User Talk: SHIFT64
Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.
July 2025
25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style ↗ that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in :IOF ↗, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page ↗ to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-mos1 --> DMacks (talk) 16:30, 6 July 2025 (UTC)
September 2025
25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm 204.111.137.20. I noticed that you recently removed all content from a page. Please do not do this. ↗ Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. As a rule, if you discover a duplicate article, please redirect ↗ it to an appropriate existing page. If a page has been vandalised ↗, please revert ↗ it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit ↗ the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy ↗ for how to proceed. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you wish to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.<!-- Template:uw-blank1 --> 204.111.137.20 ↗ (talk) 17:59, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
:The user who created the redirect is blocked. That's why I wanted to delete the redirect. SHIFT64 (talk) 18:07, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
::If the redirect was created in violation of the block you should tag the page with Template:Db-g5 ↗. If the redirect was created prior to the first block you should list it at WP:RFD ↗, instructions at WP:RFDHOWTO ↗. 204.111.137.20 ↗ (talk) 18:16, 7 September 2025 (UTC)
25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Please do not remove content or templates ↗ from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary ↗. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted ↗. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-delete2 --> <span style="color:#000000">✗</span><span style="color:white;background:black;font-family:felix titling;font-size:80%">plicit</span> 14:12, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
October 2025
25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at :WP:Sandbox ↗. Your edits appear to be disruptive ↗ and have been or will be reverted ↗.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute ↗ with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page ↗, and seek consensus ↗ with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution ↗ page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards ↗.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents ↗.
:lol SHIFT64 (talk) 11:57, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
::What is so funny about that? 2606:9400:98A0:92A0:E1E6:C7C8:F733:7D28 ↗ (talk) 12:40, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
30px|alt=Stop icon ↗ Your editing history at :Wikipedia:Sandbox ↗ shows that you are currently engaged in an '''edit war ↗'''. That means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Instead of reverting edits, please ''stop editing the page'' and discuss on the '''talk page ↗''' to create a version of the page that represents consensus ↗ among the editors involved. Wikipedia provides a page explaining how this is accomplished ↗. If discussions reach an impasse, you can request help at a relevant noticeboard ↗ or seek dispute resolution ↗ such as a Third opinion ↗. In some cases, you may wish to request page protection ↗ while a discussion to resolve the dispute is ongoing.
'''If you continue edit warring, you may be blocked from editing ↗ Wikipedia'''—especially if you break the three-revert rule ↗, which states that an editor ''must not perform more than three reverts ↗ on a single page within a 24-hour period''. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, or whether it involves the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also, please keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''— if it looks like you intend to continue reverting.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> 2606:9400:98A0:92A0:E1E6:C7C8:F733:7D28 ↗ (talk) 12:43, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
:(Just to clarify: you have done 2 manual reverts and one regular revert) 2606:9400:98A0:92A0:E1E6:C7C8:F733:7D28 ↗ (talk) 12:43, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
::lol SHIFT64 (talk) 12:44, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
:use your own sandbox page. do not use the draft sandbox page. that page is protected. SHIFT64 (talk) 12:44, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
::That page is for IP's and new users to edit 2606:9400:98A0:92A0:E1E6:C7C8:F733:7D28 ↗ (talk) 12:45, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
:::no SHIFT64 (talk) 12:46, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
::::That is literally the entire point
::::{{talk quote inline|"Welcome to this sandbox page, a space to experiment with editing."}} 2606:9400:98A0:92A0:E1E6:C7C8:F733:7D28 ↗ (talk) 12:48, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
:::::lol SHIFT64 (talk) 12:50, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
::::::Look, I have a sandbox page at <nowiki>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:SHIFT64/sandbox</nowiki> You can create an account and create your sandbox page. SHIFT64 (talk) 12:51, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
:::::::if people dont want to create an account or they cant make one because of restrictions, the sandbox is the only place to make a draft article 2606:9400:98A0:92A0:E1E6:C7C8:F733:7D28 ↗ (talk) 12:54, 22 October 2025 (UTC)
OMG Please stop
why can't you just stop reverting people's edit at the Sandbox ↗?? ~2025-31802-40 ↗ (talk) 20:07, 8 November 2025 (UTC)
:lol SHIFT64 (talk) 09:59, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
::The Wikipedia Sandbox page is a protected page. You cannot edit it. SHIFT64 (talk) 10:05, 9 November 2025 (UTC)
:::false ~2026-31248-41 ↗ (talk) 15:40, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
::This is not funny! The Sandbox is not a protected page at all. ~2026-31248-41 ↗ (talk) 19:37, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 18 November 2025 (UTC)</small>
</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2025/Coordination/MM/09&oldid=1322758983 -->
Gaming the system
I see that you take pleasure in reverting people's Sandbox edits. It may not be so, but it appears that you are gaming the system in order to get a larger edit count. If I were you, I would start editing constructively. Plasticwonder (talk) 08:14, 23 November 2025 (UTC)
:Wikipedia sandbox is a protected page. it would be better for them to make edits on the sandbox page in their own accounts instead of editing there. SHIFT64 (talk) 08:17, 23 November 2025 (UTC)
::OK,
::Well why do you have countless messages and warnings from other people for you to stop then? Why, when another user asked you to stop, you replied dismissively with "lol" ↗? It seems you don't actually have a legitimate reason for reverting like the reason you just gave, which itself does not make much sense. Plasticwonder (talk) 08:22, 23 November 2025 (UTC)
You didn't answer my questions, and you are still continuing.
Your answer to those will determine if I inquire to have more administrator eyes on your behavior, as it can be viewed as disruptive. Plasticwonder (talk) 08:45, 26 November 2025 (UTC)
:He's also been edit warring on Turkish Wikipedia. See this: https://tr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Saddam_Hüseyin&diff=37215206&oldid=37215197 ↗ https://tr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Saddam_Hüseyin&diff=37215206&oldid=37215197 ↗ https://tr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Saddam_Hüseyin&diff=37215206&oldid=37215197 ↗ https://tr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Saddam_Hüseyin&diff=37215206&oldid=37215197 ↗ ~2026-31248-41 ↗ (talk) 19:42, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
::So you're the one who made changes to the Turkish wiki without adding any sources. SHIFT64 (talk) 19:42, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
:::And you're the one gaming the system just to get a higher edit count. ~2026-31248-41 ↗ (talk) 19:45, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
Please stop with the war crimes please
You can't just revert the sandbox and anyone is allowed to edit the page and you're still gaming the system. All you do is spam "lol". ~2026-31248-41 ↗ (talk) 12:23, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
:The Wikipedia sandbox page is protected. Please write on your own sandbox. SHIFT64 (talk) 12:25, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
::Don't lie, you're trying to cause an edit war just to get a higher edit count. The Wikipedia sandbox page is not protected at all. Anyone is allowed to edit it. Edit warring ↗ is a war crime, hope you know that. ~2026-31248-41 ↗ (talk) 14:55, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
I told you to stop, but you're still doing it.
I swear to God, if I see another edit war ↗, you will get blocked ↗ and reported by an administrator. ~2026-31248-41 ↗ (talk) 19:35, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
:If you continue adding categories without citing your sources, I will report you to an administrator. SHIFT64 (talk) 19:39, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
::And you were the one committing war crimes on Wikipedia. ~2026-31248-41 ↗ (talk) 19:44, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
:::war crimes? what? SHIFT64 (talk) 19:45, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
::::Pointless, unreasonable edit wars ↗. ~2026-31248-41 ↗ (talk) 19:46, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
::I have reported you to an administrator for edit warring and gaming the system. ~2026-31248-41 ↗ (talk) 19:55, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
:::I advise you to leave this editor alone or you will be blocked. 331dot (talk) 19:56, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
::::Oh sorry, I just believed that he was edit warring. ~2026-31248-41 ↗ (talk) 19:59, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
:::::They are not edit warring, and they are not gaming their edit count. They are already extended-confirmed, there is nothing to game. Please go and contribute to the encyclopedia. 331dot (talk) 20:02, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
::::::I am contributing positively, I just wanted to add valid sources, not cause pointless edit wars. ~2026-31248-41 ↗ (talk) 20:05, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
::::::I am aware that he is extended confirmed. ~2026-31248-41 ↗ (talk) 20:05, 26 May 2026 (UTC)
::::I think he was fighting over a sandbox. ~2026-31248-41 ↗ (talk) 13:32, 27 May 2026 (UTC)