User Talk: The7thMarxBrother

Server-side rendered snapshot of this editor's Wikipedia talk page discussions.

Speedy deletion ↗ nomination of :Canadian Union of Taxpaying Individuals ↗

48px|left|alt=|link= ↗

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as :Canadian Union of Taxpaying Individuals ↗, is not in accordance with our policies ↗. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox ↗. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion ↗.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by visiting the page ↗ and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines ↗.  '''<span style="color:orange;">Erpert</span>''' <small><sup><span style="color:yellow;">WHAT DO YOU WANT???</span></sup></small> 08:51, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Low Wages Tax

Hello The7thMarxBrother,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged :Low Wages Tax ↗ for deletion, because it seems to be vandalism or a hoax.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can <span class="plainlinks">'''Wages Tax}}&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion ↗'''</span>, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page ↗ if you have questions. William Reid Boyd (talk) 11:11, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

:Here is your "vandalism or a hoax" ..... http://canadianunionoftaxpayingindividuals.blogspot.com/ The7thMarxBrother (talk) 18:57, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

From Talk:Low Wages Tax ↗

{{cquote|This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --The7thMarxBrother (talk) 11:54, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

You are clearly pulling my leg!

I just sent an advocacy Op-Ed piece to a major Canadian daily newspaper called the 'Winnipeg Free Press' wherein the Government of Manitoba is embroiled in a controversy over its Provincial Sales Tax. In my call for a Low Wages Tax, to replace the PST, I wanted the paper's readers to know that there are tax alternatives out there.

The LWT was created in 2010 as such a tax alternative. As someone who thinks about taxes in a manner similar to the Economist James Tobin - who is listed on your Wikipedia - whose advanced degree is but one level above mine, it would be a great shame if you were to act unilaterally to ban creativity from Wikipedia.

At least let the posting exist until after the newspaper publishes my proposed Op Ed so that readers can find something on the tax on the internet. Further, I plan to post a blog which discusses the LWT.

Regards}}

You might be a little confused on how Wikipedia works. A subject has to be notable ''before'' it has an article on here, not after. See WP:NOT#OR ↗. '''<span style="color:orange;">Erpert</span>''' <small><sup><span style="color:yellow;">WHAT DO YOU WANT???</span></sup></small> 18:06, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

May 2014

25px|alt=|link= ↗ Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that <span class="plainlinks">[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=607836413 your edit] to Lucien Conein ↗ may have broken the syntax ↗ by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just [{{fullurl:Lucien Conein|action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+typo+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3ABracketBot%7CBracketBot%5D%5D}} edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20{{subst</noinclude>:REVISIONUSER}}&section=new my operator's talk page].</span>
:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

<nowiki>Born in the City of Paris ↗, France, Lucien E. Conein grew up in the city of Kansas City ↗. </nowiki>{{red|'''('''}}<nowiki>Bethanne Kelly Patrick0.</nowiki>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:53, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages ↗. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.</small>

:Lucretia Mott ↗
::added a link pointing to Liberty Party ↗

:Samuel Ringgold Ward ↗
::added a link pointing to Liberty Party ↗

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

August 2015

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Please do not add or change content, as you did at :Lexington, Virginia ↗, without citing a reliable source ↗. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources ↗ and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:57, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
:I see also that you have been capitalizing each word of section headings in various articles. This is contrary to policy, per MOS:SECTIONCAPS ↗. Would you have a moment to change them back? Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:08, 6 August 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mission San Buenaventura ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Santa Barbara ↗. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lewinsville, Virginia ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Civil War ↗. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:47, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Caleb W. Dorsey ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Columbia ↗. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:39, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open! ↗

Hi,<br>
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election ↗. The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements ↗ and submit your choices on the voting page ↗. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Harrisonburg, Virginia ↗, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Union ↗ and Confederacy ↗. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Eagle Spring ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Native ↗. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 25 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Robert G. Ingersoll ↗, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Union ↗ and Confederates ↗. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jeremiah V. Cockrell ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Carthage ↗. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:55, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

April 2016

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Please do not add or change content, as you did at :Bardstown, Kentucky ↗, without citing a reliable source ↗. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources ↗ and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:31, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Bullock Clark ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Carthage ↗. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ulric Dahlgren ↗, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Commission ↗ and Confederate ↗. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 36th Iowa Volunteer Infantry Regiment ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Camp Lincoln ↗. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Charles Clark (governor) ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Battle of Baton Rouge ↗. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John E. Wool ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brevet ↗. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. <small>Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016 ↗: Voting now open!

{{Ivmbox|Hello, The7thMarxBrother. Voting in the '''2016 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements ↗ and submit your choices on '''the voting page ↗'''. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}

Sources

Please be careful to support any changes you make with reliable sources ↗. I've had to partially revert two of your edits, because they were not supported by sources, or were inaccurate. Even with the one source you included, on the page Carlos Enrique Díaz de León ↗, you used a primary source by an author whose more recent work contradicts that source, which makes the content untenable. Vanamonde (talk) 05:05, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Copyright problem on James P. Hosty ↗

Material you included in the above article appears to have been copied from the copyright web page http://conspiracyresearch.proboards.com/thread/77/james-patrick-hosty. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa <span style="color:red">🍁</span> (talk) 22:04, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

{{Ivmbox|Hello, The7thMarxBrother. Voting in the '''2017 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''voting page ↗'''. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}

April 2018

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Thank you for your contributions ↗. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit ↗, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion ↗ of clear-cut vandalism ↗ and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you.  Meters (talk) 18:25, 20 April 2018 (UTC)

25px|alt=|link= ↗ Please stop adding unsourced ↗ content, as you did to :Billy the Kid ↗. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability ↗. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked ↗ from editing Wikipedia. ''We keep asking you to source your changes. Eventually you will be blocked if you keep making unsourced changes.'' Meters (talk) 18:23, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
:{{u|Meters}}, there's a bit of a bleeding ulcer here - plainly this editor never reads their talk page (or at any rate never acts on it - they were pointed to MOS:SECTIONCAPS ↗ in 2015), does not appear to have edited any talk page since 2013, and on reviewing their edits, they're basically all junk - uncited, and mostly introducing masses of additional verbiage that doesn't actually improve the page at all (my personal favourite is always changing "Napoleon" to "Napoleon 1st" on pages about the Napoleonic Wars, as if we might otherwise think it was Napoleon III...).
:I'm going to keep an eye on their edits but I'm not sure what else we should do. Pinkbeast (talk) 04:01, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Adele Lacy ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gentlemen Prefer Blondes ↗ ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Adele_Lacy check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Adele_Lacy?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect ↗, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. <small>(Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.)</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

{{Ivmbox|Hello, The7thMarxBrother. Voting in the '''2018 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''voting page ↗'''. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}

Disambiguation link notification for December 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited First French Empire ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Trasimene ↗ ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/First_French_Empire check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/First_French_Empire?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''2019 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2019|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2019|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
</td></tr>
</table>

Disambiguation link notification for May 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Indian Agent (film) ↗, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Norman Houston ↗. Such links are usually incorrect ↗, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. <small>(Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject ↗.)</small>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 2 May 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px;">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2022 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2022|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2022|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>

December 2022

25px|alt=Information icon ↗ Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source ↗. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources ↗ and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 11:41, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2023 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2023|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2024 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2024|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>

Edits to Lumpenproletariat ↗

Hey there. I left you some feedback in my edit summary here ↗. Please let me know if you have any questions. Would be happy to discuss further if you have some follow up questions. Thanks. –<span style="color:blue">'''Novem Linguae'''</span> <small>(talk)</small> 18:41, 27 October 2025 (UTC)

:That revision of course is totally unacceptable. Due to my learning disability I have had to spend about 12 hours doing up this info for you wikipedia characters and my writing contains much relevant information pertinent to the topic. Sadly, when I was at university, the External Examiner pointed his finger at me and told me that I was the new World's Leading Authority on the lumpenproletariat and that I had successfully replaced Hal Draper in that role who had found almost 80 uses of the word. So I take my Crown of Thorns quite seriously and I work quite hard in trying to save this badly abused concept. Many of the names listed in your mentioned article on the word, I have come across in the past while doing my work and sadly their work suffers mostly from laziness, or maybe to be more kind, from a lack of time devoted to the term, which appears to be an unwillingness to check out exactly what the term was originally meant to be by its creators. Yes, I accept that the word - like other words - has been badly derailed or wrecked BUT it would be nice to somehow write down somewhere just what the creators had meant the term to be so that wordsmiths understand the nature of just how this word was badly derailed! Another alternative I have considered years ago is to just place a second article in wikipedia on just what the term's creators had meant their word to originally mean so that language specialists can appreciate the wreckage that is now lumpenproletariat!! ... Signed an allocated World's Leading Authority on the word!! The7thMarxBrother (talk) 10:19, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
::I'm not sure I believe you're the leading authority on the word, and I don't know many academics that would write in your casual writing style, but I am happy to give you some tips so that your edits are less likely to be reverted in the future:
::* Use a factual tone, not a casual, persuasive, or emotional one. The following were a problem in the above mentioned diff:
::** "of course"
::** "thankfully"
::** "just how many uses of this word must I find and understand" - don't use first person, don't insert stream-of-consciousness commentary like that
::** "(Oh, all of you first year post-secondary students who were told in class to define your terms, you get the very last laugh here - as a student, I am better with defining my terms than were these two famous near alcoholics)"
::* Cite every paragraph. If something is controversial or you are using multiple sources in a paragraph, feel free to cite at the sentence level for added detail/clarity.
::* Marking an edit as a minor edit is for things like copy edit ↗s that tweak a couple words or punctuation, and that don't add or remove content. Please don't mark sentence additions and removals as minor, since those are regular / major edits.
::At the end of the day, as encyclopedists, our job is to summarize secondary ↗ and tertiary sources. Especially if you're an academic that is the "world's leading authority" on something, be careful of original research ↗. You should never cite your own publications or inject your own thoughts. We always summarize secondary, independent sources.
::Hope that helps. Happy editing. –<span style="color:blue">'''Novem Linguae'''</span> <small>(talk)</small> 10:48, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
:::Greetings. ... At first I did not think of myself as the world's leading authority on the lumpenproletariat until my External Examiner told me that I was. But then I continued to further read some materials written and centered around the term and I found it to be extremely easy to critique much material written on the word and it came to me that it is likely that my External Examiner was correct! Tough to wear that Crown of Thorns but I do try! ... As to my writing style, yes my style is different as I was before Grad School a dropout from a School of Journalism as I could not agree with the first and eleventh commandment of good Journalism and so I took up studies in more traditional academic pursuits BUT on the condition that I would never ever be a dry, boring academic who easily puts his audience to sleep! Rather I would prefer my audience to smile once in a while! .... Likely my strong point aside from finding those 88 term usages, was that I fully understand just how the term came to be created from the ongoing 1789-1848 debate mostly in France on just how we should understand the meaning or meanings of the term proletariat and thus just how our duo intervened in that debate and thus made the creation of the term lumpenproletariat essential in filling in "theoretical gaps" caused by keeping the emerging word proletariat. But, I am reluctant to go down that road since I believe that I am the only person who has taken up that particular journey and an article in Wikipedia featuring but ONE, SINGLE set of footnotes from only one source, mine, does NOT a Wikipedia article make! Or am I wrong?? .... The7thMarxBrother (talk) 11:30, 29 October 2025 (UTC)

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;flex-basis: 40px">40px ↗</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''2025 Arbitration Committee elections ↗''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2025|end}}-1 day}}. All '''eligible users ↗''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee ↗ is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process ↗. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans ↗, topic bans ↗, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy ↗ describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates ↗ and submit your choices on the '''2025|poll}}|voting page ↗'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 18 November 2025 (UTC)</small>

</div>
</div>

April 2026

30px|alt=Stop icon ↗ You may be '''blocked from editing ↗ without further warning''' the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced ↗ material to Wikipedia. '''''You've had several warnings.''''' Magnolia677 (talk) 13:27, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

:You are wacko if you have removed Statistics Canada data from Arnprior in 1901, 1911 obtained from a Statistics Canada published source which I have accessed and I know well as I used to be an employee at Statistics Canada among other accomplishments! The7thMarxBrother (talk) 13:49, 10 April 2026 (UTC)