User Talk: Regna sereno intenso ed infinito

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

April 2025

<table class="gs-alert" style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: #E5F8FF; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%; margin-bottom: 1em"><tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">50px ↗</td><td>This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.''
You have shown interest in the Russo-Ukrainian War ↗. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions ↗—such as editing restrictions ↗, bans ↗, or blocks ↗—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies ↗, expected standards of behaviour ↗, or the page-specific restrictions ↗, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions ↗. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.</td></tr></table> Mellk (talk) 02:04, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

July 2025

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm Opm581. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, :50501 movement ↗, but you didn't provide a reliable source ↗. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable ↗. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation ↗, your edit is archived in the page history ↗. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Reddit is considered an unreliable source; please see WP:RSPREDDIT ↗ for more info.  Opm581 (talk | he/him) 18:46, 17 July 2025 (UTC)

:Since it's an organization, wouldn't it's subredit count as a primary source? Regna sereno intenso ed infinito (talk) 18:48, 17 July 2025 (UTC)
::The subreddit would still be considered unreliable because the content on it is user-generated ↗. Opm581 (talk | he/him) 05:57, 18 July 2025 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of designated terrorist groups ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Antifa ↗. Such links are usually incorrect ↗, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 19 September 2025 (UTC)

October 2025

Please stop changing the content on No Kings protests (June 2025) ↗ based on your opinion, there are three different sources listed in the body. ''Politico'' and the data journalist's estimates are both very clearly cited in separate statements and sources from the event organizer's estimate. - Adolphus79 (talk) 19:13, 19 October 2025 (UTC)

:It's not my opinion. Per the article body: "Organizers estimated that more than five million people participated in more than 2,100 cities and towns across the country, according to statements by No Kings and the American Civil Liberties Union, a co-sponsor of the protests" Regna sereno intenso ed infinito (talk) 19:14, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
::And, please continue quoting the rest of that section that includes two other estimates? - Adolphus79 (talk) 19:24, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
:::Politico estimated turnout in the millions and described them as the largest coordinated protests since the start of the second Trump administration. A crowdsourcing effort to tally participation was led by data journalist G. Elliott Morris, who wrote on June 15 that "back-of-the-envelope math" put total attendance "somewhere in the 4–6 million people range. That means roughly 1.2–1.8% of the U.S. population attended a No Kings Day event somewhere in the country yesterday." The 5 million estimate still comes from the organizers Regna sereno intenso ed infinito (talk) 19:28, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
::::That's why I changed the infobox number to "over four million, (estimate)"... - Adolphus79 (talk) 19:32, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
:::::Shouldn't the infobox list all the estimates and say in brackets where the estimate comes from? Regna sereno intenso ed infinito (talk) 19:33, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
::::::No, as I said in my edit summary ↗, this is the lowest common number, with (estimate), and full details in body. There is absolutely no reason to fill the infobox with repetitive information if all the detailed numbers are offered later in prose, we should just use the lowest common estimate. If the numbers were drastically different (one estimate said 1 million, the other said 10 and the third said 20), then we could give more of a range and details. - Adolphus79 (talk) 19:38, 19 October 2025 (UTC)
:::::::Ok Regna sereno intenso ed infinito (talk) 19:57, 19 October 2025 (UTC)

December 2025

25px|alt=Warning icon ↗ Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy ↗ by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at :Assata Shakur ↗, you may be blocked from editing ↗.  FDW777 (talk) 14:19, 8 December 2025 (UTC)

:But the article says that she was wanted for murder Regna sereno intenso ed infinito (talk) 14:20, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
::No, it says she was convicted of murder which is already covered in the second sentence. But that's largely missing the point, since it's calling her a terrorist in wikivoice which is the WP:NPOV ↗ vioaltion. FDW777 (talk) 14:21, 8 December 2025 (UTC)

Contentious Topic - Post-1992 politics of the United States

link=|25px|alt=Information icon ↗ You have recently made edits related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. This is a standard message to inform you that post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. Contentious topics are the successor to the former discretionary sanctions system, which you may be aware of. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics ↗. For a summary of differences between the former and new systems, see WP:CTVSDS ↗. FDW777 (talk) 14:33, 8 December 2025 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Simón Bolívar Internationalist Brigades logo.png

Thanks for uploading :File:Simón Bolívar Internationalist Brigades logo.png ↗. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags ↗ to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list ↗, click on this link ↗, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions ↗. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:30, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

May 2026

alt=Information icon|25x25px ↗ Hello! I noticed that you added content about Jeremy MacKenzie (activist) ↗, but you didn't provide a source. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people ↗, so it has been removed and archived in the page history for now, but by all means add it back with a citation if you have a reliable source. If you have any questions/comments/concerns, you can reply to this message. Thank you. 
— W.andrea (talk) 11:11, 22 May 2026 (UTC)

:He said in a tweet that he was born in Nova Scotia
:https://x.com/i/status/2050051479466082417 Regna sereno intenso ed infinito (talk) 14:27, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
::Are you able to verify that that account is really him? For reference see WP:TWITTER-EL ↗. I don't use Twitter myself, but I know they muddied the waters by changing the checkmark to mean more than just "verified". BTW, here's an archive of the tweet to add to a citation ↗. — W.andrea (talk) 17:18, 22 May 2026 (UTC)
:::His account is real because there are only things that the real guy could post, especially things such as his face. Also thanks for the archive link I'll add it to the article later Regna sereno intenso ed infinito (talk) 19:38, 23 May 2026 (UTC)