W
Active Editors
Back to Profile

User Talk: Pave Paws

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

{{Talk header}}

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: sandbox (December 31)


<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> 50px|left ↗Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation ↗ has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by Drewmutt was:

{{divbox|gray|3=This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article ↗—that is, they do not show ''significant'' coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in ''published'', ''reliable'' ↗, ''secondary'' ↗ sources that are ''independent ↗'' of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies ↗). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help ↗ and learn about mistakes to avoid ↗ when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}}<!--
--
-->&nbsp;The comment the reviewer left was:

{{divbox|blue|3=Links to wiki pages and sources related to the topic are not well-established reliable sources independent of the subject.}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit ''when they have been resolved''.
{{clear}}

Drewmutt <span style="color:#01B0F0;letter-spacing:-2px">(</span><span style="color:#FF358B">^ᴥ^</span><span style="color:#01B0F0;letter-spacing:-2px">)</span> <span style="color:#F2813D;font-size:10px">talk</span> 05:13, 31 December 2019 (UTC)</div><!--Template:Afc decline-->

{| style="margin: 0.4em 2em;"
|- style="vertical-align: top;"
| alt=Teahouse logo ↗
| <div style="background-color:#f4f3f0; color: #393D38; padding: 1em; font-size: 1.1em; border-radius:10px;box-shadow:-2px -2px 1px #8e8a78;">Hello, '''BanditTheManedWolf'''!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the '''Articles for creation help desk ↗'''. If you have any ''other'' questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the '''Teahouse ↗''', a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Drewmutt <span style="color:#01B0F0;letter-spacing:-2px">(</span><span style="color:#FF358B">^ᴥ^</span><span style="color:#01B0F0;letter-spacing:-2px">)</span> <span style="color:#F2813D;font-size:10px">talk</span> 05:13, 31 December 2019 (UTC)</div>
|}<!-- Wikipedia:Teahouse/AfC Invitation -->
Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC ↗

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Russia-Saudi Arabia oil price war ↗ (March 11)


<div style="border: solid 1px #F99; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> 50px|left ↗Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the <span class="plainlinks">[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Russia-Saudi_Arabia_oil_price_war '''Articles for creation help desk''']</span> or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help ↗.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason<!-- pluralize "reason" --><!--empty--> left by Sulfurboy was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia ↗.<!--
--
-->&nbsp;The comment the reviewer left was: Wikipedia is WP:NOTNEWS ↗
{{clear}}
Sulfurboy (talk) 05:03, 11 March 2020 (UTC)</div><!--Template:Afc reject-->

Your submission at Articles for creation ↗: Russia-Saudi Arabia oil price war ↗ has been accepted


<div style="border:solid 1px #57DB1E; background:#E6FFE6; padding:1em; padding-top:0.5em; padding-bottom:0.5em; width:20em; color:black; margin-bottom: 1.5em; margin-left: 1.5em; width: 90%;">50px|left ↗ '''Russia-Saudi Arabia oil price war ↗, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.'''<br /> The article has been assessed as '''B-Class''', which is recorded on the article's talk page ↗. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme ↗ to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia ↗. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself ↗ without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation ↗ if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
''' DGG''' ( talk ) 18:53, 11 March 2020 (UTC)</div><!--Template:Afc talk-->
\
:I cannot account for the previous review. but I accepted it. Please strengthen the article further by adding additional sources showing the international significance. Startwith the ones in thecurrent New York Times. Let me know on my user talk p. if it gets nominated for deletion, though on the basis of over 12 years experience here, I am reasonably sure it will not in fact be deleted. ''' DGG''' ( talk ) 18:56, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

April 2021



25px|alt=Information icon|link= ↗ Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary ↗. Please do your best to '''always fill in the summary field'''. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! <!-- Template:Summary2 --> ―&nbsp;<span style="color:#990000">'''''Tartan357'''''</span>&nbsp;<sup><span style="color:#224434">'''Talk'''</span></sup> 03:52, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Thank you


{{Infobox legislative election
| country = French Third Republic
| previous_election = 1902 ↗
| next_election = 1910 ↗
| election_date = 6 and 20 May 1906
| seats_for_election = All 585 seats in the Chamber of Deputies ↗
| majority_seats = 293

| party1 = Conservatives ↗{{efn|Including Popular Liberal Action ↗, {{ill|Nationalist Party (France)|fr|Parti nationaliste (Troisième République)}} and Reactionaries ↗}}
| leader1 = Jacques Piou ↗
| color1 = #1F497D
| seats1 = 108
| percentage1 = 29.18
| last_election1 = 124

| party2 = PRRRS ↗
| leader2 = Ferdinand Sarrien ↗
| percentage2 = 28.53
| seats2 = 132
| last_election2 = 104

| party3 = Progressives ↗
| leader3 = Alexandre Ribot ↗
| percentage3 = 14.05
| seats3 = 66
| last_election3 = 127

| party4 = French Section of the Workers' International
| leader4 = Jean Jaurès ↗
| percentage4 = 9.95
| seats4 = 54
| last_election4 = 43

| party5 = Democratic Republican Alliance
| leader5 = Louis Barthou ↗
| percentage5 = 7.99
| seats5 = 90
| last_election5 = 62

| party6 = Independent Radicals
| leader6 = Georges&nbsp;Clemenceau ↗
| percentage6 = 7.85
| seats6 = 115
| last_election6 = 129

| party7 = Independent Socialists (France)
| leader7 = Aristide Briand ↗
| percentage7 = 2.33
| seats7 = 20
| last_election7 = New

| title = Prime Minister ↗
| before_election = Ferdinand Sarrien ↗
| before_party = PRRRS ↗
| after_election = Ferdinand Sarrien ↗
| after_party = PRRRS ↗
}}
Just wanted to drop a message to say thanks for your patience in dealing with this, and sorry you've been dragged into it. Nearly the entire series of articles had the nonsense results reinstated yesterday... <span style="color: orange;">Number</span> <span style="color: green;">5</span><span style="color: blue;">7</span> ↗ 10:56, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
:Also, re the removal of the vote figures at the 1889 election, the total votes and electorate is useful to show the level of voter turnout. Would it be an issue to reinstate that? <span style="color: orange;">Number</span> <span style="color: green;">5</span><span style="color: blue;">7</span> ↗ 10:57, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
::Not an issue at all, I just figured it may be more useful to condense the results table given all of the empty spaces. Perhaps the total votes/electorate can be represented in the infobox? "registered" and "turnout" are available options in the template. If not, reinstating it is fine. Pave Paws (talk) 11:18, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
:::Sounds sensible, go for it. <span style="color: orange;">Number</span> <span style="color: green;">5</span><span style="color: blue;">7</span> ↗ 11:36, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Re this ↗, is –1 correct? In 1902 we have PRRRS winning 104 seats, ARD 62 and RI 129 (total 295). The three then won 337 in 1906, which would be an increase of 42. I am guessing the difference is the Socialists being included in the left bloc in 1902, but they are not in the left bloc in 1906 (the SFIO was then a standalone group), which if in the infobox, would have its own seat swing of +11. Cheers, <span style="color: orange;">Number</span> <span style="color: green;">5</span><span style="color: blue;">7</span> ↗ 02:55, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

:I suspect it is due to the fact the Socialists and Rev. Socialists are combined in 1902; if they were not, it would be a positive swing in 1906. The Socialists ↗ were part of the Lefts Bloc in 1902, but the SFIO was never part of it. F-P looks like it disentangles the Rev. Socialists and Socialists in 1902 but the seat total there is all wrong. Perhaps Nohlen and Stöver has something? Pave Paws (talk) 03:20, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
::Nohlen & Stöver has completely different seat figures for both elections... <span style="color: orange;">Number</span> <span style="color: green;">5</span><span style="color: blue;">7</span> ↗ 14:41, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
:::I'm led to believe that Independent Socialists were part of the Bloc des gauches in 1906 but apparently not in 1902, if judging by the French Wikipedia article for the government of Ferdinand Sarrien ↗, which shows Aristide Briand (an Independent Socialist) as a government minister. I'll add the Independent Socialists to the infobox total for the Bloc des gauches in 1906 for now unless there's a source that says otherwise. Pave Paws (talk) 20:49, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
::::TBH I am concerned that grouping the parties into the Left Bloc is WP:OR ↗, particularly when reliant on other Wikipedia articles. Maybe it would be better for the infobox to summarise the results table (which has the advantage of including more parties) – see right for what it could look like. <span style="color: orange;">Number</span> <span style="color: green;">5</span><span style="color: blue;">7</span> ↗ 23:34, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
:::::If OR is a concern I think we can revert to previous edits ↗ where the infobox displays the individual parties (but with accurate figures, of course). I'm personally against the legislative elections infobox, but not for any reason other than aesthetics, mainly preserving the infobox images, and it being somewhat redundant with the results table being right next to the infobox. Pave Paws (talk) 02:57, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
::::::Restoring a party-only version of the current would be preferable to the current one, but I don't really understand the objections to the proposed one – why is it better to have only three parties listed than seven? Not sure I will ever understand the reasoning for wanting images in infoboxes for parliamentary elections... Cheers, <span style="color: orange;">Number</span> <span style="color: green;">5</span><span style="color: blue;">7</span> ↗ 21:20, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

{{notelist}}

Disambiguation link notification for January 25



Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cuban Missile Crisis ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page R-12 ↗. Such links are usually incorrect ↗, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. <small>(Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.)</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 13:39, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

hi



hey :) Lough Swilly (talk) 22:03, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

:hey!! Pave Paws (talk) 06:50, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message



<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2024 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2024|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/07&oldid=1258243692 -->

Disambiguation link notification for December 11



An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Syria ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Syrian coup d'état ↗.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

:Kris_(Deltarune) ↗ has an RfC ↗



<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>''':Kris_(Deltarune) ↗''' has an RfC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the '''discussion page ↗'''.<!-- Template:Rfc notice--> Thank you. Eldomtom2 (talk) 01:28, 6 July 2025 (UTC)

Hero of 1848



I just saw how much you are doing on the Revolutions of 1848 page. That's an ambitious clean-up job. Wanted to give you kudos because it is an important (but overlooked) piece of history and I'm glad to see that you're putting the work in on it. RedactedSagan (talk) 04:24, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

:Thank you, that means a lot!! Pave Paws (talk) 04:28, 21 October 2025 (UTC)

Ditto! Nice copy-editing. Wegesrand (talk) 15:42, 28 October 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message



<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 18 November 2025 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2025/Coordination/MM/06&oldid=1322758825 -->

Concern regarding Draft:Manifesto to Europe ↗


25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, Pave Paws. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Manifesto to Europe ↗, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted ↗, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it ↗ again&#32;or request ↗ that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted ↗ so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:07, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Manifesto to Europe ↗


48px|left|alt=|link= ↗

Hello, Pave Paws. This message concerns the Articles for Creation ↗ submission or draft ↗ page you started, "Manifesto to Europe ↗".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy ↗, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply {{edit|Draft:Manifesto to Europe|edit the submission}}, and remove the {{tlc|db-afc}}, {{tlc|db-draft}}, or {{tlc|db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can '''request its undeletion''' ↗. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! <!-- Template:Db-draft-notice --> DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 09:24, 7 July 2026 (UTC)