User Talk: The Account 2
Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.
{{Talk header}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
| algo = old(30d)
| archive = User talk:The Account 2/Archive %(counter)d
| counter = 3
| maxarchivesize = 125K
| archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}}
| minthreadstoarchive = 1
| minthreadsleft = 5
}}
<!-- Template:Setup auto archiving -->
Merger
China
Hey! Thank you so much for your help with China ↗. I finished rewriting the History section. The part I feel I'd be worst at would be the politics and economic sections, so I wanted to ask if you'd want to help double-check the citations, implement SFNs and more academic sourcing there. The prose itself is pretty good, but if we wanna take this to GA/FA, the sourcing has to be good and the citations have to be consistent. I think we could co-nominate this for GA together relatively soon, if you're interested!<small> Generalissima (talk) (it/she) </small> 03:40, 10 June 2026 (UTC)
:Yes of course, I'm interested in this too. The Account 2 (talk) 12:08, 10 June 2026 (UTC)
::{{yo|The Account 2}} Alright, would it be a good time to end the Peer Review so we can nominate it for GAN?<small> Generalissima (talk) (it/she) </small> 09:05, 7 July 2026 (UTC)
:::Yes, is there a way to do joint nominations? The Account 2 (talk) 09:11, 7 July 2026 (UTC)
::::{{u|The Account 2}} Oops, just saw this now. One person has to nominate it, and then add the other as a co-nom afterwards. I could do it and add you, if you'd like me to.<small> Generalissima (talk) (it/she) </small> 07:34, 9 July 2026 (UTC)
:::::Yes, I accept. The Account 2 (talk) 09:24, 9 July 2026 (UTC)
June 2026
25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Hello, I'm Gasiseda. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions ↗ to :Republic of Korea Armed Forces ↗ have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse ↗ or the Help desk ↗. Thanks.<!-- Template:uw-vandalism1 --> Gasiseda (talk) 12:45, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
:I understand the revert and hadn't seen the talk page, but was this notification necessary? The Account 2 (talk) 13:07, 28 June 2026 (UTC)
Sense of community for the Chinese nation
Amigao wants to delete the aricle you created & translated, and I prefer to keep. Please also write your comment on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sense of community for the Chinese nation ↗. Much appreciated! TinaLees-Jones (talk) 03:42, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
:{{u|TinaLees-Jones}}, this instance of WP:CANVASS ↗ should probably be promptly retracted. - Amigao (talk) 09:16, 3 July 2026 (UTC)
Nomination of :Sense of community for the Chinese nation ↗ for deletion
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">48px|alt=|link= ↗</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :Sense of community for the Chinese nation ↗, to which you have significantly contributed ↗, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗ or if it should be deleted ↗.
The discussion will take place at '''Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sense of community for the Chinese nation ↗''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by ''SDZeroBot'' (talk) 01:02, 4 July 2026 (UTC)<!-- User:SDZeroBot/AfD notifier/template -->
Other comments on the Xi review
Just letting you know that I am continuing to work on the Xi review; most of the holdup has been in getting access to the sources. As far as the external comments on the review, you are neither encouraged nor discouraged from addressing them. The only comments that affect whether the review passes are the ones I am leaving. <span style="font-family: monospace;">elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him)</span> 05:43, 6 July 2026 (UTC)
:Ok, I'll be waiting. Thanks! The Account 2 (talk) 08:23, 6 July 2026 (UTC)
::Hey I just wanted to let you know that Elijah is completely wrong. This is collaborative process and all users opinions are welcome during GAN. Czarking0 (talk) 01:16, 9 July 2026 (UTC)
:::No, I am not wrong. I said that The Account 2 was "neither encouraged nor discouraged" from editing based on your comments. That is completely true, and I have no obligation to close a review based on comments I didn't write. My focus is on writing the review, not reading someone else's review. You are the one who has hijacked this review, you did it without asking, and you are expecting the same weight to be applied here. I can't attest whether you have access to the source materials or not, nor whether you have enough knowledge of the Chinese language to read some of these sources. Whether this review passes or fails is dependent on The Account 2's ''engagement'' with the review at hand as written by me; anything else is extra material. <span style="font-family: monospace;">elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him)</span> 03:07, 9 July 2026 (UTC)
:::You are free to leave whatever feedback you like at the GAN, but the nominator is under no requirement to follow your suggestions to get it passed.<small> Generalissima (talk) (it/she) </small> 09:22, 9 July 2026 (UTC)
Your nomination of Flag of China ↗ is under review
Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Flag of China ↗ is <span class="nowrap">20px|alt=|link= ↗ </span>'''under review'''. See '''Talk:Flag of China/GA2{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have.<!-- Template:GANotice default --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kisseran</small> -- Kisseran (talk) 17:43, 9 July 2026 (UTC)
Your nomination of Flag of China ↗ has failed
Your good article nomination ↗ of the article Flag of China ↗ has <span class="nowrap">20px|alt=|link= ↗ </span>'''failed'''. See '''Talk:Flag of China/GA2{{!}}the review page ↗''' for more information. If or when the reviewer's feedback has been addressed, you may nominate the article again.<!-- Template:GANotice |result=fail --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Kisseran</small> -- Kisseran (talk) 17:03, 10 July 2026 (UTC)