User Talk: RangersRus

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis
| age =2160
| archiveprefix =User talk:RangersRus/Archive
| numberstart =1
| maxarchsize =75000
| header ={{Archive}}
| minkeepthreads =5
| format = %%i
}}{{Archives|bot=ClueBot III|age=90}}

This is my 3rd time asking for a resolution regarding this draft

MUIC26, This is a fan-made project Draft:Miss_Universe_International_Convention_2026 ↗ <small class="autosigned">— Preceding unsigned ↗ comment added by FujikoPedia (talk • contribs ↗) 13:15, 27 April 2026 (UTC)</small> 

@RangersRus: Draft:Anuradhapura invasion of Chola Kingdom (114-136)

In the last discussion you said that you would check the sources and let me know and its been almost two months and still no answer and clearly the sources which i provided show the historical accuracy of the event and i hope i get a resolution regarding the draft. Thanks TeenX808 (talk) 10:34, 13 December 2025 (UTC)

:From the discussion we had, remove all unreliable sources and its content. Only use reliable sources by actual academics who are historians and modern era sources. Please rewrite article with neutrality as per what each historians say about the incident as real and myth. RangersRus (talk) 01:06, 15 December 2025 (UTC)
::@RangersRus: i will update it and let you know, should the last section be removed which gives a overview of all historians and their thoughts on the event. Thanks TeenX808 (talk) 20:51, 15 December 2025 (UTC)
::@RangersRus: Hi i couldn't start the article because i was busy, I have mentioned in the places which are exaggerated should i remove the legacy info and add which info are directly mythical ?
::Almost every single author is a historian and says similar info to the rest.
::If all the problems are fixed shall i resubmit. TeenX808 (talk) 04:36, 23 January 2026 (UTC)
:::There was more to this discussion that we talked about and you have not addressed it. Please see what I said last. RangersRus (talk) 10:55, 24 January 2026 (UTC)
::::@RangersRus: You asked me to remove the mythical elements and i did plus added a source also mentioned how some historians consider the event exaggerated.
::::The reason you might think more should be removed is the mention of the giant which was never included in the article and for some reason brought up in the discussion. if i missed something please can you point out and i will do the change. Thanks
::::TeenX808 (talk) 19:11, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

Draft: Girl In The Year Above

Hi @RangersRus - I've resubmitted this draft page for review today - hopefully it now meets the criteria for notability of a musical act as the band have had a song listed on the Official UK Singles Chart, in addition to the previous references, plus some new radio play and press articles. Thanks. Pinkplectrum (talk) 15:18, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

:Just to say I have now added several additional references including a full page in Rolling Stone UK on the band. Would love to know if this is getting close to meeting notability criteria now. Thanks for your help Pinkplectrum (talk) 17:09, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

First time draft submission

Hi @RangersRus! Just wanted to thank you for taking the time to review my very first article submission. It was, uh, promptly rejected lol, (no hard feelings) but I appreciate it nonetheless. I don't disagree with the rejection - I'd suspected it hadn't met notability requirements but wasn't sure if there was a true set amount of sources a subject needs, so I'd gone for it anyway. I'd submitted another draft with a few more sources I could find, but eh we'll see- might have to wait until more new coverage comes out.

Anyway, I've fallen down this rabbit hole of wikipedia contributions and article creation - I find all of this fascinating. Hoping if you had time you'd give me some tips, suggestions, or lessons learned when it comes to creating new wikipedia articles of AfC editing in general (or specific to the Draft:Shawna Lander ↗ I had been working on). Thank you! Stormh99 (talk) 20:39, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

Draft:Erik Geslin Rejected requesting clarification

Hi @RangersRus,

I noticed that you rejected my revised biography article yesterday, even though it had been significantly updated following the feedback from previous reviewers.

You mentioned the need for sources that:
provide significant coverage (not just brief mentions or routine announcements),
are reliable (from reputable outlets with editorial oversight),
and are independent (not affiliated with the subject, such as interviews, press releases, or the subject’s own website).

I included around 15 external references in the article. The four news sources I added come from mainstream media and are independent of the subject, not press releases or sponsored content.

Could you please clarify your decision in more detail? I would really appreciate understanding which aspects still do not meet the notability criteria, so I can improve the article accordingly.
I believe the subject is well recognized in their field and would be a valuable addition to the encyclopedia. As I plan to contribute more biographies in the future, I would like to better understand the objective criteria I should focus on.

Thank you very much for your time and guidance.
Esther EsthaBrink (talk) 06:28, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

May 2026 Administrator Elections – Schedule

<div style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF; padding: 0.5em 1em 0 1em;" role="article">
right|80px ↗

The May 2026 administrator elections ↗ are set to proceed.

We plan to use the following schedule:

* April 29–May 5: Candidate sign-up

* May 8–May 12: Discussion phase

* May 13–May 19: SecurePoll voting phase

If you have any questions, concerns, or thoughts before we get started, please ask at Wikipedia talk:Administrator elections ↗.

<p role="contentinfo" aria-label="May 2026 administrator elections subscription"><span style="font-size: 85%;">You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list ↗.</span></p>
</div>

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:04, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

Draft:Gosala_Rambabu

Hello @RangersRus, Couple of times I have tried to improve the article but still not getting approval and saying not providing significant coverage, reliable information. I am not sure on what exactly missing here. kindly help me the needful. so that i will try to rectify and resolve. Thank you. BhagavanY (talk) 03:55, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Inquiry regarding Draft:Ahmed Kamel naim

I am writing to kindly ask if you could take a second look at the draft for Ahmed Kamel Naim.
Since the decline on 23 April, I have worked extensively to address the concerns regarding independent secondary sources. I have added five international medical citations (from Saudi Arabia, Colombia, Honduras, and Cuba) and a retrospective analysis from the Medical Journal of Australia (1968) to demonstrate the subject's long-term academic impact.
I have also included digital verification links (DOIs and PMIDs) and independent institutional coverage from the Al-Sharekh Archive and Cambridge Core.
Before I officially resubmit, does the draft now meet the 'Significant Coverage' and 'Secondary Source' requirements in your view? I would appreciate any further guidance you might have.
Best regards, Mohamed Naim (talk) 12:12, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

Battle of Maski

Hinatarex (talk) 13:08, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

Iam using chat gpt for grammer mistake and it's all my own accounts many books sources such as nilakanda sastri and sen . Iam edited with wikipedia terms and conditions with neutral passage and battle of maski was iam give strong and sources .. so accept my maski battle page .

I would like to clarify that I used an AI tool only to improve the grammar and readability of my writing. All historical content, interpretations, and references were based on reliable published sources, including K. A. Nilakanta Sastri and other scholarly works, which I consulted directly.

I understand Wikipedia’s concerns regarding AI-generated content. I will ensure that all future contributions are written in my own words and closely reflect the cited sources, without relying on AI-generated phrasing.

If any part of my previous edit does not accurately reflect the sources, I am happy to correct or remove it. I am committed to following Wikipedia’s content policies and contributing in good faith. <small class="autosigned">— Preceding unsigned ↗ comment added by Itsmethunder9783 (talk • contribs ↗) 13:21, 25 April 2026 (UTC)</small>

Clarification regarding AI use in my edits

Hinatarex (talk) 13:20, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

Cultural Erasure and Urban Transformation in Pakistan ↗ moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Cultural Erasure and Urban Transformation in Pakistan ↗. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because '''it consists of machine-generated text''' and '''it also reads like a WP:NOTESSAY ↗'''.
I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page ↗.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. SecretSpectre (talk) 23:58, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

Draftification

Regarding this ↗. It was declined on the basis of not demonstrating notability, right? Just AfD the article if you think it's not notable. I don't see any other reason to drafity. regards, TryKid <sup style="white-space:nowrap;">[''dubious ↗ – discuss'']</sup> 03:40, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion ↗ of :USMART Securities ↗

48px|left|alt=Warning icon|link= ↗
The page :USMART Securities ↗ has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗, because it was a redirect from the article namespace ↗ to a different namespace ↗ except the Category ↗, Template ↗, Wikipedia ↗, Help ↗, or Portal ↗ namespaces.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the {{Querylink|Special:Log|qs=type=delete&page=USMART+Securities|deleting administrator}}, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review ↗.  <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">'''''L'''''iz</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">'''''Read!''''' ↗ '''''Talk!'''''</sup> 00:31, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

Your Articles for Creation ↗ review on Take Up Thy Stethoscope and Walk ↗

<div style="border:solid 1px #9accf6;background:#f1f9ff; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">

50px|left ↗

Hello RangersRus. This is a reminder that your Articles for Creation ↗ review on Take Up Thy Stethoscope and Walk ↗ is still marked as ongoing for over forty-eight hours. After seventy-two hours, Take Up Thy Stethoscope and Walk ↗ will be returned to the review queue so that other reviewers may review the draft.

If you wish to continue reviewing the draft but need more time before the bot returns it to the review queue, you can place {{tlx|bots|deny{{=}}TenshiBot}} on the draft so you can continue your review. Also, if you do not want to receive these notifications, you can place the same template on your talk page. TenshiBot (talk) 09:39, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

</div>

Speedy deletion ↗ of :The Meltdown (film) ↗

48px|left|alt=Warning icon|link= ↗
The page :The Meltdown (film) ↗ has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗, because it was a redirect from the article namespace ↗ to a different namespace ↗ except the Category ↗, Template ↗, Wikipedia ↗, Help ↗, or Portal ↗ namespaces.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the {{Querylink|Special:Log|qs=type=delete&page=The+Meltdown+%28film%29|deleting administrator}}, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review ↗.  <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">'''''L'''''iz</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">'''''Read!''''' ↗ '''''Talk!'''''</sup> 23:32, 27 April 2026 (UTC)

Draft:The Amazing Adventures of Kavalier & Clay (opera) ↗

You declined the submission Draft:The Amazing Adventures of Kavalier & Clay (opera) ↗ a few days ago because "You need to add multiple critical reviews on the play and significant coverage on the lasting impact." The work is a notable composition by a notable composer performed at the Metropolitan Opera and broadcast on PBS. The article contains numerous citations from reliable, independent sources to that effect, some of which I added since your decline. I suggest the article should be moved to mainspace. Cheers, Michael Bednarek (talk) 06:48, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
:Notable composer does not make the play notable just like a notable actor does not make a film notable. Without secondary independent reliable sources on significant coverage, especially critical coverage, it can not pass notability. However, my decline was just a simple ask to add critical reviews. Here are some that you can add https://www.vulture.com/article/review-the-dismaying-opera-of-kavalier-and-clay.html ↗, https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/22/arts/music/kavalier-clay-met-opera-review.html ↗, https://operawire.com/metropolitan-opera-2025-26-review-the-amazing-adventures-of-kavalier-and-clay/#google_vignette ↗. Please add a "Reception" header and add comments from these reviews and cite them. Please let me know and I can accept it. RangersRus (talk) 11:46, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
::I disagree on your notability point (but there's no notability guideline WP:NOPERA ↗ or WP:NCLASSICAL ↗, so I let that go for now). I incorporated ↗ summaries of the reviews you mentioned as best as I could, so you might look at the article again. Thank you. Michael Bednarek (talk) 13:39, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
:::Please submit it for review so that I am able to accept it. Article looks notable now. Thank you. Let me know once the draft is submitted for review. RangersRus (talk) 15:27, 28 April 2026 (UTC)
::::Resubmitted ↗ as requested. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 00:44, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

Review - Draft:Sushmita_Konidela ↗

Hi @RangersRus,

please draft review ~2026-25930-63 ↗ (talk) 17:45, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

May 2026 Administrator Election – Call for Candidates

<div style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF; padding: 0.5em 1em 0 1em;" role="article">
right|80px ↗
The administrator elections process has officially started! Interested editors are encouraged to self-nominate or arrange to be nominated by reviewing the instructions at '''Wikipedia:Administrator elections/May 2026/Candidates ↗'''.

Here is the schedule:

April 29 – May 5: Call for candidates

May 8–12: Discussion phase

May 13–19: SecurePoll voting phase

Please note the following:

The requirements to run are identical to RFA ↗—a prospective candidate must be extended confirmed ↗.

Prospective candidates are advised to become familiar with the community's expectations of administrators, which are much higher than the minimum requirement of having extended confirmed status. This includes reviewing successful ↗ and unsuccessful ↗ RFAs, reading the essay Wikipedia:Advice for admin elections candidates ↗, and possibly requesting an optional poll on their chances of passing ↗.

The process will have a seven day call for candidates phase, a two day pause, a five day discussion phase, and a seven day private vote using SecurePoll. Discussion and questions are only allowed on the candidate pages during the discussion phase.

The outcome of this process is identical to making a request for adminship. There is '''no official difference''' between an administrator appointed through RFA versus administrator elections.

Administrator elections are also a valid means of regaining adminship for de-sysopped editors ↗.

Ask any questions about the process at the talk page ↗. Later, a user talk message will be sent to official candidates with additional information about the process.

If you are interested in the process, please make sure to watchlist the appropriate pages. A watchlist notice will be added when the discussion phase opens, and again when the voting phase opens.

<p role="contentinfo" aria-label="May 2026 administrator elections subscription"><span style="font-size: 85%;">You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list ↗.</span></p>
</div>

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 April 2026 (UTC)

Draftification question

Hi there! I noticed you recently draftified Draft:Suspect (2024 film) ↗, and I had a question (you've done nothing "wrong"--don't worry!). Can you explain your process for draftifying? For example, do you use Move Page or a script of some sort? I'm trying to track down why some draftifications end up getting tagged for speedy deletion and others don't. Significa liberdade <small>(she/her)</small> (talk) 15:35, 1 May 2026 (UTC)

:I use move page. This page that I moved back to draft failed to meet WP:NFILM ↗. Unfortunately new accounts have access to move page manually to mainspace bypassing AFC review. RangersRus (talk) 23:53, 1 May 2026 (UTC)
::If you regularly draftify articles, I recommend installing the MoveToDraft ↗ userscript as it manages a few stages of the draftification process, including notifying the page creator, setting up the draft page, and marking the article space redirect for R2 speedy deletion. Significa liberdade <small>(she/her)</small> (talk) 03:33, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

Request on 08:16:54, 6 May 2026 for assistance on AfC ↗ submission by NickyM1978

{{anchor|08:16:54, 6 May 2026 review of submission by NickyM1978}}
{{Lafc|username=NickyM1978|ts=08:16:54, 6 May 2026|declinedtalk=Draft:Jason_E._Medina}}



NickyM1978 (talk) 08:16, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

Request on 10:14:34, 6 May 2026 for assistance on AfC ↗ submission by BraydenWilliams

{{anchor|10:14:34, 6 May 2026 review of submission by BraydenWilliams}}
{{Lafc|username=BraydenWilliams|ts=10:14:34, 6 May 2026|declinedtalk=Draft:IP_Logging}}



I submitted a draft on IP Logging. It was declined however it did not break any rules. All research was done and it is an important topic, especially in online safety and technology in general.

BraydenWilliams (talk) 10:14, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

Parrot Kindergarten Draft for Review

I've added additional citations from reputable news sources. Can you please review and suggest any guidance toward publication of this article? Thank you for your time. Richidenmark (talk) 02:15, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

May 2026 Administrator Elections – Discussion Phase

{{Wikipedia:Administrator elections/May 2026/MMS/Discussion phase}} -- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:22, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

La Resistance (Medley) ↗

Hi RR. Just checking, when you approved this page at AfC, did you see any sigcov in other sources? I'm not happy with the sourcing currently on the page, but if you've seen enough elsewhere to warrant an article, it'd be great if you could add a sourcesexist tag then we can approve it at NPP. If you've not, I'll do a before check to see if it should be changed to a redirect. Boynamedsue (talk) 17:15, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

Can I Get an Amen ↗

Hi, just to let you know that per your request, I deleted that page to make way for the approval of Draft:Can I Get an Amen ↗. – Epicgenius (talk) 21:36, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

Your Articles for Creation ↗ review on Can I Get an Amen ↗

<div style="border:solid 1px #9accf6;background:#f1f9ff; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">

50px|left ↗

Hello RangersRus. This is a reminder that your Articles for Creation ↗ review on Can I Get an Amen ↗ is still marked as ongoing for over forty-eight hours. After seventy-two hours, Can I Get an Amen ↗ will be returned to the review queue so that other reviewers may review the draft.

If you wish to continue reviewing the draft but need more time before the bot returns it to the review queue, you can place {{tlx|bots|deny{{=}}TenshiBot}} on the draft so you can continue your review. Also, if you do not want to receive these notifications, you can place the same template on your talk page. TenshiBot (talk) 09:40, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

</div>

May 2026 Administrator Elections – Voting Phase

<div style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF; padding: 0.5em 1em 0 1em;" role="article">
right|80px ↗
The voting phase of the May 2026 administrator elections has started and will continue until {{Administrator elections status/data|May 2026|end}} at {{Administrator election time|end}} UTC. You can participate in the voting phase at '''Wikipedia:Administrator elections/May 2026/Voting phase ↗'''.

As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:

{{Administrator elections/Header/daterange|May 2026|begin|end}}: SecurePoll voting phase ('''we are here''')

Scrutineering phase

In the voting phase, the candidate subpages close to public questions and discussion, and everyone who qualifies to vote ↗ has a week to use the SecurePoll ↗ software to vote, which uses a secret ballot ↗. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote totals cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's vote total during the election. The suffrage requirements ↗ are similar to those at RFA.

Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for a few days, perhaps longer. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the results page ↗ (this is a good page to watchlist), and transcluded to the main election page ↗. In order to be granted adminship, a non-recall candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose), and a minimum of 20 support votes. Recall ↗ candidates must achieve 55.0% support ↗. Because this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ↗ ("crat chats").

Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page ↗. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.

<p role="contentinfo" aria-label="May 2026 administrator elections subscription"><span style="font-size: 85%;">You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list ↗.</span></p>
</div>

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 13 May 2026 (UTC)

Fifth Jyoti ministry

Hey! Please check the given references and check the election of 1996 of wb, don't unnecessary declined the page if you don't agree with that then don't decline it ,leave that page. But my humble request to you that accept the page if you have that power and co-operate with me to improve the page. Thanks Rggg77 (talk) 15:19, 14 May 2026 (UTC)

:Let me be very clear to you. You have right to resubmit draft for review but you can not remove previous decline reviews. Those always stay during draft review. If you keep removing them, then it can be seen as disruptive and you can be reported and blocked from editing. So, kindly, just resubmit draft if you do not agree with decline but do not remove previous decline reviews. RangersRus (talk) 15:23, 14 May 2026 (UTC)
::Can you guide me what I should do to get acceptance for the page or can you kindly accept the page and help me to improve it. Rggg77 (talk) 15:36, 14 May 2026 (UTC)
:::What you need to do is find and add significant coverage on the topic that specifucally nentions fifth Jyoti Ministry or Fifth Basu ministry. RangersRus (talk) 09:11, 16 May 2026 (UTC)
::::hey! Listen, first see the chief minister of West Bengal, now recent CM is suvendu Adhikari. You are asking some significant reference that includes 'Jyoti Basu ministry' or 'basu ministry' , right ? Okay then provide me any significant reference of 'suvendu Adhikari ministry' other than wikipedia. You can't get this type of reference that release not for only basu for all west bengal CM. So please research first and see all the West Bengal CM and Their Ministry that already existing in wikipedia and tell me. Please make all the ministry page that I had created and you made them draft , into main page. Thanks Rggg77 (talk) 10:57, 16 May 2026 (UTC)
:::::Any such page that do not meet the general notability guideliness with no significant coverage on the topic, will either be moved to draft or nominated for deletion. RangersRus (talk) 11:49, 16 May 2026 (UTC)
::::::See then also on wikipedia
::::::1. Second Mukherjee ministry ↗
::::::2. First Bhattacharjee ministry ↗
::::::3. Second Bhattacharjee ministry ↗
::::::4. Third Bhattacharjee ministry ↗
::::::5. First Banerjee ministry ↗
::::::6. Second Banerjee ministry ↗
::::::7. Third Banerjee ministry ↗ ~2026-29253-48 ↗ (talk) 14:45, 16 May 2026 (UTC)
:::::::I have restored the contents of the article. Please do not move important mainspace article to draftspace uni-laterally. Its an abuse of tools. If you disagree with notability, please open a WP:AFD ↗ so that a concensus is reached. Thank you. <span style="font-family:Impact;color:#7d4440;">Agent</span> <i style="color:#0f0000;"><b>007</b></i> (talk) 16:11, 16 May 2026 (UTC)
::::::::its not done uni-laterally but is an option to move to draft if the notability is not met. But if move happens again like you did now, then yes AFD is the next option. RangersRus (talk) 16:20, 16 May 2026 (UTC)
:::::::::How did you came to the conclusion that the article is non-notable. <span style="font-family:Impact;color:#7d4440;">Agent</span> <i style="color:#0f0000;"><b>007</b></i> (talk) 16:22, 16 May 2026 (UTC)
::::::::::Through the sources that did not add up to the content that the topic is on. The topic is not suitable for a stand-alone article when such topic has not received significant coverage. The sources should address the topic directly but fails to do so here. RangersRus (talk) 16:38, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Minecraft Sequel draft

Hiya, recently you rejected my submission of Draft:A Minecraft Sequel ↗ for not being the critera for inclusion for films. I don't fully understand; the article uses several reliable sources that confirm that the film is in production. I'd be grateful if you could elaborate on why the draft was declined, or if it was moved into mainspace. ''Signed, SleepyRedHair.'' (talk - contribs ↗) 15:42, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

:Right now, it is all predictions, announcements, trivia and interviews. This is case of WP:TOOSOON ↗. Once the filming is complete and significant coverage is generated then it will pass notability for films. I do not think this will happen till the film is close to release date, that is next year. RangersRus (talk) 16:25, 16 May 2026 (UTC)
::Understood, that seems fair. ''Signed, SleepyRedHair.'' (talk - contribs ↗) 16:29, 16 May 2026 (UTC)

Talkback

{{talkback|Kailash29792}} <span style="white-space:nowrap;font-family: Tahoma"><b style="color: gray;">Kailash29792</b> <span style="color: gray;">(talk)</span> </span> 06:46, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

Request for re-review of Draft:How We Made Your Mother under WP:GNG

Hello RangersRus,

Thank you for reviewing the draft "How We Made Your Mother" and for the detailed feedback. I would like to respectfully request a re-review under what I believe is the applicable notability guideline.

Your decline cited WP:NCORP ↗ (Notability for organizations and companies). I would like to suggest that this guideline does not apply here. "How We Made Your Mother" is a podcast, which is a creative media work rather than an organization or company. The standard typically used for podcasts is WP:GNG ↗ (the general notability guideline).

For precedent, see the approved article for the partner show on the same network, Office Ladies ↗, which meets GNG through similar types of coverage.

The current draft cites significant, in-depth coverage from independent, reliable, secondary sources, including:

''Variety ↗''

''People ↗'' (multiple articles)

''Parade ↗'' (multiple articles)

''Entertainment Weekly ↗''

''Entertainment Tonight ↗''

''BuzzFeed ↗''

''TVLine ↗''

AOL and Yahoo Entertainment

Each source has editorial oversight, is independent of the subject, and provides substantive coverage rather than passing mentions.

Could you please reconsider the draft under WP:GNG? If concerns remain under that guideline specifically, I would welcome direct guidance on what additional types of sourcing would strengthen the case.

Thank you for your time and your work reviewing submissions.

Anthonythewanderer (talk) 18:11, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion ↗ nomination of :7/G Rainbow Colony 2 ↗

48px|left|alt=|link= ↗

A tag has been placed on :7/G Rainbow Colony 2 ↗ requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗, because it is a redirect from the article namespace ↗ to a different namespace ↗ except the Category ↗, Template ↗, Wikipedia ↗, Help ↗, or Portal ↗ namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by visiting the page ↗ and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗. 

EaglesFan37 (talk) 01:50, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion ↗ nomination of :Demonte Colony 3 ↗

48px|left|alt=|link= ↗

A tag has been placed on :Demonte Colony 3 ↗ requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗, because it is a redirect from the article namespace ↗ to a different namespace ↗ except the Category ↗, Template ↗, Wikipedia ↗, Help ↗, or Portal ↗ namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by visiting the page ↗ and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗. 

EaglesFan37 (talk) 01:50, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion ↗ nomination of :Mental Manadhil ↗

48px|left|alt=|link= ↗

A tag has been placed on :Mental Manadhil ↗ requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗, because it is a redirect from the article namespace ↗ to a different namespace ↗ except the Category ↗, Template ↗, Wikipedia ↗, Help ↗, or Portal ↗ namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by visiting the page ↗ and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗. 

EaglesFan37 (talk) 01:50, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion ↗ nomination of :Mookuthi Amman 2 ↗

48px|left|alt=|link= ↗

A tag has been placed on :Mookuthi Amman 2 ↗ requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗, because it is a redirect from the article namespace ↗ to a different namespace ↗ except the Category ↗, Template ↗, Wikipedia ↗, Help ↗, or Portal ↗ namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by visiting the page ↗ and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗. 

EaglesFan37 (talk) 01:51, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

Draft:CARMINE

'''NOTE:''' https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~022055984907651056875 ~2026-29877-62 ↗ (talk) 10:17, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

:What is this? RangersRus (talk) 19:08, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

Draft: Joel Boung

Hello RangersRus

Thank you for reviewing the draft for Joel Ondoua Boung. I understand the concern that the current sourcing does not yet satisfy Wikipedia’s notability requirements for athletes and biographies.

I would respectfully ask, however, that the draft not be permanently rejected at this stage. Boung’s career has taken place mainly in Cameroonian football, where media coverage and searchable statistical records are far less complete than in European or North American football. The available official record shows that FECAFOOT listed him as BOUNG Joël ONDOUA, born 27 July 1996, a defender for PWD de Bamenda, and “Champion du Cameroun 2020.” He was part of PWD Bamenda’s historically significant period, during which the club won Cameroon’s top division and Cameroon Cup for the first time their history.

I understand that sporting merit alone is not enough for Wikipedia, and that reliable independent secondary coverage is still required. My concern is simply that top-tier African domestic football should be assessed on its own footballing context, while still applying Wikipedia’s sourcing rules fairly.

Could you please advise whether a revised draft built around official FECAFOOT documentation, independent coverage of PWD Bamenda’s historic title-winning campaign, and third-party media coverage of Boung would be suitable for resubmission?

Thank you again for your time and guidance. Judge-mental-007 (talk) 08:35, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

Regarding Rathindra Bose ↗, Speaker of 18th West Bengal Assembly ↗.

Kindly See the draft:Rathindra Bose ↗ that has been submitted in AFC. And do needful. Thank you in advance. '''<b style="color:purple;">Rasel ‍Hasan </b>'''<sup><span style="color:green;">Talk</span></sup> 13:01, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

:That article already exists. You need to add all contents from the draft to the article on the politician that already exists. RangersRus (talk) 13:06, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

Advans Draft

Hello,
I’m reaching out to you regarding Draft:Advans ↗.
Thank you for your feedback. I understand your concern about the promotional tone. Could you let me know if the issue stems from certain phrases that could be more neutral, or if the structure itself is problematic? I want to make sure the rewrite meets AfC’s expectations.
Thank you in advance for your time Solenereboulet (talk) 13:50, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

Your Articles for Creation ↗ review on Malcolm Todd discography ↗

<div style="border:solid 1px #9accf6;background:#f1f9ff; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;">

50px|left ↗

Hello RangersRus. This is a reminder that your Articles for Creation ↗ review on Malcolm Todd discography ↗ is still marked as ongoing for over forty-eight hours. After seventy-two hours, Malcolm Todd discography ↗ will be returned to the review queue so that other reviewers may review the draft.

If you wish to continue reviewing the draft but need more time before the bot returns it to the review queue, you can place {{tlx|bots|deny{{=}}TenshiBot}} on the draft so you can continue your review. Also, if you do not want to receive these notifications, you can place the same template on your talk page. TenshiBot (talk) 09:39, 16 June 2026 (UTC)

</div>

Request for clarification regarding Draft: Shashvat Nakrani

Hello. I would appreciate clarification regarding the decline of Draft:Shashvat Nakrani. The draft includes multiple independent, reliable sources that provide significant coverage of the subject, including coverage from major publications. Could you please explain which specific notability requirements you believe are still unmet, and which sources you consider insufficient? I would like to improve the draft in line with Wikipedia policy. Thank you. Aman.rathee7 (talk) 14:47, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

:sources are mostly about him stepping back or aside from operations. And Hurun is not notable achievement as it's a platform promoting entrepreneurship through lists and research. For a person to be notable, the person who is the topic of a biographical article should be "worthy of notice" or "remarkable" or "significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded. The sources need to be secondary independent reliable sources. If you disagree, you are welcome to resubmit the draft for another viewer to look at. RangersRus (talk) 20:32, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

Draft:Claire Dodgson

Yes, hello, I have a updated draft to editor Claire Dodgson ↗ due to news about her becoming a director to Illumination ↗'s new film ''Not Alone ↗'' in 2027 and I was wondering if one of you that have checked the draft can see how it's up to wikipedia standards. I've been making more drafts around the people so far such as Eric Guillon ↗, John Cohen (film producer) ↗, and Pamela Ziegenhagen-Shefland ↗. One I'm also working hard on is the draft around Jonathan del Val ↗. I did remove and add some references for Claire, but the backlog is being stuffed over 5,000 drafts. So, still, I was hoping if you or the others can check back on what I did to fix Clarie's draft that will be fine. If not, next time. Thanks. ~2026-33078-81 ↗ (talk) 19:58, 8 July 2026 (UTC)