-- Template:Welcome--> CNMall41 (talk) 16:51, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
:Thanks a lot, @CNMall41! Orlandov123 (talk) 16:53, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
Improving sourcing for Dolder Waldhaus draft
Hello Orlandov123, I’m a member of WikiProject Switzerland and have been assisting with drafts in the AfC queue. Your Dolder Waldhaus draft is off to a strong start, and it’s clear you’ve put in a lot of effort. I’ve added a source from the ''Tages-Anzeiger'' and improved the "Demolition and New Construction" section to strengthen the draft’s notability. I've also copyedited the lead for neutrality, making it better align with Wikipedia’s style. However, a few key details still need clearer sourcing to ensure the draft meets Wikipedia’s standards:
- '''Lead History:''' The 1879 conception date, Heinrich Hürlimann’s role, and the 1894–95 timeline for the Dolderbahn, including Ulrich Bosshard’s contract, should be directly supported by reliable secondary sources (WP:RS ↗ & WP:V ↗). Without clear sourcing, these details may be challenged or removed.
- '''Notability:''' To meet WP:GNG ↗, the draft needs independent coverage in high-quality sources like ''NZZ'', ''Tages‑Anzeiger'', and ''Swissinfo''. Primary sources, such as the organization’s own site, can be useful for details but do not establish notability.
I recommend reviewing your sources, ensuring each claim in the article is accurately cited, and rephrasing or removing any unsupported details. If you’d like to chat about the draft, please feel free to ping me. Happy editing! HerBauhaus (talk) 12:49, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
:Hi @HerBauhaus, thanks a lot for your edits and your kind advice, I will be glad to work on the improvements you suggested! Orlandov123 (talk) 14:16, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Dolder Waldhaus ↗ has been accepted
<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:#E6FFE6; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">50px|left ↗ '''Dolder Waldhaus ↗, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.'''<br />
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. <br />
The article has been assessed as '''B-Class''', which is recorded on its talk page ↗. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top {{AfC talk/B percentage}} of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme ↗ to see how you can improve the article. You may also consider nominating a fact from the article ↗ within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's "Did you know" section ↗.
<div class="autoconfirmed-show">Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself ↗ without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation ↗ if you prefer.</div>
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the '''<span class="plainlinks" >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Dolder_Waldhaus help desk]</span>'''.<span class="unconfirmed-show"> Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself ↗ without posting a request to Articles for creation ↗.</span>
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider {{leave feedback/link|page=Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation|text=leaving us some feedback}}.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Superboilles (talk) 11:59, 10 May 2025 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC accept-->
Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Learning the Walk of Handan ↗ (June 15)
<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: var(--background-color-warning-subtle, #fdf2d5); color: inherit; padding: 0.5em 1em; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> 50px|left ↗Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation ↗ has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by CanonNi was:
{{divbox|gray|3=This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article ↗. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: <br />
- ''in-depth ↗'' (not just passing mentions about the subject)
- ''reliable'' ↗
- ''secondary'' ↗
- ''independent'' ↗ of the subject <br />
--
--> The comment the reviewer left was:
{{divbox|blue|3=Some sources don't mention the idiom at all.}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit ''after they have been resolved''.
{{clear}}
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Learning the Walk of Handan ↗ and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted ↗.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior ↗ associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the <span class="plainlinks" >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Learning_the_Walk_of_Handan '''Articles for creation help desk''']</span>, on the <span class="plainlinks" >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:CanonNi&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Learning_the_Walk_of_Handan '''reviewer's talk page''']</span> or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors ↗.
<span style="font-family:monospace">'''<small><nowiki>'''</nowiki></small>User:CanonNi<small><nowiki> ↗'''</nowiki></small>'''</span> (talk • contribs ↗) 10:37, 15 June 2025 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC decline-->
{| style="margin: 0.4em 2em;"
|- style="vertical-align: top;"
| alt=Teahouse logo ↗
| <div style="background-color:#e1e6db; color: #393D38; padding: 1em; font-size: 1.1em; border-radius:10px;box-shadow:-2px -2px 1px #8e8a78;">Hello, '''Orlandov123'''!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the '''Articles for creation help desk ↗'''. If you have any ''other'' questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the '''Teahouse ↗''', a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! <span style="font-family:monospace">'''<small><nowiki>'''</nowiki></small>User:CanonNi<small><nowiki> ↗'''</nowiki></small>'''</span> (talk • contribs ↗) 10:37, 15 June 2025 (UTC)</div>
|}<!-- Wikipedia:Teahouse/AfC Invitation -->
Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC ↗
Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Shababeek for Contemporary Art ↗ has been accepted
<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:var(--background-color-success-subtle, #dff2eb); padding: 0.5em 1em; color: inherit; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">50px|left ↗ '''Shababeek for Contemporary Art ↗, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.'''<br />
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
<div class="autoconfirmed-show">Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself ↗ without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation ↗ if you prefer.</div>
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the '''<span class="plainlinks" >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Shababeek_for_Contemporary_Art help desk]</span>'''.<span class="unconfirmed-show"> Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself ↗ without posting a request to Articles for creation ↗.</span>
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Wikishovel (talk) 09:46, 16 September 2025 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC accept-->
Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: How the World Made the West: A 4,000-Year History ↗ has been accepted
<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:var(--background-color-success-subtle, #dff2eb); padding: 0.5em 1em; color: inherit; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">50px|left ↗ '''How the World Made the West: A 4,000-Year History ↗, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.'''<br />
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
<div class="autoconfirmed-show">Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself ↗ without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation ↗ if you prefer.</div>
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the '''<span class="plainlinks" >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=How_the_World_Made_the_West:_A_4,000-Year_History help desk]</span>'''.<span class="unconfirmed-show"> Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself ↗ without posting a request to Articles for creation ↗.</span>
Thanks again, and happy editing!
DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:22, 30 September 2025 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC accept-->
Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Learning the Walk of Handan ↗ has been accepted
<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:var(--background-color-success-subtle, #dff2eb); padding: 0.5em 1em; color: inherit; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">50px|left ↗ '''Learning the Walk of Handan ↗, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.'''<br />
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions. <br />
The article has been assessed as '''Start-Class''', which is recorded on its talk page ↗. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop ↗ over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme ↗ to see how you can improve the article.
<div class="autoconfirmed-show">Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself ↗ without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation ↗ if you prefer.</div>
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the '''<span class="plainlinks" >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Learning_the_Walk_of_Handan help desk]</span>'''.<span class="unconfirmed-show"> Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself ↗ without posting a request to Articles for creation ↗.</span>
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Jcgaylor (talk) 22:45, 8 November 2025 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC accept-->
Your draft article, Draft:List of largest Private Banks ↗
48px|left|alt=|link= ↗
Hello, Orlandov123. This message concerns the Articles for Creation ↗ submission or draft ↗ page you started, "List of largest Private Banks ↗".
Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy ↗, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply {{edit|Draft:List of largest Private Banks|edit the submission}}, and remove the {{tlc|db-afc}}, {{tlc|db-draft}}, or {{tlc|db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can '''request its undeletion''' ↗. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! <!-- Template:Db-draft-notice --> DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 00:26, 1 May 2026 (UTC)
Peer review
Hello, Orlandov123, this is 16dvnk. I have responded to your peer review. I am a new reviewer, so I may make mistakes, and in that case, please let me know and forgive me. I have found some issues that you may work on, which may improve your article. Thank you for your attention! 16dvnk (talk) 15:16, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
Peer review updates
link=|alt=|left|48x48px ↗
Hello @Orlandov123, this is 16dvnk. Here is a summary of new comments in the peer review in case if you have not caught up yet:
# The first batch of improvements should be done in 1-2 weeks due to a ''de facto'' rule in WP:GAN ↗ that I like to impose, but please, DO NOT rush if you cannot finish in that timeframe.
# Using the GA tool kit, the article has a 40% copyvio alert (though it is because of citing the original verses of the idiom, which does not count and is not the issue) but the second more glaring issue is that GPTZero ↗ (used by WP:GAN ↗) listed the article as "100% AI". Even though this (may or) may not be your fault, and the tool is notoriously inaccurate, this is something that future reviewers tend to nitpick on, and plus, on further reviewing, the tone does sound a little "AI" to me. Hence, we should make the tone sound more encyclopedic, as even if it were a false positive, this shows that the article may not be well toned. Therefore, in the list, we can add 6. Make the article sound more encyclopedic. In fact, this should be the VERY FIRST priority as articles can now be DELETED if the article is found to be generated with Artificial Intelligence, which is unfortunate.
# If you need any help, you can contact me at any time.
Thank you for your attention, and happy editing :D! 16dvnk (talk) 12:30, 3 June 2026 (UTC)
:hi @16dvnk
:thank you so much for all of your contributions! Just to give you an update: I have made all the relevant changes to the article based on your feedback and only the lead will now have to be updated. If you have time I would be very glad if you could double-check and maybe recommend some further steps! Best Orlandov123 (talk) Orlandov123 (talk) 14:44, 8 June 2026 (UTC)
::Thank you! I will go through the changes today (or at most within 1-2 days). Thank you very much! 16dvnk (talk) 09:05, 9 June 2026 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:List of pottery by Exekias ↗
25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, Orlandov123. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of pottery by Exekias ↗, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted ↗, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it ↗ again or request ↗ that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted ↗ so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:07, 7 June 2026 (UTC)
Peer review updates
@Orlandov123
link=|alt=|left|48x48px ↗
Thank you very much. Here is a summary of the latest updates:
# Your contribution was appreciated, and I am glad to announce that meets the C tier criteria. Thank you! 2. Please check the list of fixes for a potential B tier. Thank you very much, and happy editing! :D 16dvnk (talk) 15:49, 11 June 2026 (UTC)