User Talk: Slava570
Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.
{{Contentious topics/aware|a-i}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
| algo = old(30d)
| archive = User talk:Slava570/Archive %(counter)d
| counter = 1
| maxarchivesize = 400K
| archiveheader = {{Archive}}
| minthreadstoarchive = 1
| minthreadsleft = 4
}}
{{Archives|bot=Lowercase sigmabot III|age=30}}
<!-- Template:Setup auto archiving -->
DYK nomination of Susie Pop
25px ↗ Hello! Your submission of Susie Pop ↗ at the Did You Know nominations page ↗ has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at '''your nomination's entry ↗''' and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! <!--Template:DYKproblem--> <span style="color:#4B0082;">Tb</span><span style="color:#6082B6;">hotch</span><sup><span style="color:#555555;">™</span></sup> (CC BY-SA 4.0) 20:20, 13 June 2026 (UTC)
I hope that when you see this message, it is uplifting!
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:#000000; background-color:#AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">40px|left ↗
Issac I Navarro (talk) wishes you peace! <br />
Spread peace and goodwill by adding {{tls|WikiPeace}} to other's talk pages with a friendly message.</div><!-- Template:WikiPeace -->
{{thank you}} for your edits on the RfC at Talk:Clop (erotic fan art) ↗.
:Thank you so much for this, although I didn't do much :-) Slava570 (talk) 11:21, 26 June 2026 (UTC)
Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement ↗ regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee ↗ decision. The thread is '''Slava570 ↗'''. <!--Template:AE-notice--> Thank you. Paprikaiser (talk) 21:55, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
DYK for Susie Pop
{{ivmbox
|image = Updated DYK query.svg
|imagesize=40px
|image class=skin-invert
|text = On 9 July 2026 ↗, '''Did you know ↗''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''Susie Pop ↗''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that a fixture of Madrid nightlife in the 1990s was '''a trans girl ↗''' who was often seen at concerts wearing a large picture hat?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Susie Pop ↗. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page <small>(Susie Pop ↗)</small>, and the hook may be added to the statistics page ↗ after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it ↗.
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:03, 9 July 2026 (UTC)
{{DYK views|16,744|697.4|July 2026|Susie Pop}} GalliumBot (talk • contribs ↗) (he/it ↗) 03:28, 10 July 2026 (UTC)
Pictures and copyrights
To expand on my answer on the Teahouse:
in terms of copyright, there are two types of image: those that are properly free, and those that aren't. (This is a simplification.)
For any image you find online, you should always assume it '''''is not''''' properly free, unless you know the exact reason that it ''is''. (This also applies to things like 'taking a photo of a painting or photo or sculpture that someone else made'. Some people think they can sneak around copyright this way; that's not how copyright works.)
Every language's version of Wikipedia has its own policies. For most of them, they've decided "we will only use properly free pictures. Sometimes that means an article just won't have any picture at all."
English Wikipedia has decided "under some circumstances, we ''will'' use nonfree pictures — but if none of those circumstances apply, then the article just won't have any picture at all."
The picture of Susie Pop is not properly free. Since she had died, it is not possible to make new properly free photos of her. That's one of the circumstances for which enwiki says "go ahead", but most of the other Wikipedias says "too bad".
Makes sense? DS (talk) 14:35, 9 July 2026 (UTC)
:OK, that makes perfect sense. Thank you so much for the explanation! So I guess that means nothing can be done unless a new picture is found. Oh, well... Slava570 (talk) 14:41, 9 July 2026 (UTC)