W
Active Editors
Back to Profile

User Talk: Szekere07

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

December 2024



25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm Soetermans. An edit that you recently made to :Bashar al-Assad ↗ seemed to be a test and has been reverted ↗. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''Please note that a hidden note ↗ was put there to make it clear. Being exiled does not mean Assad is somehow immediately politically inactive.''<!-- Template:uw-test1 --> <span style="font-variant:small-caps">soetermans</span>. <sup>↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A <span style="font-variant:small-caps">'''TALK'''</span></sup> 21:59, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

30px|left|alt=Stop icon ↗ Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war ↗; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page ↗ to work toward making a version that represents consensus ↗ among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done ↗. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard ↗ or seek dispute resolution ↗. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection ↗.

'''Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing ↗'''&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule ↗, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts ↗ on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;'''even if you do not violate the three-revert rule'''&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr -->{{pb}}Your recent edits included:
Boud (talk) 11:42, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message



<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 18 November 2025 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2025/Coordination/MM/09&oldid=1322758983 -->

Proposed deletion ↗ of :Aaron Calder ↗


left|link=|alt=Notice|48px| ↗

The article :Aaron Calder ↗ has been proposed for deletion ↗&#32;because of the following concern:
<blockquote>'''Town councillors are not considered notable.'''</blockquote>

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary ↗ or on the article's talk page ↗.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process ↗, but other deletion process ↗es exist. In particular, articles for deletion ↗ allows discussion to reach consensus ↗ for deletion based on established criteria ↗.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion ↗ of the article at any time.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify --> • '''a frantic turtle''' 🐢 20:02, 28 November 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of :Aaron Calder ↗ for deletion


<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0;">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :Aaron Calder ↗ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗ or whether it should be deleted ↗.

The article will be discussed at '''Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aaron Calder ↗''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> • '''a frantic turtle''' 🐢 20:08, 28 November 2025 (UTC)

January 2026



30px|alt=Stop icon ↗ '''You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war ↗, according to the reverts you've made to :Nicolás Maduro ↗.''' This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate ↗ with others, avoid editing disruptively ↗, and try to reach a consensus ↗ – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:
# {{strong|Edit warring is disruptive behavior ↗ – regardless of how many reverts you have made;}}
# {{strong|Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.}}
You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page ↗ and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard ↗ or seek dispute resolution ↗ if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection ↗. {{strong|If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked ↗ from editing.}} <!-- Template:uw-ew --> <span style="background:linear-gradient(to right,#FF0A0A,#FF840A);display:inline-flex">&nbsp;&nbsp;<span style="color:#FFFFFF">'''Jalapeño'''&nbsp;&nbsp;</span></span> <small>''(u t g)''</small> 10:12, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

:You are actively disrupting in the page yourself - Maduro has been captured and this has been confirmed by multiple independent sources, therefore you should cease reverting correct information. Szekere07 (talk) 10:15, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
::The "multiple independent sources" all seem to be citing whatever Trump is saying (hence, "Trump says" in every news caption). We can't base all of this on what one person is saying, especially if that person happens to be the one authorising the invasion of Venezuela. <span style="background:linear-gradient(to right,#FF0A0A,#FF840A);display:inline-flex">&nbsp;&nbsp;<span style="color:#FFFFFF">'''Jalapeño'''&nbsp;&nbsp;</span></span> <small>''(u t g)''</small> 10:18, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
:::The Vice President of Venezuela has confirmed that they are missing.
:::https://www.reuters.com/world/us/live-trump-says-us-has-captured-venezuela-president-maduro-2026-01-03/
:::"Venezuela's Vice President Delcy Rodriguez says the Venezuelan government does not know the whereabouts of Maduro or his wife Cilia Flores.
:::Rodriguez spoke on Saturday morning in an audio played on state television.
:::"We demand immediate proof of life of President Nicolas Maduro and the first combatant Cilia Flores," Rodriguez said." Szekere07 (talk) 10:20, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
::::Maduro is still the president. Until it's announced that he has been deposed, has resigned, etc. and that it's actually confirmed, he is still the Venezuelan president. Not knowing the whereabouts of Maduro doesn't automatically mean he is no longer the president. <span style="background:linear-gradient(to right,#FF0A0A,#FF840A);display:inline-flex">&nbsp;&nbsp;<span style="color:#FFFFFF">'''Jalapeño'''&nbsp;&nbsp;</span></span> <small>''(u t g)''</small> 10:24, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
:::::He might be president ''de iure'', but ''de facto'' he is incapacitated and has ceased his functions. Szekere07 (talk) 10:25, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
::::::Please discuss this on the article's talk page. But if you want to make that claim in the article we need a verifiable source that says this is the case. Jeff<span style="border-style:dashed;border-color:blue; border-width:1px">'''UK'''</span> 15:49, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at :Nicolás Maduro ↗. Your edits appear to be disruptive ↗ and have been or will be reverted ↗.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges ↗. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-disruptive2 --> <b style="color: #f8f8f8; background-color: #001031">Freedoxm</b> (<b style="color:#025f96">talk</b> '''·''' <b style="color:#025f96">contribs</b> ↗) 17:15, 10 January 2026 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics


{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = You have recently edited a page related to '''living or recently deceased subjects of biographical content on Wikipedia articles''', a topic designated as '''''contentious ↗'''''. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and <em>does <strong>not</strong> imply that there are any issues with your editing</em>.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as ''contentious topics''. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee ↗. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators ↗ have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit <strong>carefully and constructively</strong>, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

<p>Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics <em>procedures</em>, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard ↗ or you may learn more about this contentious topic ↗. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{tl|Ctopics/aware}} template. </p>}}<!-- Derived from Template:Contentious topics/alert/first --> <b>Callanecc</b> (talk • contribs ↗ • logs ↗) 07:05, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

February 2026



30px|alt=Stop icon ↗ '''You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war ↗, according to the reverts you've made to :Ali Khamenei ↗.''' This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate ↗ with others, avoid editing disruptively ↗, and try to reach a consensus ↗ – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:
# {{strong|Edit warring is disruptive behavior ↗ – regardless of how many reverts you have made;}}
# {{strong|Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.}}
You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page ↗ and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard ↗ or seek dispute resolution ↗ if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection ↗. {{strong|If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked ↗ from editing.}} <!-- Template:uw-ew --> <span style="color:#f542d7">Tol</span> (talk &#124; contribs ↗) @ 20:12, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

Edit warring



A case has been filed here: Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#Ali_Khamenei ↗. Psephguru (talk) 20:12, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

Deletion of information without cause or explanation


Hi @Szekere07, any chance you could explain why you removed the information I added to Kristi Noem ↗ without explanation, and did so as part of a revert, as opposed to a removal?
CSGinger14 (talk) 19:07, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

:My bad, I intended to revert some information on the infobox and must've accidentally deleted your info Szekere07 (talk) 21:06, 5 March 2026 (UTC)
::@Szekere07 Thanks for the response. Apologies if I came off snappy at all. Please do be careful moving forward, though, when making reverts.
::All the best,
::CSGinger14 (talk) 03:27, 7 March 2026 (UTC)