W
Active Editors
Back to Profile

User Talk: Tetradisulfate

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.


<!-- ##RW UNDERDATE## -->

Welcome!


thumb|alt=A plate of chocolate chip cookies.|Help:Getting started|'''Welcome!''' ↗ ↗
Hello, Tetradisulfate, and '''''welcome to Wikipedia ↗'''''! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the '''Wikipedia Teahouse ↗'''.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian ↗! Please sign your name ↗ on talk pages ↗ using four tilde ↗s (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our '''help pages''' ↗, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place '''{{Tlc|Help me}}''' on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome!<!-- Template:Welcome_cookie --> <big><sup><span style="color:#A188FC;">'''E'''</span></sup></big><span style="color:#A188FC;">'''F'''</span><sup><span style="color:#A188FC;">'''5'''</span></sup> 16:47, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

collage adjustment on 2016 Abilene–Chapman tornado



Hi,

Thanks for the adjustment regarding the infoheader box/collage adjustment on my tornado article ↗. For the next time, could you as well change the '''Clockwise from the top''' caption to correspond with your edits? Just a little reminder.

Thank you for reading, Eranston (talk) 12:57, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

:Yes, sorry about that. Tetradisulfate (talk) 17:57, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Edit



Hey you undid my edit that took a long time
4 tornadoes have been confirmed
edwardsburg EF?
three rivers EF2+
Union city EF3+
Clarendon EF0
please add my edit back it took me a long time and it was factual
im very pissed &#126;2026-14594-46 ↗ (talk) 23:40, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

:I undid it because you didn't have a source. I found a source which proved you right, and now it says pretty much the same thing now. If you want to change the wording back to what you said there's nothing stopping you from just doing that. Tetradisulfate (talk) 00:17, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Tornadoes of 2026



thought so 001Firestorm (talk) 23:09, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

:hey. Regarding to the may 6th outbreak, do you have any proof of those 2 tornadoes being EF3s? 001Firestorm (talk) 02:37, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
::https://apps.dat.noaa.gov/stormdamage/damageviewer/ Tetradisulfate (talk) 02:39, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:2025 Selmer tornado ↗


25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, Tetradisulfate. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:2025 Selmer tornado ↗, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted ↗, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it ↗ again&#32;or request ↗ that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted ↗ so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:08, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 27



Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of United States tornadoes in May 2026 ↗, a link pointing to the disambiguation page IA ↗ was added. Such links are usually incorrect ↗, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. <small>(Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.)</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 27 May 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion ↗ nomination of :Draft:Tornado outbreak of June 17, 2026 ↗


48px|left|alt=|link= ↗
{{Quote box|quote=<p>If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article ↗.</p><p>You may want to consider using the Article Wizard ↗ to help you create articles.</p>|width=20%|align=right}}
A tag has been placed on :Draft:Tornado outbreak of June 17, 2026 ↗, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion ↗, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox ↗ for any other experiments you would like to do.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by visiting the page ↗ and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗. <!-- Template:Db-nonsense-notice --><!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> Quincy Gordon (talk) 15:33, 16 June 2026 (UTC)

No more speedy d



Speedy deletion nomination removed, article move suggestion: move draft:Tornado outbreak of June 17, 2026 ↗ to draft:Tornado outbreak of June 16-18, 2026 ↗ as the 16th and 18th could also be significant The Rochelle EF4 (talk) 16:07, 16 June 2026 (UTC)

Hi ı have a question



The <nowiki>''</nowiki>EWSD found four instances of IF3 and 2 instances of possible IF4 damage<nowiki>''</nowiki> comes from the ESWD VOP Sitchnot which documented this IF3+ so it is a reliable source.He is also working in the ESWD for 7 years StormL00ver (talk) 14:27, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

:Also this tornado leveled 3 farm houses with their foundation and is currently under a discussion about an upgrade to an IF4. StormL00ver (talk) 14:28, 7 July 2026 (UTC)
:Twitter is a very controversial source, doesn't matter who posted what you are citing. Just wait for the VOP to get the rating confirmed in the ESWD, as the ESWD is where ratings are quality checked, finalized, and officially documented. There is now a very detailed description on the ESWD, so just use that instead of the tweet. Tetradisulfate (talk) 04:02, 8 July 2026 (UTC)
::So ı need to write IF3+ until IF4 becomes official? StormL00ver (talk) 04:09, 8 July 2026 (UTC)
:::Saying "IF3+" is pretty much the same as saying "potentially IF4", both are technically correct but saying IF3+ is just more concise in my opinion. Tetradisulfate (talk) 04:13, 8 July 2026 (UTC)
::::okay then. StormL00ver (talk) 04:14, 8 July 2026 (UTC)