W
Active Editors
Back to Profile

User Talk: TeddyRoosevelt1912

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

{{User:MiszaBot/config
| algo = old(90d)
| archive = User talk:TeddyRoosevelt1912/Archive %(counter)d
| counter = 1
| maxarchivesize = 400K
| archiveheader = {{Archive}}
| minthreadstoarchive = 1
| minthreadsleft = 4
}}
{{Archives|bot=Lowercase sigmabot III|age=90}}
<!-- Template:Setup auto archiving -->

Edit at Talk:Syrian civil war#Map of the Civil War/War ongoing or not? ↗



In this ↗ edit you state: {{tq|First off, if you're gonna revert the photo collage and change it back to a 2026 map, at least have the logical reasoning to also change the end date on the infobox from 2024 to present, otherwise it just doesn't make any sense.}} Inferring that I have been illogical because I have not followed your version of logic is arguably not particularly civil and I suggest you strike it. I am not going to disrupt WP to prove a point by changing the date unilaterally without gaining consensus through discussion. That would be like replacing the map with a collage when an ongoing discussion has not reached a consensus for that action. Cinderella157 (talk) 04:17, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

:@Cinderella157 Fine, but you're actually proving my point that there is firm consensus on the end of the civil war, and based on that historical precedent (and now growing consensus) that an image collage is the best way to organize an infobox of a historical conflict. Fact is that the reversion was to an organizational style that is inherently illogical, and it is not "my version of logic" that a map should be within the time frame of the event it is referencing to, but rather basic common sense of relevance. I also don't see how following historical precedent by placing an image collage is disruptive while replacing it with a map with the wrong time frame isn't so. In any case, the current discussion will determine consensus for the future of the infobox. TeddyRoosevelt1912 (talk) 21:20, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

In this ↗ post, you use somewhat pejorative language that focuses on the contributor, not the content (see WP:CONTENTNOTCONTRIB ↗). I suggest you strike that part which is inappropriate. Cinderella157 (talk) 08:22, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

:I don't consider it problematic as it is still focused on shifting the topic of discussion towards discussing image policy. But I would also like to not argue over this, so I'll reword it to address your concerns. TeddyRoosevelt1912 (talk) 21:57, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!



{| style="background-color: var(--background-color-success-subtle, #fdffe7); border: 1px solid var(--border-color-success, #fceb92); color: var(--color-base, #202122);"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | 100px ↗
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Barnstar of Diplomacy'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | For providing valuable insight, polished responses, and starting productive discussion ↗ in the debate about the main image of the Syrian civil war ↗ article. 100k+ bytes later, your contributions towards reaching consensus cannot be understated. Cheers! '''<span style="color:orange;">Johnson</span>''''''<span style="color:blue;">524</span>''' 09:05, 23 March 2026 (UTC)
|}

:@Johnson524 Thank you so much, I can say the same for you too! Thanks for organizing and moderating discussion on a collage! TeddyRoosevelt1912 (talk) 15:55, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on 2025–2026 Iran–United States negotiations ↗


25px|alt=|link= ↗ Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have '''automatically detected''' that this edit ↗ performed by you, on the page :2025–2026 Iran–United States negotiations ↗, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive ↗, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/Boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20TeddyRoosevelt1912&section=new&preloadparams%5b%5d={{FULLPAGENAMEE:2025–2026 Iran–United States negotiations}}&preloadparams%5b%5d=1347745563 report it to my operator].
Thanks, <!-- User:Qwerfjkl (bot)/inform -->Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:00, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Yashar (political party)


30px|link=|alt=Control copyright icon ↗ Hello TeddyRoosevelt1912! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Yashar (political party) ↗, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted material from other websites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://en.idi.org.il/israeli-elections-and-parties/parties/yashar/, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies ↗. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate your contributions, copying content from other websites is unlawful and against Wikipedia's copyright policy ↗. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are likely to lose their editing privileges ↗.

If you believe that the article is {{em|not}} a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout ↗. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗.

See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries ↗ for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.

Otherwise, you may rewrite this article from scratch. If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [{{fullurl:Talk:Yashar (political party)/Temp|action=edit&preload=Template:Copyvio/preload}} this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Yashar (political party) ↗ saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing!<!-- Template:Nothanks-web --> Tanline666 (talk) 21:12, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

:@Tanline666 Thank you for letting me know about this, but I do want some elaboration on the issue, is the problem the source itself, the direct quoting, or maybe something else? I hope to improve the section and would like to avoid having this issue again. Thanks TeddyRoosevelt1912 (talk) 00:43, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
::To clarify, the issue is with directly quoting the web page with no modifications. From checking the website's legal info, it seems that all of its text is copyrighted and is not licensed under Creative Commons. Therefore, the text itself would have to be rewritten. Tanline666 (talk) 18:17, 5 June 2026 (UTC)