User Talk: TCU9999

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

Archives: 1

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 18 November 2025 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>

I need your assistance, SwatJester is acting up again.

Same person that vandalized Pyoljji-1-2 ↗ by insisting it was Pon'gae-6 is now reverting edits on several articles that involves North Korea such as Hwasong-7 ↗, RD-250 ↗ and Ghadir-class submarine ↗. For Hwasong-7, SwatJester asserts article mentioning missile does not mention the missile, on basis Nodong was mentioned and not Hwasong-7 when it is clearly stated in notes Hwasong-7 article that the missile is also known as Nodong/Nodong-1. When comes to Ghadir-class submarine, SwatJester asserts as sources not relevant when there are multiple sources stating Ghadir as being Yono-class or derivative of it. On RD-250 article, SwatJester blatantly reverted when very reasoning they provide to revert it is not supported by what they remove when it is not what they assert it is. CybermancySFRY (talk) 09:42, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

:I have checked your edits in Hwasong-7 ↗. The main issue is bare citations (citation with URL only), which prevent verification. Also, the article itself do not have a seperate "Naming" section. This section was added by me to earlier articles, including Hwasong-11A ↗, Hwasong-11B ↗ and Hwasong-11D ↗. Therefore, I will add a seperate "Naming" section to Hwasong-7 to avoid any confusion about its known external and internal designations.
:For Ghadir-class submarine ↗: I don't have knowledge about Iranian submarine, and I has never edited this area. TCU9999 (talk) 10:59, 3 May 2026 (UTC)
::From my observation you are Vietnamese, correct? Vietnam has bought from North Korea midget submarines, forgot if it was Yugo or Yono-class and you have made some of your own. CybermancySFRY (talk) 11:12, 3 May 2026 (UTC)
:::Yes, but I don't want to reveal further personal information here. TCU9999 (talk) 13:58, 3 May 2026 (UTC)
::::I understand. CybermancySFRY (talk) 15:08, 3 May 2026 (UTC)
::Yet again User talk:Swatjester has reverted my edits on Ghadir-class submarine along labelling them as not relevant to the article despite fact in very sources discuss Ghadir-class submarine along Yono-class due to there being connection between two. Something else related to submarines, I have been seeing some of your countrymen around the internet stating Vietnam has produced Yugo-class submarine ↗ of their own or at least based on Yugo-class submarines they bought from North Korea. I do not see such mentioned in the Wikipedia article, hence inquiry if you could find out if that is true and update the article with Vietnamese sources on the subject of Vietnam producing domestically Yugo-class or derivative of it. Thank you in advance. CybermancySFRY (talk) 18:22, 3 May 2026 (UTC)